Treating the discs

4 Treating the discs


The discs act as flexible cushions between the spinal vertebra during mechanical shear and loading, cushioning the spine and giving it flexibility. Discs have an inner gel-like nucleus surrounded by an outer covering, the annulus fibrosus, wrapped in 13 concentric laminated bands around the nucleus, not unlike a jelly doughnut wrapped around its jam filling. The well-innervated disc annulus has no vascular supply and receives its nutrients by diffusion from the vertebral body vascular supply where it attaches to the end plates (White 1978). The disc is an osmotic system sensitive to load, pressure and concentration of proteoglycans that lives from motion (Kraemer 1995).


Water flows out of the disc during compression while standing or sitting upright and flows into the disc during decompression from relaxed sitting and lying. The disc itself has no blood supply and its nutrition is by diffusion from the end plate vasculature. To be optimally healthy the disc must be hydrated and mobile but not subject to excessive static compressive or repetitive flexed rotational loading. Inflammation in the disc is a response to excessive or prolonged loading, dehydration and micro tears in the annulus.


The outer three annular layers of the healthy disc are innervated by small myelinated and unmyelinated nerve fibers from the dorsal root ganglia and sympathetic trunks from multiple spinal levels. A disc at one spinal level may receive innervation from three or more spinal levels which means that inter-neurons in the cord are also involved. The vertebral end plate is as well innervated as the disc annulus suggesting that the end plate is an important source of discogenic pain (Lotz 2006).


The muscles at the spine stabilize the segment and protect the disc and the joint during movement. If the muscles are not effective the joint moves too much, the annulus is overstressed and the rate of degeneration increases: “… degeneration occurs as the result of imbalance of both static and dynamic spinal stabilizers. The disc degeneration that occurs is characterized by increased local inflammation and increased apoptosis of intervertebral disc cells” (Wang 2006).


The disc nucleus is rich in phospholipase A2, a strongly proinflammatory substance that is very toxic and damaging to nerves (Olmarker 1993, 1995, Ozaktay 1995, 1998). When the disc bulges or ruptures the fragments of the nucleus expand from hydration when they are outside annular containment. The disc fragments create inflammatory damage to the nerves, the disc annulus and the surrounding tissues which is compounded by the immune system inflammatory response to a foreign body in the epidural space.


Degeneration is an inevitable response to mechanical loading and shear during repetitive motion or constant static loading as the spine ages. Studies have shown increases in IL-1, IL-6, TNFα and PGE2 in injured discs. TNFα stimulates nerve growth factor and causes pain sensitive nerves to infiltrate the outer layers of the disc annulus and become sensitized. The degenerative process in the discs is complex and characterized by inflammation, loss of water and elasticity, tearing, scarring and disorganization of annular fibers, infiltration of nerves into the degenerated annulus and end plate tissues and dehydration and fragmentation of the nucleus (Kang 1996).


Pathologic degeneration may be a chronic ineffective healing response consisting of ongoing accumulation of tissue damage in the end plate and disc annulus, inflammation, neo-innervation and nociceptor sensitization. Physiologic degeneration on the other hand may be an adaptation to loading over time, without accumulation of peripheral damage and thus having no appreciable inflammatory or nociceptive component (Lotz 2006). Patients with genetic predisposition to increased inflammation have increased degenerative response to activities that compromise disc health (Solovieva 2004). This genetic predisposition, when combined with environmental factors can create enhanced inflammatory response and may explain the difference between two patients with identical spinal imaging showing disc degeneration when one patient has tremendous pain symptoms and one has no pain at all.


Medical treatment for disc related injuries and pain includes pain medication, steroids to reduce the inflammatory response, physical therapy, exercises to stabilize the spine and move the disc fragment away from the nerve root as recommended by McKenzie (2006) and ultimately surgery. Epidural steroid and “caine” class anesthetic injections are used to reduce the nerve pain and inflammation and to keep the patient comfortable while the disc heals. Cauda equina symptoms, such as loss of bowel or bladder function, and severe motor weakness are indications for open spinal surgery without delay.


Microsurgery has better outcomes than large open back surgeries. It produces less perineural scarring because there is less muscle trauma, less internal bruising and fewer layers of tissue that have the potential to adhere to each other. Failed back syndrome, iatrogenic spine, or post-discotomy syndrome (PDS) result from the inflammation, soft tissue scarring and perineural fibrosis that accompany surgery.


Ultimately, if the pain can be managed and the surgery is put off long enough the symptoms resolve on their own and fewer than 10% of patients presenting with discogenic and radicular pain require surgery. Only 0.25%, one quarter of one percent, of individuals with “back problems” requires some form of surgery (Kraemer 1995).


Most surgeries are performed to provide pain relief for patients in the acute phase of disc inflammation. FSM has been shown to be effective in reducing neuropathic pain (Chapter 3) and in reducing IL-1, IL-6, TNFα and COX and LOX mediated inflammation, all of which have been implicated in discogenic pain. If FSM can be used to reduce inflammation and pain along with exercise therapies in the 99.75% of back pain patients who do not require surgery, more patients can recover function and avoid surgery and its complications. There are numerous case reports in which FSM treatment has done exactly this. The responses are consistent, predictable, reproducible and very encouraging to both patients and clinicians treating this difficult patient population.





Diagnosing the disc


Treating the disc with FSM is usually successful but the practitioner must know that the disc is what needs treating, which is not always as obvious as it sounds. The key to diagnosing discogenic pain is in the history, especially the mechanism of injury, the pain patterns and physical examination.


The mechanism of injury will involve flexion or combined flexion and rotation or some activity that exposes the patient to axial loading, lifting or flexion and rotation on a regular basis. In general, spinal flexion or combined flexion and rotation make the pain worse and extension may make the pain better as long as the patient does not have co-existing facet joint degeneration. Some patients know exactly what activity created the injury and some patients have no idea. Some patients have a history of activities that challenge the disc and then experience one event that makes the disc symptomatic. The challenge in taking the history is to identify which activities create spinal loading, flexion and rotation and might have caused the injury by asking questions about specific activities.


The patient may complain of low back, neck, shoulder, or thoracic spine pain or dermatomal nerve pain depending on what level has been injured and how badly it has been damaged. Some patients will have pain only in the area of the inflamed nerve root and their complaint will be “leg pain in the lateral calf” and not an L5 disc injury. Treating the leg or the muscle will not be satisfactory since the disc is ultimate the cause of the leg pain.


Cervical discogenic pain may present as neck, shoulder and arm pain or midscapular pain. The classic diagram (Fig. 4.3) published by Cloward describes the midscapular referred pain areas for the cervical discs. The patient with a cervical disc injury may present only with midscapular pain and shoulder pain (Cloward 1959). Treating the shoulder or the midscapular area will be unsatisfactory and only treatment aimed at the cervical disc will relieve the symptoms.




History questions




What sorts of things were you doing in the days or weeks just before the pain started?



Were you lifting, leaning forward while using a keyboard, sitting, driving or bending over for long periods?


Did you have any sort of trauma such as a fall or traffic accident?



Were you in one flexed or rotated position without moving for a prolonged period of time?



What do you do for a living?




What do you do for fun or do at home?








What makes it better – What makes it worse?



Flexion / combined flexion and rotation


The inability to tolerate flexion postures is diagnostic of disc injuries. The patient may complain



specifically that the pain is worse when driving a car because the seats put the lumbar spine into flexion and the legs are extended while using the pedals. This position creates flexion pressure on the discs, and stretches the sciatic nerve causing pain in the foot, leg or hip.


Patients with lumbar discogenic pain cannot lay supine with the knees flexed and must have the legs straight when supine so the lumbar spine is in extension. The patient can usually lay prone comfortably as long as the facet joints are not also pain.


Cervical discs create neck pain and pain between the shoulder blades and in the cervical dermatomes that is worse with forward head postures created while using a keyboard, eating or reading. The pain will be worse when lifting or using the arms outstretched because the anterior cervical muscles contract to stabilize the spine during lifting, causing disc compression.


Headaches, neck, arm and hand pain will be worse with certain sleeping positions when a pillow creates neck flexion. Driving a car places the neck in flexion because of poor seat design and holding the steering wheel with the arms outstretched creates nerve tension and muscle fatigue making this activity a guaranteed pain generator for a cervical disc patient.






Physical examination


The disc can be directly challenged by maneuvers that physically compress it or stress it in the direction of lesion. Cervical discs can be evaluated by gently pressing on the top of the head and loading the discs in axial compression. If a disc annulus is compromised the maneuver will cause pain between the scapulae (Cloward 1959) and may increase pain in the affected dermatome.


A Valsalva maneuver, in which the patient inhales, holds the breath and bears down, will compress the injured disc and move nerve towards the inflamed area causing local and occasionally dermatomal pain.


Nerve tension tests gently stretch the nerves and are painful when the nerve is inflamed due to disc injuries. They are non specific but can be revealing when combined with the history and other findings. Straight leg raise (SLR) is a nerve tension test for the L4, L5 and S1 nerves.






Myofascial involvement


The biomechanical abnormalities of the spinal segment associated with disc degeneration can contribute to the formation of myofascial trigger points in the muscles and fascia. Trigger points cause the muscles to be short and taut and contribute to the compression and loading of the discs and facets that accelerates the degenerative process.


Myofascial trigger points sensitize pain nerves that feed back into the spine. This neural input from the muscles compounds the nociceptive sensitization of the nerves to the disc from the dorsal rami and amplifies the pain response. Palpation of the muscles in the lumbar spine will almost always reveal trigger points in the psoas, quadratus lumborum and multifidi, most prominently at the level of the involved disc.


In the cervical spine, the scalenes, longus coli, levator scapulae, sternocleidomastoid (SCM) and trapezius will usually have trigger points in the area directly adjacent to the involved disc. Palpate the deep scalenes between the thyroid cartilage and the SCM and feel a taut band just along the border of the anterior disc line. This taut band is an indicator that the disc at that level is inflamed. When the disc is treated the band should soften and disappear as treatment progresses.


When discs in the thoracic spine are inflamed the thoracic paraspinals and trapezius directly adjacent to the disc will be taut and may contain trigger points; digestion may be affected. The rectus abdominus may be taut and have trigger points at the levels whose nerves are affected by the injured disc.


The practitioner treating a disc patient will of necessity end up treating the disc, the nerve and the muscles associated with that disc.



More than one diagnosis


Patients who have both facet and disc generated pain will have pain with both flexion and extension and may have trouble finding a relief position. Specifically, it is common in patients who have had whiplash injuries to have a C5–6 disc injury from the flexion component that creates neck and shoulder pain and a C2–3 facet joint injury from the extension component that creates upper cervical pain and a peri-orbital headache. As the patient flattens the cervical curve to relieve the upper facets the disc annulus compresses and the patient begins to experience discogenic midscapular and nerve pain. The patient will arch the neck to relieve the disc pain until the facet compression in the upper cervical spine becomes intolerable. The patient constantly shifts neck position from flexion to extension to obtain relief from one or the other of the pain generators. If the spinal ligaments were damaged in the same injury the pain may be quite intense.


Patients with chronic low back pain may have pain generators in the disc annulus, the facet joints, the muscles and the nerves. The same injuries that traumatize and damage the discs can also damage the muscles and facet joints. The psoas attaches to the anterior vertebral bodies and the discs and the lesser trochanter in the femur and acts as a trunk and hip flexor. Lumbar flexion may be painful because of a disc injury or it may be painful because trigger points in the psoas are activated when the muscle contracts to flex the trunk but the presence of trigger points in the psoas does not rule out the disc as a pain generator in lumbar flexion. The facet joints may cause pain when compressed during lumbar extension or the trigger points in the psoas may be activated when stretched during extension. The patient may have the disc, the muscle and the facet joint all contributing as pain generators.


As always the patient is entitled to more than one diagnosis. FSM practitioners have tools to treat each of these conditions and the only challenge is figuring out which to treat first in any given patient or whether to treat them all simultaneously (see Chapters 5, 6, 7, 11).



Treating spinal discs






Jun 14, 2016 | Posted by in PAIN MEDICINE | Comments Off on Treating the discs

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access