Key Points
- ▪
The brain has a high metabolic rate and receives approximately 12% to 15% of cardiac output. Under normal circumstances, cerebral blood flow (CBF) is approximately 50 mL/100 g/min. Gray matter receives 80% and white matter receives 20% of this blood flow.
- ▪
Approximately 60% of the brain’s energy consumption supports electrophysiologic function. The remainder of the energy consumed by the brain is involved in cellular homeostatic activities.
- ▪
CBF is tightly coupled to local cerebral metabolism, a process called neurovascular coupling. When cerebral activity in a particular region of the brain increases, a corresponding increase in blood flow to that region takes place. Conversely, suppression of cerebral metabolism leads to a reduction in blood flow.
- ▪
CBF is autoregulated and remains constant over a mean arterial pressure (MAP) range estimated at 65 to 150 mm Hg, given normal venous pressure. CBF becomes pressure passive when MAP is either less than the lower limit or more than the upper limit of autoregulation. The lower and upper limits, as well as the range and slope of the plateau, manifest significant variability between individuals.
- ▪
CBF is also under chemical regulation. CBF varies directly with arterial carbon dioxide tension (Pa co 2 ) in the range of 25 to 70 mm Hg. When arterial partial pressure of oxygen (Pa o 2 ) decreases to less than 60 mm Hg, CBF increases dramatically. Reductions in body temperature influence CBF primarily by the suppression of cerebral metabolism.
- ▪
Systemic vasodilators (e.g., nitroglycerin, nitroprusside, hydralazine, and calcium channel blockers) vasodilate the cerebral circulation and can, depending on the MAP, increase CBF. Vasopressors such as phenylephrine, norepinephrine, ephedrine, and dopamine do not have appreciable direct effects on the cerebral circulation. Their effect on CBF is via their effect on arterial blood pressure. When the MAP is less than the lower limit of autoregulation, vasopressors increase the MAP and thereby increase CBF. If the MAP is within the limits of autoregulation, then vasopressor-induced increases in systemic pressure have little effect on CBF.
- ▪
All volatile anesthetics suppress cerebral metabolic rate (CMR) and, with the exception of halothane, can produce burst suppression of the electroencephalogram. At that level, the CMR is reduced by approximately 60%. Volatile anesthetics have dose-dependent effects on CBF. In doses less than the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC), CBF is modestly decreased. In doses larger than 1 MAC, direct cerebral vasodilation results in an increase in CBF and cerebral blood volume (CBV).
- ▪
Barbiturates, etomidate, and propofol decrease the CMR and can produce burst suppression of the electroencephalogram. At that level, the CMR is reduced by approximately 60%. Because neurovascular coupling is preserved, CBF is decreased. Opiates and benzodiazepines effect minor decreases in CBF and CMR. In contrast, ketamine can increase CBF significantly, in association with a modest increase in CMR.
- ▪
Brain stores of oxygen and substrates are limited, and the brain is extremely sensitive to decreases in CBF. Severe decreases in CBF (<6-10 mL/100 g/min) lead to rapid neuronal death. Ischemic injury is characterized by early excitotoxicity and delayed apoptosis.
- ▪
Barbiturates, propofol, ketamine, volatile anesthetics, and xenon have neuroprotective efficacy and can reduce ischemic cerebral injury in experimental models. This anesthetic neuroprotection is sustained only when the severity of the ischemic insult is mild; with moderate-to-severe injury, long-term neuroprotection is not achieved. The neuroprotective efficacy of anesthetics in humans is limited. Administration of etomidate can decrease regional blood flow, which can exacerbate ischemic brain injury.
This chapter reviews the effects of anesthetic drugs and techniques on cerebral physiology—in particular, their effects on cerebral blood flow (CBF) and metabolism. The final section presents a brief discussion of pathophysiologic states, including cerebral ischemia and cerebral protection. Attention is directed to the rationale for selection and appropriate use of the anesthetic agents for neuroanesthetic management. Chapter 57 presents the clinical management of these patients in detail. Neurologic monitoring, including the effects of anesthetics on the electroencephalogram (EEG) and evoked responses, is reviewed in Chapter 39 .
The Anatomy of the Cerebral Circulation
The arterial blood supply to the brain is composed of paired right and left internal carotid arteries, which give rise to the anterior circulation, and paired right and left vertebral arteries, which give rise to the posterior circulation. The connection of the two vertebral arteries forms the basilar artery. The internal carotid arteries and the basilar artery connect to form a vascular loop called the circle of Willis at the base of the brain that permits collateral circulation between both the right and left and the anterior and posterior perfusing arteries. Three paired arteries that originate from the circle of Willis perfuse the brain: anterior, middle, and posterior cerebral arteries. The posterior communicating arteries and the anterior communicating artery complete the loop. The anterior and the posterior circulations contribute equally to the circle of Willis.
Under normal circumstances, blood from the anterior and posterior circulations does not admix because the pressures in the two systems are equal. Similarly, side-to-side admixing of blood across the circle is limited. The vessels that originate from the circle provide blood flow to well-delineated regions of the brain. However, in pathologic circumstances during which occlusion of one of the arterial branches occurs, the circle of Willis can provide anterior-posterior or side-to-side collateralization to deliver flow to the region of the brain with reduced perfusion.
A complete circle of Willis is shown in Fig. 11.1 A . However, substantial variability exists in the anatomy of the circle of Willis, and a significant proportion of individuals may have an incomplete circular loop. The variations in the circle and their prevalence are shown in Fig. 11.1 B .
Three sets of veins drain blood from the brain. The superficial cortical veins are within the pia mater on the brain’s surface. Deep cortical veins drain the deeper structures of the brain. These veins drain into dural sinuses, of which the superior and inferior sagittal sinuses and the straight, transverse and sigmoid sinuses are the major dural sinuses. These ultimately drain into the right and left internal jugular veins.A schematic representation of the cerebral venous circulation is shown in Fig. 11.1 C .
There is considerable asymmetry in the blood flow between the right and left internal jugular veins. In approximately 65% of patients, flow in the right IJV is greater than in the left; in the remainder, the left IJV is dominant. The pattern of venous drainage may have implications for insertion of jugular venous catheters for the measurement of jugular venous oxygen saturation (SjVO 2 ). To ensure accurate measurement of SjVO 2 , it has been advocated that the catheter be inserted into the dominant jugular vein. In most patients, the right IJV will be the dominant vein.
Cerebrospinal Fluid Formation and Circulation
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is produced primarily by the choroid plexus in the lateral, third, and fourth ventricles; there are small contributions from the endothelial cells and from fluid that is produced as a consequence of metabolic activity. CSF production is the result of hydrostatic efflux from capillaries into the perivascular space, and then active transport into the ventricles. CSF reabsorption occurs primarily via the arachnoid granulations present in the dural sinuses. A smaller proportion of CSF, which tracks along cranial and peripheral nerves, perivascular routes, and along white matter tracts, gains access to the cerebral venous system by transependymal flow. The total CSF space is approximately 150 mL and total daily CSF production averages 450 mL. Therefore, there is a substantial daily turnover of CSF. CSF production is also under the influence of the circadian rhythm, with the peak production of CSF occurring during sleep.
Recently, the concept of the glymphatic pathway as a means by which waste products are removed from the brain has been advanced. Conceptually, the glymphatic pathway can be visualized as a system akin to the lymphatic system in the systemic circulation (note, however, that the brain does not contain lymphatics other than those present in the meninges). Functionally, CSF enters the periarterial space, a space that is bounded by the vessels and the end-feet of astrocytes. Aquaporin channels on the end-feet facilitate this water exchange. From the periarterial space, CSF is transported to the brain parenchyma, and from there to the perivenous space and on to the ventricles. As such, the glymphatic system serves as a waste disposal system. Of considerable interest is the observation that the periarterial space increases significantly during sleep and during general anesthesia; hence, glymphatic transport and waste clearance is increased during these states. Among anesthetic agents, glymphatic transport is reduced by volatile agents but is less affected by dexmedetomidine.
Regulation of Cerebral Blood Flow
Anesthetic drugs cause dose-related and reversible alterations in many aspects of cerebral physiology, including CBF, cerebral metabolic rate (CMR), and electrophysiologic function (EEG, evoked responses). The effects of anesthetic drugs and techniques have the potential to adversely affect the diseased brain and are thus of clinical importance in patients with neurosurgical disease. Conversely, the effects of general anesthesia on CBF and CMR can be altered to improve both the surgical course and the clinical outcome of patients with neurologic disorders.
The adult human brain weighs approximately 1350 g and therefore represents approximately 2% of total body weight. However, it receives 12% to 15% of cardiac output. This high flow rate is a reflection of the brain’s high metabolic rate. At rest, the brain consumes oxygen at an average rate of approximately 3.5 mL of oxygen per 100 g of brain tissue per minute. Whole-brain oxygen consumption (50 mL/min) represents approximately 20% of total body oxygen utilization. Normal values for CBF, CMR, and other physiologic variables are provided in Box 11.1 .
CBF | |
Global | 45-55 mL/100 g/min |
Cortical (mostly gray matter) | 75-80 mL/100 g/min |
Subcortical (mostly white matter) | 8-20 mL/100 g/min |
CMRO 2 | 3-3.5 mL/100 g/min |
CVR | 1.5-2.1 mm Hg/100 g/min/mL |
Cerebral venous P o 2 | 32-44 mm Hg |
Cerebral venous S o 2 | 55%-70% |
rSO2 | 55%-80% |
SjV o 2 | 60%-70% |
ICP (supine) | 8-12 mm Hg |
Approximately 60% of the brain’s energy consumption supports electrophysiologic function. The depolarization-repolarization activity that occurs, reflected in the EEG, requires expenditure of energy for the maintenance and restoration of ionic gradients and for the synthesis, transport, release, and reuptake of neurotransmitters. The remainder of the energy consumed by the brain is involved in cellular homeostatic activities ( Fig. 11.2 ). Local CBF and CMR within the brain are very heterogeneous, and both are approximately four times greater in gray matter than in white matter. The cell population of the brain is also heterogeneous in its oxygen requirements. Glial cells make up approximately one half of the brain’s volume and require less energy than neurons. Besides providing a physically supportive latticework for the brain, glial cells are important in the reuptake of neurotransmitters, in the delivery and removal of metabolic substrates and wastes, and in blood-brain barrier (BBB) function.
Given the limited local storage of energy substrate, the brain’s substantial demand for substrate must be met by adequate delivery of oxygen and glucose. However, the space constraints imposed by the noncompliant cranium and meninges require that blood flow not be excessive. Not surprisingly, elaborate mechanisms regulate CBF. These mechanisms, which include myogenic, chemical, and autonomic neural factors, are listed in Table 11.1 .
Factor | Comment |
---|---|
Chemical, Metabolic, Humoral | |
CMR | CMR influence assumes intact flow-metabolism coupling, the mechanism of which is not fully understood. |
Anesthetics | |
Temperature | |
Arousal; seizures | |
Paco 2 | |
Pao 2 | |
Cardiac output | |
Vasoactive drugs | |
Anesthetics | |
Vasodilators | |
Vasopressors | |
Myogenic | |
Autoregulation; MAP | The autoregulation mechanism is fragile; in many pathologic states, CBF is regionally pressure passive. |
Rheologic | |
Blood viscosity | |
Neurogenic | |
Extracranial sympathetic and parasympathetic pathways | Contribution and clinical significance are poorly defined. |
Intraaxial pathways |
Myogenic Regulation (Autoregulation) of Cerebral Blood Flow
The conventional view of autoregulation is that the cerebral circulation adjusts its resistance to maintain CBF relatively constant over a wide range of mean arterial pressure (MAP) values. In normal human subjects, CBF is autoregulated between 70 mm Hg (lower limit of autoregulation, LLA) and 150 mm Hg (upper limit of autoregulation, ULA) ( Fig. 11.3 ). There is, however, considerable variation between subjects in the autoregulation limits. Cerebral perfusion pressure is the difference between the MAP and the intracranial pressure (ICP). Because ICP is not usually measured in normal subjects, cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP = MAP − ICP) is rarely available. Assuming a normal ICP of 5 to 10 mm Hg in a supine subject, an LLA of 70 mm Hg expressed as MAP corresponds to a LLA of approximately 60 to 65 mm Hg expressed as CPP. Above and below the autoregulatory plateau, CBF is pressure-dependent (pressure-passive) and linearly varies with CPP. Autoregulation is influenced by the time course over which the changes in CPP occur. Even within the range over which autoregulation normally occurs, a rapid change in arterial pressure will result in a transient (i.e., 3-4 minute) alteration in CBF.
The limits of autoregulation and the autoregulatory plateau are conceptual frameworks for the purpose of analysis. They do not represent physiologic “all-or-none” responses. There is considerable variability in the LLA and ULA as well as in the limits of the plateau (see the section on “An Integrated Contemporary View of Cerebral Autoregulation”).
The precise mechanisms by which autoregulation is accomplished and its overlap with neurovascular coupling are not known. According to the myogenic hypothesis, changes in CPP lead to direct changes in the tone of vascular smooth muscle; this process appears to be passive. Nitric oxide (NO) and calcium channels may participate in the vasodilation associated with hypotension.
Chemical Regulation of Cerebral Blood Flow
Several factors, including changes in CMR, arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (Pa co 2 ), and arterial partial pressure of oxygen (Pa o 2) cause alterations in the cerebral biochemical environment that result in adjustments in CBF.
Cerebral Metabolic Rate
Regional CBF and metabolism are tightly coupled. They involve a complex physiologic process regulated, not by a single mechanism, but by a combination of metabolic, glial, neural, and vascular factors. Increased neuronal activity results in increased local brain metabolism, and this increase in the CMR is associated with a proportional change in CBF referred to as neurovascular coupling . The traditional view of neurovascular coupling is that it is a positive feedback mechanism wherein increased neuronal activity results in a demand for energy; this demand is met by an increase in CBF. More recent data indicate that coupling is based on a feed-forward mechanism wherein neuronal activity directly increases CBF, thereby increasing energy supply. Although the precise mechanisms that mediate neurovascular coupling have not been defined, the data available implicate local by-products of metabolism (e.g., potassium ion [K + ], hydrogen ion [H + ], lactate, adenosine, and adenosine triphosphate [ATP]). Increased synaptic activity with the attendant release of glutamate leads to the downstream generation of a variety of mediators that affect vascular tone ( Fig. 11.4 ). Glutamate, released with increased neuronal activity, results in the synthesis and release of NO, a potent cerebral vasodilator that plays an important role in neurovascular coupling. Glia also play an important role in neurovascular coupling. Their processes make contact with neurons, and these processes may serve as conduits for the coupling of increased neuronal activity to increases in blood flow. Glutamate activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluR) in astrocytes leads to arachidonic acid (AA) metabolism and the subsequent generation of prostaglandins and epoxyeicosatrienoic acids. Oxygen modulates the relative contribution of these pathways, and in the setting of reduced oxygen tension at the tissue level, the release of adenosine can contribute to vascular dilation. The net result therefore on vascular tone is determined by the relative contribution of multiple signaling pathways. In addition, nerves that innervate cerebral vessels release peptide neurotransmitters such as vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), substance P, cholecystokinin, somatostatin, and calcitonin gene–related peptide. These neurotransmitters may also potentially be involved in neurovascular coupling.
CMR is influenced by several phenomena in the neurosurgical environment, including the functional state of the nervous system, anesthetic drugs, and temperature.
Functional state
CMR decreases during sleep and increases during sensory stimulation, mental tasks, or arousal of any cause. During epileptic activity, increases in the CMR may be extreme, whereas regionally, after brain injury and globally with coma, the CMR may be substantially reduced.
Anesthetic drugs
The effect of individual anesthetic drugs on the CMR is presented in greater detail in the second section of this chapter. In general, anesthetic drugs suppress the CMR, with the exception of ketamine and nitrous oxide (N 2 O). The component of the CMR on which they act is electrophysiologic function. With several anesthetics, including barbiturates, isoflurane, sevoflurane, desflurane, propofol, and etomidate, increasing plasma concentrations cause progressive suppression of EEG activity and a concomitant reduction in the CMR. However, increasing the plasma level beyond what is required to first achieve suppression of the EEG results in no further depression of the CMR. The component of the CMR required for the maintenance of cellular integrity, the “housekeeping” component, is unaltered by anesthetic drugs (see Fig. 11.2 ).
When the complete suppression of EEG is achieved, the cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO 2 ) is similar irrespective of the anesthetic agent used to achieve EEG suppression. Yet anesthetic-induced EEG suppression is not a single physiologic state and is influenced by the drug used to produce suppression. When barbiturates are administered to the point of EEG suppression, a uniform depression in the CBF and CMR occurs throughout the brain. When suppression occurs during the administration of isoflurane and sevoflurane, the relative reductions in the CMR and CBF are more intense in the neocortex than in other portions of the cerebrum. Electrophysiologic responsiveness also varies. Cortical somatosensory evoked responses to median nerve stimulation can be readily recorded at doses of thiopental far in excess of those required to cause complete suppression of the EEG but are difficult to elicit at concentrations of isoflurane associated with a burst-suppression pattern (∼1.5 minimum alveolar concentration [MAC]). In addition, the EEG characteristics of the burst-suppression states that occur just before complete suppression differ among anesthetic drugs. These differences may be of some relevance to discussions of differences in the neuroprotective potential of drugs that can produce EEG suppression.
Temperature
The effects of hypothermia on the brain have been reviewed in detail. The CMR decreases by 6% to 7% per degree Celsius of temperature reduction. In addition to anesthetic drugs, hypothermia can also cause complete suppression of the EEG (at approximately 18°C-20°C). However, in contrast to anesthetic drugs, temperature reduction beyond that at which EEG suppression first occurs does produce a further decrease in the CMR ( Fig. 11.5 ). This decrease occurs because anesthetic drugs reduce only the component of the CMR associated with neuronal function, whereas hypothermia decreases the rate of energy utilization associated with both electrophysiologic function and the basal component related to the maintenance of cellular integrity. Mild hypothermia preferentially suppresses the basal component of the CMR. The CMRO 2 at 18°C is less than 10% of normothermic control values, which may explain the brain’s tolerance for moderate periods of circulatory arrest at these and colder temperatures.
Hyperthermia has an opposite influence on cerebral physiologic function. Between 37°C and 42°C, CBF and CMR increase. However, above 42°C, a dramatic reduction in cerebral oxygen consumption occurs, an indication of a threshold for a toxic effect of hyperthermia that may occur as a result of protein (enzyme) denaturation.
PaCO 2
CBF varies directly with Pa co 2 ( Fig. 11.6 A ), especially within the range of physiologic variation of Pa co 2 . CBF changes 1 to 2 mL/100 g/min for each 1 mm Hg change in Pa co 2 around normal Pa co 2 values. This response is attenuated at a Pa co 2 less than 25 mm Hg. Under normal circumstances, the sensitivity of CBF to changes in Pa co 2 (ΔCBF/ΔPa co 2 ) is positively correlated with resting levels of CBF. Accordingly, anesthetic drugs that alter resting CBF cause changes in the response of the cerebral circulation to CO 2 . The magnitude of the reduction in CBF caused by hypocapnia is more intense when resting CBF is increased (as might occur during anesthesia with volatile agents). Conversely, when resting CBF is reduced, the magnitude of the hypocapnia-induced reduction in CBF is decreased slightly. It should be noted that CO 2 responsiveness has been observed in normal brain during anesthesia with all the anesthetic drugs that have been studied.
The role of MAP in the CO 2 responsiveness of the cerebral circulation is further highlighted by the impact of modest and severe hypotension. With the former, the increase in CBF attendant upon hypercarbia is significantly reduced, whereas hypocapnia-induced vasoconstriction is only modestly affected. When hypotension is severe, a cerebrovascular response to changes in Pa co 2 is not observed ( Fig. 11.6 A ). The level of Pa co 2 also modulates cerebral autoregulation. With hypercarbia, cerebral autoregulatory response to hypertension is attenuated. By contrast, with the induction of hypocapnia, CBF is autoregulated over a wider MAP range ( Fig 11.6 B ).
The changes in CBF caused by Pa co 2 are dependent on pH alterations in the extracellular fluid of the brain. NO, in particular NO of neuronal origin, is an important although not exclusive mediator of CO 2 -induced vasodilation. The vasodilatory response to hypercapnia is also mediated in part by prostaglandins. The changes in extracellular pH and CBF rapidly occur after Pa co 2 adjustments because CO 2 freely diffuses across the cerebrovascular endothelium and the BBB. In contrast with respiratory acidosis, acute systemic metabolic acidosis has little immediate effect on CBF because the BBB excludes H + from the perivascular space. The CBF changes in response to alterations in Pa co 2 rapidly occur, but they are not sustained. Despite the maintenance of an increased arterial pH, CBF returns toward normal over a period of 6 to 8 hours because the pH of CSF gradually returns to normal levels as a result of extrusion of bicarbonate (see Fig. 57.6). Consequently, a patient who has had a sustained period of hyperventilation or hypoventilation deserves special consideration. Acute restoration of a normal Pa co 2 value will result in a significant CSF acidosis (after hypocapnia) or alkalosis (after hypercapnia). The former results in increased CBF with a concomitant increase in ICP that depends on the prevailing intracranial compliance. The latter conveys a theoretic risk for ischemia.
PaO 2
Changes in Pa o 2 from 60 to more than 300 mm Hg have little influence on CBF. A reduction in Pa o 2 below 60 mm Hg rapidly increases CBF ( Fig. 11.7 A ). Below a Pa o 2 of 60 mm Hg, there is a rapid reduction in oxyhemoglobin saturation. The relationship between oxyhemoglobin saturation, as evaluated by pulse oximetry, and CBF is inversely linear (see Fig. 11.7 B ). The mechanisms mediating cerebral vasodilation during hypoxia may include neurogenic effects initiated by peripheral and neuraxial chemoreceptors, as well as local humoral influences. A reduction in arterial oxygen content, and therefore cerebral oxygen delivery, can be achieved either by a reduction in Pa o 2 (hypoxemic hypoxia) or by a reduction in hemoglobin concentration (anemia, hemodilution). Both hemodilution and hypoxemic hypoxia lead to cerebral vasodilation and an increase in CBF. Of the two variables, however, hypoxemic hypoxia is a far more potent variable in CBF augmentation than hemodilution. Cerebral oxygen delivery is better maintained during hypoxia when arterial content is equivalently reduced by hypoxia or hemodilution (see Fig. 11.7 C ). Deoxyhemoglobin plays a central role in hypoxia-induced increases in CBF by causing the release of NO and its metabolites, as well as ATP. Hypoxia-induced opening of ATP-dependent K + channels in vascular smooth muscle leads to hyperpolarization and vasodilation. The rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM) serves as an oxygen sensor within the brain. Stimulation of the RVM by hypoxia results in an increase in CBF (but not CMR), and lesions of the RVLM suppress the magnitude of the CBF response to hypoxia. The response to hypoxia is synergistic with the hyperemia produced by hypercapnia and acidosis. At high Pa o 2 values, CBF modestly decreases. At 1 atmosphere of oxygen, CBF is reduced by approximately 12%.
Neurogenic Regulation of Cerebral Blood Flow
The cerebral vasculature is extensively innervated. The density of innervation declines with vessel size, and the greatest neurogenic influence appears to be exerted on larger cerebral arteries. This innervation includes cholinergic (parasympathetic and nonparasympathetic), adrenergic (sympathetic and nonsympathetic), serotoninergic, and VIPergic systems of extraaxial and intraaxial origin. An extracranial sympathetic influence via the superior cervical ganglion, as well as parasympathetic innervation via the sphenopalatine ganglion, certainly exists in animals. The intraaxial pathways likely result from innervation arising from several nuclei, including the locus coeruleus, the fastigial nucleus, the dorsal raphe nucleus, and the basal magnocellular nucleus of Meynert. Evidence of the functional significance of neurogenic influences has been derived from studies of CBF autoregulation and ischemic injury. Hemorrhagic shock, a state of high sympathetic tone, results in less CBF at a given MAP than occurs when hypotension is produced with sympatholytic drugs. During shock, a sympathetically mediated vasoconstrictive effect shifts the lower end of the autoregulatory curve to the right. It is not clear what the relative contributions of humoral and neural mechanisms are to this phenomenon; however, a neurogenic component certainly exists because sympathetic denervation increases CBF during hemorrhagic shock. Moreover, sympathetic denervation produced by a blockade of the stellate ganglion can increase CBF in humans. Activation of cerebral sympathetic innervation also shifts the ULA to the right and offers some protection against hypertension-induced increases in CBF (which can in certain circumstances lead to a breakdown of the BBB). Experimental interventions that alter these neurogenic control pathways influence outcome after standardized ischemic insults, presumably by influences on vascular tone and therefore CBF. The nature and influence of such pathways in humans are not known, and their manipulation for the purposes of clinical management remains to be systematically investigated.
Effects of Blood Viscosity on Cerebral Blood Flow
Blood viscosity can influence CBF. Hematocrit is the single most important determinant of blood viscosity. In healthy humans, variation of the hematocrit within the normal range (33%-45%) probably results in only modest alterations in CBF. Beyond this range, changes are more substantial. In anemia, cerebral vascular resistance is reduced and CBF increases. However, this may result not only from a reduction in viscosity but also as a compensatory response to reduced oxygen delivery. Although arterial oxygen content can be reduced by both hypoxia and by hemodilution, the increase in CBF that accompanies hypoxia is of a greater magnitude than that by hemodilution induced reduction in oxygen delivery. The effect of a reduction in viscosity on CBF is more important with focal cerebral ischemia, a condition in which vasodilation in response to impaired oxygen delivery is probably already maximal. In this situation, reducing viscosity by hemodilution increases CBF in the ischemic territory. In patients with focal cerebral ischemia, a hematocrit of 30% to 34% will result in optimal delivery of oxygen. However, manipulation of viscosity in patients with acute ischemic stroke is not of benefit in reducing the extent of cerebral injury. Therefore, viscosity is not a target of manipulation in patients at risk as a result of cerebral ischemia, with the possible exception of those with hematocrit values higher than 55%.
Cardiac Output
The conventional view of cerebral hemodynamics is that perfusion pressure (MAP or CPP) is the primary determinant of CBF and that the influence of cardiac output is limited. More recent data suggest that cardiac output impacts cerebral perfusion. In several investigations in which central blood volume was modulated, either reduced by application of lower body negative pressure, or increased by the infusion of fluid, a linear relationship between cardiac output and CBF, as measured as middle cerebral artery flow velocity (MCAfv) by transcranial Doppler, was clearly demonstrated. An analysis of the pooled data from these investigations indicates that a reduction in cardiac output of approximately 30% leads to a decrease in CBF by about 10%. In patients undergoing hip arthroplasty under hypotensive epidural anesthesia, the administration of epinephrine led to a maintenance of CBF even though the MAP was below the LLA. Presumably, this maintenance of CBF was due to an epinephrine-induced increase in cardiac output. An association between CO and CBF has also been observed in acute stroke, subarachnoid hemorrhage-induced vasospasm, and sepsis. However, the CO–CBF relationship has not been demonstrated uniformly; in fact, augmentation of CO does not increase CBF in several disease states, including traumatic head injury, neurologic surgery, and cardiac surgery. Collectively, the available data suggest that CO does influence CBF and that this effect may be of particular relevance in situations in which circulating volume is reduced and in shock states.
An Integrated Contemporary View of Cerebral Autoregulation
The conventional view of cerebral autoregulation is that CBF is held constant as MAP increases between the lower limit and ULA. The currently available data, however, indicate that this view is now outmoded and is in need of revision. As discussed previously, CBF and the cerebral vasculature are influenced by a variety of variables. Clearly, MAP (perfusion pressure) is a major determinant of CBF. Cardiac output is increasingly being recognized as an important determinant of CBF. Cardiac output in turn is dependent on adequate circulatory volume, cardiac preload, contractility, afterload, and heart rate and rhythm. The presence of cardiovascular disease, in particular congestive heart failure, will limit the capacity of autoregulatory mechanisms to maintain CBF in response to hypotension. Arterial blood gas tensions affect vasomotor tone, and both hypercarbia and hypoxia attenuate autoregulation. The contribution of the sympathetic nervous system is of importance in the cerebrovascular response to hypertension. At the same time, sympathetic nerves reduce the vasodilatory capacity of the cerebral vessels during hypotension. A variety of medications can impact autoregulation, either through modulation of sympathetic nervous system activity (β-antagonists, α 2 -agonists) or by direct reduction of vasomotor tone (calcium channel antagonists, nitrates, angiotensin receptor blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitors). Anesthetics modulate autoregulation by a number of means, including suppression of metabolism, alteration of neurovascular coupling to a higher flow–metabolism ratio, suppression of autonomic neural activity, and by direct effect on cerebral vasomotor tone, and alteration of cardiac function and systemic circulatory tone.
Cerebrovascular tone and CBF are therefore under the control of a complex regulatory system ( Fig. 11.8 ). Given the multitude of factors that determine the capacity of the cerebral circulation to respond to changes in perfusion pressure, the premise that cerebral autoregulation is static is now untenable. Rather, cerebral autoregulation should be viewed as a dynamic process and that the morphologic form of the autoregulatory curve is the result of the integration of all the variables that affect cerebrovascular tone in an interdependent manner. Therefore, a continuum of vascular responsiveness in both the lower and upper limits and in the plateau probably exists as the ability of the cerebrovascular bed to dilate or constrict is exhausted. In a review of the available data from investigations in humans, the range of pressures that defined the LLA spanned from 33 mm Hg to as high as 108 mm Hg. In healthy humans subjected to lower body negative pressure to reduce central blood volume and to reduce blood pressure, the autoregulatory plateau spanned a range of only 10 mm Hg (± 5 mm Hg from baseline) as opposed to a range of 100 mm Hg in the once conventional representations of autoregulation. Above and below this narrow plateau, CBF was pressure passive. Even within this narrow plateau, a modest increase in CBF with increases in blood pressure is observable—that is, the plateau is not flat. The slope of the percentage change in MAP to percentage change in CBF relationship has been demonstrated to be 0.81 ± 0.77 with induction of hypotension and 0.21 ± 0.47 with the induction of hypertension. These data are consistent with the premise that the capacity of the cerebral circulation to adapt to increases in blood pressure is considerably greater than adaptation to hypotension. Based on these more recent observations, the conventional view of autoregulation is probably not applicable to most subjects, and a revision of the framework of cerebral circulatory control along the lines of recent data is needed. In this respect, it is the view of the authors that cerebral autoregulation should be accurately represented by a family of autoregulatory curves rather than a single static curve (see Fig. 11.8 ). In these dynamic autoregulatory curves, there is considerable heterogeneity in the LLA and ULA, as well as in the limits and slope of the plateau.
Clinical implications : Maintenance of cerebral perfusion is essential, and identification of a target range of MAP in individual patients is a key part of anesthetic management. Given the substantial variability in cerebral autoregulatory capacity, it may be difficult to identify the target range based on an LLA in most patients. Selection of the target range based on the baseline pressure, after due consideration of comorbid conditions that may impact cerebrovascular and cardiovascular performance, may be preferable. In attempts to maintain adequate perfusion pressure, the traditional approach of systemic vasoconstriction, for example with α 1 -agonists, is reasonable. However, the adequate maintenance of circulatory volume and of cardiac output should also be considered; administration of agents that can also increase cardiac output may be of value. This may be of particular relevance in patients with compromised cardiac function.
Vasoactive Drugs
Many drugs with intrinsic vascular effects are used in contemporary anesthetic practice, including both anesthetic drugs and numerous vasoactive drugs specifically used for hemodynamic manipulation. This section deals with the latter. The actions of anesthetics are discussed in the “Effects of Anesthetics on Cerebral Blood Flow and Cerebral Metabolic Rate” section.
Systemic Vasodilators
Most drugs used to induce hypotension, including sodium nitroprusside, nitroglycerin, hydralazine, adenosine, and calcium channel blockers (CCBs), also cause cerebral vasodilation. As a result, CBF either increases or is maintained at pre-hypotensive levels. In addition, when hypotension is induced with a cerebral vasodilator, CBF is maintained at lower MAP values than when induced by either hemorrhage or a noncerebral vasodilator. In contrast to direct vasodilators, the ACE inhibitor enalapril does not have any significant effect on CBF. Anesthetics that simultaneously vasodilate the cerebral circulation cause increases in cerebral blood volume (CBV) with the potential to increase ICP. The effects of these anesthetics on ICP are less dramatic when hypotension is slowly induced, which probably reflects the more effective interplay of compensatory mechanisms (i.e., shifts in CSF and venous blood) when changes occur more slowly.
Catecholamine Agonists and Antagonists
Numerous drugs with agonist and antagonist activity at catecholamine receptors (α 1 , α 2 , β 1 , β 2 , and dopamine) are in common use. The effects of these vasoactive drugs on cerebral physiology are dependent on basal arterial blood pressure, the magnitude of the drug-induced arterial blood pressure changes, the status of the autoregulation mechanism, and the status of the BBB. A drug may have direct effects on cerebral vascular smooth muscle or indirect effects mediated by the cerebral autoregulatory response to changes in systemic blood pressure (or both types of effects). When autoregulation is preserved, increases in systemic pressure should increase CBF if basal blood pressure is outside the limits of autoregulation. When basal pressure is within the normal autoregulatory range, an increase in systemic arterial pressure does not significantly affect CBF because the normal autoregulatory response to a rising MAP entails cerebral vasoconstriction (i.e., an increase in cerebral vascular resistance) to maintain a constant CBF. When autoregulation is defective, CBF will vary in direct relation to arterial pressure. The information in the following paragraphs and in Table 11.2 emphasizes data obtained from investigations of vasopressors in intact preparations, and gives priority to the results obtained in humans and higher primates.
Agonist | Cerebral Blood Flow | Cerebral Metabolic Rate |
---|---|---|
Pure | ||
α 1 | 0/− | 0 |
α 2 | − | − |
β | + | + |
β (BBB open) | +++ | +++ |
Dopamine | ++ | 0 |
Dopamine (high dose) | − | ?0 |
Fenoldopam | − | ?0 |
Mixed | ||
Norepinephrine | 0/− | 0/+ |
Norepinephrine (BBB open) | + | + |
Epinephrine | + | + |
Epinephrine (BBB open) | +++ | +++ |
α 1 -Agonists
Will the administration of α 1 -agonists (phenylephrine, norepinephrine) reduce CBF?
Studies in humans and nonhuman primates do not confirm this concern. Intracarotid infusions of norepinephrine in doses that significantly increase the MAP result in no change in CBF. Norepinephrine can increase CBF, but such increases might occur if autoregulation were defective or its limit exceeded. β-Mimetic drugs (norepinephrine has β 1 activity) may cause activation of cerebral metabolism with a coupled increase in CBF. This effect is more apparent when these drugs can gain greater access to the brain parenchyma via a defective BBB (see Table 11.2 ). Administration of phenylephrine to patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass does not decrease CBF. In spinal cord–injured patients with relative hypotension, the administration of the α 1 -agonist midodrine increased perfusion pressure and increased flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) and the posterior cerebral artery. In healthy patients, and in those undergoing surgery in the beach chair position, the administration of phenylephrine maintains or augments MCAfv. Collectively, these data suggest that norepinephrine and phenylephrine maintain cerebral perfusion.
The traditional view that CBF can be maintained by the administration of α 1 -agonists without any adverse effect on cerebral oxygenation has been challenged. In anesthetized patients, phenylephrine administration by bolus modestly reduced regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO 2 ), measured by near-infrared oximetry. Ephedrine, although increasing arterial blood pressure to a similar extent as phenylephrine, did not reduce rSO 2 , presumably because of its ability to maintain cardiac output. In human volunteers, a norepinephrine-induced increase in arterial blood pressure slightly reduced MCAfv and cerebral oxygen saturation (S co 2 ) and SjV o 2 . By contrast, although phenylephrine decreased rSO 2 , MCAfv was increased and SjV o 2 was unchanged. These data have led to the question of whether phenylephrine and norepinephrine administration negatively impact cerebral oxygenation. Several factors argue against this possibility. The first concern is methodology. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) measures oxygenated and deoxygenated blood in a defined region of brain and is a composite of arterial, capillary, and venous blood. Vasopressors affect both arterial and venous tone. Even a minor change in the volume of arterial and venous volumes within the region of the brain can affect the rSO 2 measurement. Moreover, extracranial contamination is a significant component of the rSO 2 values reported by the currently available NIRS monitors. This contamination is more important than the slight reduction in S co 2 observed in these investigations. In the absence of direct measurement of brain tissue oxygenation, a modest reduction in S co 2 in the face of increasing arterial blood pressure cannot be taken as evidence of impairment of cerebral oxygenation. In addition, phenylephrine did not decrease SjV o 2 , a more global measurement of cerebral oxygenation. Although norepinephrine decreased SjV o 2 by approximately 3% (a mild reduction at best), its administration has been previously shown to increase the CMRO 2 . Finally, the minor reduction in rSO 2 effected by phenylephrine is no longer apparent when an increase in the CMRO 2 is concurrent. Phenylephrine apparently does not prevent an increase in CBF when such an increase is warranted by increased brain metabolism.
These studies were conducted in patients with a normal central nervous system (CNS). Although unlikely, the concern is that α 1 -agonists might reduce cerebral perfusion in the injured brain. In patients with a head injury, the administration of phenylephrine increased CPP and did not reduce regional CBF. Transient changes may occur in CBF and rSO 2 (on the order of 2-5 minutes) in response to bolus doses of phenylephrine; however, with a continuous infusion, α 1 -agonists have little direct influence on CBF and cerebral oxygenation in humans. Thus maintenance of CPP with these vasopressors does not have an adverse effect on the brain.
α 2 -Agonists
α 2 -Agonists have both analgesic and sedative effects. This class of drugs includes dexmedetomidine and clonidine, with the latter being a significantly less specific and less potent α 2 -agonist. Two investigations in human volunteers have confirmed the ability of dexmedetomidine to decrease CBF. Dexmedetomidine dose-dependently decreased MCAfv, with the maximum reduction being approximately 25%. Dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg loading dose and infusion at either 0.2 or 0.6 μg/kg/hr) decreased CBF by approximately 30% in healthy human volunteers. In both these investigations, the CMR was not measured; whether the reduction in CBF was due to a direct vasoconstrictor activity of dexmedetomidine or to suppression of the CMR with a corresponding reduction in CBF is not clear. In a more recent study of dexmedetomidine during which both MCAfv and the CMR were measured in healthy humans, dexmedetomidine decreased MCAfv in parallel with a reduction in the CMR. Similarly, in healthy patients and those with traumatic brain injury undergoing sedation with dexmedetomidine, the reduction in CBF was matched by a parallel reduction in CMR. Thus the effects of dexmedetomidine on CBF were primarily mediated by its ability to suppress the CMR; the reduction in CBF is commensurate with the reduction in CMR, and there is no evidence that dexmedetomidine causes cerebral ischemia. However, the well-known effect of dexmedetomidine in decreasing arterial blood pressure merits careful consideration if used in patients who are critically dependent on collateral perfusion pressure, especially in the recovery phase of an anesthetic.
β-Agonists
β-receptor agonists, in small doses, have little direct effect on the cerebral vasculature. In larger doses and in association with physiologic stress, they can cause an increase in the CMR with an accompanying increase in CBF. The β 1 -receptor is probably the mediator of these effects. In doses that do not result in substantial changes in the MAP, intracarotid epinephrine does not change CBF in nonanesthetized humans. However, with larger doses that lead to an increase in the MAP, both CBF and CMRO 2 can increase by approximately 20%. A recent investigation has demonstrated that the administration of epinephrine in patients undergoing surgery under hypotensive epidural anesthesia can increase MCAfv, presumably by augmenting cardiac output (as discussed previously).
Dobutamine can increase CBF and CMR by 20% and 30%, respectively. Dobutamine can increase CBF independent of its effect on blood pressure; the increase in CBF has been attributed to the augmentation of cardiac output by dobutamine.
Evidence suggests that a defect in the BBB enhances the effect of β-agonists. Intracarotid norepinephrine, which does not normally affect CBF and CMR, increases CBF and CMR when BBB permeability is increased with hypertonic drugs. Epinephrine caused an elevation in the CMRO 2 , but only when the BBB was made permeable. These observations beg the interpretation that β-agonists will increase CBF and CMR only when the BBB is injured. However, when epinephrine was given in doses that did not significantly increase the MAP, increases in CBF and CMR occurred. Accordingly, BBB injury may exaggerate but is not a necessary condition in humans for the occurrence of β-mediated increases in CBF and CMR.
β-Blockers
β-Adrenergic blockers either reduce or have no effect on CBF and CMR. In two investigations in humans, propranolol, 5 mg intravenously, and labetalol, 0.75 mg/kg intravenously, had no effect on CBF and cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV), respectively. Modest reductions in CBF occur after the administration of labetalol to patients undergoing craniotomy who become hypertensive during emergence from anesthesia. Esmolol shortens seizures induced by electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), which suggests that esmolol does cross the normal BBB. Catecholamine levels at the time of β-blocker administration or the status of the BBB (or both) may influence the effect of these drugs. β-Adrenergic blockers are unlikely to have adverse effects on patients with intracranial pathology, other than effects secondary to changes in perfusion pressure.
Dopaminergic agents
Dopamine can be used for the treatment of hemodynamic dysfunction. It also augments the function of the normal cardiovascular system when an increase in the MAP is desired as an adjunct to the treatment of focal cerebral ischemia, especially in the setting of vasospasm. Nonetheless, its effects on CBF and CMR have not been defined with certainty. The likely predominant effect of dopamine in the normal cerebral vasculature, when administered in small doses, is probably slight vasodilation with a minimal change in the CMR. Increased CMR in discrete regions of the brain, such as the choroid plexus and basal ganglia, can occur. However, overall cortical blood flow is not influenced. Vasoconstriction of the cerebral circulation is not observed even when dopamine is administered in doses of up to 100 μg/kg/min. Fenoldopam is a dopamine agonist with activity at the DA 1 -receptor and α 2 -receptor. The administration of fenoldopam leads to systemic vasodilation and a decrease in arterial blood pressure. In humans, fenoldopam decreased systemic blood pressure to a level that was above the LLA; however, a modest (≈15%) reduction was observed in CBF that did not increase to normal levels when systemic blood pressure was supported. The reason for the reduction of CBF is not clear.
Calcium channel blockers
CCBs are frequently used to treat acute hypertension in the neurologically injured patient population. Cerebral vessels are richly endowed with calcium channels, in particular the L-type calcium channel. CCBs therefore induce vasodilation of the pial and cerebral arteries. In healthy humans, intravenous administration of nimodipine does not change CBF; however, when the slight decrease in MAP and changes in Pa co 2 are taken into consideration, CBF increased by approximately 5% to 10%. CMR and CO 2 reactivity are maintained. Nimodipine in human subjects does, however, blunt autoregulation moderately. Intraarterial nimodipine for the treatment of cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage increased regional CBF significantly provided MAP was maintained, indicating that nimodipine is a cerebral vasodilator.
Nicardipine is perhaps the most commonly used CCB for perioperative blood pressure control because of its short half-life and easy titratability. Nicardipine is a modest cerebral vasodilator and has repeatedly been shown to increase CBF or CBFV while reducing systemic MAP. Cerebral CO 2 reactivity appears to be well preserved in the presence of nicardipine.
Clevidipine is a third generation dihydropyridine CCB that has an ultrashort half-life because it undergoes rapid esterase-mediated metabolism. Its use in both the cardiac and neurologic patient populations has increased significantly given its rapid titratability. In healthy volunteers, clevidipine did not increase MCAfv. However, a substantial reduction in MAP of approximately 25% occurred. The lack of increase in MCAfv in the face of hypotension suggests that clevidipine is a cerebral vasodilator and, like nicardipine, probably attenuates autoregulation to a moderate extent. CO 2 reactivity is preserved.
The available data indicate that CCBs are moderate cerebral vasodilators. Their net impact on CBF is therefore dependent on the extent of systemic vasodilation and MAP. When MAP is maintained, increases in CBF should be expected.
Angiotensin II, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, and Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists
There has been a renaissance of the use of angiotensin II (AII) for the treatment of vasodilatory shock that is refractory to conventional vasopressor agents. In these shock states, AII increased MAP and reduced the need for other vasopressors including norepinephrine and vasopressin. The acute effect of AII on the cerebral circulation has received only modest attention. Acute administration of AII increases cerebral microvascular constriction without affecting CBF; this effect precedes its impact on blood pressure. However, AII attenuates regional hyperemia that occurs with an increase in regional metabolism, thereby adversely impacting neurovascular coupling. Given that CBF is maintained in the face of increased blood pressure, autoregulation and CO 2 responsivity appear to be maintained.
Both ACE inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) are commonly used to treat hypertension. In the surgical setting and in the neurocritical care unit, these drugs are administered to control arterial blood pressure acutely. ACE inhibitors and ARBs reduce arterial blood pressure when hypertension is present. However, they do not affect resting CBF, and autoregulation is maintained. However, acute administration of ACE inhibitors and ARBs decreases the LLA (left shift of the autoregulatory curve in experimental animals); the significance of this finding in humans is not clear. In patients with acute stroke, ACE inhibitors and ARBs reduce arterial blood pressure but do not acutely affect CBF. Apparently, these drugs do not reduce CBF when arterial blood pressure is modestly decreased.
Age
The loss of neurons is progressive in the normally aging brain from young adulthood to advanced age. There is approximately 10% neuronal loss in healthy aged brain. The loss of myelinated fibers results in reduced white matter volume. By contrast, the loss of synapses in the aged brain is considerably greater. The majority of excitatory synapses in the brain are on dendritic spines. Dendrite branching and volume decrease progressively, and the number of dendritic spines is reduced by approximately 25% to 35%. Concomitant with the loss of neuropil, both CBF and CMRO 2 decrease by 15% to 20% at the age of 80 years. Cerebral circulatory responsiveness to changes in Pa co 2 and to hypoxia are slightly reduced in the healthy aged brain.
Effects of Anesthetics on Cerebral Blood Flow and Cerebral Metabolic Rate
This section discusses the effects of anesthetic drugs on CBF and CMR. It includes limited mention of the influences on autoregulation, CO 2 responsiveness, and CBV. Effects on CSF dynamics, the BBB, and epileptogenesis are discussed later in the chapter.
In the practice of neuroanesthesia, the manner in which anesthetic drugs and techniques influence CBF receives prime attention. The rationale is twofold. First, the delivery of energy substrates is dependent on CBF, and modest alterations in CBF can influence neuronal outcome substantially in the setting of ischemia. Second, control and manipulation of CBF are central to the management of ICP because as CBF varies in response to vasoconstrictor-vasodilator influences, CBV varies with it. With respect to ICP, CBV is the more critical variable. In the normal brain, CBV is approximately 5 mL/100 g of brain, and over a Pa co 2 range of approximately 25 to 70 mm Hg, CBV changes by approximately 0.049 mL/100 g for each 1 mm Hg change in Pa co 2 . In an adult brain weighing approximately 1400 g, this change can amount to 20 mL in total CBV for a Pa co 2 range of 25 to 55 mm Hg. Because CBV is more difficult to measure than CBF few data exist, especially in humans.
Although CBV and CBF usually vary in parallel, the magnitude of change in CBV is less than the magnitude of change in CBF ( Fig. 11.9 ). In addition, CBV and CBF vary independently under some circumstances. During cerebral ischemia, for example, CBV increases, whereas CBF is reduced significantly. Autoregulation normally serves to prevent MAP-related increases in CBV. In fact, as the cerebral circulation constricts to maintain a constant CBF in the face of an increasing MAP, CBV actually decreases. When autoregulation is impaired or its upper limit (≈150 mm Hg) is exceeded, CBF and CBV then increase in parallel as arterial blood pressure increases (see Fig. 11.8 ). A decreasing MAP results in a progressive increase in CBV as the cerebral circulation dilates to maintain constant flow, and exaggerated increases in CBV occur as the MAP decreases to less than the LLA. In normal subjects, the initial increases in CBV do not increase ICP because there is latitude for compensatory adjustments by other intracranial compartments (e.g., translocation of venous blood and CSF to extracerebral vessels and the spinal CSF space, respectively). When intracranial compliance ∗
∗ Note a well-entrenched misuse of terminology. 64 The “compliance” curve that is commonly drawn to describe the ICP-volume relationship (see Fig. 57-3) actually depicts the relationship ?P/?V (elastance) and not ?V/?P (compliance). References to “reduced compliance” in this text would more correctly be rendered as “increased elastance.” However, because the existing literature most commonly uses the “compliance” terminology, the authors have left the misuse uncorrected herein.
is reduced, an increase in CBV can cause herniation or sufficiently reduce CPP to cause ischemia.Intravenous Anesthetic Drugs
The action of most intravenous anesthetics leads to parallel reductions in CMR and CBF. Ketamine, which causes an increase in the CMR and CBF, is the exception. The effects of selected intravenous anesthetic drugs on human CBF are compared in Fig. 11.10 . ,
Intravenous anesthetics maintain neurovascular coupling, and consequently changes in CBF induced by intravenous anesthetics are largely the result of the effects on the CMR with parallel (coupled) changes in CBF. Intravenous anesthetics have direct effects on vascular tone. Barbiturates, for example, cause relaxation of isolated cerebral vessels in vitro. However, in vivo , barbiturates suppress CMR, and the net effect at the point of EEG suppression is vasoconstriction and a substantial decrease in CBF. In general, autoregulation and CO 2 responsiveness are preserved during the administration of intravenous anesthetic drugs.
Barbiturates
A dose-dependent reduction in CBF and CMR occurs with barbiturates. With the onset of anesthesia, both CBF and CMRO 2 are reduced by approximately 30%. When large doses of thiopental cause complete EEG suppression, CBF and CMR are reduced by approximately 50% to 60%. Further increases in the barbiturate dose have no additional effect on the CMR. These observations suggest that the major effect of nontoxic doses of depressant anesthetics is a reduction in the component of cerebral metabolism that is linked to electrical brain function (e.g., neurophysiologic activity) with only minimal effects on the second component, which is related to cellular homeostasis (see Fig. 11.2 ).
Tolerance to the CBF and CMR effects of barbiturates may quickly develop. In patients with severe head injury in whom barbiturate coma was maintained for 72 hours, the blood concentration of thiamylal required to maintain EEG burst suppression was observed to be increased by the end of the first 24 hours and continued to increase over the next 48 hours. During deep pentobarbital anesthesia, autoregulation and CO 2 responsiveness are maintained.
Propofol
The effects of propofol (2,6-diisopropylphenol) on CBF and CMR are similar to those of barbiturates. Both CBF and CMR decrease after the administration of propofol in humans. In healthy volunteers, surgical levels of propofol reduced regional CBF by 53% to 79% in comparison with the awake state. Cerebral glucose metabolism in volunteers was evaluated by positron-emission tomography (PET) before and during infusion of propofol to the point of unresponsiveness, and resulted in a decrease of the whole-brain metabolic rate of 48% to 58%, with limited regional heterogeneity. When compared with isoflurane-fentanyl or sevoflurane-fentanyl anesthesia, a combination of propofol and fentanyl decreased subdural pressure in patients with intracranial tumors and decreased the arteriovenous oxygen content difference (AVDO 2 ). Collectively, these investigations in human subjects indicate that propofol effects reductions in the CMR and secondarily decreases CBF, CBV, and ICP.
Both CO 2 responsiveness and autoregulation are preserved in humans during the administration of propofol, even when administered in doses that produce burst suppression of the EEG. The magnitude of the reduction in CBF during hypocapnia is decreased during propofol administration. This effect is probably due to the cerebral vasoconstriction induced by suppression of CMR, which limits further hypocapnia-mediated vasoconstriction.
Etomidate
The effects of etomidate on CBF and CMR are also similar to those of barbiturates. Roughly parallel reductions in CBF and CMR occur in humans, and in general, they are accompanied by progressive suppression of the EEG. Induction of anesthesia with either thiopental or etomidate resulted in a similar reduction in MCAfv by approximately 27%. The changes in CBF and CMR are substantial. Etomidate, 0.2 mg/kg, reduced CBF and CMR by 34% and 45%, respectively, in adults. As is the case with barbiturates, no further reduction in the CMR occurs when additional drug is administered beyond a dose sufficient to produce EEG suppression. Although this latter phenomenon has not been demonstrated in humans, etomidate has been demonstrated to reduce ICP only when EEG activity is well preserved; etomidate is ineffective in reducing ICP when EEG activity is suppressed in head injured patients. The global CMR suppression attainable with etomidate is slightly less profound than that achieved with isoflurane and barbiturates. This finding is consistent with the observation that unlike barbiturates, which cause CMR suppression throughout the brain, the CMR suppression caused by etomidate is regionally variable and occurs predominantly in forebrain structures.
Etomidate is effective in reducing ICP without causing a reduction in CPP in patients with intracranial tumors and patients with head injuries. However, the administration of etomidate resulted in an exacerbation of brain tissue hypoxia and acidosis in patients in whom the MCA was temporarily occluded during surgery. Additional concerns regarding the occurrence of adrenocortical suppression caused by enzyme inhibition and renal injury caused by the propylene glycol vehicle will probably preclude more than episodic use.
Reactivity to CO 2 is preserved in humans during the administration of etomidate. Autoregulation has not been evaluated. Myoclonus and epileptogenesis are discussed in the section, “Epileptogenesis.”
Narcotics
Inconsistencies can be found in the available information, but narcotics likely have relatively little effect on CBF and CMR in the normal, unstimulated nervous system. When changes do occur, the general pattern is one of modest reductions in both CBF and CMR. The inconsistencies in the literature may largely arise because the control states entailed paralysis and nominal sedation in many studies, often with N 2 O alone. In these studies, in which substantial reductions in CBF and CMR were frequently observed, the effect of the narcotic was probably a combination of the inherent effect of the drug plus a substantial component attributable to reduction of arousal. Comparable effects related to reduction of arousal may occur and can be clinically important. However, they should be viewed as nonspecific effects of sedation or pain control, or both, rather than specific properties of narcotics. The following discussion emphasizes investigations in which control measurements were unlikely to have been significantly influenced by arousal phenomena.
Morphine
When morphine (∼1 mg/kg) was administered as the sole drug to humans, no effect on global CBF and a 41% decrease in the CMRO 2 were observed. The latter is a substantial reduction, and the absence of a simultaneous adjustment in CBF is surprising. No other investigations of morphine have been conducted in humans alone. Administration of morphine (1 mg/kg and 3 mg/kg) with 70% N 2 O to patients did not significantly change CBF or CMR. The N 2 O that was used might be expected to have caused a tendency toward increases in CBF. The relative absence of net changes in these variables from awake control measurements suggests a small-to-moderate depressive effect of morphine on CBF and CMR at this large dose. However, morphine can cause a substantial release of histamine in individual patients. Histamine is a cerebral vasodilator that will cause an increase in CBV and a CBF effect that will vary, depending on the systemic blood pressure response.
Autoregulation was observed to be intact between MAP values of 60 and 120 mm Hg in human volunteers anesthetized with a combination of morphine, 2 mg/kg, and 70% N 2 O.
Fentanyl
Fentanyl, in a dose range of 12 to 30 (mean, 16) μg/kg, in combination with 50% N 2 O, reduced CBF and CMR modestly, by 21% and 26%, respectively, in comparison to the awake control state. The data for fentanyl-N 2 O presented in Fig. 11.10 are derived from these patients. In combination with 0.4 mg/kg of diazepam, high dose fentanyl (100 μg/kg) led to a reduction of CBF by 25%, although part of this effect may well have been a result of benzodiazepine (see later discussion in the section, “Benzodiazepine”) rather than fentanyl per se . In sedative doses of 1.5 μg/kg, fentanyl increased CBF in the frontal, temporal, and cerebellar areas simultaneous with decreases in discrete areas associated with pain-related processing. CO 2 responsiveness and autoregulation are unaffected, and the hyperemic CBF response to hypoxia remains intact.
In conclusion, fentanyl will cause a moderate global reduction in CBF and CMR in the normal quiescent brain and will, similar to morphine, cause larger reductions when administered during arousal.
Alfentanil
Administration of alfentanil, 320 μg/kg, to pentobarbital-anesthetized dogs did not affect CBF, CMR, CO 2 responsiveness, autoregulation, or CBF response to hypoxia. No studies of the effects of alfentanil on the CMR in humans have been conducted. In patients in whom anesthesia was induced with thiopental, administration of 25 to 50 μg/kg of alfentanil transiently decreased MCAfv, indicating a slight reduction in CBF. By contrast, no change in MCAfv was observed in response to 25 to 50 μg/kg of alfentanil given to patients during the maintenance of anesthesia with isoflurane-N 2 O. An evaluation of the surgical field in patients undergoing craniotomy to whom alfentanil was administered did not reveal any adverse events.
In general, alfentanil does not significantly impact the cerebral circulation, provided that alfentanil induced reduction in MAP is prevented.
Sufentanil
Studies in humans indicate that sufentanil causes, depending on the dose, either no change or a modest reduction in CBF and CMR. Induction of anesthesia with 10 μg/kg of sufentanil resulted in a 29% reduction in CBF and a 22% reduction in CMRO 2 . In healthy human volunteers, 0.5 μg/kg of sufentanil does not affect CBF. Sufentanil, at doses of 1.0 and 2.0 μg/kg, decreases MCAfv in head injured patients with increased ICP.
A logical conclusion is that no change and no reduction in ICP occur as a result of the administration of either sufentanil or alfentanil. However, in some investigations in humans, sufentanil was associated with modest increases in ICP. The increases in ICP associated with sufentanil are likely the consequence, in part, of a normal autoregulatory response to the sudden reduction in MAP that can occur as a consequence of sufentanil administration. Therefore sufentanil and fentanyl should be administered in a manner that does not produce a sudden reduction of MAP. Such a decrease will reduce CPP and may increase ICP, each of which, in sufficient extreme, may be deleterious. However, ICP increases attributed to sufentanil are small. Furthermore, conditions in the surgical field, including pressure under brain retractors and the state of brain relaxation, revealed no adverse influences attributable to sufentanil. Accordingly, sufentanil need not be viewed as contraindicated in any way, although its effect on MAP should be followed closely.
Remifentanil
Investigations of moderate doses of remifentanil in patients have revealed effects similar to those of other synthetic narcotics (with the exception of its substantially shorter duration of action). In patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial space-occupying lesions, 1 μg/kg of remifentanil caused no change in ICP. In a second investigation in patients undergoing craniotomies, approximately 0.35 μg/kg/min of remifentanil resulted in CBF values comparable to those observed with moderately deep anesthesia with either isoflurane-N 2 O or fentanyl-N 2 O, and CO 2 responsiveness was preserved. Greater doses of remifentanil may have more substantial effects. MCAfv decreased by 30% in response to 5 μg/kg, followed by 3 μg/kg/min of remifentanil at a constant MAP in patients being anesthetized for bypass surgery. However, a lower dose of 2 μg/kg, followed by an infusion of 3 μg/kg/min, did not affect MCAfV. Quantitatively, the effects of remifentanil appear to be similar to those of sufentanil.
Remifentanil was administered with other drugs that might influence cerebral hemodynamics. More recent studies in human volunteers have demonstrated that the infusion of small (sedative) doses of remifentanil can increase CBF. A PET study in human subjects to whom remifentanil, 0.05 and 0.15 μg/kg/min, was administered revealed increases in CBF in the prefrontal, inferior parietal, and supplementary motor cortices; reductions in CBF were observed in the cerebellum, superior temporal lobe, and midbrain gray matter. The relative increase in CBF was greater with the administration of the larger dose of remifentanil. Similar data were obtained by Lorenz and colleagues, who used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to determine CBF. In a PET investigation in human volunteers, remifentanil-induced increases in regional CBF within the limbic system were observed. Although the underlying mechanisms of the increases in CBF are not clear, disinhibition produced by the small-dose remifentanil infusion, or perhaps the sensation of side effects (e.g., warmth, comfort, pruritus), may have contributed. When combined with N 2 O, CBF and CO 2 reactivity is similar in patients given remifentanil or fentanyl. In conclusion, sedative doses of remifentanil alone can cause minor increases in CBF. With larger doses or with the concomitant administration of anesthetic adjuvants, CBF is either unaltered or modestly reduced.
Benzodiazepines
Benzodiazepines cause parallel reductions in CBF and CMR in humans. CBF and CMRO 2 decreased by 25% when 15 mg of diazepam was given to patients with head injuries. The effects of midazolam on CBF (but not on CMR) have also been studied in humans. Administration of 0.15 mg/kg of midazolam to awake healthy human volunteers resulted in a 30% to 34% reduction in CBF. In an investigation using PET scanning, a similar dose of midazolam led to a global 12% reduction in CBF; the decreases occurred preferentially in the brain regions associated with arousal, attention, and memory. CO 2 responsiveness was preserved.
The available data indicate that benzodiazepines cause a moderate reduction in CBF in humans, which is coupled to metabolism. The extent of the maximal reductions of CBF and CMR produced by benzodiazepines is probably intermediate between the decreases caused by narcotics (modest) and barbiturates (substantial). It appears that benzodiazepines should be safe to administer to patients with intracranial hypertension, provided that respiratory depression (and an associated increase in Pa co 2 ) or hypotension do not occur.
Flumazenil is a highly specific, competitive benzodiazepine receptor antagonist. It had no effect on CBF when administered to nonanesthetized human volunteers. However, flumazenil reverses the CBF-, CMR-, and ICP-lowering effects of midazolam. When patients were aroused from midazolam anesthesia with flumazenil at the conclusion of craniotomy for brain tumor resection, no change in either CBF or CMR was observed. By contrast, severe increases in ICP occurred when flumazenil was given to patients with severe head injury in whom ICP was not well controlled. These latter observations are consistent with animal investigations during which flumazenil not only reversed the CBF and CMR effects of midazolam, but it also caused a substantial, although short-lived, overshoot above premidazolam levels in both CBF and ICP by 44% to 56% and 180% to 217%, respectively. The CMR did not rise above control levels, thus indicating that the increase in CBF was not metabolically coupled. The CBF overshoot effect is unexplained, but it may be a neurogenically mediated arousal phenomenon. Flumazenil should be used cautiously to reverse benzodiazepine sedation in patients with impaired intracranial compliance.
Droperidol
No human investigations of the CBF and CMR effects of droperidol have been conducted in isolation. However, the information available from animal investigations and combination drug administration in humans, taken together, suggests that droperidol is not a cerebral vasodilator and probably has little effect on CBF and CMR in humans. The occasional increases in ICP that have been observed probably reflect normal autoregulation-mediated vasodilation in response to an abrupt decrease in MAP.
Ketamine
Among the intravenous anesthetics, ketamine is unique in its ability to cause increases in both CBF and CMR. Animal studies indicate that the changes in the CMR are regionally variable; substantial increases occur in limbic system structures with modest changes or small decreases in cortical structures. PET studies in humans have demonstrated that subanesthetic doses of ketamine (0.2-0.3 mg/kg) can increase global CMR by approximately 25%. The greatest increase in the CMR occurred in the frontal and anterior cingulate cortex. A relative reduction in the CMR in the cerebellum was also observed. Commercially available formulations of ketamine contain both the (S) – and (R) -ketamine enantiomers. The (S) -ketamine enantiomer substantially increases CMR, whereas the (R) enantiomer tends to decrease the CMR, particularly in the temporomedial cortex and in the cerebellum. These changes in the CMR are accompanied by corresponding changes in CBF. Global, as well as regional, increases in CBF in humans that were not accompanied by similar increases in the CMRO 2 after the administration of (S) -ketamine enantiomer have been observed. Both subanesthetic and anesthetic doses of ketamine increased global CBF by approximately 14% and 36%, respectively, without altering global CMRO 2 . As expected, in the face of an unchanged CMR and increased CBF, the oxygen extraction ratio was reduced. The majority of investigations indicate that autoregulation is maintained during ketamine anesthesia, and CO 2 responsiveness is preserved. A recent metaanalysis concluded that, in humans, ketamine administration increases CBF, particularly in the anterior cingulate gyrus, medial prefrontal cortex, and occipital lobes. In aggregate, the available data indicate that ketamine does increase CBF, and the accompanying increase in CMR is at best modest. Ketamine does not increase CBV.
The anticipated increase in ICP with an increase in CBF has not been confirmed to occur in humans. When examined in their entirety, the available data indicate that ketamine does not increase ICP in patients with nontraumatic neurologic illness nor in patients with traumatic brain injury. In fact, decreases in ICP occur when relatively large anesthetic doses of ketamine (1.5-5 mg/kg) are administered to patients with head injuries who are sedated with propofol. However, it should be noted that, in most of the studies in which the ICP effects of ketamine have been evaluated, patients received sedative agents in addition to ketamine. It has been established that anesthetic drugs (diazepam, midazolam, isoflurane-N 2 O, propofol, opioids, methohexital) blunt or eliminate the increases in ICP or CBF associated with ketamine. Accordingly, although ketamine is probably best avoided as the sole anesthetic drug in patients with impaired intracranial compliance, it may be cautiously given to patients who are simultaneously receiving adjunctive sedative drugs.
Lidocaine
In nonanesthetized human volunteers, reductions in CBF and CMR of 24% and 20%, respectively, were observed after the administration of 5 mg/kg of lidocaine over a 30-minute period, followed by an infusion of 45 μg/kg/min. When very large doses (160 mg/kg) were given to dogs maintained on cardiopulmonary bypass, the reduction in the CMRO 2 was apparently more than that observed with large-dose barbiturates. The membrane-stabilizing effect of lidocaine probably reduces the energy required for the maintenance of membrane integrity.
The effectiveness of bolus doses of thiopental, 3 mg/kg, and lidocaine, 1.5 mg/kg, in controlling the acute increase in ICP that occurred after the application of a pin head holder or skin incision in patients undergoing craniotomies has been assessed. The two regimens were equally effective in causing a reduction in ICP. However, the decrease in the MAP was greater with thiopental. Accordingly, a bolus dose of lidocaine is a reasonable adjunct to the prevention or treatment of acute increases in ICP and can prevent increases in ICP associated with endotracheal suctioning. Although large doses of lidocaine can produce seizures in humans, lidocaine-induced seizures have not been reported in anesthetized humans. Nonetheless, lidocaine doses should be adjusted to achieve serum levels less than the seizure threshold (>5-10 μg/mL) in awake humans. After a 2-mg/kg bolus, peak serum concentrations of 6.6 to 8.5 μg/mL are below the seizure threshold. Bolus doses of 1.5 to 2.0 mg/kg therefore seem appropriate.
Inhaled Anesthetics
Volatile Anesthetics
The pattern of volatile anesthetic effects on cerebral physiology is quite different than that of intravenous anesthetics, which generally cause parallel reductions in CMR and CBF. All volatile anesthetics, in a manner similar to intravenous sedative-hypnotic drugs, suppress cerebral metabolism in a dose-related fashion. Volatile anesthetics also possess intrinsic cerebral vasodilatory activity as a result of direct effects on vascular smooth muscle. The net effect of volatile anesthetics on CBF is therefore a balance between a reduction in CBF caused by CMR suppression and an augmentation of CBF caused by the direct cerebral vasodilation. When administered at a dose of 0.5 MAC, CMR suppression–induced reduction in CBF predominates, and net CBF decreases in comparison with the awake state. At 1 MAC, concentrations of isoflurane, sevoflurane, or desflurane, CBF remains unchanged; at this concentration, CMR suppression and vasodilatory effects are in balance. Beyond 1 MAC, the vasodilatory activity predominates, and CBF significantly increases, even though the CMR is substantially reduced ( Fig. 11.11 ). Vasodilation with increasing doses of volatile agents lead to an attenuation of cerebral autoregulation. With large doses, autoregulation is abolished and cerebral perfusion becomes pressure passive ( Fig. 11.12 ).
The increase in CBF produced by volatile anesthetics at doses larger than 1 MAC has been referred to as reflecting a loss of neurovascular coupling. However, coupling (CBF adjustments paralleling changes in the CMR) persists during anesthesia with volatile anesthetics. Accordingly, the conclusion should be that the CBF/CMR ratio is altered (increased) by volatile anesthetics. This alteration is dose related, and under steady-state conditions, increasing doses of volatile agents lead to greater CBF/CMRO 2 ratios —that is, higher MAC levels cause greater luxury perfusion.
The important clinical consequences of the administration of volatile anesthetics are derived from the increases in CBF and CBV—and consequently ICP—that can occur. Of the commonly used volatile anesthetics, the order of vasodilating potency is approximately halothane ≫ enflurane > desflurane ≈ isoflurane > sevoflurane.
Effects on cerebral blood flow
Volatile anesthetics possess intrinsic vasodilatory activity, and they not only modify cerebral autoregulation, but they also produce a dose-dependent decrease in arterial blood pressure. Hence, their effects on CBF and CMR are best evaluated when arterial blood pressure is maintained at a constant level. In addition, the cerebrovascular effects of volatile anesthetics are modulated by the simultaneous administration of other CNS-active drugs. The control state—awake, sedated, or anesthetized—against which the CBF and CMR effects of volatile anesthetics are compared, is important to recognize. The best information concerning the cerebrovascular effects of volatile anesthetics is obtained in studies during which a nonanesthetized (awake) control state is used.
Data on the cerebrovascular effects of halothane and enflurane are limited. Initial studies in humans demonstrated that the administration of 1 MAC halothane significantly increases CBF, even when systemic blood pressure is substantially reduced, in comparison with preanesthetic CBF. When the MAP is maintained at 80 mm Hg, 1.1 MAC levels of halothane increase CBF by as much as 191% and decrease the CMR by approximately 10% ( Fig. 11.13 ). When compared with awake values, 1.2 MAC enflurane also increased CBF and decreased CMR by 45% and 15%, respectively. The dramatic increases in CBF with a simultaneous modest reduction in the CMR attest to the cerebral vasodilatory properties of halothane and enflurane. Isoflurane, by contrast, does not increase CBF as much as halothane or enflurane. At concentrations of 1.1 MAC, isoflurane increases CBF by approximately 19% when arterial blood pressure is maintained within the normal range. The CMR is reduced by approximately 45%.
Both sevoflurane and desflurane can reduce CBF significantly in humans when compared with CBF in awake, nonanesthetized patients. At 1 MAC concentrations, sevoflurane and desflurane decreased CBF by 38% and 22% and CMR by 39% and 35%, respectively. These results, which suggest that the cerebral vasodilation produced by isoflurane is greater than that produced by sevoflurane and desflurane, were obtained with CBF measured by the Kety-Schmidt technique. This technique primarily measures CBF within the cortex and therefore may have substantially underestimated global CBF. PET studies in healthy humans have shown that sevoflurane dose-dependently suppresses the CMRO 2 and CBF; at 1 MAC levels, the reduction in CBF and CMRO 2 is approximately 50% and 50% to 60%, respectively. Even with a significant reduction in CBF, the administration of sevoflurane does not cause a decrease in CBV. Other investigations in humans, most using the measurement of MCAfv by transcranial Doppler, indicate that differences in the effects of isoflurane, desflurane ( Fig. 11.14 A ), and sevoflurane are modest. Unfortunately, a strictly quantitative comparison among these volatile anesthetics is not possible because of the variations in arterial blood pressure among study group patients. In addition, some discrepancy exists among studies in the literature regarding the magnitude of the effects of volatile anesthetics on CBF. Much of this inconsistency may occur as a result of the interaction of regionally selective CBF methods with the heterogeneity within the cerebrum of the CBF effects of volatile anesthetics. (See the later section, “Distribution of Changes in Cerebral Blood Flow/Cerebral Metabolic Rate.”)
The anesthetic properties of xenon were recognized several decades ago, but this anesthetic is only now being evaluated for possible use in patients. The MAC of xenon has been estimated to be 63% to 71%, with female patients having significantly lower MAC values (51%). Xenon exerts its anesthetic effect via noncompetitive antagonism of the N -methyl- d -aspartate receptor (NMDAR), although activation of the TREK two-pore K + channel may also play a role. In healthy humans, the administration of 1 MAC xenon resulted in a reduction in CBF by approximately 15% in the cortex and by 35% in the cerebellum. Interestingly, CBF in white matter increased by 22%. This reduction in CBF is accompanied by a parallel reduction of the cerebral metabolic rate of glucose (CMRg) by 26%. Cerebral autoregulation and CO 2 reactivity are preserved during xenon anesthesia in animals. Under background pentobarbital anesthesia in an experimental model of increased ICP, the administration of xenon did not increase ICP, and the response to both hypocapnia and hypercapnia was preserved. Diffusion of xenon into air-containing spaces such as the bowel does occur, although the magnitude of air expansion is considerably less than that with N 2 O. Nonetheless, caution will have to be exercised with the use of xenon in patients with intracranial air. These data indicate that xenon has a favorable profile for neuroanesthesia.
Effects on cerebral metabolic rate
All volatile anesthetics cause reductions in CMR. The degree of reduction in CMRO 2 that occurs at a given MAC is less with halothane than with the other four anesthetics. Sevoflurane’s effect on the CMRO 2 is very similar to that of isoflurane. The available information, derived in separate investigations, suggests that desflurane causes slightly less suppression of the CMRO 2 than isoflurane, especially at concentrations above 1 MAC. Although a direct comparison of the CMRO 2 effects of all of the volatile anesthetics has not been performed in humans, doses of 1 MAC isoflurane, sevoflurane, and desflurane clearly reduce the CMRO 2 by 25%, 38%, and 22%, respectively. In PET studies, halothane (0.9 MAC) and isoflurane (0.5 MAC) can decrease the CMRg by 40% and 46%, respectively. The decrease in the CMRO 2 is dose-related. With isoflurane (and almost certainly desflurane and sevoflurane as well), the maximal reduction is simultaneously attained with the occurrence of EEG suppression, which occurs at clinically relevant concentrations, in the range of 1.5 to 2 MAC in humans. With additional isoflurane, 6% end-tidal concentration results in no further reduction in the CMR and no indication of metabolic toxicity. Halothane presents a contrast to this pattern. Halothane concentrations more than 4 MAC are required to achieve EEG suppression in animals, and additional halothane causes a further reduction in the CMRO 2 in concert with alterations in energy charge. The latter changes, which are reversible, suggest interference with oxidative phosphorylation by halothane.
Some nonlinearity exists in the CBF and CMR dose-response relationships for volatile anesthetics. The initial appearance of an EEG pattern associated with the onset of anesthesia with halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane is accompanied by a sharp decline in the CMRO 2 . Thereafter, the CMRO 2 declines in a slower dose-dependent manner. Such an effect has also been demonstrated for sevoflurane. In a dose escalation study in humans, the greatest reduction in entropy (i.e., a measure of anesthetic depth) was observed with 1 MAC sevoflurane anesthesia, with lesser reductions occurring at increasing concentrations.
Distribution of changes in cerebral blood flow and cerebral metabolic rate
The regional distribution of anesthetic-induced changes in CBF and CMR differs significantly between halothane and isoflurane. Halothane produces relatively homogeneous changes throughout the brain. CBF is globally increased, and CMR is globally depressed. The changes caused by isoflurane are more heterogeneous. Increases in CBF are greater in subcortical areas and hindbrain structures than in the neocortex. The converse is true for the CMR, with a larger reduction in the neocortex than in the subcortex. In humans, 1 MAC sevoflurane ( Fig. 11.15 ) results in a reduction in CBF within the cortex and the cerebellum. With an increase in sevoflurane dose, CBF within the cortex decreases further. By contrast, flow increases in the cerebellum with doses greater than 1.5 MAC. These effects of sevoflurane are similar to those produced by isoflurane. Desflurane has not been evaluated by local CBF studies. However, considering the similarity of its effects on the EEG (suggesting similar cortical CMR and CBF effects), an assumption of similar heterogeneity in CBF distribution seems reasonable, pending further investigation. These distribution differences may explain certain apparent contradictions in reported CBF effects in the existing literature for isoflurane. Methods that assess global hemodynamic effects reveal greater changes than those that emphasize the cortical compartment. For instance, when a xenon surface washout technique is employed (measurement of local cortical flow only), no increase in CBF occurred when isoflurane was administered to patients undergoing craniotomy.
Time dependence of cerebral blood flow effects
The effects of volatile anesthetics on CBF are time-dependent in animal investigations. After an initial increase, CBF decreases and reaches a steady state near pre–volatile agent levels between 2.5 and 5 hours after exposure. The mechanism of this effect is not understood, and the phenomenon was not evident in humans studied during a 3- or 6-hour exposure to halothane, isoflurane, desflurane, or sevoflurane.
Cerebral blood volume
The extensive investigation of the influence of volatile anesthetics on CBF has been primarily based on the concern that the cerebral vasodilation produced by volatile anesthetics might increase ICP. However, it is CBV and not CBF, per se, that influences ICP. Most of the intracranial blood is within the cerebral venous circulation; although a reasonable correlation exists between vasodilation-induced increases in CBF and CBV, the magnitude of changes in CBF is considerably greater than that in CBV (see Fig. 11.9 ). Hence, changes in CBF do not reliably predict changes in CBV and, by extension, in ICP. CBV is considerably greater during isoflurane anesthesia than during propofol or pentobarbital anesthesia. In human volunteers, 1 MAC sevoflurane reduced regional CBF but not regional CBV; by contrast, propofol reduced both regional CBF and regional CBV ( Fig. 11.16 ). In addition, CBV responds to changes in Pa co 2 by a reduction in CBV with hypocapnia and an increase in CBV with hypercapnia. The magnitude of the change in CBV is, however, less than the change in CBF. In aggregate, although the effect of anesthetics and interventions on CBF may parallel the effect on CBV, substantial qualitative and quantitative differences may well be observed.
Carbon dioxide responsiveness and autoregulation
CO 2 responsiveness is well maintained during anesthesia with all volatile anesthetics. As with all vasodilators, CBF is preserved up to lower MAP values during the administration of volatile anesthetics with no evidence of differences among the various anesthetics. Direct comparisons of CBF with isoflurane, desflurane, and sevoflurane anesthesia during hypotension are not available. By contrast, autoregulation of CBF in response to increasing arterial blood pressure is impaired, which is most apparent with the anesthetics that cause the most cerebral vasodilation and are dose related. Sevoflurane may cause less impairment of the autoregulatory response to increasing blood pressure than other volatile anesthetics. Recent studies surprisingly report no change in MCAfv in response to phenylephrine-induced increases in the MAP during anesthesia with 1.2 to 1.5 MAC sevoflurane or in CBF during hemorrhagic hypotension. The autoregulatory response to increasing blood pressure may be pertinent during acute episodes of hypertension, such as during laryngoscopy or mismatch of surgical stimulation to anesthetic depth.
Cerebral vasodilation by anesthetics — clinical implications
Isoflurane, desflurane, and sevoflurane may have a modest cerebral vasodilating effect in the human cortex when administered at doses of 1 MAC or less. In fact, the administration of volatile anesthetics may produce a net decrease in CBF (see Fig. 11.14 A ). These data, however, should be interpreted with the knowledge that the critical variable of interest in the clinical setting is CBV. Although a direct correlation exists between CBF and CBV, as noted earlier, the relationship is not strictly 1:1. The magnitude of the changes in CBV is significantly less than the magnitude of the changes in CBF, and modest reductions in CBF may not necessarily be accompanied by reductions in CBV. This finding is exemplified by clinical investigations in which a significant increase in ICP (and by extension, CBV) was observed in patients to whom isoflurane was administered at doses that should reduce CBF. Although induction of hypocapnia mitigated the increase in ICP, hyperventilation may not be effective in blunting isoflurane-induced increases in ICP in patients with intracranial tumors. In experimental investigations of cerebral injury, volatile anesthetics significantly increased ICP, which was not ameliorated by hypocapnia. Collectively, these data suggest that volatile anesthetics have modest effects on cerebral hemodynamics in patients with normal intracranial compliance. However, in patients with abnormal intracranial compliance, the potential for volatile anesthetic–induced increases in CBV and ICP exist. Accordingly, volatile anesthetics should be used with caution in the setting of large or rapidly expanding mass lesions, unstable ICP, or other significant cerebral physiologic derangements in which CO 2 responsiveness and neurovascular coupling may be impaired. When they occur (e.g., a somnolent, vomiting patient with papilledema; a large mass; compressed basal cisterns), the clinician may well be advised to use a predominantly intravenous technique until such time as the cranium and dura are open and the effect of the anesthetic technique can be directly evaluated. Such circumstances will be relatively uncommon in elective neurosurgery.
Situations in which the CMR has been decreased by drug administration or disease processes should also justify caution in the use of volatile anesthetics. As previously noted, the vasodilation mediated increase in CBF induced by a volatile anesthetic is in part, and at low doses, offset by an opposing metabolically mediated vasoconstriction (see Fig. 11.11 ). In situations in which the CMR is already reduced, the vasodilatory activity will predominate and, therefore, the increase in CBF will be greater. For example, when CMR is only slightly reduced by morphine, isoflurane does not cause significant increase in CBF. However, under thiopental anesthesia, the introduction of isoflurane significantly increases CBF. Similarly, prior propofol anesthesia produces near maximal suppression of CMR; in this situation, introduction of any of the volatile agents leads to significant increases in CBF. In essence, antecedent CMR suppression unmasks the vasodilatory action of volatile anesthetics. These data also suggest that caution must be exercised in the administration of volatile anesthetics in pathologic conditions, such as traumatic brain injury, in which metabolism is already reduced.
The net vasodilating effects of equi-MAC concentrations of isoflurane, desflurane, and sevoflurane are less in humans than that of halothane, and the former are probably therefore preferable if a volatile anesthetic is to be used in the setting of impaired intracranial compliance. When hypocapnia is established before the introduction of halothane, the increases in ICP that might otherwise occur in a normocapnic patient with poor intracranial compliance can be prevented or greatly attenuated. Nonetheless, isoflurane, desflurane, or sevoflurane are preferred because the margin for error is probably wider than with halothane.
Nitrous Oxide
N 2 O can cause increases in CBF, CMR, and ICP. At least a portion of the increases in CBF and CMR may be the result of a sympathoadrenal-stimulating effect of N 2 O. The magnitude of the effect considerably varies according to the presence or absence of other anesthetic drugs ( Fig. 11.17 ). When N 2 O is administered alone, substantial increases in CBF and ICP can occur. In sharp contrast, when N 2 O is administered in combination with intravenous drugs, including barbiturates, benzodiazepines, narcotics, and propofol, its cerebral-vasodilating effect is attenuated or even completely inhibited. The addition of N 2 O to anesthesia established with a volatile anesthetic will result in moderate increases in CBF.
The most dramatic increases in ICP or CBF in humans and experimental animals have occurred when N 2 O was administered alone or with minimal background anesthesia. For instance, before and during spontaneous breathing of 66% N 2 O by patients with intracranial tumors, mean ICP increased from 13 to 40 mm Hg. The increases in CBF observed in humans are more modest than those observed in animals but are still substantial. Whether these substantial increases represent the effects of N 2 O, per se, or whether they reflect the nonspecific effects of a second-stage arousal phenomenon is not known.
When N 2 O is administered in conjunction with certain intravenous anesthetics, its CBF effect may be considerably attenuated. In an investigation of patients with intracranial tumors and poor intracranial compliance (mean preinduction ICP, 27 mm Hg), 50% N 2 O introduced during barbiturate anesthesia and after the induction of hypocapnia had a negligible effect on ICP. Benzodiazepines administered alone have been shown to blunt the CBF response to N 2 O in both animals and humans. Narcotics appear to have a similar effect. Anesthesia with 1 mg/kg morphine and 70% N 2 O resulted in no change in CBF from awake control values. Because of the very minor effect of morphine on CBF, these data suggest that N 2 O did not cause substantial cerebral vasodilation. Although the addition of N 2 O to propofol anesthesia in children increased MCAfv in one study, similar increases were not demonstrated by other investigators.
In most investigations, including several in humans, during which N 2 O has been added to a volatile anesthetic of 1 MAC or greater, substantial increases in CBF have been recorded. A comparison of an approximately equi-MAC substitution of N 2 O for isoflurane revealed that CBF was greater by 43% with 0.75 MAC isoflurane and 65% N 2 O in comparison to 1.5 MAC isoflurane. Several investigations have confirmed that CBF will be less with 1 MAC isoflurane than with a 1 MAC combination achieved with 50% to 65% N 2 O and isoflurane. These observations are consistent with a substantial additive vasodilating effect of N 2 O in the presence of a volatile agent.
This vasodilating effect of N 2 O may be positively correlated with the concentration of inhaled drug and suggests that, in general, the increase in CBF caused by N 2 O is exaggerated at higher concentrations of both halothane and isoflurane. Of importance, however, is the observation that the administration of 50% N 2 O to healthy volunteers did not significantly alter CBV. In support of this observation, N 2 O did not have any effect on CBV when added to a background of 1 MAC sevoflurane anesthesia. Although N 2 O can increase CBF, these data indicate that its effect on CBV is modest.
Effects of nitrous oxide on cerebral metabolic rate
No uniform agreement has been reached concerning the effect of N 2 O on the CMR. Parallel changes in CBF and CMR, increases in CBF without alteration of the CMR, and CMR alteration occurring without changes in CBF have all been reported. These findings are, doubtless, the product of differences in species, methods, depth of background anesthesia, and interactions with simultaneously administered anesthetics. In a recent investigation in humans, the administration of 70% N 2 O on a background of either sevoflurane or propofol anesthesia resulted in modest increases in the CMRO 2 , thus indicating that N 2 O does indeed increase cerebral metabolism.
The CBF response to CO 2 is preserved during the administration of N 2 O.
Clinical implications
Despite the inconsistencies that are evident, the vasodilatory action of N 2 O can be clinically significant in neurosurgical patients with reduced intracranial compliance. However, N 2 O-induced cerebral vasodilation can be considerably blunted by the simultaneous administration of intravenous anesthetics. By contrast, the addition of N 2 O to a volatile drug–based anesthetic can modestly increase cerebral metabolism and blood flow. N 2 O has been widely used in neurosurgery, and banishing it is inconsistent with the accumulated experience. Nonetheless, in circumstances wherein ICP is persistently elevated or the surgical field is persistently tight , N 2 O should be viewed as a potential contributing factor. Because N 2 O rapidly enters a closed gas space, it should be avoided or omitted when a closed intracranial gas space may exist or intravascular air is a concern.
Muscle Relaxants
Nondepolarizing Relaxants
The only recognized effect of nondepolarizing muscle relaxants on the cerebral vasculature occurs via the release of histamine. Histamine can result in a reduction in CPP because of the simultaneous increase in ICP (caused by cerebral vasodilation) and a decrease in the MAP. It is not entirely clear whether histamine directly causes cerebral vasodilation or whether it is a secondary (autoregulatory) response to a reduction in the MAP. d -Tubocurarine is the most potent histamine releaser among available muscle relaxants. Metocurine, atracurium, and mivacurium also release histamine in lesser quantities. This effect is likely to be clinically inconsequential unless these muscle relaxants are administered in the large doses necessary to achieve endotracheal intubation conditions rapidly. Of this group of drugs, cisatracurium has the least histamine-releasing effect. No evidence of histamine release was observed after the administration of 0.15 mg/kg of cisatracurium to neurosurgical patients in the intensive care unit. Yet, cisatracurium’s slow onset of action makes it less useful for a rapid sequence induction of anesthesia.
Vecuronium, in relatively large doses, does not have a significant effect on cerebral physiology in patients with brain tumors. The other aminosteroids, pipecuronium and rocuronium, should be similarly without direct effect, and no adverse events have been reported.
The indirect actions of relaxants may also have effects on cerebral physiology. Muscle relaxation may reduce ICP because coughing and straining are prevented, which decrease central venous pressure with a concomitant reduction in cerebral venous outflow impedance.
A metabolite of atracurium, laudanosine, may be epileptogenic. However, although large doses of atracurium caused an EEG arousal pattern in dogs, CBF, CMR, and ICP were unaltered. In rabbits, the administration of laudanosine did not increase the severity of the epileptoid activity caused by the direct application of a cephalosporin to the cortical surface. It appears highly unlikely that epileptogenesis will occur in humans with modest atracurium administration.
In summary, vecuronium, pipecuronium, rocuronium, atracurium, mivacurium, cisatracurium, metocurine, and pancuronium (if acute MAP increases are prevented with the latter) are all reasonable muscle relaxants for use in patients with or at risk for intracranial hypertension. Doses of metocurine, atracurium, and mivacurium should be limited to ranges not associated with hypotension.
Rocuronium is increasingly being used for the induction of anesthesia, as well as for intraoperative relaxation. It has the most rapid onset time of any nondepolarizing muscle relaxant. With sugammadex, even a profound neuromuscular blockade can be rapidly reversed (see Chapter 27, Chapter 28 ). The cerebrovascular effects of sugammadex have not yet been evaluated.
Succinylcholine
Succinylcholine can produce modest increases (∼5 mm Hg) in ICP in lightly anesthetized humans. This effect appears to be the result of cerebral activation (as evidenced by EEG changes and increases in CBF) caused by afferent activity from the muscle spindle apparatus. As might be expected with what appears to be an arousal phenomenon, deep anesthesia prevents succinylcholine-induced increases in ICP. The increase in ICP is also blocked by paralysis with vecuronium and by defasciculation with metocurine, 0.03 mg/kg. The efficacy of other defasciculating anesthetics has not been examined in humans.
Although succinylcholine can produce increases in ICP, it can still be used for a rapid sequence induction of anesthesia. No change in ICP was observed after the administration of succinylcholine, 1 mg/kg, to 10 nonparalyzed, ventilated neurosurgical patients in the intensive care unit, 6 of whom had sustained a head injury. Their observations are relevant because it is in precisely this population of patients that the issue of the use of succinylcholine arises most frequently. Considering that the ICP effects of succinylcholine may be an arousal phenomenon caused by increased afferent traffic from muscle spindles, it is reasonable to assume that disease processes that substantially blunt the level of consciousness might similarly blunt this response. As with many anesthetics, the concern should not be whether it is used but how it is used. When contraindications do not exist, with proper attention to the control of CO 2 tension, arterial blood pressure, and depth of anesthesia and after defasciculation, little hazard should attend succinylcholine administration.
Other Effects of Anesthetics on Cerebral Physiology
Cerebrospinal Fluid Dynamics
Anesthetics have been shown to influence both the rate of formation and the rate of reabsorption of CSF. Table 11.3 provides nonquantitative information about the direction of the influences of common anesthetic drugs. All the information has been derived from animals, and these processes have not been examined in humans. Of the volatile anesthetics, halothane decreases the secretion of CSF, isoflurane has no effect, and enflurane and desflurane increase secretion. Absorption of CSF is reduced by halothane and enflurane, unchanged by desflurane, and increased by isoflurane. A theoretic concern might be in the setting of a prolonged closed-cranium procedure in a patient with poor intracranial compliance. The most deleterious potential combination of effects in a patient with poor intracranial compliance is increased CSF production and decreased reabsorption. This pattern occurs with enflurane in the dog, which is perhaps another reason (in addition to the potential for epileptogenesis in the presence of cerebral injury and hypocapnia) for omission of enflurane in this circumstance.
Halothane | Enflurane | Isoflurane | Desflurane | Fentanyl | Etomidate | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Secretion | ↓ | ↑ | — | ↑ | — | ↓ |
Absorption | ↓ | ↓ | ↑ | — | ↑ | ↑ |
Blood-Brain Barrier
In the majority of the body’s capillary beds, fenestrations between endothelial cells are approximately 65 Å in diameter. In the brain, with the exception of the choroid plexus, in the pituitary, and in the area postrema, tight junctions reduce this pore size to approximately 8 Å. As a result, large molecules and most ions are prevented from entering the brain’s interstitium (BBB). A limited number of studies of anesthetic effects on the BBB have been conducted. In experimental animals, 1% isoflurane leads to extravasation of albumin into the thalamus, indicating some compromise of the BBB integrity. At higher doses, isoflurane (3%) significantly increases protein extravasation, not only in the thalamus but also in the cortex. This disruption of the BBB is quantitatively similar to that achieved by mannitol. In experimental models of brain injury, isoflurane has been reported to both exacerbate and ameliorate edema formation in the injured brain. Whether these effects are the result of isoflurane action at the BBB, per se , or to hemodynamic perturbations attendant upon anesthesia is not known. The clinical relevance of the potential BBB modulation by anesthetics is not clear. To the authors’ knowledge, no peer-reviewed investigation has attempted a comparison of anesthetic effects on BBB function during anesthesia in normotensive humans.
Epileptogenesis
An extensive review of the pro- and anticonvulsant effects of anesthetics and adjuvants is available. Several commonly used anesthetics have some epileptogenic potential, particularly in predisposed individuals. A concern is that seizure activity may go unrecognized in an anesthetized and paralyzed patient and may result in neuronal injury if substrate demand (CMR) exceeds supply for a prolonged period. A second concern is that the epileptogenic effect will persist in the postanesthesia period when seizures may occur in less well-controlled circumstances than those that exist in the surgical unit. In practice, it appears that spontaneous seizures during or after anesthesia have been extremely rare events. Nonetheless, in patients with processes that might predispose them to seizures, the use of potentially epileptogenic drugs should be avoided in situations during which reasonable alternatives are available.
Volatile Anesthetics
Enflurane is potentially epileptogenic in clinical setting. Of particular relevance to neuroanesthesia is the observation that hypocapnia potentiates seizure-type discharges during enflurane anesthesia. A 50% decrease in the CMRO 2 was noted in human volunteers anesthetized with 3% enflurane; however, with the onset of seizure activity, the CMRO 2 returned to normal, thus indicating preservation of neurovascular coupling. No evidence suggests that this type of EEG activity is deleterious when oxygen delivery is maintained during the event. However, because seizure activity can elevate brain metabolism by as much as 400%, the use of enflurane, especially at high doses and with hypocapnia, should probably be avoided in patients predisposed to seizures.
The EEG-activating property of enflurane has been used intraoperatively to activate and identify seizure foci that are to be surgically resected, and in this situation, spike activity not preoperatively present has been observed to persist after surgery. However, adverse outcomes related to enflurane-induced seizures have not been reported.
Isoflurane can cause EEG spiking and myoclonus, but it has not been associated, in the experimental setting, with the frank epileptoid activity induced by enflurane. The clinical experience with isoflurane is extremely large, and unexplained seizure-like activity has been reported in only two patients. One occurrence was intraoperative, and the other was immediately postoperative. Therefore epileptogenesis does not appear to be a clinical concern with isoflurane. In fact, isoflurane has been successfully used to control EEG seizure activity in refractory status epilepticus.
Seizures occur during the induction of anesthesia with high concentrations of sevoflurane in children, including those without a recognized seizure diathesis. In two healthy humans, EEG burst suppression with 2 MAC sevoflurane was accompanied by epileptiform discharges that were observed during EEG monitoring. These discharges were associated with a significant increase in CBF, thus demonstrating that neurovascular coupling was preserved. In patients with temporal lobe epilepsy, the administration of 1.5 MAC sevoflurane elicited widespread paroxysmal EEG activity. Of note was the observation that the paroxysmal activity was not restricted to the ictal focus and that the administration of sevoflurane did not provide any assistance in localizing the epileptogenic region of the brain. The development of tonic-clonic movements suggestive of seizure activity has also been reported in otherwise healthy patients on emergence from sevoflurane anesthesia. In all of the reported cases of seizure activity attributable to sevoflurane anesthesia, untoward sequelae have not been documented. These reports highlight sevoflurane’s ability, albeit small, to evoke epileptiform activity; accordingly, the use of sevoflurane in patients with epilepsy should be undertaken with appropriate caution.
Methohexital
Myoclonic activity is sometimes observed with methohexital. Accordingly, this anesthetic has been used to activate seizure foci during cortical mapping. In neurosurgical patients to whom larger doses of methohexital were administered to produce burst suppression of the EEG, refractory seizures have occurred. Consequently, it appears that patients with seizures of temporal lobe origin, typically of the psychomotor variety or those to whom large doses are administered, are at risk for seizure activation by methohexital. However, prolonged seizure activity after single-dose methohexital administration has not been reported in patients who undergo ECT.
Ketamine
Ketamine can elicit seizures in patients with an epileptic diathesis. Depth electrode recordings in epileptic patients have revealed the occurrence of isolated subcortical seizure activity originating in the limbic and thalamic areas during ketamine anesthesia and demonstrated that this subcortical activation may not be reflected in surface EEG recordings. On only two occasions, seizures have also been reported after ketamine anesthesia in subjects who were neurologically normal; seizure thresholds may have been lowered by aminophylline in one of these instances. However, ketamine has also been employed for the purpose of controlling status epilepticus. Therefore, ketamine-induced seizure activity is not of significant concern.
Etomidate
Etomidate frequently produces myoclonus that is not associated with epileptiform activity on the EEG. A single instance of severe, sustained myoclonus immediately after anesthesia with etomidate by infusion has been reported. Etomidate has also been shown to precipitate generalized epileptic EEG activity in epileptic patients, and its use in this population should probably be avoided. However, it has been electively used in low doses to activate seizure foci for the purposes of intraoperative EEG localization. In the experience of the authors (unpublished), selective activation of a quiescent focus can be achieved with 0.1 mg/kg etomidate. Larger doses are more likely to lead to generalized activation.
Etomidate is also associated with longer seizures in response to ECT than seizures that occur after the administration of methohexital or propofol. Remarkably, etomidate, in the dose range of 0.15 to 0.3 mg/kg, does not cause dose-related seizure inhibition during ECT, as is readily demonstrated with methohexital or propofol.
The preceding information notwithstanding, no convincing reports indicate epileptogenesis in subjects who are neurologically normal, and the use of etomidate need not be restricted on this basis. In fact, etomidate has been used to control refractory status epilepticus.
Propofol
Abnormal body movements and opisthotonos can occur after propofol anesthesia. However, systematic studies in humans, although identifying the occurrence of occasional dystonic and choreiform movements, have failed to confirm propofol as a proconvulsant. Furthermore, ECT seizures were shorter after induction with propofol than after induction with methohexital, which is more consistent with an anticonvulsant effect. In addition, propofol sedation has been widely used during awake resection of seizure foci and other intracranial lesions. Although pronounced high-amplitude beta-frequency activity in the EEG has been observed, unexpected incidences of seizures have not been reported.
Narcotics
Seizures or limbic system hypermetabolism (or both) can be readily elicited in some animal species with narcotics. Although an increase in CBF in deep brain structures associated with pain processing has been observed in human volunteers, humans do not have a clinically apparent correlate of the hypermetabolism effect observed in animals. Several anecdotal accounts, unaccompanied by EEG recordings, have reported the occurrence of grand mal convulsions in patients who received both high and low doses of fentanyl. However, systematic investigations of EEG changes during the administration of relatively large doses of fentanyl, sufentanil, and alfentanil in humans have not documented neuroexcitatory activity, and the seizures may have been an exaggerated rigidity phenomenon. There are exceptions. Partial complex seizures on the induction of anesthesia with fentanyl in patients undergoing anterior temporal lobectomy have been reported. Eight of the nine patients displayed electrical seizure activity at a range of clinically relevant fentanyl doses (mean, 26 μg/kg). Another study found that alfentanil, 50 μg/kg, augmented temporal lobe spike activity in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Untreated rigidity may, itself, also have important CNS consequences. ICP elevation can occur during narcotic-induced rigidity, probably as a consequence of cerebral venous congestion.
Neonatal Anesthetic Neurotoxicity
This subject is discussed in detail in Chapter 78 .
Cerebral Physiology in Pathologic States
Cerebral Ischemia — Pathophysiologic Considerations
Critical Cerebral Blood Flow Thresholds
The brain has a high rate of energy utilization and very limited energy storage capacity. The brain is therefore extremely vulnerable in the event of interruption of substrate (e.g., oxygen, glucose) supply. Under normal circumstances, global CBF is maintained at approximately 50 mL/100 g/min. In the face of a declining CBF and therefore oxygen supply, neuronal function deteriorates in a progressive manner rather than in an all-or-none fashion ( Fig. 11.18 ). There is substantial reserve below normal CBF levels, and not until EEG evidence of ischemia begins to appear is CBF decreased to approximately 20 mL/100 g/min. At a CBF level of approximately 15 mL/100 g/min, the cortical EEG is isoelectric. However, only when CBF is reduced to approximately 6 to 10 mL/100 g/min are indications of potentially irreversible membrane failure, such as increased extracellular potassium and a loss of the direct cortical response, rapidly evident. As CBF decreases in the flow range between 15 and 10 mL/100 g/min, a progressive deterioration in energy supply occurs and eventually leads to membrane failure and neuronal death at a time course that may last hours rather than minutes. The brain regions falling within this CBF range (6-15 mL/100 g/min) encompass brain tissue in which neuronal dysfunction is temporarily reversible but within which neuronal death will occur if flow is not restored; such regions are referred to as the ischemic penumbra . Studies defining progression to cerebral infarction within the penumbra have been performed principally in the cerebral cortex of primates, and the actual CBF levels at which the various decrements in function occur may vary with both anesthetic and species. However, in humans anesthetized with halothane and N 2 O, the CBF threshold for the initial EEG change is similar to that observed in the animal investigations.
Models of Cerebral Ischemia
How different is complete cerebral ischemia, as occurs during cardiac arrest, and incomplete cerebral ischemia, as may occur during occlusion of a major cerebral vessel or severe hypotension? From the clinician’s vantage, the important difference is that the residual (i.e., collateral) blood flow during incomplete ischemia may result in enough delivery of oxygen to allow some generation of ATP and thereby stave off the catastrophic irreversible membrane failure that occurs within minutes during normothermic complete cerebral ischemia. This difference in the rate of failure of the energy supply ( Fig. 11.19 ) can result in significantly greater apparent tolerance for focal or incomplete ischemia than for complete global ischemia (e.g., cardiac arrest).
Energy Failure and Excitotoxicity
Energy failure is the central event that occurs during cerebral ischemia. ATP is required for the maintenance of the normal membrane ionic gradient, and energy failure is rapidly attended by membrane depolarization and influx of sodium (Na + ) and calcium (Ca 2+ ) into the neuron. Voltage-dependent Ca 2+ channels are then activated, and Ca 2+ gains entry into the cytosol. Depolarization of presynaptic terminals also results in the release of massive quantities of excitatory neurotransmitters, particularly glutamate, into the synaptic cleft. Activation of glutamatergic receptors, the NMDAR, and the α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazopropionic acid receptors (AMPARs), adds to the influx of Na + and Ca 2+ ( Fig. 11.20 ). Initiation of cellular signaling by the activation of the mGluR leads to the release of stored Ca 2+ from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) via inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate (IP 3 ) receptors. Ionic influx is accompanied by an influx of water, and neuronal swelling rapidly occurs after membrane depolarization. The injury that is initiated by excessive glutamatergic activity is referred to as excitotoxicity .
Ca 2+ is a ubiquitous second messenger in cells and is a cofactor required for the activation of a number of enzyme systems. The rapid, uncontrolled increase in cytosolic Ca 2+ levels initiates the activation of a number of cellular processes that contribute to injury. Cytoskeletal proteins such as actin are cleaved by activated proteases. These enzymes also degrade a number of the protein constituents of the neuron. Lipases attack cellular lipids and produce membrane damage. An important lipase, phospholipase A 2 , releases fatty acids such as AA from membranes. Metabolism of AA to prostaglandins and leukotrienes by cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase is accompanied by the generation of superoxide free radicals. The latter, in combination with other free radicals generated in response to mitochondrial injury, can lead to lipid peroxidation and membrane injury. Prostaglandins and leukotrienes also evoke an inflammatory response and are powerful chemotactic drugs. Activation of platelets within cerebral microvessels, as well as an influx of white blood cells into damaged areas, aggravate the ischemic injury by occluding the vasculature.
Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage is also an important event during ischemic neuronal injury. Generation of free radicals from AA metabolism, from injured mitochondria, and from the production of peroxynitrite from NO leads to oxidative injury to DNA. Activation of endonucleases also produces DNA strand breaks. Under normal circumstances, DNA injury results in the activation of poly–adenosine diphosphate [ADP]–ribose polymerase (PARP), an enzyme that participates in DNA repair. With excessive DNA injury, PARP activity dramatically increases, which can lead to the depletion of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD + ), a substrate of PARP. NAD + is also an important coenzyme in energy metabolism, and its depletion further exacerbates energy failure.
Lactate formation is an additional element of the pathophysiologic process. Lactic acid is formed as a result of the anaerobic glycolysis that takes place after failure of the supply of oxygen. The associated decrease in pH contributes to the deterioration of the intracellular environment. An increased preischemic serum glucose level may accelerate this process by providing additional substrate for anaerobic glycolysis.
NO, which has emerged as a probable mediator of CBF changes in many normal physiologic states (see the section “Cerebral Metabolic Rate”), is also of relevance to pathophysiologic ischemia. NO is, in fact, a weak free radical that in turn leads to the generation of a more reactive species (peroxynitrite), and it is the killer substance used by macrophages. In cerebral ischemia, NO is probably both friend and foe. During a period of focal ischemia, the vasodilating effect of NO (probably constitutively elaborated NO of endothelial origin) probably serves to augment collateral CBF. However, in the postischemic phase, NO (probably derived from neurons or macrophages) contributes to neuronal injury.
Collectively, the simultaneous and unregulated activation of a number of cellular pathways overwhelms the reparative and restorative processes within the neuron and ultimately leads to neuronal death.
The Nature of Neuronal Death
The neuronal death that occurs in response to these processes has been categorized as necrotic or apoptotic in nature. Necrotic death mediated by excitotoxic injury, is characterized by rapid cellular swelling, condensation and pyknosis of the nucleus, and swelling of the mitochondria and ER. A characteristic of these necrotic neurons is the presence of acidophilic cytoplasm. Necrotic neuronal death results in local infiltration of the brain by inflammatory cells. A considerable amount of collateral damage is a consequence of this inflammation.
Neuronal apoptosis, a form of cellular suicide , has also been demonstrated in a variety of models of cerebral ischemia. Apoptosis is characterized by chromatin condensation, involution of the cell membrane, swelling of mitochondria, and cellular shrinkage. In the later stages of apoptosis, neurons fragment into several apoptotic bodies, which are then cleared from the brain. The lack of a substantial inflammatory response to apoptotic death limits injury to surrounding neurons that have survived the initial ischemic insult.
A number of biochemical pathways that lead to apoptosis have been described. Initiation of apoptosis by the release of cytochrome c from injured mitochondria has been studied extensively ( Fig. 11.21 ). Cytochrome c is restricted from the cytoplasm by the outer mitochondrial membrane. When mitochondria are injured, pores within the outer membrane allow cytochrome c to be released into the cytoplasm, where it interacts with procaspase-9 and apoptosis-activating factor (APAF) to produce an apoptosome. Procaspase-9 undergoes activation by proteolytic cleavage. Activated caspase-9 then activates caspase-3. The latter serves as an executor of apoptosis by cleaving a number of protein substrates that are essential in DNA repair (such as PARP). Activation of caspase-3 can also occur by inflammatory signaling via tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and the activation of caspase-8. It should be noted that the neuronal injury that occurs in response to ischemia cannot be easily divided into necrosis or apoptosis. The nature of neuronal death probably encompasses a spectrum in which some neurons undergo either necrosis or apoptosis, whereas others undergo cell death that has features of both necrosis and apoptosis.
Timing of Neuronal Death
The traditional concept of ischemic injury was that neuronal death was restricted to the time of ischemia and during the early reperfusion period. However, more recent data indicate that postischemic neuronal injury is a dynamic process during which neurons continue to die for a long period after the initiating ischemic insult ( Fig. 11.22 ). This delayed neuronal death, which was first demonstrated in models of global cerebral ischemia, has been demonstrated during focal ischemia as well. The extent of delayed neuronal death depends on the severity of the ischemic insult. With severe ischemia, most neurons undergo rapid death. With more moderate insults, neurons that survive the initial insult undergo delayed death. This ongoing neuronal loss contributes to the gradual expansion of cerebral infarction after focal ischemia. In experimental studies, evidence of cerebral inflammation, which can theoretically contribute to further injury, has been demonstrated even 6 to 8 months after the primary ischemia.