Vasopressin vs. Epinephrine for Cardiac Arrest

!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd”>


CHAPTER 33 VASOPRESSIN VS. EPINEPHRINE FOR CARDIAC ARREST


Vasopressin vs. Epinephrine for Inhospital Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Controlled Trial


Steill IG, Hébert PC, Wells GA, et al. Lancet. 2001;358(9276):105–109


BACKGROUND


With an estimated 300,000 cardiac arrests in North America annually, and only a 6% survival among those requiring epinephrine, there is great room to improve survival. A small study preceding this work showed a significant survival benefit in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients treated with vasopressin vs. epinephrine. This study looked to formally evaluate vasopressin as an alternative to epinephrine in a randomized controlled design in the inpatient setting.


OBJECTIVES


To compare the efficacy of vasopressin to epinephrine in the inpatient cardiac arrest setting.


METHODS


Triple-blinded, randomized trial in the EDs, critical care units and wards of three Canadian teaching hospitals.


Participants

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 14, 2016 | Posted by in EMERGENCY MEDICINE | Comments Off on Vasopressin vs. Epinephrine for Cardiac Arrest

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access