Defining Dignity
The term dignity is widely used when discussing and debating various and sometimes contentious issues in end-of-life care. Dying with dignity has powerful and provocative connotations and yet, is rarely defined or fully explained.
The Oxford English Dictionary defines dignity as “the state or quality of being worthy of respect.” Thus the term is closely related to concepts like virtue, respect, self-respect, autonomy, human rights, and enlightened reason. The word dignity derives from the Latin word ‘dignus’ meaning worthy. The Universal Declaration on human rights recognizes dignity as a condition closely associated with inherent human rights; “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights …” However, these definitions do not specify end-of-life circumstances and do not examine dignity from the perspective of seriously ill patients.
Dignity in health care is often presumed, yet rarely defined, in terms of its various components and targeted clinical outcomes. Without clarity on how to achieve or maintain dignity within the context of care, it is more at risk for being lost. When dignity is absent from care, people are more likely to feel devalued; they are more likely to sense that they lack control and comfort. The absence of dignity can undermine confidence, and patients may find themselves feeling less able to make decisions. At its worst, loss of dignity equates with feeling humiliated, embarrassed, and ashamed.
A Model of Dignity in the Terminally Ill
Dignity has also been identified as one of the five most basic requirements that must be satisfied in caring for dying patients. Empirical work by Chochinov et al studying dying patients and their families has informed a model of dignity ( Table 50-1 ). The model suggests that patient perceptions of dignity are related to and influenced by three major thematic areas termed: illness related concerns; the patient dignity conserving repertoire; and the social dignity inventory. For instance, illness related concerns relate to issues arising directly from the illness itself and has sub-themes that include level of independence and symptom distress. Level of independence is further subdivided into cognitive acuity, or ability to maintain mental capacity and functional capacity. The major category ‘dignity conserving repertoire’ includes those aspects of patients’ psychological and spiritual landscape, often based on personality and internal resources, which influence the patient’s sense of dignity, whether they are perspectives or practices. The social dignity inventory refers to social concerns or relationship dynamics that enhance or detract from a person’s sense of dignity. The themes in this category are privacy boundaries, social support, care tenor, burden to others, and aftermath concerns.
MAJOR DIGNITY CATEGORIES, THEMES, AND SUB-THEMES | ||
---|---|---|
Illness Related Concerns | Dignity Conserving Repertoire | Social Dignity Inventory |
|
|
|
In recent decades, the term dignity has become associated with the physician-assisted suicide (PAS) and euthanasia agenda (these topics are addressed elsewhere in this textbook). It is important that dignity be reclaimed within the lexicon of routine clinical and bedside care. Within this context, dignity should be considered an essential aim of quality, comprehensive palliative care. There is ample evidence, both from the perspective of patients and carers, that they crave dignity and fear its absence. A recent qualitative study ( Table 50-1 and Table 50-2 ) addressing advanced cancer collected serial, triangulated data from patients within the last year of life, along with their families or friends and their health care providers. Six main themes were identified, including: maintaining normality; preparing for death; support from family/friends; self care strategies/physical; self care strategies/emotional; and support from health care professionals. Maintaining normality and preparing for death were the two most important areas identified by patients. Patients also valued support that enabled them to maintain their independence and remain at home. The overarching issue that came from the findings was that preserving and maintaining dignity and being treated with dignity was paramount to patients and permeated their experience of living with advanced cancer.
Theme | Subtheme | Research Question |
---|---|---|
Maintaining Normality |
|
|
Preparing for Death |
|
|
Support from Family/Friends |
|
|
Addressing Dignity in Clinical Care
The Model of Dignity in the Terminally Ill provides a clinically relevant, empirically based framework, which can inform and guide dignity-conserving care for patients nearing end-of-life. Every element of the model offers therapeutic possibilities to mitigate distress; in their entirety, these combined approaches could be described as a Dignity Care Pathway (DCP) . While the details of such a care pathway need to be elaborated and empirically tested (work is currently in progress by the authors), the following represent a sampling of what will eventually constitute elements of this novel approach ( Table 50-3 ).
Major Dignity Categories, Themes and Subthemes | Intervention/Action |
---|---|
Illness Related Concerns | |
Symptom Distress | |
Physical distress |
|
Psychological distress |
|
Medical uncertainly |
|
Death anxiety | |
Level of Independence |
|
Cognitive acuity |
|
Functional capacity |
|
Dignity-Conserving Repertoire | |
Dignity-Conserving Perspectives | |
Continuity of self |
|
Maintaining of pride |
|
Role preservation |
|
Hopefulness |
|
Generativity/legacy |
|
Autonomy/control |
|
Acceptance |
|
Dignity-Conserving Practices | |
Living in the moment |
|
Maintaining normalcy | |
Finding/seeking spiritual comfort |
|
Social Dignity Inventory | |
Privacy boundaries |
|
Social support |
|
Care tenor |
|
Burden to others |
|
Aftermath concerns |
|