Securing Funding for Simulation Centers and Research



Fig. 47.1
Word cloud from publications on clinical simulations by engineer



A978-1-4614-5993-4_47_Fig2_HTML.gif


Fig. 47.2
Word cloud from publications by clinicians on clinical simulation


The word clouds reveal a limited overlap between the concepts important to engineers and clinicians. This lack of common focus and vocabulary translates into limited interaction between the two communities even though a sustained exchange of ideas is necessary for development of effective, affordable solutions. A conclusion of the doctoral consortium was to encourage simulation centers to hire a part or full-time engineer to develop customized solutions. Such strategies are fundable as they generate true next-generation simulators which are both clinically applicable and affordable.

Using of the shelf Nintendo Wii®, our team of engineers and clinicians have developed several different simulators [15, 16]. These have been developed by a team of engineers working closely with clinicians and identifying needs of clinicians and finding technical affordable solutions. These were in some cases funded by grants through National Science Foundation and/or have been licensed for mass ­consumption by Simulab Corporation.

In conclusion, implementing these five strategies can greatly increase the chances of securing funding and ­improving current funding situations for existing centers. It leads to an accountable organization in terms of a measurable impact and leads to an organization that commits to a culture of innovation, which is central to the concept of simulation and its uses in the healthcare community.



Innovation Plan for Simulation Centers


To address the needs of a simulation center, it is strongly recommended that simulation programs develop an innovation plan. Innovation plans are based on the five dimensions that address the simulation barriers above. In a simulation center being developed in India, an innovation plan outlined four areas of focus. These four areas were identified by documenting needs of the organization and established multidisciplinary collaborations in that area. We present excerpts from the innovation plan below as an example of how to create such a plan. This innovation plan outlines the overall strategy for one simulation center. It is presented to be used as a template for organizations to plan their innovation strategy towards higher funding levels.


Sample Innovation Plan


There are four focus areas of advanced medical education and learning where technology can play an important role and address gaps in our training capacity.

The first focus area lies in delivering practical training and skills assessment to the healthcare workforce. Skills such as IV insertion, suturing wounds, central venous catheter placement, cardiac stent placement, endoscopy, advanced cardiac life support, basic life support, blood pressure taking, and ECG monitoring, to name a few, are the basis of modern-day medical practice. Practicing these skills requires significant amount of time and resources. In addition to these technical skills, many skills are actually nontechnical such as team skills that require a healthcare workforce to function efficiently as a team. Traditionally these skills are practiced on patients, which is an extremely unsafe and inefficient method of acquiring such skills. Fortunately technology has been developed that allows for practicing such skills over and over again in a safe environment. Technology also exists for providing skills training on rare skills and rare treatments that enable the healthcare workforce to be prepared for any eventualities including disaster management. There are also provisions in technology for quantitative evaluation of skills that allows for development of benchmarks of examination and allows for competency-based training. This is critical in ensuring high-quality healthcare to the masses. Such technology centered on the core idea of medical simulation has matured rapidly in the past few decades and has been shown to translate to marked significant improvement in clinical skills and quality of care [1, 3, 9, 1732]. Medical simulation refers to a suite of technologies available for healthcare professionals to practice skills in a variety of disciplines both individually and as a team. It is imperative to develop a coordinated approach to including simulation-based training in the medical education and training infrastructure.

Strategy: We will work with clinicians to identify low-hanging fruit in this area. We will also establish links with local and global engineering institutes to help realize the vision. Funds will be allocated for pilot projects in this domain, and the possible funding agencies will include Science Foundation (equivalent to NSF in USA). Clinicians may help point to direct impact on patient safety based on which institutes of Health (equivalent to NIH in USA) can be applied to. We will work with International Foundations by inviting them to visit the center and present to them skills relevant to their portfolio.

The second focus area lies in employing technology for remote education and monitoring. A key element of training the healthcare workforce is to contextualize the training to the sociotechnical condition of the environment. Traditionally this has been hard as such efforts require establishment of local infrastructure and local support system which is expensive. With the development of the information communication technology backbone, it is now possible to deliver didactic content and didactic training and examination remotely. The National Knowledge Network (http://​www.​nkn.​in/​) is an example of such efforts and displays an important example of leveraging ICT for education. In a similar vein we can deliver medical education and training remotely. There are however two additional opportunities that lie in further strengthening the mission of remote education and monitoring. The first lies in developing remote practice environments like the skills training systems described above so practical skills in addition to didactic material can be taught remotely. This is again possible with the technology of motion tracking, motion-based computing, and virtual reality. The second lies in using technology environments to create a personalized training module that is consistent with system practices of a region and its requirement. This can again be done through personalized content delivery and also by employing mobile units that deliver training through mobile systems.

Strategy: We will work with the telemedicine department to integrate our services with them. The content storage facilities of both the centers can be combined to achieve this goal.

The third focus area lies in delivering best practices design, implementation, and training. Best practices imbibed through guidelines, procedure checklists, and decision-making algorithms have become the corner stone of the quality drive in medical profession [33]. Training for best practices and implementing and designing best practices are however not trivial. Simple didactic training for best practices is not enough, and there is a need for a safe environment to practice implementation of best practices and adapting best practices to a particular sociotechnical system. There is also a need for a safe environment to design best practices. System-wide best practices and procedures can be designed and tested in a simulation environment, and such efforts have been shown to have a highly positive impact in improving clinical practice that is more significant than simply didactic training [34]. This is a golden opportunity for creating a culture of quality and safety in a system-wide sense.

Strategy: This is a high priority item. We will work with the quality department of our organization to identify metrics. Individual departments will be polled for impending rollout of best practices, and we will identify avenues where simulation can play a role. A joint committee would then be established for pursuing some best practice implementation. Funding can be obtained from Agency for Quality Research (equivalent to AHRQ in the USA). Funding for pilot project would be requested to our organization as it is a multidisciplinary effort.

The fourth focus area lies in practical training to ensure optimal use of equipment and resources for quality healthcare. An important part of training is to train usage of medical equipment, drug administration protocols, and optimal use of existing resources. Traditional training only serves as orientation training but does not allow for advanced usage. There are many features of equipment such as EKG monitors that are not used efficiently due to lack of training. Simulation environments allow interfacing medical simulators with equipment and provide the capability of designing training scenarios where equipment and resource usage can be taught.

Strategy: We will target equipment manufacturers and sales for this venture. Overall the vision would be to test medical devices in the simulation center. We will identify potential partners and work with them to showcase scenarios where the important points of the device are highlighted in practical use. Pilot funding will be obtained by industry collaboration. We will also keep the legal department in the loop for IP issues and transfer.

In order to develop viable solutions for these four focus areas, we need a comprehensive coordinated strategy to deliver skills education remotely and safely, allowing procedure standardization leading to best practices, objective measurement of skills and proficiency, and training for optimum usage of equipment and resources. With the availability of cheap computing infrastructure, readily available bandwidth, and growth of technologies such as medical simulation, virtual reality, movement analysis, computer graphics, persuasive technology, and mobile computing, it is possible to envision the future of advanced medical education that fully leverages the opportunities presented by these tools. There is a need to focus resources and develop these technologies for medical education and training for all levels of the healthcare workforce from senior physicians to paramedics. Such an effort will both lower the healthcare costs by decreasing medical errors and improving efficiency. We will develop a blueprint for 5 years for innovation.


Funding Sources and Strategies


Having discussed the core elements of a center pursuing funding and ways to prepare for this process, we now move onto a discussion of specific organizations funding simulation. Below we present several funding entities at the local, national, and international levels that have allocated resources towards simulation-based endeavors in the past.


Parent Institution


The core five ideas described above are the basis of securing funding from any source, including your parent institution. The success of the BannerHealth Phoenix (BHP) simulation center, one of the largest in the USA, has been due to tremendous support from the parent organization. This support was ultimately a result of a business plan that was in line with the needs of the organization. At BHP, our group developed an innovative educational program focused on the institution’s need for a more efficient onboarding process. Nurse onboarding is an expensive process of orientation of new nurses to a new hospital. A plan was developed where simulation, not the traditional senior nurse mentorship model, would be used as the main training for new nurses. In the program, the simulation center proposed a reduction of nurse onboarding time from 4 to 3 weeks. This reduction was based on the assumption that the program would help nurses more efficiently achieve technical and nontechnical skills benchmarks using simulation. The budget proposal also included funding to support research that would investigate the use of simulation to reduce onboarding times while promoting patient safety and satisfaction.

The reduction of training time from 4 to 3 weeks not only allowed the hospitals to reduce cost and time of nurse onboarding, but the training provided a solid foundation for new nurses to improve their performance and participate in best practices implementation. This plan was very successful for our group and can serve as a template for other institutions. In this instance, the plan was targeted towards valued needs of the organization. When the organizational leaders perceived a simulation-based program as having value, they were amenable to funding the program. The overall budget for building the simulation center was approximately 12 million dollars and the projected break even was 4 years.


The National Institutes of Health


The National Institutes of Health (NIH) are the foremost research entities in the world that focus on health, with an annual budget approaching 32 billion dollars (www.​nih.​gov). Within NIH, there are several institutes that focus on disease and organs like the National Cancer Institute and National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering. Unfortunately, a very small percentage of their funding is currently focused on simulation-driven initiatives. This could be attributed to several factors. A major factor however lies in the barriers presented earlier that prevent a direct link between patient safety and simulation. However, The National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences are two prime organizations that fund simulation centers. Further, simulation centers can also be part of training initiatives and infrastructure projects that the NIH supports. The key again is to prove a measurable impact on patient safety attributable to simulation.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 30, 2017 | Posted by in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Securing Funding for Simulation Centers and Research

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access