45 Arterial Blood Gas Interpretation
Arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis plays a pivotal role in the management of critically ill patients. Although no randomized controlled study has ever been performed evaluating the benefit of ABG analysis in the intensive care unit (ICU), it is likely this technology stands alone as the diagnostic test which has had the greatest impact on the management of critically ill patients; this has likely been translated into improved outcomes. Prior to the 1960s, clinicians were unable to detect hypoxemia until clinical cyanosis developed. ABG analysis became available in the late 1950s when techniques developed by Clark, Stow and coworkers, and Severinghaus and Bradley permitted measurement of the partial pressures of oxygen (PaO2) and carbon dioxide (PaCO2) in arterial blood.1–3 The ABG remains the definitive method to diagnose, categorize, and quantitate respiratory failure. In addition, ABG analysis is the only clinically applicable method of assessing a patient’s acid-base status. ABGs are the most frequently ordered test in the ICU and have become essential to the management of critically ill patients.4 Indeed, a defining requirement of an ICU is that a clinical laboratory should be available on a 24-hour basis to provide blood gas analysis.5
Indications for Arterial Blood Gas Sampling
ABGs are reported to be the most frequently performed test in the ICU.4 There are, however, no published guidelines and few clinical studies that provide guidance as to the indications for ABG sampling.6 It is likely that many ABGs are performed unnecessarily. Muakkassa and coworkers studied the relationship between the presence of an arterial line and ABG sampling.7 These authors demonstrated that patients with an arterial line had more ABGs drawn than those who did not, regardless of the value of the PaO2, PaCO2, the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, or the use of a ventilator. In that study, multivariate analysis demonstrated that the presence of an arterial line was the most powerful predictor of the number of ABGs drawn per patient independent of all other measures of the patient’s clinical status. Roberts and Ostryznuik demonstrated that with use of a protocol they were able to reduce the number of ABGs by 44%, with no negative effects on patient outcomes.4
Arterial Blood Gas Sampling
ABG specimens may be obtained from an indwelling arterial catheter or by direct arterial puncture using a heparinized 1- to 5-mL syringe. Indwelling arterial catheters should generally not be placed for the sole purpose of ABG sampling, as they are associated with rare but serious complications. Arterial puncture is usually performed at the radial site. When a radial pulse is not palpable, the brachial or femoral arteries are suitable alternatives. Serious complications from arterial puncture are uncommon; the most common include pain and hematoma formation at the puncture site. Laceration of the artery (with bleeding), thrombosis, and aneurismal formation are rare but serious complications.8,9
Arterial Blood Gas Analysis
Oxygenation
Relation Between PaO2 and FIO2
The PaO2 alone provides little information regarding the efficiency of oxygen loading into the pulmonary capillary blood. The PaO2 is determined largely by the FIO2 and the degree of intrapulmonary shunting (Figure 45-1). The PaO2 must therefore always be interpreted in conjunction with the FIO2. The PaO2 alone does not quantitate the degree of intrapulmonary shunt, which is required for assessing the severity of the underlying lung disease and in guiding the approach to oxygen therapy and respiratory support. There are various formulas for calculating the intrapulmonary shunt, including the classic “shunt equation,” which is the gold standard but requires mixed venous sampling through a pulmonary artery catheter, and the alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient equation (Table 45-1). Clinically the PaO2-to-FIO2 ratio (PaO2/FIO2) is most commonly used to quantitate the degree of ventilation/perfusion mismatching (V/Q). Since the normal PaO2 in an adult breathing room air with an FIO2 of 0.21 is 80 to 100 mm Hg, the normal value for PaO2/FIO2 is between 400 and 500 mm Hg. A PaO2/FIO2 ratio of less than 200 most often indicates a shunt of greater than 20%. A notable limitation of the PaO2/FIO2 is that it does not take into account changes in PaCO2 at a low FIO2, which tends to have a considerable effect on the ratio.
Age
The normal arterial oxygen tension decreases with age (see Table 45-1). The normal PaO2 at sea level and breathing room air is approximately 85 to 90 mm Hg at the age of 60 and 80 to 85 mm Hg at the age of 80 years.
The PaO2 is primarily used for assessment of oxygenation status, since PaO2 accurately assesses arterial oxygenation from 30 to 200 mm Hg, whereas SaO2 is normally a reliable predictor of PaO2 only in the range of 30 to 60 mm Hg. However, oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2) or by ABG analysis (SaO2) is a better indicator of arterial oxygen content than PaO2, since approximately 98% of oxygen is carried in blood combined with Hb. Hypoxemia is defined as a PaO2 of less than 80 mm Hg at sea level in an adult patient breathing room air; the concomitant decrease in cell/tissue oxygen tension is known as hypoxia (or tissue hypoxia). The degree of hypoxia in patients with hypoxemia depends on the severity of the hypoxemia and the ability of the cardiovascular system to compensate. Hypoxia is unlikely in mild hypoxemia (PaO2 = 60-79 mm Hg). Moderate hypoxemia (PaO2 = 45-59 mm Hg) may be associated with hypoxia in patients with anemia or cardiovascular dysfunction. Hypoxia is almost always (but with a few exceptions) associated with severe hypoxemia (PaO2 <45 mm Hg). However, it must be recognized that the human body has an extraordinary capacity to adapt to hypoxemia. Indeed, patients with cyanotic heart disease do not have evidence of tissue hypoxia at rest. Most remarkably, at the top of Mount Everest (29,028 ft; 253 torr) and without supplemental oxygen, experienced mountain climbers have been reported to have a mean PaO2 of between 24 and 28 mm Hg in the absence of tissue hypoxia.12,13
Acid-Base Balance
The history of assessing the acid-base equilibrium and associated disorders is intertwined with the evolution of the definition of an acid. In the 1950s, clinical chemists combined the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation and the Brønsted-Lowry definition of an acid to produce the current bicarbonate ion–centered approach to metabolic acid-base disorders.14 Stewart repackaged pre-1950 ideas of acid-base in the late 1970s, including the Van Slyke definition of an acid.15 Stewart also used laws of physical chemistry to produce a new acid-base approach.14 This approach, using the strong ion difference (SID) and the concentration of weak acids (particularly albumin), pushes bicarbonate into a minor role as an acid-base indicator rather than as an important mechanism:
As the SID approaches zero, anions “accumulate” and acidity increases. This approach provides a physicochemical model for “hyperchloremic acidosis” following 0.9% saline administration,21 and the systemic alkalosis of hypoalbuminemia (regarded as a weak acid).
Most clinicians use the bicarbonate ion–centered approach for the diagnosis and management of acid-base disorders; this approach is easier to understand and more practical. Furthermore, there are no clinical data to suggest that the Steward approach has any advantages over the classic (bicarbonate) approach.16 The Henderson-Hasselbalch equation describes the fixed interrelationship between PaCO2, pH, and HCO3− being described as pH = pKc log HCO3−/dissCO2. If all the constants are removed, the equation can be simplified to pH = HCO3−/PaCO2 (∼Kidney/Lung). The HCO3− is controlled mainly by the kidney and blood buffers. The lungs control the level of PaCO2 by regulating the level of volatile acid, carbonic acid, in the blood. Buffer systems can act within a fraction of a second to prevent excessive change in pH. The respiratory system takes about 1 to 15 minutes and kidneys many minutes to days to readjust H+ ion concentration.
The Anion Gap
Following the principle of electrochemical neutrality, total [cations] must equal total [anions], and so in considering the commonly measured cations and anions and subtracting them, a fixed number should be derived. The measured cations are in excess; mathematically this “gap” is filled with unmeasured anions ensuring electrochemical neutrality. There is never a “real” AG, in line with the law of electrochemical neutrality; it is rather an index of nonroutinely measured anions. The anion gap is calculated using the following formula17:
Critical illness is typically associated with a rapid fall in the plasma albumin concentration. Albumin is an important contributor of the “normal” AG. Therefore, as the albumin concentration falls, it tends to reduce the size of the AG, or have an alkalinizing effect. Various corrections are available; however, Figge’s AG correction (AGcorr) is most commonly used17: