Abstract
With modern lung isolation techniques, hypoxemia during one-lung ventilation is a much less frequent occurrence. When it does occur, however, it can be a challenge for the anesthesiologist. This chapter uses a case study to outline how the risk of hypoxia in one lung can be assessed, and it provides the anesthesiologist with several tools to manage it, the most important of which is a solid understanding of the physiologic mechanisms at play that may either contribute to or help prevent hypoxia during one-lung ventilation cases.
Keywords
hypoxia, hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, lung isolation, one-lung ventilation
Case Synopsis
A 72-year-old man is scheduled for robotic-assisted right upper lobe wedge resection for adenocarcinoma. His medical history is notable for stable coronary artery disease treated with coronary artery bypass grafting and a bare metal stent and hypertension treated with an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor. Preoperative pulmonary function testing reveals a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1 ) of 85% predicted, a diffusing capacity of 56% predicted, and a ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scan showing 65% of perfusion to the right lung. After intubation with a left double-lumen tube, the patient is positioned laterally, and lung isolation is achieved after reconfirmation of tube placement with a bronchoscope. Within 5 minutes of lung isolation, the patient begins to desaturate, gradually reaching a nadir of 88% at 30 minutes despite initial maneuvers to improve oxygenation on one lung.
Problem Analysis
Definition and Recognition
Hypoxemia used to be a frequent occurrence during one-lung ventilation (OLV) before the use of routine fiberoscopy and modern inhaled anesthetic agents that have less of an inhibitory action on hypoxic vasoconstriction. Although the majority of cases requiring OLV now proceed without significant desaturation when lung isolation is achieved successfully, significant desaturation may still occur in 1% to 10% of patients even when maintained on a fraction of inspired oxygen (Fi o 2 ) of 1.0. This case illustrates how hypoxia may still pose a significant challenge to the anesthesiologist. An understanding of the determinants of lung perfusion during OLV and a systematic approach to dealing with hypoxia as outlined in this chapter will provide the anesthesiologist with strategies to manage cases such as the one described.
In the absence of endotracheal tube or bronchial blocker malposition, hypoxia during OLV is caused primarily by shunting of blood through the nonventilated lung. The development of atelectasis in the ventilated lung further worsens this by creating additional areas of low V/Q. The blood flow from these nonventilated areas then mixes with that from the ventilated lung segments and causes a decrease in Pa o 2 . Interestingly, no threshold saturation has been universally adopted as a safe lower limit during OLV; however, generally a saturation of 90% is often accepted, and in patients without significant comorbid disease, desaturations to the high 80s may be tolerated for short periods.
Optimal V/Q matching during OLV is achieved by maximizing perfusion to the dependent lung and maximizing pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) in the nondependent lung. Many factors are at play in determining the proportion of pulmonary perfusion that flows through the nonventilated lung during OLV, and several are amenable to influence by the anesthesiologist ( Fig. 66.1 ). Lung volumes influence PVR in a hyperbolic manner; at extremes the PVR increases whereas at functional residual capacity (FRC) it is at its lowest, which is ideal for the dependent lung. During anesthesia, atelectasis tends to develop in the dependent lung because of mechanical compression in the lateral position and gas absorption, particularly after inspiring pure oxygen during preoxygenation and before OLV. The end-expiratory volume of the dependent lung therefore trends toward residual volume in the absence of positive pressure to counteract these factors. Despite maintaining positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), a pig model of OLV demonstrates that much of the ventilated lung remains suboptimally aerated at end-expiration ( Fig. 66.2 ). Position of the patient is an additional factor influencing the distribution of pulmonary blood flow, due to the effect of gravity. More recent studies call into question the magnitude of this effect on distribution of pulmonary perfusion as opposed to other characteristics, suggesting that gravity’s effects are superimposed on a background of heterogeneous perfusion due to the underlying structure of the vascular bed. At least to some extent, lateral positioning does allow for a gravity-induced increase in perfusion to the dependent ventilated lung, thereby minimizing shunt.
The pulmonary vasculature itself is not a passive bystander; on the contrary, it assumes an active role in determining regional perfusion via hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV). In response to low alveolar oxygen tensions, pulmonary arterial smooth muscle constricts increasing regional resistance though the pulmonary vascular bed and redistributing flow away from hypoxic areas. This mechanism optimizes V/Q matching and is most effective when the hypoxic fraction of lung tissue corresponds to between 30% and 70% of the lung. The onset of this response is rapid, plateauing over approximately 20 minutes, followed by a delayed phase beginning after 40 minutes. The magnitude of this response in experimental settings (breathing 5% O 2 into the test lung) has been shown to increase pulmonary vascular resistance in the test lung by threefold to fivefold and decrease perfusion to that lung by 30% to 45%. Debate exists in the literature with regard to the presence of a preconditioning effect whereby the sensitivity of the response to hypoxia increases on repeat exposure; these disparities in results may reflect differences in experimental conditions such as duration of hypoxic exposure and interval before reexposure. HPV is attenuated by ACE inhibitors.
Surgical manipulation itself may influence the distribution of pulmonary blood flow. Although local release of vasoactive mediators may oppose HPV, retraction and mechanical interference with pulmonary blood flow can decrease perfusion of the nondependent (operated) lung.
Risk Assessment
As mentioned, the majority of patients when maintained on an Fi o 2 of 100% with adequate positioning of a double-lumen tube or bronchial blocker will not have significant hypoxemia. Several factors listed in Box 66.1 have been identified that may predict desaturation during OLV.
High percentage of ventilation or perfusion to the operative lung on preoperative V/Q scan
Poor Pa o 2 during two-lung ventilation, particularly in the lateral position intraoperatively
Right-sided thoracotomy
Normal preoperative spirometry (FEV 1 or FVC) or restrictive lung disease
Supine position during one-lung ventilation
FEV 1 , Forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FVC, forced vital capacity; V/Q, ventilation/perfusion.
Most of these factors relate directly to the proportion of blood that will be shunting through the nonventilated lung. A higher percentage of ventilation or perfusion to the operative lung and surgery on the larger right lung result in relatively more blood being shunted through the collapsed lung. Supine positioning will remove the beneficial effect of gravity to increase perfusion to the dependent ventilated lung.
Perhaps surprisingly, obstructive airflow limitation correlates inversely with risk of desaturation on OLV. Mechanisms that have been proposed include delayed collapse of the nondependent lung, persistent end-expiratory airflow in the dependent lung contributing to auto-PEEP, and altered mechanisms of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. The most significant factor correlating with hypoxia on OLV is the intraoperative Pa o 2 on two-lung ventilation (TLV) before OLV. The TLV Pa o 2 serves as a gauge of the ability of the respiratory system to optimize V/Q matching when faced with factors that promote mismatch such as general anesthesia, positive-pressure ventilation, and the lateral position.
As most of these factors are known well in advance of the surgery, this allows the anesthesiologist to be prepared for potential difficulty with oxygenation during such cases and apply prophylactic measures for prevention of hypoxia as outlined in the following section.