Soft Tissue Infections



INTRODUCTION





This chapter discusses soft tissue infections in adults; impetigo and other soft tissue infections in children are discussed in chapter 141, “Rashes in Infants and Children.”






ANATOMY AND DEFINITIONS





The skin consists of the superficial epidermis, dermis, and deeper subcutaneous tissues including fat (Figure 152-1). The lymphatics run parallel with the blood vessels (not shown in the figure). Cellulitis is an infection of the dermis and subcutaneous tissues of the skin. Cellulitis is divided clinically as purulent or nonpurulent, and management of the two types is different.1,2 Purulent cellulitis is cellulitis with an abscess, or cellulitis with drainage or exudate in the absence of a drainable abscess. Nonpurulent cellulitis has no purulent drainage or exudate and no associated abscess.1,2 Erysipelas traditionally has been defined as a more superficial skin infection involving the upper dermis with clear demarcation between involved and uninvolved skin with prominent lymphatic involvement. However, in many countries, the term erysipelas is considered synonymous with cellulitis.2 Folliculitis is an infection of the hair follicle, often purulent, but is superficial without involvement of the deeper tissues. Skin abscesses are collections of pus within the dermis and deeper skin tissues, potentially involving the subcutaneous tissues. Abscesses should be differentiated from simple cellulitis, because abscesses should be treated with incision and drainage.1 Furuncles (or boils) are single, deep nodules involving the hair follicle that are often suppurative.2 Carbuncles are formed by multiple interconnecting furuncles that drain through several openings in the skin.2 Necrotizing soft tissue infections are necrotizing infections involving any of the soft tissue layers including the dermis, subcutaneous tissues, fascia, and muscle.3




FIGURE 152-1.


Schematic diagram of the architecture of the skin. This diagram shows the anatomy of the skin, including the epidermis, dermis, and deeper subcutaneous tissues. Also shown are the blood vessels and a hair follicle. [Reproduced with permission from Wolff et al: Fitzpatrick’s Dermatology in General Medicine, 7th ed. © 2008, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York.]








CELLULITIS AND ERYSIPELAS





EPIDEMIOLOGY



Cellulitis accounts for approximately 1.3% of all ED visits. General risk factors for cellulitis are listed in Table 152-1.4,5 Risk factors for specific organisms causing cellulitis are listed in Table 152-2.1,4,6,7,8,9,10,11 Cellulitis is observed more frequently among middle-aged and elderly patients, whereas erysipelas is more common among children and elderly patients.12 Patient characteristics demonstrate a male predominance (61%) and a mean age of 46 years, and the vast majority of infections involve either the lower or upper extremities (48% and 41%, respectively). Approximately 10% of patients diagnosed with cellulitis are hospitalized, the majority of these patients are over age 64 years.




TABLE 152-1   General Risk Factors for Cellulitis and Erysipelas 




TABLE 152-2   Risk Factors for Specific Organisms Causing Cellulitis 



MICROBIOLOGY



Approximately 80% of cellulitis cases are caused by gram-positive bacteria. Community-acquired Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is now the most common cause of skin and soft tissue infections presenting to the ED,6,13 regardless of patient risk factors. The Infectious Diseases Society of America recommends differentiation of purulent from nonpurulent cellulitis (see detailed definitions above) for treatment decisions.1 MRSA is likely to be the causative agent in purulent cellulitis. For nonpurulent cellulitis, the role of MRSA is unknown, and empirical therapy for β-hemolytic streptococcal infection with β-lactams is recommended.1,14,15



Gram-negative aerobic bacilli are the third most common etiology. Other less common pathogens causing cellulitis are listed in Table 152-2 with associated risk factors.



Erysipelas is usually caused by β-hemolytic streptococci.12 Bullous erysipelas is a more severe form, and can represent synergy with beta-hemolytic streptococci and methicillin-resistant staphylococcal aureus.16



PATHOPHYSIOLOGY



Most symptoms of cellulitis are secondary to a complex set of immune and inflammatory reactions triggered by cells within the skin itself. Although bacterial invasion is what triggers the inflammation, the organisms are largely cleared from the site within the first 12 hours, and the infiltration of cells, such as Langerhans cells and keratinocytes, releases the cytokines interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor that enhance skin infiltration by lymphocytes and macrophages. The net effect is a rapid clearing of bacteria but with significant inflammatory response.



CLINICAL FEATURES



Cellulitis


In cellulitis, the affected skin is tender, warm, erythematous, and swollen, and typically does not exhibit a sharp demarcation from uninvolved skin. Edema can occur around hair follicles that leads to dimpling of the skin, creating an orange peel appearance referred to as “peau d’orange” (Figure 152-2). Symptoms develop gradually over a few days. Lymphangitis and lymphadenopathy are seen occasionally in previously healthy patients, but purely local inflammation is much more common. In cases of purulent cellulitis, exudate drains from the wound1; an abscess may or may not subsequently form. Systemic signs of fever, leukocytosis, and bacteremia are more typical in the immunosuppressed. Recurrent episodes of cellulitis can lead to impairment of lymphatic drainage, permanent swelling, dermal fibrosis, and epidermal thickening. These chronic changes are known as elephantiasis nostra and predispose patients to further attacks of cellulitis.




FIGURE 152-2.


Cellulitis of the right leg characterized by erythema and mild swelling. [Photo contributed by Lawrence B. Stack, MD. Reproduced with permission from Knoop K, Stack L, Storrow A, Thurman RJ: Atlas of Emergency Medicine, 3rd ed. © 2010, McGraw-Hill, New York.]





Erysipelas


In erysipelas, the onset of symptoms is usually abrupt, with fever, chills, malaise, and nausea representing the prodromal phase. Over the next 1 to 2 days, a small area of erythema with a burning sensation develops. As infection progresses, the affected skin becomes indurated with a raised border that is distinctly demarcated from the surrounding normal skin. The “peau d’orange” appearance is also common in erysipelas. A classic description is a “butterfly” pattern over the face (Figure 152-3). Complete involvement of the ear is the “Milian ear sign” and is a distinguishing feature of erysipelas because the ear does not contain deeper dermis tissue typically involved in cellulitis. Lymphatic inflammatory changes, known as toxic striations, and local lymphadenopathy are common. Purpura, bullae, and small areas of necrosis warrant a search for possible necrotizing soft tissue infection. On resolution of the infection, desquamation of the site often occurs.




FIGURE 152-3.


Butterfly rash of erysipelas. The sharp demarcation between the salmon-red erythema and the normal surrounding skin is evident. [Reproduced with permission from Shah BR, Lucchesi M: Atlas of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, © 2006, McGraw-Hill, New York.]





DIAGNOSIS



The diagnosis of cellulitis and erysipelas is clinical. Management should be guided by the clinical differentiation between purulent and nonpurulent soft tissue infections.1,2 Presence of an abscess defines the soft tissue infection as purulent; purulent cellulitis is defined as cellulitis with drainage or exudate in the absence of a drainable abscess.



Mild disease, for both purulent and nonpurulent forms of cellulitis, is distinguished by the absence of systemic symptoms. In cases of mild infection, blood cultures, needle aspiration, punch biopsy, leukocyte count, or other lab data are of little benefit and are not recommended.2 Needle aspiration of the leading edge of an area of cellulitis produces organisms in 15.7% of cultures (range, 0% to 40%), and punch biopsy reveals an organism only 18% to 26% of the time.14 Areas with abscess formation have significantly higher yields; wound culture is recommend when the decision has been made to place the patient on antibiotics for purulent cellulitis.2 Blood cultures are positive in only 5% of cases. For both purulent and nonpurulent cellulitis, in patients with systemic toxicity, extensive skin involvement, underlying comorbidities, immunodeficiency, immersion injuries, failed initial therapy, or recurrent episodes, or in circumstances such as animal bites, cultures of pus, bullae, or blood are recommended.2,17,18, Routine radiographic evaluation is unnecessary but should be considered if osteomyelitis (see chapter 281, “Hip and Knee Pain”) or necrotizing soft tissue infections are suspected (see section below). Table 152-3 lists differential diagnoses and characteristics that help distinguish cellulitis from the listed disorder.




TABLE 152-3   Differential Diagnosis of Cellulitis and Erysipelas 



Bedside US is useful to exclude occult abscess.19 Doppler studies may be indicated to distinguish lower extremity deep venous thrombosis from cellulitis. The most important diagnosis to exclude is necrotizing soft tissue infection (see section below).



TREATMENT



General Treatment


Treatment is elevation of the affected area, incision and drainage of any abscess found (see section below), antibiotics for cellulitis, and treatment of underlying conditions. Elevation helps drainage of edema. Treat skin dryness with topical agents because skin dryness and cracking further exacerbate symptoms. Treat predisposing conditions such as tinea pedis (see chapter 253, “Skin Disorders: Extremities”) and refer to primary care for treatment of lymphedema and chronic venous insufficiency.



Treatment for Purulent Cellulitis or Suspected Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus


See Table 152-4 for empiric antibiotic recommendations for purulent cellulitis or when MRSA is suspected.2 Identify and thoroughly drain an abscess. Bedside US will aid this procedure. Provide empiric therapy for MRSA for patients who have failed initial non-MRSA therapy, those with a previous history of or risks for MRSA, or those who live in an area with a high prevalence of community-associated MRSA infections.20 For patients with severe infection or systemic toxicity, consider necrotizing fasciitis (see later section on necrotizing fasciitis). It may be difficult to clinically distinguish MRSA cellulitis from methicillin-susceptible S. aureus cellulitis. Treatment failure rates are similar for both β-lactam antibiotics and MRSA-specific antibiotics such as trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.21,22




TABLE 152-4   Empiric Antibiotic Treatment of Purulent Cellulitis* and/or Soft Tissue Abscess 



Treatment of Nonpurulent Cellulitis/Erysipelas


Guidelines no longer differentiate the treatment of nonpurulent cellulitis from erysipelas.2 Oral antibiotics are sufficient for simple cellulitis or erysipelas in otherwise healthy adult patients. See Table 152-5 for guideline-recommended antibiotic options.2 Consider surgical consultation in patients with bullae, crepitus, pain out of proportion to examination, or rapidly progressive erythema with signs of systemic toxicity, because these signs and symptoms suggest necrotizing infection (see later section on necrotizing fasciitis).




TABLE 152-5   Empiric Treatment of Nonpurulent Cellulitis*/Erysipelas 



DISPOSITION AND FOLLOW-UP

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 13, 2016 | Posted by in EMERGENCY MEDICINE | Comments Off on Soft Tissue Infections

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access