Predictive Models of Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation and Difficult Weaning


Authors

Subjects

Candidate predictors

Time point candidate predictors assessed

Outcome to be predicted

Variables independently associated with outcome

Prediction accuracy measures

Sapijaszko et al.

145 med/surg,

≥3 days on ventilation

Age, APACHE II, fluid balance, albumin, diagnosis category

First ICU day

Number of days on ventilation

Diagnosis category
 
Estenssoro et al.

189 med/surg, intubated in ICU

Age, gender, diagnosis category, APACHE II, SAPS II, McCabe score, TISS, shock

First ICU day

>21 days

Shock
 
Troche et al.

195 derivation, 128 validation, surgical ICU

Age, BMI, emergent admission, emergent intubation, days admission-intubation, Altemeier group, diagnosis category, SAPS, GCS, SS, LIS, OSFI, albumin

First ICU day and intubation day

>14 days

Emergent intubation, LIS on intubation day

Emergent intubation + LIS ≥1:

Se 0.88,

Sp 0.28, PPV 0.24, NPV 0.91

Clark et al.

99 medical ICU

Demographic, anthropometrics, vital signs, arterial blood gases, hematology, chemistry, APACHE II, APS, intubation in ICU

Intubation day

≥14 days

Intubation in the ICU, heart rate > 100/min, BUN > 25 mg/dl, creatinine > 2 mg/dl, pH < 7.25 and HCO3 < 20 mEq/l

4 criteria met:

Se 0.16,

Sp 1,

PPV 1,

NPV 0.72, AUC 0.75

Sennef et al.

5,915 intubated on first ICU day, from 42 ICUs

Operative status, location and day prior to ICU, diagnosis category, APS, TISS, APACHE III and its individual physiology variables, age, comorbidities, hospital type, chronic lung disease

First ICU day

Number of days on ventilation

Diagnosis category, APS, age, chronic lung disease, albumin, PaO2/FIO2, respiratory rate, hospital type, disease physiology, location and days prior to ICU.

Predictive equation:

R2 0.18 in individual patients

Papuzinski et al.

142 general ICU

Age, vital signs, comorbidities, APACHE II, TISS, diagnosis category, hematology, chemistry, CRP

Not reported

≥7 days

Age, hypernatremia, COPD, PaO2/FiO2 < 200

Predictive model:

AUC 0.81

Añon et al.

1,289 derivation,

372 validation, from 13 ICUs

APACHE II, SOFA, location prior to ICU, NIV failure, comorbidities, Barthel index, vasopressors, diagnosis category

Intubation day

≥7 days

Not reported

Predictive model:

AUC 0.64 vs death +

<7 days

AUC 0.74 vs alive +

<7 days


ICU intensive care unit, APACHE Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation, SAPS Simplified Acute Physiology Score, TISS Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System, GCS Glasgow Coma Scale, SS sepsis score, LIS lung injury score, OSFI number of organ system failures, APS Acute Physiology Score, CRP C-reactive protein, BUN blood urea nitrogen, NIV noninvasive ventilation, COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Se sensitivity, Sp specificity, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value, AUC area under the receiver operating characteristics curve



Other studies have identified factors associated with duration of ventilation, then applied them as predictive criteria and analyzed their classic predictive performance characteristics. With this methodology, Troche et al. [7] reported that the Lung Injury Score may have high negative predictive value for surgical patients to need prolonged ventilation. In a study limited to a surgical ICU population, they followed 195 patients and analyzed multiple candidate variables including diagnosis leading to mechanical ventilation and severity of illness scores assessed at the time of admission and intubation. Only the need for emergent intubation and the Lung Injury Score were independently associated with duration of ventilation > 14 days. In their subsequent validation cohort of 128 patients requiring emergent intubation, a Lung Injury Score ≥1 predicted >14 days of ventilation with sensitivity of 0.88, specificity of 0.28, positive predictive value of 0.24, and negative predictive value of 0.91. In contrast, Clark et al. [8] found a high positive predictive value to require prolonged ventilation for medical patients when four of their predictive criteria were met. In their retrospective study of 99 medical ICU patients, excluding those dying before day 14, 27 common clinical and laboratory variables (diagnosis not included) were collected from the day of intubation. By multivariate analysis, intubation in the ICU, heart rate >100/min, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) > 25 mg/dl, creatinine> 2 mg/dl, pH < 7.25, and HCO3 < 20 mEq/l were each associated with a duration of ventilation ≥14 days. A predictive model consisting of the number (0–4) of these criteria met, applied to the same derivation sample, resulted on sensitivity of 0.16, specificity of 1, positive predictive value of 1, and negative predictive value of 0.72 when four criteria were met. Lower numbers of criteria met resulted in progressively higher sensitivity and lower specificities. The area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve for this model was 0.75.

The largest study reported to date suggested that both diagnosis category and the degree of physiologic derangement could be important predictors [9]. This study not only aimed to identify predictive factors but also to use them to develop an equation to predict the precise duration of mechanical ventilation. In this retrospective analysis of the APACHE III database prospectively collected from 40 hospitals’ ICUs, 5,915 patients who were on mechanical ventilation on their first ICU day had many variables extracted from that day. The total duration on the ventilator was precisely measured for patients spending ≤ 7 days on the ventilator, while it was estimated for patients with longer durations. Of 11 variables that were found to be independently associated with mechanical ventilation duration, the primary reason for ICU admission (selected from the 78 APACHE III disease categories) and the Acute Physiology Score (a component of the APACHE III score) accounted for most of the relative contributions to this association. An equation to predict precise duration on mechanical ventilation was then developed by the authors. In internal cross-validation, this equation was shown to be accurate (R2 0.94) to predict average duration in patient groups classified by illness severity, but inaccurate (R2 0.18) in individual patients.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Oct 12, 2016 | Posted by in CRITICAL CARE | Comments Off on Predictive Models of Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation and Difficult Weaning

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access