Noninvasive Ventilation Withdrawal Methodology After Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure




© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016
Antonio M. Esquinas (ed.)Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation and Difficult Weaning in Critical Care10.1007/978-3-319-04259-6_14


14. Noninvasive Ventilation Withdrawal Methodology After Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure



Chung-Tat Lun  and Chung-Ming Chu 


(1)
Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, United Christian Hospital, Hong Kong, China

 



 

Chung-Tat Lun



 

Chung-Ming Chu (Corresponding author)



Keywords
Noninvasive ventilationRespiratory failureWeaning


Abbreviations


AHcRF

Acute hypercapnic respiratory failure

ARF

Acute respiratory failure

BTS

British Thoracic Society

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

NIV

Noninvasive ventilation

OSA

Obstructive sleep apnea

RCT

Randomized controlled trial



14.1 Introduction


Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) has been shown to be effective in treating acute respiratory failure (ARF) due to a variety of causes [1, 2], including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [3], neuromuscular diseases [4], and obesity-hypoventilation syndrome [5, 6]. NIV can augment ventilation and unloading of respiratory muscles, reduce atelectasis, and splint the upper airway in obstructive sleep apnea.

Despite the effectiveness of NIV as a treatment, there has been no study of the withdrawal method of NIV after recovery from ARF. The Royal College of Physicians (United Kingdom) and the British Thoracic Society (BTS) published guidelines on the use of NIV in the management of patients with COPD admitted to hospital with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (AHcRF) in 2008 [7]. The guideline suggested a 4-day weaning strategy, starting with reduction of NIV use during the daytime. The BTS guideline adopted the above weaning strategy from a multicenter randomized controlled trial that was planned to compare the effect of NIV and standard medical treatment instead of comparing different methods of NIV withdrawal [8].

In contrast to the paucity of data in NIV withdrawal, an RCT was performed in 1995 comparing different methods of weaning in patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation [9]. A once-daily spontaneous breathing trial led to extubation about three times more quickly than intermittent mandatory ventilation and about twice as quickly as pressure-support ventilation.

It is important to determine the best time and the best schedule to withdraw NIV after ARF. Premature NIV withdrawal may be followed by early recurrence of ARF. On the other hand, NIV is labor intensive, occupies high-dependency beds, is sometimes uncomfortable for patients, and is costly. A reduction of NIV duration may reduce nursing care, free up NIV machines and beds, reduce patient discomfort, reduce cost, and facilitate early discharge. This chapter reviews the available evidence in relation to NIV withdrawal after resolution of ARF.


14.2 Analysis



14.2.1 Duration of NIV at Initiation


There is no comparative study on the duration of NIV at initiation. As patients suffering from ARF are at life-threatening risk, it seems reasonable to have long hours of NIV to improve their gas exchange at the beginning of treatment. The BTS guideline recommends the patient have NIV fir as long as they can tolerate at the beginning of treatment [7]. Many clinical trial protocols also encourage patients to use NIV for as long as they can tolerate [1, 2, 8].


14.2.2 Time to Consider NIV Withdrawal


The aim of NIV in AHcRF in COPD is to reduce PaCO2 by augmenting ventilation and unloading respiratory muscles. Physicians may consider NIV withdrawal after patients have achieved clinical stability with improvement in blood gases. The BTS recommends considering NIV withdrawal after 24 h of commencement, if NIV is successful, which is defined as pH ≥7.35, resolution of underlying cause or symptoms, and normalization of respiratory rate. Studies of NIV in COPD have similar criteria for NIV withdrawal [7]. Kramer et al. [2] attempted withdrawal when the respiratory rate was less than 24 breaths/min, heart rate less than 110 beats/min, pH ≥7.35 and adequate oxygenation with ≥90 % saturation with oxygen flow less than 3 L/min.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Oct 12, 2016 | Posted by in CRITICAL CARE | Comments Off on Noninvasive Ventilation Withdrawal Methodology After Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access