Brain death is declared when the clinical picture is consistent with irreversible cessation of all brain functions.

The mainstay of donor management is maintenance of euvolemia, oxygenation, perfusion, and normothermia, as well as communication with multiple surgical teams.

Donation after cardiac death organs now account for over 10% of organ transplants in the United States.

Living kidney and liver donors must be healthy and without significant cardiopulmonary, neurologic, or psychiatric disease, diabetes, obesity, or hypertension.

Immune suppression is associated with severe infections, increased risk of malignancy, and progressive vascular disease.

Renal transplant recipients are often anemic, with hyperdynamic cardiac indices.

For renal transplantation, the major anesthetic consideration is maintenance of renal blood flow. Typical hemodynamic goals during transplant are systolic pressure >90 mm Hg, mean systemic pressure >60 mm Hg, and central venous pressure >10 mm Hg.

Patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) have multiorgan dysfunction with secondary cardiac, pulmonary, and renal complications of ESLD.

Liver transplantation is traditionally described in three phases: dissection, anhepatic, and neohepatic, with reperfusion marking the neohepatic phase.

Intraoperative management of lung transplant patients should focus on fluid and ventilatory strategies designed to minimize acute lung injury and primary graft dysfunction.

Left ventricular assist devices are increasingly common in patients presenting for heart transplantation.

Nonischemic cardiomyopathy has replaced ischemic cardiomyopathy as the most common indication for heart transplantation.

For all transplant recipients, antibiotic, antiviral, antifungal, immunosuppression, and disease-specific drug regimens should be disrupted minimally in the perioperative period.

Multimedia

Left Liver Lobe Donation

Transplantation is the standard of care for many end-stage diseases. About 113,000 patients are on solid-organ transplant waiting lists in the United States. Organ donation has not kept pace with demand, resulting in many practice changes to increase the donor pool, including more use of living-related organ donation, donor organs once considered marginal (extended criteria donors [ECDs]), grafts from “donation after cardiac death” (DCD) donors, as well as paired kidney donations (kidney swaps). All of these changes impact anesthetic management of organ recipients.

The United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS; www.unos.org) was created by the 1984 National Organ Transplant Act to manage the organ procurement and transplant network for efficient and equitable distribution of donated organs. The system for organ placement received a technology upgrade in 2006 with the launch of DonorNet, an electronic resource for matching and distribution of organs around the United States. Speed of placement is important, as brain-dead donors are unstable, and ECD grafts are particularly important to transplant with minimal cold ischemic times. In general, maximum cold ischemic times are 4 to 6 hours for heart or lung grafts, 12 to 24 hours for livers, and up to 72 hours for kidneys. The UNOS website data contain center- and region-specific transplant databases, regularly updated.

The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (www.ustransplant.org) is a source of transplant data important to clinicians, patients, and researchers. US centers performed 27,527 transplants in 2009, and almost 200,000 Americans are living with transplanted organs. Data on death rates while on transplant waiting lists are sobering, pointing to the complexity of illness in these patients and the need for more organ donation. In 2008, the rate of death on the waiting list for hearts was 17%, for kidneys 6.3%, and for livers 11.4%. In 2010, in the United States (including Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico), 28,663 transplants were performed: 16,899 kidneys, 350 pancreata, 828 kidneys/pancreata, 6,291 livers, 2,333 hearts, 1,770 lungs, 41 hearts/lungs, and 151 intestinal transplants. In major transplant centers, specialist anesthesiology teams participate in the preoperative assessment and optimization of patients for major organ transplant procedures. Directors of liver transplant anesthesiology teams are now required to complete transplant continuing medical education. Solid-organ transplantation is also a critical component of many anesthesia training programs.

ANESTHETIC MANAGEMENT OF ORGAN DONORS

Brain-dead Donors

Brain-dead, heart-beating donors present many challenging management issues because collected experience in a single center is usually small, and research in brain-dead human subjects is sparse. Brain death is declared when the clinical picture is consistent with irreversible cessation of all brain function.¹ Legal and medical brain death criteria differ from state to state, but all require cessation of both cerebral and brainstem functions. Brain-dead donors are unresponsive to sensory stimuli and have no brainstem reflexes, including ventilatory drive with apnea testing. Physicians involved in the transplant recipient process should not be involved in declaration of brain death of a donor. Potentially reversible causes of coma must be ruled out (hypothermia, hypotension, drugs, toxins) before declaration of brain death. Flat electroencephalogram is consistent with brain death. Transcranial Doppler and traditional or isotope angiography are used to confirm the clinical examination and lack of circulation to the brain.² Brain-dead patients may have intact spinal reflexes, so they may require neuromuscular blockade during organ procurement.

Brain death is associated with hemodynamic instability, wide swings in hormone levels, systemic inflammation, and oxidant stress, all of which negatively impact donor organ function.³ Just after brain death, adrenergic surges can cause ischemia and ischemia–reperfusion injuries. Studies of head trauma patients suggest that the onset of brain death is associated with a transient period of hypotension with increased cardiac index and tissue perfusion. During this period, vasoactive drugs administered to increase blood pressure can cause rapid circulatory deterioration.⁴ This period precedes the autonomic storm associated with herniation of the brain and emphasizes the wide dynamic swings in blood chemistries and hemodynamics after brain death. The timing of therapies to support hemodynamics is difficult as catecholamine storm is often followed quickly by pituitary failure. Once pituitary failure ensues, hormone therapy may help stabilize donors hemodynamically and thereby extend the donor pool.^5–8 However, with the inherent difficulty of controlling studies in brain-dead patients, proof that routine donor hormone therapy is beneficial is difficult to obtain. A standard hormone therapy regimen is triiodothyronine (4-μg intravenous [IV] bolus, then 3 μg/hr); methylprednisolone, 15 mg/kg intravenously every 24 hours; desmopressin, 1 U then 0.5 to 4 U/hr to maintain systemic vascular resistance (SVR) at 800 to 1,200 dyne/s/cm⁵ (and reduce the polyuria of diabetes insipidus). Insulin infusion to maintain blood glucose 120 to 180 mg/dL is also recommended, and recent studies support glucose control for maintaining donor kidney graft quality.⁹ Evidence that desmopressin is better than norepinephrine for maintaining donor heart quality is solid, evidence for triiodothyronine is not strong.¹⁰ Other medications that should be available for the donor operation are broad-spectrum antibiotics, mannitol and loop diuretics, and heparin.

Because donor yield for hearts is only 42%, consensus conferences have been used to improve evaluation and utilization of cardiac donor organs.¹¹ Donor heart history is very important, and electrocardiography and echocardiography are mandatory. The ideal heart donor is <50 years old and is hemodynamically stable. Presence of major chest trauma, cardiac disease, active infection, prolonged cardiac arrest, malignancy, human immunodeficiency virus or hepatitis, or intracardiac injections moves the donor from ideal to marginal status. Overall health status of the donor prior to determination of brain death can facilitate a directed laboratory evaluation. Cardiac catheterization is often requested for male donors >45 years old, for females >50 years old, or for young donors with significant personal or family history of coronary artery disease. For recipients with pulmonary hypertension, younger donors, short ischemic time, low donor inotrope requirement, and oversized organs are preferred. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing and ABO blood group compatibility are performed. The donor heart size should be within 20% to 30% of the recipient’s heart size.

Anesthetic management during organ harvest is guided by the needs of the procurement teams, who may come from several centers and have discrepant requests, depending on the organs procured. UNOS has created a resource for managing organ donors in an effort to improve donor care and, therefore, the function of donated organs.^a Transport of ventilated donors to the operating room (OR) often requires positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) valves attached to the Ambu bag to maintain oxygenation. Recently, in a rare prospective trial, a lung-sparing ventilation strategy was shown to increase the lung donor pool. Patients ventilated with tidal volumes of 6 to 8 mL/kg body weight and 8 to 10 cm water (H₂O) PEEP were more likely to be lung donors than patients managed with tidal volumes 10 to 15 mL/kg and 3 to 5 cm PEEP.¹²

The mainstay of donor management is maintenance of euvolemia; therefore, central venous pressure (CVP) monitoring is standard. CVP is maintained at 6 to 12 mm Hg, and when pulmonary artery (PA) catheters are used to assess cardiac function, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure is maintained at <12 mm Hg. The type of fluid used for resuscitation can make a difference. In a study of 64 brain-dead donors, high molecular weight hydroxyethyl starch (HES, 200/0.6) had a negative impact on long-term renal function in recipients of these donor grafts compared with low molecular weight (130/0.4) HES.¹³ The goals of volume and hormonal therapies are to minimize the use of vasopressors as the use of high-dose dopamine is associated with renal graft failure.⁷ Efforts should be made to maintain serum sodium levels below 155 mmol/L; higher levels are associated with poor liver graft function.¹⁴ A large European trial showed that brain-dead donors treated with 4 μg/kg/min dopamine generated better functioning kidney grafts than untreated controls.¹⁵

Generally, packed cells are used to maintain hematocrit of 30%, and fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) is used to maintain the international normalized ratio (INR) <1.5, although these practices are not evidence based. Surgeons procuring the lungs will want to keep the CVP low, and diuretics may be requested just prior to collection of the lungs. Surgeons procuring kidneys usually want high filling pressures. Donor oxygenation, perfusion, and normothermia are all important anesthetic goals, and the precise end points of therapy require coordination and communication with the various surgical teams. Generally, arterial PCO₂ is maintained at 30 to 35 mm Hg.

Prior to lung removal, surgeons will perform bronchoscopy. An adapter, such as the Portex fiberoptic bronchoscopic swivel adapter (SIMS Portex, Inc., Keene, New Hampshire), facilitates ventilation during the procedure. Glucocorticoids may be requested, and on occasion, prostaglandin E₁ is requested to improve circulation of the lung preservation solution. Surgical techniques have been developed to allow three recipients from one thoracic donor: two single-lung transplants and a heart transplant.¹⁶ The heart is removed first, leaving a small cuff of left atrium attached to the lungs. The harvesting team will ask for systemic heparinization just prior to exsanguination and excision. Cardioplegia is administered, the heart stops ejecting, and the heart is removed. The trachea is transected and the lungs are removed en bloc for later separation.

Donor lungs are more susceptible to injury in brain-dead patients before procurement than are other organs, likely from contusion, aspiration, or edema with fluid resuscitation. Consequently, many multiorgan donors do not meet the current strict criteria for lung donors. These criteria are listed in Table 51-1. The Pulmonary Council of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation reviews evidence (or lack thereof) for these criteria.¹⁷ Lungs once considered marginal are being used increasingly because of this severe shortage of donor lungs. Exclusion of donors based on arterial blood gas or chest roentgenogram (CXR) (Table 51-1) is based on relatively small trials.¹⁸ With experience, lung transplantation using donors outside these boundaries does not negatively impact the recipient, and most centers rely on bronchoscopy to determine lung suitability for transplantation.¹⁹ Sputum Gram stains and cultures are routinely obtained on all lung donors. A positive Gram stain does not seem to impact outcome; however, organisms on bronchoalveolar lavage are associated with decreased survival.²⁰ One study suggested that evidence of aspiration seen on bronchoscopy, bilateral pulmonary infiltrates, or persistent purulent secretions is a criterion for donor exclusion.²¹ Advanced donor age (>55 years) together with long ischemic time (>6 hours) are associated with poor transplant outcomes. In addition to the usual hematologic criteria, donor–recipient compatibility is based on height and/or total lung capacity.

For heart retrieval, the surgeons perform a pericardiotomy, and the aortic root is cannulated for infusion of cardioplegia solutions. Following ligation of the great veins, the heart is compressed and exsanguinated, cardioplegia is given to induce cardiac arrest, and the aorta is cross-clamped. After cardiectomy the donor heart is preserved in cold ice slush. For donors who provide both lungs and the heart to a single recipient, a combined cardiopulmonary surgical extraction is performed.

A shortage of available donors has led to increased use of marginal donors and separate alternate transplant lists of recipients who consent to accept marginal donors. Increased risk of primary graft dysfunction is the main reason to avoid marginal donors. Marginal donors are typically used for patients who do not meet the standard recipient criteria, with advanced age a common reason for alternative listing. Common donor factors that lead to marginal status are abnormal hepatitis screening tests, left ventricular dysfunction or coronary artery disease, advanced age, and DCD.

Donation After Cardiac Death

In 2007 hospitals were mandated by the Joint Commission, in collaboration with local Organ Procurement Organizations, to develop DCD policies and protocols in response to organ donor shortages. Since that time, DCD grafts have increased in the United States, accounting for 10.6% of all organ transplants,²² while a few European countries have not adopted the practice at all. The criteria for death of DCD donors (previously called non–heart-beating donors) are distinct from those of brain-dead donors. DCD donors typically have severe whole-brain dysfunction but have electrical activity in the brain. Death is defined by cessation of circulation (arterial monitoring showing pulse pressure is zero, or Doppler monitoring showing no flow) and respiration. Life support measures are used to control the timing of death and organ procurement and to maximize the function of organs from these donors. Based in part on a study by the Institute of Medicine,²³ the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) developed a reference document for management of DCD patients,^b but every hospital must develop its own protocols reflecting local constraints. Optimally, end-of-life care, including analgesia, is provided by the same medical team responsible for the care of the patient in the intensive care unit (ICU). Anesthesiologists do not necessarily have to be involved in DCD donor management, even when withdrawal of care occurs in the OR.²⁴ The main principles for institutional guidelines are outlined in the ASA report and include the following: The decision to withdraw care must be made prior to and independent of any discussion about organ donation. Suitable DCD donors are those in whom death is anticipated within 1 to 2 hours of withdrawal of life support. With experience, DCD donors with longer time to cardiorespiratory arrest can be used successfully for kidney transplantation.²⁵

Detailed protocols for interactions with family members of the donor, transplant teams, organ procurement organizations (OPOs), and OR personnel must be established as part of DCD planning. Informed consent is required for organ donation and for any preorgan recovery procedures, such as drug administration or vascular cannulation. A plan for the donor’s care should be in place if the patient does not die within the anticipated time frame, and ideally care should be transferred back to the team that knows the patient and family. Once the family decision to consent to DCD is made, the OPO can help guide management of the patient while the allocation of organs is being arranged. Uncontrolled, unanticipated crises that force the conversation about consent under extreme circumstances are obviously more difficult and may mean that the OPO cannot be involved in donor management because of time constraints. Nonetheless, uncontrolled DCD donors can be used for transplantation.^26,27

Circulation and respiration must be absent for a minimum of 2 minutes before the start of organ recovery. Organ recovery started >5 minutes after respiratory and circulatory arrest may compromise donor organ quality, but this limit has now been extended with reasonable transplant outcomes. Predicting which patients will expire in 1 to 2 hours cannot be done with certainty. The most experienced program with DCD, University of Wisconsin, developed an evaluation tool to help predict which patients would die within 1 to 2 hours of withdrawal of support (Table 51-2).²⁸

DCD donors provided 1,306 transplanted kidneys in 2008 (an increase of 12% over 2007), but 20.9% of DCD kidneys were discarded. DCD donors provided 276 livers (down from 2007), but 32.3% of the livers had to be discarded. Over half the pancreata of DCD donors had to be discarded, and 32 pancreata transplants from DCD donors were performed. These numbers point to the need to optimize DCD protocols, including matching to appropriate recipients. DCD lungs are used efficiently, and only 5.6% were discarded. Pediatric DCD donors also provide quality organs for transplantation.²⁹ Although DCD donors extend the donor pool, they are associated with increased recipient complications, decreased graft survival, and increased cost of transplantation.³⁰ DCD livers, for example, have consistently poorer outcomes than brain-dead donors’ livers, but careful selection of both donors and recipients for these marginal grafts can still help expand the donor pool.³¹

Living Kidney Donors

Safety and comfort are the primary considerations in the care of living donors. Living donors must be healthy and without significant cardiopulmonary, neurologic, or psychiatric disease, diabetes, obesity, or hypertension. Renal function must be normal, with no history of renal stones or proteinuria. Open nephrectomy has been largely replaced by laparoscopic donor nephrectomy, which is associated with significantly less pain than the open procedure and shorter hospital length of stay and time to full recovery, but otherwise similar complication rates to the open procedure.³² With experience, laparoscopic donor nephrectomies have been performed in more complex patients, with a low incidence of conversion to open nephrectomy and transfusion only rarely required.³³ Both anesthetics and insufflation of the peritoneum with carbon dioxide (CO₂) necessary for the laparoscopic procedure decrease renal blood flow. Nonetheless, as laparoscopic nephrectomies have become shorter (limiting the period of reduced renal perfusion), early graft function is similar to that of grafts obtained with the open procedure.³⁴ Patients undergoing the laparoscopic procedure often receive more fluids than open nephrectomy donors, probably reflecting attempts to maintain renal perfusion during the period of compromise. Fluid loading overnight before surgery (vs. fluid administration starting with surgery) is associated with better creatinine clearance during the procedure, but this advantage is lost by postoperative day 2,³⁵ likely because donors have good renal function at baseline and the period of renal perfusion compromise is generally short. A reasonable fluid protocol is to administer crystalloid at 10 mL/kg/hr above calculated losses and to maintain urine output at about 100 mL/hr³⁶ or to titrate fluids to a CVP end point, although CVP may not accurately reflect volume status with the patient in lateral decubitus and with pneumoperitoneum.³⁷ Nitrous oxide is contraindicated for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy because distended bowel can get in the way of the surgeons.³⁸ For patient comfort, central venous lines (if used) are generally placed after induction of anesthesia.

Donor nephrectomy should be an uncomplicated procedure and donor tracheas can be extubated in the OR. Deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis is warranted.³⁹ For open nephrectomy, the patient is positioned in the lateral decubitus position with the bed flexed to expose and arch the flank. Donors are generally managed with general anesthesia, but epidural and combined epidural–spinal techniques (supplemented with intravenous propofol)⁴⁰ as well as general–epidural combined techniques are used. Postoperative pain following donor nephrectomy can be severe, and patient-controlled analgesia is often used. But the pain can still be severe enough to limit respiratory effort and mobilization of the patient. Furthermore, a survey of 123 donors showed that one-third of them had chronic pain after the open procedure,⁴¹ suggesting postoperative pain management is often not optimal. Early complications include pulmonary (atelectasis, pneumothorax, pneumonia), urinary tract infections, and wound problems; long-term complications include reduced renal function, hypertension, albuminuria, and psychiatric issues (anxiety, depression).³⁹ Some centers admit donors to a step-down or medical ICU for a day after surgery, but the total hospital stay is usually only 2 to 4 days. Bladder catheters are removed on postoperative day 1. Patients should be advised that full recovery (i.e., feeling normal) takes 4 to 6 weeks, especially after the open procedure. Fortunately, perioperative mortality is rare but cannot be denied as a possible outcome during preoperative patient discussions.

Living Liver Donors

Left lobe liver donation (segments II and III) is usually done in the context of parent-to-child donation with recipients <15 kg. Although left lateral segmentectomy is a big operation, it is generally well tolerated (Fig. 51-1). Nonetheless, living left lobe donors must be healthy and without a history or risk for thromboembolic disease. By comparison, donor right hepatectomy needed for adult-to-adult liver transplantation is a major procedure (Fig. 51-2) and carries significant risk. The residual liver volume of the donor must be >35% of original volume to prevent “small for size” syndrome in the donor. Because risk for this syndrome is increased in older donors or in patients with cholestatic or hepatocellular disease, including steatosis,⁴² adult-to-adult living donors should have no liver disease. Mortality of right liver resection for donation is estimated at 0.2% to 0.5%.⁴² Complication rates are high for right liver donors (up to 30% of donors), including air embolism, atelectasis, pneumonia,⁴³ and biliary tract damage. An estimated 3.2% of donors in experienced centers suffer major complications.⁴⁴ Most centers do not perform adult-to-adult liver transplants in very ill recipients.

Large liver resections may require virtually complete hepatic venous exclusion (cross-clamping of the hepatic pedicle usually without cava clamping). Not unexpectedly, venous return falls significantly. Without the collaterals developed by patients with chronic liver disease, normal donors may experience significant hypotension when the hepatic pedicle is cross-clamped. Blood pressure is maintained largely through reflex increases in endogenous vasopressin and norepinephrine levels.⁴⁵ For these reasons, volume loading is reasonable prior to clamping, but some centers try to reduce blood loss by maintaining low CVP, while CVP monitoring is not routine in other centers. Sufficiently powered studies to prove that the benefits of low CVP (reduced transfusion requirements) outweigh the risks (renal compromise, air embolism) are unlikely to be performed, and institutional practices vary widely. If vasopressors are needed, vasopressin and norepinephrine are reasonable choices to enhance normal endogenous reflexes. Isovolemic hemodilution has been reported to reduce allogeneic red cell requirements in major hepatic resections.⁴⁶ At experienced centers, blood loss is usually <1 L, and 20% to 40% of patients require transfusion.^47–49 Blood salvage is useful, and some centers offer autologous donation programs for donors. Both can reduce the need for allogeneic blood transfusions.⁵⁰ Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), if expertise is available, is ideal and may obviate central line placement. Most donor tracheas can be extubated safely in the OR. Hypothermia is a preventable reason for not extubating in the OR. A wide variety of general anesthetics are used for liver donors, although one small single-center trial suggested that desflurane resulted in better hepatic and renal functions after right liver donation than propofol–remifentanil anesthesia.⁵¹

Postoperative pain management in these patients is a matter of controversy because of perioperative coagulopathy (see Chapter 57). Some institutions use epidural catheters, providing excellent analgesia without complications. However, with large liver resection, INR rises significantly after surgery, peaking at 1 day⁵² or within a few days after surgery, at a time when the catheter is usually removed. (Platelet counts also fall after large liver resections but usually remain in normal ranges.) For this reason, many centers will not place epidural catheters in right liver donors and rely on IV patient-controlled analgesia to manage postoperative pain. Laparoscopic resection of left lobe liver (segments II and III)⁵³ and right lobe⁵⁴ is available in some centers.

Hypophosphatemia (with excessive loss of phosphate in the urine) is common after hepatectomy,⁵⁵ and should be treated with sodium phosphate infusions to maintain phosphate levels 3.5 to 5.4 mg/dL, unless patients have significant renal compromise (creatinine clearance <50 mL/hr). Liver function tests other than INR are also abnormal in the postoperative period after liver resection and usually return to baseline levels within 3 months, although small changes in liver function tests can persist for up to a year after hepatectomy. Some living liver donors can experience chronic low platelet counts after hepatectomy.⁵⁶

Living Lung Donors

Living lung donation is not a common procedure. Selection criteria for living lung donors are listed in Table 51-3.⁵⁷ Reported morbidity is low,⁵⁸ but follow-up of these donors is not well reported. If two donors are used for one recipient, scheduling difficulties are considerable. The surgical procedure is performed in three ORs simultaneously, one for each donor and the recipient. Donors are generally managed with combined general anesthesia and epidural analgesia.

IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE AGENTS

Pharmacologic suppression of the immune response to allografts is associated with major side effects. Considerable variability in intestinal absorption, genetic and induced differences in metabolism of these drugs, changing dosage requirements with aging, and idiosyncratic complications all mandate individualization of immunosuppressive regimens. Immunosuppressed patients who are undertreated risk rejection; overimmunosuppression can be toxic, especially to the kidneys. All immunosuppression regimens carry major risks, such as infection, malignancy, and progressive vascular disease. Immunosuppression regimens differ considerably from center to center, and anesthesiologists must communicate with the transplant team to obtain the schedule and dose of immunosuppressive agents for each patient. It is particularly important to review drug regimens with transplant coordinators when posttransplant patients are scheduled for surgery because the transplant team needs information about peak and trough drug levels that may not be accessible on the hospital record.

Immunosuppressed patients coming to the OR deserve special attention to sterile technique and maintenance of antibiotic, antifungal, and antiviral regimens during the perioperative period. Complications of chronic immunosuppression are summarized in Table 51-4.

Calcineurin Inhibitors

The modern transplant era began with the introduction of the calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) cyclosporine into clinical practice. CNIs are still a mainstay of immunosuppression for solid-organ transplant recipients. Tacrolimus (FK-506) is also widely used. Inhibition of calcineurin, among other effects, modifies NFAT (nuclear factor of activated T cells) and frees nuclear factor-κB to translocate to the nucleus, where it enhances transcription of T-cell interleukin-2 (IL-2). Via these signal transduction pathways, CNI inhibits T-lymphocyte activation, differentiation, and cytokine production.⁵⁹ Calcineurin is involved in diverse cellular processes, so its inhibition can cause many significant side effects. These include hypertension (often requiring therapy), hyperlipidemia, ischemic vascular disease (including in heart recipients), diabetes, and nephrotoxicity. Cyclosporine causes acute nephropathy, which is usually reversible with drug cessation. But chronic renal damage from cyclosporine is a more refractory problem. A variety of other drugs are used with CNI to reduce the amount of CNI required. Ischemic cardiac disease is the leading cause of death of kidney transplant recipients, in part because of underlying disease that preceded transplantation. But CNI can exacerbate risk factors for coronary artery disease. It is important to note that end-stage liver disease (ESLD) does not confer protection from coronary artery disease, and liver transplant patients are also at risk for progression of ischemic cardiac disease after transplantation. Neurologic side effects also complicate CNI therapy, including tacrolimus-induced polyneuropathy⁶⁰ and encephalopathy.⁶¹ When immunosuppression is interrupted by surgery or when multiple potentially interacting drugs are used, tacrolimus trough levels should be reassessed.

Tacrolimus is metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4 and causes its up-regulation. Cyclosporine may rarely prolong the action of pancuronium.^62,63 To switch from oral to intravenous dosing of cyclosporine, usually about one-third the oral dose is used. Usual doses of tacrolimus are 0.15 to 0.3 mg/kg/day given in two doses. To switch from oral to intravenous tacrolimus, a starting dose of about one-tenth the oral dose can be used.

Corticosteroids

Corticosteroids disrupt expression of many cytokines in T cells, antigen-presenting cells, and macrophages. These drugs are used both for maintenance immunosuppression and in pulse dosing for acute rejection. Especially for growing children, corticosteroid-sparing regimens are increasingly popular. The well-known side effects are hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, weight gain (including Cushingoid features), and gastrointestinal ulceration (see Chapter 49). Communication with the transplant service is important in determining timing and dose of steroid administration perioperatively in patients who are taking the drug chronically. Corticosteroids are generally withheld during liver transplantation in recipients with hepatitis C because of concern that they contribute to hepatitis C recurrence.⁶⁴ Nonetheless, a recent multicenter study showed little advantage to a steroid-free immunosuppression regimen in patients with hepatitis C followed for 2 years after their transplants.⁶⁵

Polyclonal and Monoclonal Antibodies

Antithymocyte globulin (ATG) is purified rabbit immunoglobulin-G (IgG) taken from animals immunized with human thymocytes, so that previous exposure to rabbits is a risk factor for serum sickness with ATG exposure. Polyclonal ATG suppresses the immune system by depleting immune cells, mostly T cells, but it interacts with a wide variety of cell surface molecules involved in adhesion and cell trafficking and ischemia–reperfusion injury. It has a long history of use in treating acute rejection and induction of immunosuppression, particularly in sensitized transplant recipients and in steroid- and calcineurin-sparing regimens.⁶⁶ Anesthesiologists should be aware that acute and severe serum sickness is a rare side effect of ATG administration,⁶⁷ presenting as jaw pain, and is treated by stopping the drug, plasmapheresis, and corticosteroids.⁶⁸

OKT3 antibody is directed against a component of the T-cell receptor complex and affects immunosuppression by blocking T-cell function. Acute administration of OKT3 in awake patients (especially first administration) may result in generalized weakness, fever, chills, and some hypotension. More severe hypotension, bronchospasm, and pulmonary edema have been reported. Formulations of OKT3 may require syringe filtering before administration.

“Humanized” antibodies are antibodies engineered to contain human constant regions in the immunoglobulin protein, so that patients do not develop an antimouse immunologic response. Muromonab-CD3 is a humanized form of OKT3, usually used for acute rejection.⁶⁹

IL-2 receptor (CD25) antagonists, such as basiliximab and daclizumab, are newer humanized antibodies directed against a portion of the IL-2 receptor expressed on activated T cells. About half of the heart transplant centers now use IL-2 receptor antagonists in their initial immunosuppression regimen to reduce the dose and cardiovascular side effects of calcineurin inhibitors. Gastrointestinal upset is the most commonly cited side effect of these drugs. However, basiliximab has been implicated in causing pulmonary edema in young renal transplant patients.⁷⁰

Belatacept is directed against the CD80/CD86 ligands on antigen-presenting cells that activate T cells through the CD28 (costimulatory) pathway. It is approved for maintenance immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients. Infusion reactions can include hypotension, but acute reactions are usually mild.⁷¹ New targets for immunosuppressive drugs include complement and B cells as well as drugs directed at molecules that exacerbate ischemia–reperfusion.⁷² Coagulopathy has been reported as a side effect of alemtuzumab (Campath),⁷³ which recognizes CD52 on B cells. Rituximab is another anti–B-cell antibody that acts at CD20 and is used for humoral rejection.

Tolerance of organ grafts without pharmacologic immunosuppression is possible using combined bone marrow and solid-organ transplants, with marrow and the solid organ derived from the same donor.⁷⁴

Other Immunosuppressive Drugs

Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors are often used in combination with CNI to decrease the complications of dose-related side effects (calcineurin-sparing regimens) such as nephrotoxicity. TOR is involved in complex signaling processes that promote synthesis of proteins, including several that regulate cellular proliferation. Thus, mTOR inhibitors such as sirolimus (Rapamycin) are antiproliferative, used both in immunosuppression and increasingly in cancer therapies. Similar to cyclosporine and tacrolimus, sirolimus is metabolized in liver via P450 CYP3A isoenzymes, but coadministration of sirolimus and a calcineurin inhibitor does not increase calcineurin inhibitor drug requirements. In fact, the combination may be synergistic.⁷⁵ Diltiazem raises the plasma concentration of sirolimus.⁷⁶

Azathioprine is hydrolyzed in blood to 6-mercaptopurine, a purine analog and metabolite with the ability to incorporate into DNA during the S phase of the cell cycle. Because DNA synthesis is a necessary prerequisite to mitosis, azathioprine exerts an antiproliferative effect. Antiproliferative drugs rely on the fact that immune activation implies explosive proliferation of lymphocytes. Side effects occur because other proliferating cells (gastrointestinal tract, bone marrow) are also affected. Repression of bone marrow cell cycling can cause pancytopenia. Cardiac arrest and severe upper airway edema are rare complications.⁷⁷ The intravenous dose is about half the oral dose.

Mycophenolate mofetil is metabolized into a molecule that inhibits purine synthesis. It too can cause leukopenia and thrombocytopenia as side effects, as well as red cell aplasia⁷⁸; additionally it is teratogenic.⁷⁹ The usual oral dose is 1 to 1.5 g twice a day. Mycophenolate has largely replaced azathioprine in combination regimens.⁸⁰

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are anti-inflammatory stem cells, currently in multiple clinical trials for solid-organ transplantation. MSCs are multipotent cells that are easily derived from marrow, fat, or other organs and expanded ex vivo. Their first use in the context of organ transplantation was for the treatment of grade IV graft versus host disease in marrow transplant recipients.⁸¹ MSCs have pleiotropic effects on the immune response, including antiproliferative T-cell function. The goal of MSC trials for solid-organ transplantation is to reduce the amount of pharmacologic immunosuppression needed. Although these are allogeneic cells, they do not elicit a classical immune response, so third-party MSCs can be used in any patient without the need for donor-specific MSC. No adverse acute reactions to MSC infusion or injection have been reported after thousands of treatments.

CORNEAL TRANSPLANTATION

Corneas are the most common organs transplanted in the United States, with >40,000 transplants per year. Corneal transplants can be performed under local anesthesia (often with IV sedation) or general anesthesia. Recipients of cornea grafts are often elderly. A major anesthetic goal is maintaining low intraocular pressure (see Chapter 48 – EYE). For particularly complex procedures, diuretics and intravenous fluid restriction may be warranted to prevent edema.⁸² Patient positioning (head-up angle of the bed) on transfer from the OR should be directed by the surgeon. Rejection of corneal allografts is the most common cause of graft loss in the first year after transplantation.

RENAL TRANSPLANTATION

Preoperative Considerations

The prevalence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is about 0.17% in the United States, where 16,899 kidney transplants were performed in 2010, representing no change in transplant volume in 5 years despite growing need. The most common recipient age group was 50 to 64 years (6,684 patients), and 2,813 recipients were over 65 years. Thirty-seven percent overall received living donor grafts. Mortality on the waiting list in 2009 was 6.3%.^c

Diseases treated with renal transplants are shown in Table 51-5, calculated from the 2008 waiting list data. Many of these underlying diagnoses are also risk factors for coronary artery disease, so preoperative evaluation is focused on cardiovascular function, but a comprehensive medical workup is essential.

About half the mortality of patients on dialysis is due to heart failure. Cardiovascular complication is a leading cause of death after renal transplantation. Therefore, cardiovascular risk factor modification is imperative before and after transplantation,⁸³ including hypertension and hyperlipidemia. Renal transplant recipients are often anemic, with hyperdynamic cardiac indices. Patients >50 years (with or without risk factors for coronary disease) are generally screened with dobutamine stress tests or myocardial scintigraphy. The interval at which these studies are repeated in patients listed for transplantation varies from center to center. Peripheral vascular disease should also be assessed. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) should be reviewed by anesthesiologists prior to transplantation (see Chapter 11). PFTs are particularly important in type 1 diabetics who often present with reduced lung volumes and diffusing capacity. The precise cause of abnormal PFTs in these patients is not known, but clinical studies suggest that long-term normoglycemia after kidney or pancreas transplantation is associated with improved pulmonary function.⁸⁴ Hypercoagulable states are common in patients with renal disease and deserve detailed evaluation so that they can be managed perioperatively.⁸⁵

All solid-organ transplant patients are screened for tumors (mammography, Papanicolaou [Pap] test, colonoscopy, prostate-specific antigen) and infection (dental evaluation, viral serologies). Patients should have good control of their diabetes before transplantation and have an evaluation for psychiatric stability and social support. Severe heart, lung, or liver disease, most malignancies, and active or untreatable infections such as tuberculosis are exclusion criteria for renal transplantation.

Dialysis-dependent patients should be dialyzed before surgery. Cadaveric grafts can be safely transplanted after 24 hours of cold ischemia time, and potentially after 36 hours, allowing scheduling of preoperative dialysis. With preoperative dialysis, severe hyperkalemia during surgery is unusual.

ECDs are often used for kidney transplantation. Factors used in designation of ECD kidneys are age, creatinine, stroke as cause of death, and hypertension. Healthy older living donor kidneys have outcomes similar to standard criteria donor kidneys.⁸⁶ For example, donors over 50 years old are considered ECD if they have a history of hypertension, creatinine >1.5 mg/dL, or cause of death was cerebrovascular accident.⁸⁷ DCD donors are also an ECD category. ECDs affect the scheduling of transplantation as minimization of cold ischemia times is essential and delayed graft function may complicate the intraoperative course of DCD graft recipients.⁸⁸ Some centers report increased rates of primary nonfunction in DCD kidney grafts, contributing to early graft loss.⁸⁹

Kidney allocation is a bit more complex than liver allocation. Blood type O kidneys are allocated to type O recipients, and blood type B kidneys are transplanted only in B recipients, except in the case of zero antigen mismatched candidates. Zero mismatched kidneys have the same HLA A, B, and DR antigens, and there is mandatory sharing of these kidneys through UNet with a complicated set of rules governing priority for these donors (see http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/PoliciesandBylaws2/policies/pdfs/policy_7.pdf).

Intraoperative Protocols

Renal transplantation is generally done under general anesthesia. Small studies have suggested good outcomes with epidural anesthesia⁹⁰ or combined epidural–spinal anesthesia. But concerns over uremic platelet dysfunction and residual heparin from preoperative dialysis have limited the use of regional anesthesia for kidney transplantation. Rapid-sequence induction is indicated in diabetic patients with gastroparesis (preceded by oral sodium bicitrate). Anemic, hyperdynamic patients may have higher dose requirements for induction agents such as propofol.⁹¹ Rocuronium is useful for patients in whom rapid-sequence induction is indicated, but the duration of block is variable in patients with ESRD.⁹² Similarly, plasma clearance of rapacuronium is reduced with renal failure, but titration of dose to neuromuscular blockade monitoring end points prevents delayed recovery.⁹³ Generally, the long-acting nondepolarizing muscle relaxants are avoided and shorter-acting agents such as cisatracurium are used. Before incision, antibiotics are given. A central venous catheter (usually triple lumen) is placed for CVP monitoring and drug administration in most centers, and a bladder catheter is placed.

Incision is usually in the lower right abdomen to facilitate placement of the graft in the iliac fossa. The recipient iliac artery and vein are used for graft vascularization, followed by connection of the ureter to the recipient bladder. If the kidney is too large for the iliac fossa, it can be positioned in the retroperitoneal space. Iliac vessels may be used for anastomoses, or the aorta and inferior vena cava may be required.

The major anesthetic consideration is maintenance of renal blood flow. No data are available to determine whether inhaled versus balanced intravenous techniques are better at preserving (graft) renal flow. Similarly, the choice of inhaled gas has not been shown to significantly impact posttransplant renal function. Isoflurane, sevoflurane, and desflurane are all used to manage renal transplant patients. Morphine effect is prolonged in the setting of ESRD, and high doses of meperidine can cause accumulation of its metabolite, normeperidine, in these patients. Similarly remifentanil metabolite accumulation occurs in ESRD, whereas fentanyl, alfentanil, and sufentanil pharmacokinetics are clinically normal.⁹⁴

Hypertensive renal transplant patients often require antihypertensive drugs perioperatively. Calcium channel blockers have been best studied for renal protection of cyclosporine-treated hypertensive transplant patients. But after surgery, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and α-blockers may be as effective as calcium channel blockers.⁹⁵ Typical hemodynamic goals during transplant are systolic pressure >90 mm Hg, mean systemic pressure >60 mm Hg, and CVP >10 mm Hg. These goals are usually achievable without vasopressors, using isotonic fluids and adjustment of anesthetic doses. Hemodynamic management varies widely from center to center, so close communication between surgeon and anesthesiologist is imperative. Plasma-Lyte is the crystalloid of choice for kidney transplantation, and it preserves acid–base balance and electrolytes when compared with Ringer’s lactate or normal saline.⁹⁶

Once the first anastomosis is started, diuresis is initiated (both mannitol and furosemide are often given). Heparin and verapamil should also be available in the OR. In some centers, anesthesiologists are asked to administer the first doses of immunosuppression. A kidney graft is defective in concentrating urine and reabsorbing sodium, so attention to electrolytes is important.

Glucose control is also important for patients undergoing transplantation. A small, single-center prospective study of living kidney donor recipients identified glucose >160 mg/dL as a risk factor for acute perioperative renal dysfunction, likely associated with more severe ischemia–reperfusion injury.⁹⁷ Tight glucose control after kidney transplant is associated with less rejection, and diabetics with poorly controlled glucose levels after transplantation have increased mortality.⁹⁸ For these reasons, tight blood glucose control (80 to 110 mg/dL) is a reasonable anesthetic management goal during renal transplantation. Dopamine does not reliably improve renal function in this setting. The selective DA1 agonist fenoldopam is used to preserve renal function during kidney transplantation in some centers and is a superior renal protectant,⁹⁹ although not extensively studied.

Transfusion is rarely required in the OR, although renal transplant patients are often anemic coming to surgery (and may be receiving erythropoietin). Because of immunosuppression, if cytomegalovirus (CMV)-negative patients receiving a CMV-negative organ are transfused, CMV-negative blood is preferred. Leukocyte filters are also effective in preventing CMV transmission but are probably inferior to CMV-negative blood.¹⁰⁰ The entire surgery should take about 3 hours.

Most surgical complications of renal transplantation are not recognized in the OR. The common postoperative complications are ureteral obstruction and fistulae, vascular thromboses, lymphoceles, wound complications,¹⁰¹ and bleeding.

Patient-controlled analgesia is a good choice for postoperative pain management, and despite prolonged action, morphine can be used safely if patients are monitored intensively. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents and cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors are contraindicated. Pain can be severe, prompting some centers to explore combination blocks (ilioinguinal–iliohypogastric and intercostal nerve blocks)¹⁰² or transversus abdominis plane blocks¹⁰³ for posttransplant patients. Chronic pain after kidney transplantation is common,¹⁰⁴ suggesting that more attention should be given to early postoperative pain management. Kidney transplant recipients are generally discharged from the hospital within a week of surgery.

In children, the most common causes of ESRD requiring transplantation are congenital (largely anatomic developmental) anomalies. Only 15% of pediatric transplants are performed for children <2 years of age.¹⁰⁵ Kidney size mismatch can complicate the surgery in small children. Adult donor kidneys may have to be placed in the retroperitoneum of small children. Although chronic peritoneal dialysis may help expand the abdominal volume,¹⁰⁶ attention to peak inspiratory pressures at closure is important, and increased pressures should be reported to the surgical team. Pediatric renal transplantation is associated with somewhat lower rates of success than adult transplantation, with vascular thromboses of the grafts more common in younger children.

LIVER TRANSPLANTATION

Preoperative Considerations

Liver transplant programs vary considerably in the numbers of transplants performed, with only 20 centers reporting transplant volumes >100 patients in either 2009 or 2010. However, the number of transplants performed in a given center is only a small percentage of patients evaluated for liver transplantation. The anesthesiologist’s input into the workup of liver transplant recipients is essential for decisions regarding candidacy and optimal preparation of patients for transplantation. Patients with ESLD have multiorgan dysfunction with cardiac, pulmonary, and renal compromise because of their liver disease (Table 51-6). Furthermore, 58% of patients transplanted in 2010 were age 50 to 64 years, and 11.3% were >65 years old. Common liver diagnoses leading to liver transplantation are shown in Table 51-7.

Adult liver transplant recipients are prioritized for transplantation by severity of illness, using the MELD (model for ESLD) score, which was originally developed to predict survival of patients with liver disease independent of liver transplantation¹⁰⁷:

Pediatric patients are prioritized for transplant using the pediatric ESLD score (PELD):

Patients with acute liver failure are given priority for donor livers, then the patients with the highest MELD score and compatible blood group are next.

All liver transplant patients are screened for infectious diseases including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), CMV, and Epstein-Barr virus. As for other solid-organ transplants, major infection and malignancy may exclude patients from consideration for transplantation. Several centers have had good experience transplanting patients who have HIV, and HIV-infected patients who require liver transplants should be referred to these centers.¹⁰⁸

Renal dysfunction is common in patients undergoing liver transplantation. Serum creatinine levels are not extremely useful in capturing renal function in patients with liver disease. Even a small increase in serum creatinine in these patients suggests significant renal dysfunction; hence, the reason that creatinine is emphasized in MELD scoring. Ongoing evaluation of MELD/PELD scores of wait-listed patients is mandated, with the sickest patients requiring the most frequent laboratory studies to update scores.

Difficult decisions about patient candidacy are common in evaluating liver transplant candidates. Several are discussed here to highlight the need for regular involvement of a transplant anesthesiologist in the candidacy evaluation process. Patients with ESLD generally have very low SVR, high cardiac index, and increased mixed venous oxygen saturation. Liver disease is not protective against coronary artery disease. Most patients are screened for cardiac disease using dobutamine stress echocardiography or myocardial stress scintigraphy, although the effectiveness of diagnosing coronary artery disease in these patients is not well established.¹⁰⁹ Patients with evidence of significant coronary lesions usually require cardiac catheterization to identify stenoses amenable to angioplasty preoperatively. These studies can be done safely even in patients with significant renal dysfunction.¹¹⁰ Patients with severe coronary artery disease are generally not candidates for liver transplantation. Functional assessment of patients in addition to laboratory and imaging studies is important, and one study found that a distance of <250 m on a 6-minute walk test is an independent predictor of death on the transplant waiting list.¹¹¹ A recent, small retrospective studies suggests that troponin I levels >0.07 ng/mL may predict liver transplant patients at risk for cardiovascular complications.¹¹²

Significant aortic stenosis also presents a difficult dilemma pretransplant. Because cardiac surgery is considered risky in a patient with ESLD, patients with aortic stenosis can be treated with valvuloplasty before liver transplantation. Then, after the liver graft is stable, aortic valve replacement can be considered. Similarly, patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction can be treated with alcohol ablation of the septum before surgery to improve cardiac function during transplantation.¹¹³ These HOCM patients can benefit particularly from TEE monitoring because PA capillary wedge pressure does not accurately reflect left ventricular (LV) volume in this population. Patients with patent foramen ovales may be at risk for intraoperative stroke, and some centers work with cardiologists to close larger shunts noninvasively before surgery.

Portopulmonary hypertension (PPH) patients coming to transplant are particularly challenging. Diagnosis of PPH is made in the (a) setting of liver disease (b) mean positive airway pressure ≥25 mm Hg, pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) >240 dyne/s/cm⁵, and PA occlusion pressure ≤12 mm Hg.¹¹⁴ Echocardiography is also used to screen patients for portopulmonary hypertension and intracardiac shunts. Systolic PA pressure estimates are made by capturing the maximum velocity of regurgitant flow across the tricuspid valve, and this velocity is used in the Bernoulli equation for the pressure gradient between the right ventricle and the right atrium (δP = 4V⁴). If moderate to severe pulmonary hypertension (estimated systolic PA pressure >50 mm Hg) is suggested, right heart catheterization is needed for direct pressure measurements. Multiple case reports and small retrospective reviews demonstrate that patients with portopulmonary hypertension are at substantial risk of perioperative death. There is general agreement that a mean PA pressure >50 mm Hg is an absolute contraindication to liver transplantation. Patients with PA pressures between 35 and 50 mm Hg and pulmonary vascular resistance >250 dyne/s/cm⁻⁵ are also likely at increased risk. Efforts to lower PA pressure before transplantation pay off and considerably reduce the risk of transplantation.¹¹⁵ Epoprostenol is the usual first-line therapy for portopulmonary hypertension and is effective in lowering PA pressures significantly in many patients, but it requires home IV delivery. Inhaled iloprost has been used in Europe for PPH patients with good results.¹¹⁶ Sildenafil is also useful for treatment of portopulmonary hypertension¹¹⁷ and can be given via nasogastric tube during surgery. Controlling PA pressures is critical in patients with the most severe PPH, and a few patients have been successfully managed with the mixed endothelin antagonist bosentan¹¹⁸ or the selective endothelin-A receptor antagonist ambrisentan (Cartin-Ceba) or imatinib.¹¹⁹ Right heart dysfunction that does not reverse after treatment of primary pulmonary hypertension is considered a contraindication to liver transplantation.¹²⁰ Inhaled nitric oxide is extremely useful for managing PA pressures during liver transplantation.

PFTs are often abnormal in ESLD, with most patients showing reduced diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide. Hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS, a widened alveolar–arterial gradient in room air due to liver disease), can lead to severe hypoxemia. Contrast echocardiography is used to diagnose intrapulmonary vasodilation using agitated saline. The microbubbles act as a contrast, and if intracardiac shunts are present, they appear within three heart beats after injection in the left ventricle. The later appearance of bubbles suggests intrapulmonary shunting. Once a contraindication to transplantation, HPS is now an indication for transplantation as it is the only therapy that can reverse the underlying physiology.¹²¹ If HPS is severe and completely unresponsive to oxygen, transplantation is risky because the immediate perioperative period may be complicated by frank graft hypoxia and failure. Fortunately, most patients with HPS have some element of physiologic ventilation–perfusion mismatch, are oxygen responsive, and, with this “room to move,” can be safely transplanted.

Some patients with refractory ascites and normal renal function can have relief from ascites with terlipressin treatment,¹²² but this is unfortunately not available in the United States.

Recently, a large number of new drugs for the treatment of hepatitis C have entered clinical trials and the market,¹²³ including protease inhibitors, viral polymerase inhibitors, viral replication complex inhibitors, new interferon formulations, and new ribavirin formulations. Because clinical experience with these agents is small, the anesthetic implications and potential for drug interactions with anesthetics are not known.

Intraoperative Procedures

Uncomplicated liver transplants can take as few as 3 hours, and tracheas can be extubated at the end of the case, but predicting which patients will be straightforward is not always easy. Consequently, intensive preparation for surgery is important. Rapid-sequence induction of general anesthesia is indicated because patients with ESLD often have gastroparesis¹²⁴ in addition to increased intra-abdominal pressure from ascites. The authors place invasive lines and monitors after induction of general anesthesia: Two arterial catheters, one in the left radial and one in the right femoral artery (left femoral if a kidney transplant is planned). PA catheters and continuous echocardiography are used for monitoring volume status, and TEE is particularly useful for patients with cardiac lesions undergoing transplantation¹²⁵ (see Chapter 28). At least two large-bore (9 Fr) catheters are placed for rapid intravenous infusions. In many centers, anesthesiologists also place percutaneous lines specifically for use in venovenous bypass (VVB) if necessary, but many centers only rarely use VVB. Bladder catheters and nasogastric tubes are placed in all patients. A rapid infusion system with the ability to deliver at least 500 mL/min of warmed blood is primed and is in the room. Before surgical incision, blood product availability is confirmed, and some blood products are in the room and checked (routinely 10 U red cells and 10 U FFP). Normothermia, essential for optimal hemostasis, is maintained with fluid warmers and convective air blankets over the legs and over the upper body.

Liver transplantation is traditionally described in three phases: Dissection, anhepatic, and neohepatic, with reperfusion of the graft marking the start of the neohepatic phase. During the dissection phase of surgery, blood loss may be high. The major anesthetic goals of this phase are correction of coagulopathies and maintenance of intravascular volume for renal protection. Some centers advocate low CVP management of liver transplant patients to reduce blood loss,¹²⁶ but this technique may be harmful in patients with higher MELD scores¹²⁷ and marginal renal function.

Coagulation Management

Although standard laboratory coagulation studies do not predict bleeding well, they are still the best tests available in real time in the OR. For this reason, FFP is used to maintain INR ≤1.5 in patients with anticipated or ongoing bleeding. Point of care INR is extremely useful in patients with massive blood loss, providing information in seconds. In the authors’ experience, point of care INR and clinical laboratory INR values may be different, but once the offset is known, the two INR values track well. Rapid infusion of FFP can quickly lead to ionized hypocalcemia because of the citrate load that is not metabolized by a diseased liver. Infusion of calcium chloride (CaCl₂), adjusted to ionized Ca²⁺ levels, is better at maintaining constant calcium (Ca²⁺) levels than are intermittent boluses. Platelet transfusion has traditionally been used to maintain platelet counts >50,000/mm³; however, recent data suggest that platelet transfusion is detrimental to graft and patient survival.¹²⁸ Importantly, we find that maintaining fibrinogen >150 mg/dL with cryoprecipitate is critical for hemostasis. Cell-saver blood may also be used to limit allogeneic transfusions, although it is generally not used in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Many other factors contribute to poor hemostasis in liver transplant patients besides poor clotting factor synthesis, including renal failure, infection, endothelial dysfunction, and high portal pressures.¹²⁹ This complexity in the etiology of underlying bleeding problems is likely a factor in the unpredictability of bleeding during liver transplant patients.

In addition to complex coagulopathies of ESLD, many patients with liver disease have a superimposed hypercoagulable state (see Chapter 16). For example, patients with autoimmune liver diseases may have antiphospholipid antibodies. In general, prohemostatic factors are also elevated in patients with liver disease, including von Willebrand factor and factor VIII, and low values of ADAMTS-13, antithrombin, protein C, and plasminogen disrupt the normal balance of hemostatic agents.¹²⁹ So, in addition to monitoring discrete parts of the coagulation profile to guide transfusion therapies, it is important to look at a measure of whole-blood clotting to assess thrombotic potential. Most centers use thromboelastography (TEG) to help sort out complex coagulation disturbances and their evolution during liver transplantation, to help with interpretation of standard laboratory tests of coagulation, and to get a picture of overall clotting and fibrinolysis status. Using TEG, normal or hypernormal whole clotting in the presence of high INR and low fibrinogen and platelets (and usually elevated D-dimers) should be taken as a caution that the patient may have a clinically significant hypercoagulable state. Under these circumstances, the authors’ approach is to maintain transfusion therapies, as noted previously, and to avoid pharmacologic procoagulant drugs. For the majority of patients with synthetic dysfunction, thrombocytopenia, and hypofibrinogenemia, whole-blood clotting is delayed. In these patients, many centers supplement transfusion therapy with antifibrinolytic agents. Considerable center-dependent variation in use and dosing of antifibrinolytics makes generalizations difficult. In the authors’ experience, ε-aminocaproic acid (EACA; 5 g load and 1 g/hr infusion) to support hemostasis during surgery is useful in most coagulopathic patients during liver transplantation, provided there is no evidence or history of hypercoagulability. Other centers use considerably less drug, less often. Fibrinolysis acutely worsens immediately after reperfusion to varying degrees, depending largely on the amount of tissue plasminogen activator released from the graft.¹³⁰ A (re)bolus of EACA (again, doses are highly variable) is helpful to maintain hemostasis once this postreperfusion exacerbation of fibrinolysis is documented. Some centers use transexamic acid instead of EACA, which is also a plasminogen inhibitor but has a longer half-life than EACA.

Activated factor VII can be used safely during liver transplantation,¹³¹ but is usually reserved for rescue of refractory critical bleeding unresponsive to more standard management because of its expense and because the risk of thrombosis in liver disease patients is not known. When this drug is given, INR rapidly normalizes,¹³² although the amount of circulating clotting factors does not change, complicating laboratory coagulation studies. NovoSeven administration is also useful for surgical hemostasis for placement of intracranial pressure (ICP) monitors in patients with acute liver failure and for selected patients undergoing liver transplantation with difficult red cell crossmatches or in patients who refuse transfusion on religious grounds.

Pulmonary embolism is an unusual complication of liver transplantation, reflecting the complex coagulation imbalance of ESLD and liver transplantation. If diagnosed promptly, low-dose tissue plasminogen activator (0.5 to 4 mg) into the CVP port of a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) can lyse the clot quickly.¹³³

Perioperative renal dysfunction is a major challenge that is common in liver transplantation and can be exacerbated by hypovolemia and anesthetic-induced impairment of renal blood flow. Creatinine levels can significantly underestimate the degree of renal dysfunction, especially in ESLD patients with significant muscle wasting.¹³⁴ Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a functional renal disorder associated with liver disease, categorized as type 1 (acute severe decompensation, creatinine >2.5 mg/dL), which is usually fatal, and type 2 (chronic, moderate renal failure with creatinine >1.5 and glomerular filtration rate <40 mL/min). HRS in general is the diagnosis of renal failure if the patient has ascites, is not in shock, has not been exposed to nephrotoxic drugs, has no parenchymal renal disease, has a creatinine level >1.5 mg/dL, and does not improve after 2 days of diuretic withdrawal and albumin therapy (1 g/kg/day up to 100 g/day).¹³⁵ Albumin may play a role in preventing and treating HRS in the setting of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.¹³⁶ In addition, large-volume (>5 L) drainage of ascites with incision is a paracentesis and should be accompanied by albumin therapy to prevent renal decompensation, with recommended albumin doses of 6 to 8 g/L of ascites drained. Terlipressin (in Europe) and norepinephrine¹³⁷ may be useful for HRS because they relieve splanchnic vasodilatation. The α₁-agonist midodrine is useful for improving renal function in some patients.¹³⁸ No prospective trials have been done to support use of one vasopressor over another during transplantation, and intraoperative pharmacologic renal support is largely guided by the hepatology literature. Dopamine is not useful for preserving renal function during liver transplantation. The most important consideration for patients with HRS is to ensure adequate volume replacement before instituting diuresis in the OR.

The anhepatic phase begins when the liver is functionally excluded from the circulation. Historically, the vena cava is clamped above (suprahepatic anastomosis) and below (infrahepatic anastomosis) the liver, and the portal vein and hepatic artery are clamped. With complete cava cross-clamp, venous return falls by 50% to 60%, often resulting in hypotension. VVB may be used to increase venous return and, therefore, blood pressure, to increase renal and gut perfusion pressures, and to decompress portal pressures for a better surgical field. VVB is rarely used in the authors’ center because surgeons use cava-sparing techniques, and hemodynamics during the anhepatic period can be managed with volume loading and vasopressors as needed. VVB carries potential complications, including arm lymphedema, air embolism, and vascular injury, and its benefit is limited when anhepatic times are short. Surgical techniques that preserve caval flow (piggyback technique)¹³⁹ are standard in most US centers and make intraoperative management significantly easier.

Reperfusion of the graft is the most treacherous time of the liver transplant. Communication between the surgical and anesthesia teams is essential in precise preparation for reperfusion. Caval clamps are removed first, and the integrity of the caval anastomoses are ensured. Caval reperfusion is usually hemodynamically well tolerated. However, portal vein reperfusion often results in hemodynamic instability. The original descriptions of reperfusion syndrome emphasized (often severe) hypotension and bradycardia with portal reperfusion.¹⁴⁰ Now, with flushing techniques that precede reperfusion and changes in preservation solution, bradycardia is less common. Typically, reperfusion is associated with hypotension (further drop of already low SVR and increase in carbon monoxide [CO]), which may or may not require treatment.

The authors’ preparation for reperfusion is to give sodium bicarbonate just before unclamping (25 to 50 mEq) to meet the acid load from the graft. For particularly prolonged acidosis tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (THAM) infusion is useful.¹⁴¹ Importantly, the authors administer 500 to 1,000 mg of CaCl₂ precisely at the time of portal reperfusion to counteract the effects of potassium on the heart. If, despite these preparations, T waves on electrocardiogram (ECG) become elevated, the same treatment is repeated. Some anesthesiologists prefer to treat ECG changes only after they are diagnosed. Lidocaine, atropine, and norepinephrine are available at the time of reperfusion in case of ventricular dysrhythmias, bradyarrhythmias, and severe hypotension. Hepatic artery unclamping is usually hemodynamically uncomplicated.

One small study suggested that methylene blue (1 to 1.5 mg/kg bolus) reduces hemodynamic instability after reperfusion,¹⁴² but was not supported in a follow-up retrospective review from another center.¹⁴³ Methylene blue is thought to mediate its effects by scavenging reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide. On the other hand, a study in which inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) was given during the entire transplant suggested significant acute benefits (decreased hepatocyte apoptosis) and earlier graft recovery, including faster coagulation factor synthesis.¹⁴⁴

Neohepatic Period

Calcium is not required after reperfusion so that one early indication of graft metabolic function is the lack of a calcium requirement, even when FFP is infused rapidly. Usually within 30 minutes, the base deficit improves with graft metabolism of citrate and lactate. Within the first hour, the CO decreases (after an acute increase after portal reperfusion) as SVR increases with graft metabolism of vasoactive substances unleashed at reperfusion. In addition, the graft appearance should be noted. It should have a smooth edge and no evidence of engorgement. Bile is made in the first half-hour after reperfusion in a good-functioning graft. Often, renal function improves after reperfusion, probably because of graft metabolism of renal vasoconstrictors. Similar to kidney transplantation, ECD grafts are increasingly used to reduce wait-list mortality. The major classes of ECD liver donors are advanced age, steatosis, DCD, and split grafts,¹⁴⁵ as well as donors with extended hospital stays.¹⁴⁶ These grafts are often slow to function metabolically in the OR. For these and other classes of ECD livers, cold ischemia times should be limited, which can significantly impact the OR schedule.

During the neohepatic period, biliary anastomoses are completed and sources of surgical bleeding are corrected. Drains are placed and the abdomen is closed. Fast-tracking protocols for liver transplant patients are common in experienced centers.¹⁴⁷

Pediatric Liver Transplantation

Indications for pediatric liver transplantation differ considerably from that of adults, with biliary atresia the most common indication (43%). Inherited metabolic diseases are the indication for 13% of pediatric liver transplants.¹⁴⁸ Portopulmonary hypertension is rare in children, but biliary atresia is associated with atrial septal defects and situs inversus.¹⁴⁹ Children <1 year of age with inherited liver disease are often very small for age. In small children, a radial artery catheter and at least one large (18-g) peripheral intravenous line are placed after induction of anesthesia. Surgeons may place tunneled central lines before incision, useful for intraoperative transfusions, postoperative administration of drugs, as well as CVP monitoring. Children with previous Kasai operations for biliary atresia may have massive bleeding during dissection because of adhesions. Small children receiving large grafts may have respiratory compromise with abdominal closure. Because hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) is a more common complication in children than adults, some centers choose to have the INR at the end of surgery in the 1.8 to 2 range; postoperative aspirin and alprostadil are often used to prevent HAT. If flow is inadequate (by poor Doppler signals) in the artery after anastomosis, intraoperative reanastomosis or a new anastomosis may be required acutely. Aortic cross-clamping may be required for these anastomoses. Biliary complications are also common in pediatric transplant recipients, especially those receiving adult left lateral segment grafts, with hepatic artery thrombosis a significant contributor to biliary complications. Some centers report longer surgical procedures and higher transfusion requirements in pediatric patients who receive a living donor graft versus a deceased donor graft.¹⁵⁰ Use of split livers (one liver for two patients) puts a strain on transplant teams, but is an effective way to extend the donor pool.

Acute Liver Failure

Anesthetic considerations for both adults and children with acute liver failure (ALF) are focused on protection of the brain and treating cerebral edema¹⁵¹ (see Chapter 39). Patients with a diagnosis of ALF should be managed in the ICU, because they can have a rapidly progressive course of elevated ICP, leading to herniation and death. In the authors’ center, because these patients are relatively rare, the care of ALF patients follows a protocol developed by a multidisciplinary team, including anesthesiology. ICP monitoring is useful in managing these patients but risks intracranial bleeding; nonetheless its use is advocated by the US Acute Liver Failure Study Group.¹⁵² Some centers have gained expertise in transcranial Doppler monitoring in place of invasive ICP monitoring^153,154 thereby avoiding the risk of ICP monitoring in coagulopathic patients. In the authors’ experience, bispectral index monitoring, especially in patients without ICP monitors, can help detect acute changes in cerebral blood flow, such as with vascular clamping in the OR. Anesthetic management of these patients starts in the ICU, with intubation as needed for airway protection in the setting of encephalopathy or for initiation of therapeutic hypothermia. Mild hypothermia (core temperature 34° to 35°C)¹⁵⁵ is used in most centers for ALF, rather than colder hypothermic treatments used for head trauma. The head is positioned midline and the head of the bed raised. Hyperventilation is also commonly used to manage ICP but is best used as a rescue therapy. Mannitol is used for osmotherapy to an end point of 310 mOsm/L. Hypertonic saline is also useful for lowering ICP in some patients, although there are limited data to support its use.¹⁵⁶ Liver-assist devices can help bridge patients with ALF to transplantation. In the United States, the molecular adsorbent recirculating system has been in use for more than a decade. These devices may also contribute to a rapid enough recovery that some ALF patients can be spared from transplantation.¹⁵⁷

Vasodilating anesthetics, including all inhaled agents, should be avoided, especially without ICP monitoring. In the authors’ experience, pentothal infusion is a good maintenance anesthetic, and acute rises in ICP can be managed with etomidate. Patients may come to the OR on N-acetylcysteine, a glutathione donor. When antihypertensive therapy is required, labetalol does not cause significant cerebral vasodilation in these patients.¹⁵⁸ Acute cerebral vasodilatation often accompanies reperfusion. Management of intracranial hypertension and cerebral edema is based on very small studies of patients with acute liver failure and on adaptations of studies directed at control of intracranial hypertension in other settings (see Chapter 39).

PANCREAS AND ISLET TRANSPLANTATION

The majority of pancreas transplants (about 75%) are done as simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplants from a single deceased donor. Pancreata grafted in these procedures have historically had better long-term survival than grafts done after kidney transplantation or independent pancreas grafts. Independent pancreas grafts are usually performed for patients with type 1 diabetes who have frequent metabolic complications (hypoglycemia) but preserved renal function. With proper donor selection and aggressive attention to targeted antibiotic coverage, better graft survival rates after isolated pancreas transplant outcomes have recently been reported.¹⁵⁹

The preoperative assessment of pancreas transplant recipients focuses on the end-organ complications of type 1 diabetes (reviewed in Chapter 44). Monitoring will depend on cardiac status, but generally patients do not require PA catheters and have been evaluated for cardiac disease as part of the transplant workup. Nonetheless, cardiovascular disease is present in many patients undergoing pancreas transplantation, although they tend to be younger than liver transplant recipients.

The major difference between pancreas transplantation and other procedures is that strict attention to control of blood glucose is indicated to protect newly transplanted β cells from hyperglycemic damage. No formula for controlling blood glucose has emerged as a standard of intraoperative management. In general, if adult patients arrive with glucose >250 mg/dL, 10 U of insulin can be given intravenously, followed by an infusion of insulin. The infusion starting rate varies, depending on the initial blood glucose level. Once blood glucose levels are controlled (<150 mg/dL), intravenous 5% dextrose (about 100 mL/hr) should also be infused as the insulin infusion is continued. The most important issue is to check the response to insulin frequently and adjust infusions as necessary. No literature exists for a patient with an implanted insulin pump, but it seems reasonable to continue to use the pump at basal rates in these patients as long as its operation is reviewed¹⁶⁰ and blood glucoses are monitored regularly during surgery.

Islet transplants were revived by the Edmonton protocol, published in 2000.¹⁶¹ The major changes introduced included a glucocorticoid-free immunosuppression regimen and immediate transplantation of islets after isolation. Since that time, islets have been cultured after isolation in many centers, which makes surgical scheduling easier. Islets are generally infused into the portal circulation; acute portal hypertension may result from the infusion. This surgery should not be complicated by significant blood loss.

SMALL BOWEL AND MULTIVISCERAL TRANSPLANTATION

In 2003, the American Gastroenterological Association published a medical position statement on indications for intestinal transplantation.^f Indications for intestinal transplantation include impending liver failure in patients with intestinal failure (or short-gut syndromes requiring total parenteral nutrition [TPN]), frequent severe dehydration in patients with intestinal failure, and severe complications of central lines for TPN (sepsis, thrombosis of central veins). Patients who develop liver failure from TPN for intestinal failure are candidates for combined liver-intestine transplantation. In these cases, liver failure should be irreversible, and biopsy findings are often required for this conclusion in patients without overt ESLD.¹⁶² In general, intestinal transplantation is usually performed only in patients with life-threatening complications of the intestinal failure, mostly in children, but increasingly in adult recipients.

For anesthesiologists, a major hurdle for these transplants is line placement adequate for transfusion of blood products and fluids, which may be substantial during these long cases. Anesthesiologists should review angiographic studies to determine venous patency before attempting central line placement. Ultrasound devices are helpful in identifying the known patent vessels for cannulation, but surgical cut-downs for venous access may be necessary, including transhepatic or intraoperative renal vein catheterization¹⁶³ (see Chapter 41). Superior vena cava or inferior vena cava obstruction may require preoperative intervention (surgical and/or lytic) for adequate vascular access for surgery.¹⁶⁴ Antibiotic regimens should be continued during the surgery. Nitrous oxide, as in liver transplantation, is avoided.

Common complications of intestinal failure include dehydration and electrolyte abnormalities, gastric acid hypersecretion, pancreatic insufficiency, bone disease, and TPN-induced liver failure.¹⁶⁵ Because electrolyte abnormalities are common, they should be monitored continuously during surgery and appropriate replacement instituted. Because enteral feeding will not be possible until weeks after surgery, TPN should be continued in the perioperative period.

Like reperfusion of liver grafts, intestinal graft reperfusion is associated with an acute release of acid and potassium from the graft. Anticipatory bicarbonate and CaCl₂ administration are used to counteract the effects of acid and potassium on the heart. After reperfusion, coagulopathy may worsen, and is usually managed by reassessment of INR, fibrinogen and platelet counts, and correction with blood products.

LUNG TRANSPLANTATION

Lung transplantation is accepted therapy for end-stage pulmonary and pulmonary vascular disease, based on documented improvement in longevity and quality of life.^166,167 The Department of Health and Human Services Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network reports >22,000 lung transplant procedures in the United States since 1988, and the 2011 Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation reports over 38,000 lung transplants worldwide since 1989.¹⁶⁶ With median waiting time ranging between 500 and 1,000 days, however, many patients die awaiting transplant because of the shortage of suitable organs. The past 16 years have seen a slow but steady improvement in overall outcomes in lung transplantation. Data compiled during that period reveal a median posttransplant survival of 5.5 years and a 53% survival rate at 5 years. The most common indications for lung transplantation are chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (35%), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (23%), cystic fibrosis (CF, 17%), and α₁-antitrypsin deficiency (6%).¹⁶⁶

Surgical options for lung transplantation are single-lung transplant, en bloc double, sequential double, and heart–lung transplantation. The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation registry for 2011 indicates a continued increase in double-lung transplants over the past 14 years, with a relatively stable number of single-lung transplants,¹⁶⁶ a trend likely related to reports of improved 1-year survival after double-lung transplantation. There has been a recent trend toward avoiding the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in single and sequential double-lung transplantation, although CPB is always made available as a backup and often used for patients with pulmonary hypertension. Double-lung transplantation is most commonly used in patients with pulmonary vascular disease and CF, although its use is increasing in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Single-lung transplantation for emphysema has favor because of good short-term outcomes, with the added advantage of availing another donor lung to another recipient. Lung transplant centers vary in applying single- or double-lung transplant to different diagnoses as well as the application of CPB, and the procedure indications are still debated.¹⁶⁷ Double-lung transplantation, however, is indicated if a single-lung transplantation would allow a continuing pathologic process to place either the native or transplanted lung in jeopardy. For example, in CF patients, infection in the native lung can easily spread to the transplanted lung. In pulmonary hypertension, remaining pulmonary vascular disease in the native lung would result in progressive pulmonary hypertension and thus hypertensive vasculopathy in the transplanted lung. Finally, a severely emphysematous lung, with its high compliance, would be at risk for air trapping and barotrauma when coexisting with a transplanted lung with normal compliance.¹⁶⁸

Recipient Selection

The International Guidelines for the Selection of Lung Transplant Candidates were updated in 2006 by consensus agreement of several thoracic societies (summarized in Table 51-8).¹⁶⁶ In general, patients should be considered for lung transplantation if they exhibit poor pulmonary function despite maximal medical therapy. Contraindications to lung transplantation are based on their impact on long-term survival (see Table 51-8). Patients with significant cardiac disease can be considered for heart–lung transplantation but are not candidates for isolated lung transplant. A new lung allocation system has been in use since May 2005.¹⁶⁶ Candidates are now given a lung allocation score to determine their wait-list status, instead of the historical scoring system, which relied heavily on time on the transplant waiting list. The new system weighs net benefit of transplant and clinical urgency.

Related posts:

20 Neuromuscular Blocking Agents 55 Critical Care Medicine 36 Anesthesia for Neurosurgery 52 Trauma and Burns 22 Preoperative Patient Assessment and Management 25 Airway Management

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Join