Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation in Treatment of Acute Respiratory Failure After Cardiac Surgery: Key Topics and Clinical Implications




© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016
Antonio M. Esquinas (ed.)Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation and Difficult Weaning in Critical Care10.1007/978-3-319-04259-6_24


24. Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation in Treatment of Acute Respiratory Failure After Cardiac Surgery: Key Topics and Clinical Implications



Luca Salvatore De Santo1, 2  , Donato Catapano3 and Sergio Maria Caparrotti 


(1)
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Chair of Cardiac Surgery, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy

(2)
Division of Cardiac Surgery, Casa di Cura Montevergine, Mercogliano, AV, Italy

(3)
Intensive Care Unit, Casa di Cura Montevergine, Mercogliano, AV, Italy

(4)
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Casa di Cura Montevergine, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Mercogliano, AV, Italy

 



 

Luca Salvatore De Santo (Corresponding author)



 

Sergio Maria Caparrotti



Keywords
Cardiac surgeryPostoperative pulmonary complicationsNoninvasive mechanical ventilationExtubation failureReintubation


Since the early days of cardiac surgery, postoperative pulmonary dysfunction has been the subject of a considerable amount of experimental and clinical research because it affects virtually every treated patient [1]. Both anomalies in gas exchange and lung mechanics contribute to the expression of postoperative respiratory dysfunction, which is clinically evidenced by increased work of breathing and respiratory rate, shallow respirations, ineffective cough, hypoxemia, and changes in chest radiographs. Widening of the alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient, increased lung microvascular permeability, and increased pulmonary vascular resistance and shunt fraction are commonly observed after cardiac surgical procedures. Accordingly, reductions in vital capacity, functional residual capacity, and static as well as dynamic lung compliance are usually evident. Pathogenesis of these derangements has been extensively studied [2, 3]. It stems from a complex interplay between patients’ baseline end organ function; the type, extent, and urgency of underlying cardiovascular pathology; and the distinct features of this surgical setting. This operative approach encompasses general anesthesia, peculiar surgical trauma (median sternotomy, pleural dissection), cardiopulmonary bypass, topical cooling for myocardial protection (which may cause phrenic nerve dysfunction), transfusion of blood products, and postoperative pain, which individually and synergistically affect respiratory performance.


24.1 The Burden of Pulmonary Complications in Cardiac Surgery


Despite these data, the continuum between pulmonary dysfunction and overt complications has been poorly characterized. Because such complications considerably jeopardize outcomes and imply increased health-care costs and resource utilization, their prevention, early identification, and effective treatment is highly advisable. Preventive measures have been authoritatively described elsewhere [4, 5]. Refinements of operative techniques and cardiopulmonary bypass and mechanical ventilation strategies, meticulous application of “ventilator care bundles,” rational and early use of antibiotics, early extubation, and judicious blood management have all been advocated for a thorough preventive management algorithm. Acute respiratory distress syndrome, transfusion-related lung injury, and ventilation associated pneumonia, though infrequent, are the most dreaded of these complications because of inherent dismal outcomes.


24.2 Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation and Extubation Failure in Cardiac Surgery


Weaning from mechanical ventilation is essential to the success of the cardiac surgical procedure and a key step toward recovery and rehabilitation. The combination of several respiratory and cardiovascular parameters is known to improve the accuracy of prediction of successful weaning from ventilator support. Nevertheless, the same parameters perform poorly in the prediction of late extubation failure. Today, pulmonary complications account for 54.9 % of intensive care unit (ICU) recidivism and reintubation is needed in at least 6.6 % of the patients [6]. Causes of post-extubation failure include both airway (such as upper-airway obstruction, aspirations, and excess pulmonary secretions) and non-airway-related factors (including cardiogenic dysfunction). Pathophysiology of post-extubation failure usually includes two distinct pathways: (1) alveolar hypoventilation and ventilation-perfusion mismatch, due to increased respiratory rate and decreased tidal volume, and (2) a failure to increase cardiac output, which leads to an enhanced tissue oxygen extraction with critically low mixed venous oxygen saturation [7]. Reintubation prolongs the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation and increases the need for tracheostomy. Loss of airway-protecting mechanisms, airway trauma, intense sedation, and the potential for aspiration are some of the drawbacks of invasive ventilation that predispose to the development of ventilator-associated pneumonia and extend the length of the ICU and hospital stay, implying higher morbidity and mortality. A pivotal study by Hein and coworkers [8] on a contemporary series of cardiac surgery patients disclosed that hospital mortality in the event of respiratory failure is as high as 38 % and the chance of 3-year survival is lower than 45 %.


24.3 Prevention of Extubation Failure


These findings emphasize the importance of both determining perioperative predictors of extubation failure and implementing new preventive and curative modalities that avoid the constraints of conventional invasive ventilation. Studies on predictors of reintubation and mechanical ventilation after prior successful weaning from ventilator support and extubation in the cardiac surgery setting are few. Back in 1999, a study conducted at the Mayo Clinic elegantly disclosed that preoperative predictors commonly occur either as single or multiple features in this patient subset, however, the author demonstrated that it is the combination of adverse intraoperative events with baseline disease process and laboratory and hemodynamic perturbations that compounds the risk of extubation failure in the individual patient. Indeed, difficult surgery (redo procedures, procedures involving the thoracic aorta or the placement of ventricular assist devices, those implying lengthy cardiopulmonary bypass time or massive transfusions of blood products) usually impact on the individual patient frailty as portrayed by surrogate markers of inadequate baseline cardiorespiratory reserve (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary hypertension, low left ventricular ejection fraction) and preoperative hematological and biochemical abnormalities (anemia, hypoalbuminemia, increased blood urea nitrogen and/or creatinine) [9]. Studies that are more recent substantially added to this knowledge and further stressed the role of prolonged primary intubation, because the longer the initial ventilator support, the higher the chance of extubation failure [25]. The clinical bottom line is that identification of patients at risk may, and, actually, should take place as early as ICU admission and should prompt alternate management algorithms.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Oct 12, 2016 | Posted by in CRITICAL CARE | Comments Off on Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation in Treatment of Acute Respiratory Failure After Cardiac Surgery: Key Topics and Clinical Implications

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access