SURGICAL CONSIDERATIONS
Description: TURP is one of the most common urologic operations, performed to relieve bladder outlet obstruction by an enlarging prostate gland. It is often preceded by cystoscopy, which is used to evaluate the size of the prostate gland and to rule out any other pathology, such as bladder tumor or stone. The operation is performed with the resectoscope, a specialized instrument having an electrode capable of transmitting both cutting and coagulating currents. Resectoscopes are either single inflow only or continuous flow with an inflow and outflow system. The latter allows the surgeon to maintain low pressure in the bladder and prostatic fossa and thus limit fluid absorption. Two different electrical options are available. The traditional resectoscope is a monopolar system, and this requires a grounding pad and possible interference with electric devices, such as pacemakers. Bipolar resectoscopes have both the active and return electrode fitted in the resectoscope and do not cause any electrical interference with cardiac electrical devices. In addition, the use of bipolar cautery allows saline to be used as an irrigant during surgery.
The resectoscope is introduced into the bladder (
Fig. 9-3), and the tissue protruding into the prostatic urethra is resected in small pieces called “chips.” Bleeding vessels are coagulated with the coagulating current. The resection is performed with continuous irrigation using an isotonic solution, such as sorbitol 2.7% with mannitol 0.54% in monopolar resectoscopes and normal saline in bipolar resectoscopes. After the obstructing prostatic tissues are completely resected and bleeding vessels coagulated, the chips are irrigated from the bladder and the resectoscope is removed. An indwelling Foley catheter is introduced into the bladder. The time of transurethral resection should not exceed 2 h because excessive absorption of the irrigating fluid may → dilutional hyponatremia, confusion, seizures, and heart failure. However, this is less of an issue with a continuous flow bipolar resectoscope where saline is used as an irrigant. Although fluid absorption can occur, hyponatremia does not occur with the use of saline. The size of the enlarged prostate or adenoma, therefore, needs to be carefully assessed preop to determine if it is possible to complete the resection within 2 h. If not, an
open prostatectomy is performed. This variant approach is discussed under Open Prostate Operations, p. 887.
Variant procedure or approaches: A number of techniques have been developed to avoid the morbidity of TURP. These are either vaporization (electrocautery or laser) or thermocoagulation of the prostate (laser, microwave, radiofrequency). The following techniques are available and approved:
TUVP: Transurethral vaporization of the prostate with a standard resectoscope using a roller ball electrode at 275-300 watts setting.
Laser Ablation: Laser coagulation of the prostate is done with Nd:YAG or Ho:YAG laser through a standard cystoscope. This procedure has been largely replaced by laser ablation with the KTP laser (PVP, green light laser) or diode laser. This wavelength allows vaporization of the prostate tissue with minimal blood loss. This is currently the most popular minimally invasive technique used for treatment of BPH. It can also be done on patients while on anticoagulation or with bleeding disorders. All personnel in the OR, including the patient, must wear protective glasses to protect the eyes from inadvertent exposure from a break in the laser fiber.
TUNA: Transurethral needle ablation of the prostate is done with a special disposable device connected to a radiofrequency generator.
TUMT: Transurethral microwave thermotherapy is done with a catheter that has a microwave antenna attached to it. A microwave generator is needed for this procedure.
All of the above have several advantages over TURP, including shorter surgical time, no blood loss, and reduced risk of fluid absorption and all can be done as outpatient procedures.
Usual preop diagnosis: Benign prostatic hypertrophy; prostate cancer
ANESTHETIC CONSIDERATIONS
PREOPERATIVE
Patients presenting for prostate surgery are generally elderly and may have preexisting medical problems, including CAD, CHF, PVD, cerebrovascular disease, COPD, and renal impairment. Preop evaluation should be directed toward the detection and treatment of these conditions before anesthesia.
INTRAOPERATIVE
Anesthetic technique: Regional or GA. Choice of technique depends on the coexisting disease and the patient’s preference. Regional anesthesia may hold some advantage over GA for TURP in that it allows evaluation of mental status and, thus, earlier detection of TURP syndrome. The incidence of postdural puncture headache is very low in this age group (< 1%). A T9 level is optimal. Continuous lumbar epidural anesthesia has no advantage over spinal anesthesia for TURP, because a sacral block may be less reliable, the procedure is relatively short and supplemental doses are usually not necessary.
Regional anesthesia:
General anesthesia:
POSTOPERATIVE
Suggested Readings
1. Hawary A, Mukhtar K, Sinclair A, Pearce I: Transurethral resection of the prostate syndrome: almost gone but not forgotten. J Endourol 2009; 23(12):2013-20.
2. Kavanagh LE, Jack GS, Lawrentschuk N: Medscape: prevention and management of TURP-related hemorrhage. Nat Rev Urol 2011; 8(9):504-14.
3. Smith RD, Patel A: Transurethral resection of the prostate revisited and updated. Curr Opin Urol 2011; 21(1):36-41.
4. Teng J, Zhang D, Li Y, et al: Photoselective vaporization with the green light laser vs transurethral resection of the prostate for treating benign prostate hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int 2013; 111(2):312-23.
5. van Rij S, Gilling PJ: In 2013, holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) may be the new ‘gold standard’. Curr Urol Rep 2012; 13(6):427-32.
6. Wang J, Zhang C, Tan G, Chen Q, Yang B, Tan D: Risk of bleeding complications after preoperative antiplatelet withdrawal versus continuing antiplatelet drugs during transurethral resection of the prostate and prostate puncture biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Int 2012; 89(4):433-8.