Introduction
Female genital cutting (FGC) is an ancient tradition dating to as early as 200 b.c. in the pharaonic era of Ancient Egypt [1]. The origins are cultural rather than religious as it is practiced by Muslims, Christians, and Jews [2] and is not restricted to a particular ethnic group or religious sect. There are various customary beliefs surrounding the practice of FGC, including a rite of passage into womanhood, ensuring social acceptance and marriageability, preserving virginity, and protecting a woman’s family honor. The endurance of the tradition rests in the fact that FGC defines and protects a woman’s livelihood and future as a wife and mother. In these societies, circumcision is done out of love, and not circumcising one’s daughter is equivalent to condemning her to a life of isolation [3]. This chapter reviews the types, epidemiology, and sequelae of FGC and offers information relevant to its surgical management, the need for culturally competent care, and rigorous research.
The World Health Organization (WHO) has defined various types of FGC (Table 36.1). Type I, also known as clitoridectomy, involves partial or total removal of the clitoris and/or the prepuce. Type II (i.e., excision) consists of the partial or total removal of the clitoris and the labia minora, with or without excision of the labia majora. Type III, or infibulation, is the most extreme form of FGC. It involves the narrowing of the vaginal orifice with creation of a covering seal by cutting and appositioning the labia minora and/or labia majora, with or without excision of the clitoris [4]. Type IV, which will not be further discussed, consists of all other harmful procedures (e.g., pricking) performed in the female genitalia for nonmed-ical purposes.
It is important to note that most studies examining FGC have relied on women’s self-reports of FGC status. Studies that include clinical assessments have documented large variations in the level of agreement between self-reported descriptions and clinically observed types of FGC [5]. Furthermore, the reliability of clinical observation can be limited by natural anatomical variations and difficulty in estimating the amount of clitoral tissue under an infibulation [4].
WHO estimates that 100–140 million women worldwide have undergone FGC [6]. The most recent prevalence data indicates that approximately 91.5 million females above 9 years of age in Africa are currently living with the consequences of FGC [7]. with an estimated 3 million at risk of undergoing FGC every year [8]. Types I, II, and III have been documented in 28 countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, and in some countries throughout Southeast Asia and the Middle East. Some forms of FGC have also been reported in other countries, including Central and South America [4]. Eighty-five percent of all forms of FGC are type I/II, whereas 15% are type III. However, recent immigration and refugee resettlement from countries where type III FGC predominates (e.g., Somalia) have resulted in a rapid surge of females with this type throughout North America and Europe.
Type | Definition |
Partial or total removal of the clitoris and/or the prepuce (clitoridectomy) | |
Type la: removal of the clitoral hood or prepuce only | |
Type lb: removal of the clitoris with the prepuce | |
II | Partial or total removal of the clitoris and the labia minora, with or without excision of the labia majora (excision) |
Type lia: removal of the labia minora only | |
Type lib: partial or total removal of the clitoris and the labia minora | |
Type lie: partial or total removal of the clitoris, the labia minora, and the labia majora | |
III | Narrowing of the vaginal orifice with creation of a covering seal by cutting and appositioning the labia minora and/or the labia |
majora, with or without excision of the clitoris (infibulation) | |
Type Ilia: removal and apposition of the labia minora | |
Type lllb: removal and apposition of the labia majora | |
IV | Unclassified: All other harmful procedures to the female genitalia for nonmedical purposes, (i.e., pricking, piercing, incising, scraping, and cauterization) |
FGC has achieved global attention due to the increasing influx of immigrants and refugees to Europe and North America, andhas been the subject of increasing legislation worldwide [9]. Educational campaigns against FGC have led to a significant decline in its prevalence over the last 25 years, although support for its continuation varies widely between and within countries.
Medical Outcomes
Women who have undergone FGC can suffer short- and long-term complications. The range of short-term complications is rarely seen in Western countries, and may include shock, hemorrhage, infection, tetanus, urinary retention and/or oliguria, injury to adjacent structures, sepsis, and death [10–13]. The long-term complications mainly pertain to type III FGC and include epidermal inclusions cysts, keloids, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, apare-unia (i.e., no coitus due to the inability to achieve penetration), hematometra, hematocolpos, chronic vaginal and urinary tract infections, urinary retention and voiding difficulty, urinary calculi, incontinence, fistula neuromas, an d infertility [11,14–19]. In an attempt to avoid obstetrical complications, antenatal or intrapartum defibulation may become necessary. The WHO has found that women with FGC are significantly more likely than those without to experience adverse obstetric outcomes, with the risks increasing with more extensive FGC [20].
Psychosexual Outcomes
There are cultural taboos against discussing sexual displeasure and the “pain” of circumcision; these taboos persist even among immigrant communities living in the West [21]. Admitting to interest in sex or discussing sexual pleasure and/or the genitalia may, in some settings, be regarded as inappropriate with strangers. There may also be gendered notions of proper conversation, and modesty standards in responding to private questions [22]. As such, the focus of research on FGC has paid only peripheral attention to psychosexual sequelae. It has been assumed that women with FGC experience dyspareunia, marital disharmony, andpoor sexual outcomes. However, recent evidence does not support the hypothesis that FGC destroys sexual function or precludes enjoyment of sexual relations in all women [22].
There are mixed findings with regards to sexual pain associated with FGC. For example, dyspareunia was reported among 31.5% of women sampled in Egypt, the majority ofwhom were circumcised, and23% of these women perceived personal distress related to sexual dysfunction [23]. In contrast, El-Defrawi et al. [24] noted that circumcised women in Egypt complained more significantly of dysmenorrhea, vaginal dryness during intercourse, lack of sexual desire, and difficulty reaching orgasm as compared to noncircumcised women, yet they did not report more dyspareunia.
When dyspareunia is present, it is most commonly reported with first intercourse, during the initial period after marriage, and with re-infibulation [25]. Male partners may also experience complications due to FGC, including difficulty with penile-vaginal entry, penile infections, and psychological sequelae [26]. However, despite these problems, sexual excitement and pleasure may be present for some women with FGC. Recent data suggests that FGC does not affect sexual function uniformly, even in societies where infibulation is performed [27].