Shoulder Dislocation and Reduction
Olabiyi Akala and Maureen Gang
INDICATIONS
History and clinical examination consistent with shoulder dislocation
Anterior Dislocation (~95%)
Mechanism
Force applied to an externally rotated, abducted, and extended arm
Rarely secondary to a blow to the posterior shoulder
Examination
Prominent humeral head anteriorly and a shallow depression inferior to the acromion may be observed
Affected extremity usually held in abduction and external rotation
Posterior Dislocation (2%–4%)
Mechanism
Axial loading of adducted and internally rotated arm
Less commonly due to direct blow to anterior shoulder or fall on an outstretched arm
May result from violent muscle contractions: e.g., seizures, electric shock, psychiatry patients
Examination
Prominence of posterior shoulder with flattening anteriorly; may be subtle
Affected extremity typically held in adduction and internal rotation
Patient usually unable to externally rotate affected extremity
Inferior dislocation (luxatio erecta)—rare
Mechanism
Forceful hyperabduction of the affected extremity
Examination
Affected arm is held above the head
Patient is unable to adduct the affected extremity
Radiographs demonstrate glenohumeral dislocation
CONTRAINDICATIONS
Any associated fracture—particularly fracture of the humeral neck
Obtain orthopedic consultation
Any associated neurologic deficit
Closed reduction may still be attempted but multiple attempts should be avoided
RISKS/CONSENT ISSUES
Recurrent dislocation
Risk dependent on age at initial dislocation, with recurrence risk up to 90% for those <20, up to 70% for those between 20 and 40 and between 2% and 4% for those older than 40
Increased risk of associated rotator cuff injuries in patients >40 years of age
Complications of reduction
Risks associated with procedural sedation
Neurovascular injury
Fracture of humerus and glenoid
General Basic Steps
Thorough examination of affected extremity, including neurovascular status
Analgesia/sedation/muscle relaxation
Reduction via preferred technique
Postreduction care and follow-up
LANDMARKS—FIGURE 62.1
Technique
Physical Examination
Compare both the affected and unaffected extremities
Perform a thorough neurovascular examination of the injured extremity
A sensory deficit over the deltoid (the so-called sergeant’s-stripe pattern) or an impaired deltoid contraction implies an axillary nerve injury
All major nerves to the arm should be assessed as injuries to the brachial plexus, ulnar, and radial nerves have been reported
Radiographs
Obtain before reduction if the clinician is unsure of the position/type of dislocation or if there is concern for an associated fracture
May defer prereduction films if the clinician is confident of an anterior dislocation based on physical examination, the patient is <40, with a history of recurrent dislocations, and the mechanism of the dislocation is not associated with direct trauma
Anteroposterior (AP), scapular Y, and axillary lateral view should be obtained
A single x-ray view should never be used to diagnose a shoulder dislocation
In anterior dislocations, the humeral head is anterior in the axillary view (using the coracoid process as a point of orientation, and anterior to the center of Y in the trans-scapular view
In posterior dislocations, the AP view may be diagnostic if it shows a partial vacancy of the glenoid fossa (vacant glenoid sign) and >6 mm space between the glenoid rim and humeral head (positive rim sign). The humeral head is posterior on axillary view and posterior to center Y on trans-scapular view.
Sedation, Analgesia, and Muscle Relaxation
Adequate analgesia, muscle relaxation, and/or sedation help facilitate successful reduction
A recent systematic review of intra-articular lidocaine vs procedural sedation showed no significant difference in reduction success rates, pain during reduction, and pain after reduction
It is reasonable to attempt initial reduction with intra-articular local anesthetic; if unsuccessful, the clinician may consider procedural sedation for subsequent attempts
Ensure that the patient relates the use of intra-articular lidocaine to the orthopedic surgeon during follow-up
Intra-articular Injection of Lidocaine
Cleanse the shoulder with povidone–iodine solution
Insert the needle 2 cm inferiorly and directly lateral to the acromion, in the lateral sulcus left by the absent humeral head
Fill a 20-mL syringe with 1% lidocaine. Attach a 1.5-inch 20-gauge needle to the syringe (FIGURE 62.2).
Withdraw to ensure you are not in a blood vessel prior to the injection of 15 to 20 mL of lidocaine into the joint space
Shoulder Reduction
The guiding principle for all methods of reduction should be a gradual and gentle application of technique (FIGURE 62.3)
The treating physician should be comfortable with several methods of reduction because no technique is 100% effective. The following techniques are described in this chapter:
Stimson maneuver
Scapular manipulation
Traction–countertraction
Milch technique
Hennepin or external rotation method
Cunningham technique
Posterior dislocation reduction
Postreduction Care
Obtain postreduction x-rays
Perform a postreduction neurovascular assessment and document the findings
Position at discharge is controversial. Evidence regarding external rotation splinting is still evolving. Patients should be placed in a shoulder immobilizer or sling and swath for 2 to 3 weeks.
Arrange orthopedic follow-up in 1 to 2 weeks
Older patients (<40) should have early follow-up within ~1 week to prevent adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder)
Stimson Maneuver
Patient is positioned prone with dislocated arm overhanging the bed
Weight of 5 to 15 lb (initially supported by the physician) is strapped to the wrist of the affected extremity
Traction is gradually exerted on the shoulder by slow and steady release of the physician’s support
Up to 30 minutes of sustained, steady traction may be necessary for reduction
Reduction may be facilitated by delicate external rotation of the affected extremity
Advantages: Can be performed by the lone practitioner without assistance
Disadvantages: Often requires more time and materials (weights and straps) than may be readily available (FIGURE 62.4). Not appropriate for all patients, particularly those with respiratory compromise.