Abstract
Metabolic and endocrine pathways are central to the body’s compensatory response to trauma. They drive mobilization of energy substrates, volume conservation and haemostasis via activation of the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis, the sympathetic nervous system and an inflammatory response. As clinicians, we can intervene in these pathways, however optimal management of anaesthesia, fluids, transfusion, nutrition and the use of steroids remains controversial and to be determined.
After reading this article, you should be able to:
- •
describe the response of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis to trauma
- •
describe how this response results in volume conservation, mobilization of fuel sources and improved haemostasis
- •
outline the current controversies surrounding the management of trauma patients
Introduction
Prior to the modern era of resuscitation, humans have long developed crucial physiological responses to survive traumatic insults. As many insults and conditions elicit similar physiologic responses to those in trauma, for the anaesthetist ‘trauma’ is a broad term just as readily encompassing surgery as well as burns, traumatic brain injury, chest and abdominal injuries. All these circumstances result in significant physiological changes, essentially via metabolic and endocrine pathways but also intrinsically involving the inflammatory and autonomic systems, all with the ultimate aim of optimizing tissue repair.
To achieve this, it is vital to maintain perfusion and energy supplies to vital organs. Hence the metabolic and endocrine responses focus on mobilizing fuel sources, conserving volume and minimizing blood loss. There is a complex interaction between these pathways, with a surge in hypermetabolism and catabolism.
Despite a robust design, these pathways are so complex there is potential for failure of negative feedback with overshooting of the response which can lead to harmful effects. It is vital for the anaesthetist to have a sound understanding of these mechanisms to minimize the consequences of injury and to optimize and support the body’s physiological responses.
The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis plays a central role in coordinating these endocrine and metabolic responses. The hypothalamus receives multiple inputs including from baroreceptors, volureceptors and pain fibres stimulated during trauma; in response a number of vital pathways are activated via the pituitary and adrenal glands, and sympathetic nervous system.
Mobilization of energy resources
Corticotrophin-releasing hormone (CRH) from the hypothalamus results in release of adrenal corticotrophin hormone (ACTH) from the anterior pituitary into the blood. This acts on the adrenal cortex, resulting in a surge of cortisol. The key aim of cortisol is to mobilize energy stores and hence it induces gluconeogenesis. Cortisol serum levels should result in negative feedback into the hypothalamic pituitary axis, decreasing release of further CRH. This can fail in trauma, leading to a persistently high ACTH and cortisol that results in catabolism, with protein and, ultimately, muscle breakdown. The latter is particularly detrimental to patients.
There is also a release of growth-hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) from the hypothalamus, leading to a release of growth hormone (GH) from the anterior pituitary. This acts via insulin insulin-like growth factors to increase catabolism, but to a lesser extent than cortisol.
The pancreas also plays a role by decreasing the secretion of insulin while increasing the secretion of glucagon. There is also a state of relative insulin resistance, which when combined with decreased insulin secretion, leads to decreased glucose uptake by cells and increased circulating blood glucose levels.
These pathways all result in an increase in gluconeogenesis via glycogenolysis, lipolysis and proteolysis. Overall, this increase in circulating glucose increases the supply of glucose at a cellular level. This is important in generating ATP via aerobic respiration in the processes of glycolysis, the Krebs cycle and, ultimately, oxidative phosphorylation to support the body post trauma.
Volume conservation and redistribution
Trauma often results in a shocked state with hypoperfusion of vital organs. In an attempt to maintain organ perfusion several physiological responses occur, with the overall aim of ensuring redistribution of blood flow to vital organs, volume conservation and optimal haemostasis.
Hypothalamic stimulation results in increased sympathetic outflow, leading to two important effector responses. Firstly, the preganglionic fibres synapsing with the adrenal medulla cause an increased release of catecholamines into the circulation. Secondly, there is an increase in output down all postganglionic sympathetic fibres. Those most important during trauma are the cardioacceleratory fibres and those to the smooth muscle of the vasculature. These postganglionic fibre outputs, together with increased circulating catecholamines, mediate their effects via the alpha and beta adrenoreceptors of the end organs leading to the essential ‘flight or fight responses’.
Increased sympathetic outflow leads to positive cardiac inotropy and chronotropy. Sympathetically mediated peripheral venoconstriction mobilizes blood from reservoirs, such as muscle, to increase venous return. Arteriolar vasoconstriction redistributes blood flow from peripheral to central structures.
In an attempt to correct volume loss, various compensatory processes are activated, namely the renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) and ADH release from the posterior pituitary. Renin is secreted from juxtaglomerular cells in the kidney as a result of increased sympathetic activity, renal hypoperfusion and reduced sodium delivery to the macula densa. Renin converts angiotensinogen to angiotensin I, which is further cleaved via angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE), to angiotensin II (AT II). AT II has multiple effects. Primarily, it stimulates the release of aldosterone from the zona glomerulosa of the adrenal cortex and via its actions on the hypothalamus, results in thirst and additional ADH secretion. It is also a potent peripheral vasoconstrictor. At the glomerulus, it causes preferential efferent arteriole constriction in an attempt to conserve glomerular filtration rate (GFR). ACTH and hyperkalaemia stimulate aldosterone release to a lesser extent.
Aldosterone acts predominantly on the distal convoluted tubule of the nephron, resulting in reabsorption of sodium and loss of potassium and hydrogen ions. This increases water reabsorption and hence volume conservation. This is further accentuated by the aldosterone like effect of circulating cortisol.
From the posterior pituitary, ADH is released and, acting via V2 receptors in the kidney, results in an increase in aquaporins into the collecting duct and hence water reabsorption into the systemic circulation, to support the circulation during this time of injury.
The immunological response
Trauma-induced tissue damage activates the complement pathway. This results in neutrophil and macrophage activation with subsequent release of inflammatory mediators, including interleukin-1, TNF-alpha and platelet activating factor. Consequently, there is upregulation of other acute phase proteins, including fibrinogen, oxygen free radicals and proteases as, including thromboxanes and prostaglandins. The end result of this earliest phase of tissue trauma is propagation of the coagulation cascade, neutrophil accumulation at the site of injury and a lymphocytosis with induction of both cell-mediated and humoral pathways, all with the aim of limiting further tissue damage and promoting repair. However, there is a delicate balance between these pro- and anti-inflammatory pathways and interfering with these in an attempt to optimize outcomes in trauma patients, for example by administration of steroids, is complex.
Haemostasis
In an attempt to prevent ongoing blood loss and conserve volume, various haemostatic mechanisms are activated. These include vasoconstriction and platelet adhesion and aggregation, ultimately leading to clot formation. These processes are augmented by the inflammatory response to trauma, namely elevated arachidonic acid metabolites such as thromboxane A2, which acts as a potent vasoconstrictor and increases platelet activation and aggregation. Serum levels of acute phase proteins, such as the procoagulant fibrinogen, are also elevated while others such as the anticoagulant, protein C are decreased, altering the balance between procoagulant and anticoagulant factors. The ultimate aim of these pathways is a hypercoagulable state.
Management of the metabolic and endocrine pathways activated in trauma: current controversies
All these processes seek to preserve vital organ functions and allow survival following traumatic insult. However, without appropriate management these compensatory mechanisms can become overwhelmed resulting in death.
The hypermetabolic state associated with trauma increases tissue oxygen demand. If cardiac output fails to increase sufficiently, inadequate oxygen delivery to the tissues occurs. This can be further compromised by peripheral vasoconstriction and anaemia. Overall, this will result in cellular hypoxia, lactic acidosis and multiorgan failure. Equally, the compensatory mechanisms of the coagulation system can become overwhelmed, resulting in disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC) and uncontrolled haemorrhage.
There are numerous interventions utilized in the management of trauma patients, some augment the natural physiological responses but some interfere with these responses and can lead to poorer patient outcomes. It is important that we understand how our actions interfere with these processes so we can continue to optimize our management and improve patient outcomes.
It is always difficult to demonstrate clear benefits of interventions in the perioperative period. In particular, multi-trauma patients are a very heterogeneous group. Furthermore, it is impossible to study and intervene in this group before their injury and hence it is difficult to elicit the true benefit or detriment of physiological responses and how best to modulate these. However, there has been much work looking at interventions in the perioperative period of general surgical and burns patients, and some of these findings can be extrapolated and applied to influence interventions more specifically for trauma patients.
Choice of anaesthesia agent
Induction of anaesthesia in these patients can be difficult and there is a constant debate about the competing interests to minimize the risk of aspiration and a surge in intracranial pressure but to maintain haemodynamic stability. Overall, the aim is to maintain the generated vasoconstrictive effect while minimizing a surge in hypertension at laryngoscopy, which could potentially cause cardiac ischaemia and worsen bleeding at the site of injury.
Etomidate was traditionally used as an induction agent in this setting, but there have been specific concerns regarding the resultant adrenal suppression and its potential impact on survival despite the lack of a definitive link to negative outcomes. Opioids are known to suppress the hypothalamic pituitary axis to a varying extent and clonidine has sympatholytic activity via central activation of alpha 2 adrenergic receptors. No clear benefit of using any of these agents has been shown and in general, a combination of agents are used, increasingly including ketamine, with invasive blood pressure monitoring to ensure targets are maintained both during induction and maintenance of anaesthesia.
Regional anaesthesia
Regional anaesthetic techniques have been used to improve analgesia, attenuate the sympathetic response and to minimize the development of chronic pain. There is increasing evidence to support the safety of regional anaesthesia in trauma despite prior concerns regarding risks associated with coagulopathy and concealed compartment syndrome. It has been particularly used for combat casualties with faster recovery and improved morale.
Fluid management
Traditionally, trauma patients have received large-volume fluid resuscitation in an attempt to reverse their hypovolaemic state and improve organ perfusion. However, it has been increasingly suggested that large-volume resuscitation can lead to dilution of coagulation factors, hypothermia and increased blood pressure resulting in clot dislodgement, coagulopathy and poor organ perfusion. Unsurprisingly, as the neurohumoral responses that demand water and sodium retention have evolved over millennia, the recent century of intravenous administration of sodium rich water has not been so physiologically adapted to. Evidence now suggests a link between increased volume of fluid resuscitation and mortality. NICE now recommends a restrictive approach to volume resuscitation until definitive control of bleeding has been achieved, with the focus on haemorrhage control. The principle of damage control resuscitation (DCR) is increasingly being used, with permissive hypovolaemia, hypotension, haemostatic transfusion and damage control surgery (see also Management of Shock in Trauma on pp 393-401 of this issue).
There is ongoing controversy over blood pressure targets in trauma resuscitation. There is some evidence that targeting a lower blood pressure in penetrating trauma has a mortality benefit but other studies, especially of blunt trauma, have failed to show benefit. European guidelines now recommend a target systolic blood pressure of 80–90 mmHg in the initial phase of resuscitation in a trauma patient without brain trauma until major bleeding has been controlled with an overall restricted volume replacement strategy. In patients with severe TBI, a mean arterial pressure of at least 80 mmHg should be targeted. If severe hypotension they recommend the use of vasopressors in addition to fluids.
Blood product management
Blood product administration is a controversial topic in trauma resuscitation. Initially, as a consequence of the stress response, acute phase proteins such as fibrinogen increase, which together with coexisting hypovolaemia, results in a hypercoaguable picture. However it is becoming evident that the coagulation picture is far more complex, with varying phases of hypo- and hypercoagulability, with a vast number of factors influencing this.
It is increasingly felt that traditional laboratory tests do not sufficiently reflect the coagulation picture accurately and hence there has been a move towards using viscoelastogram testing as a point of care test to determine blood product administration and optmization of the coagulation picture.
Traditionally, trauma resuscitation focused on administration of large volumes of packed red cells with a small volume of plasma. However, there has been much work looking at the optimal combination of blood products with ratios of plasma, platelets and red blood cells much debated with some evidence from severe trauma that increased plasma to red cell ratio might lead to an improved coagulation profile. NICE currently recommends a one-to-one ratio of red blood cells to plasma.
Fibrinogen consumption is felt to be central to the coagulopathy and hence there is a drive towards using fibrinogen earlier to correct coagulopathy aided by the increased availability of fibrinogen concentrate. Administration of tranexamic acid within 3 hours of injury to treat the exaggerated fibrinolysis has been shown to decrease morbidity and mortality and this is now recommended in many guidelines and has become accepted practice.
Steroids
Steroid use in trauma remains controversial. The initial hyperinflammatory response, aimed at limiting tissue damage, is followed by a hypoinflammatory phase. During this latter phase the body is susceptible to infection which can worsen tissue damage, the so-called ‘two hit hypothesis’. The use of steroids in traumatic head injury have been shown to increase mortality.
In hypotensive septic patients, it has been shown that the administration of steroids increases the rate of shock reversal without a mortality benefit but it is unclear if this can be translated to trauma patients. Overall understanding of the HPA axis in critical illness remains limited, with recent evidence suggesting that cortisol levels appear to be independent of ACTH. This leads to further uncertainty regarding the role of steroids in critical care, including their role in trauma patients.
Glucose control
Insulin therapy with optimum glucose levels have been long debated. Many studies have suggested that tight control, although optimizing wound healing and decreasing the incidence of infections, can be detrimental as it risks hypoglycaemia. Nonetheless it continues to be studied, with suggestions that subgroups of patients such as those with severe trauma, should have tighter control.
Enhanced recovery pathways
There has been a surge of interest in recent years in anaesthesia and surgery, reviewing the management of patients in the perioperative period, to develop multimodal perioperative care pathways, the so called ‘enhanced recovery’ programmes. The concept is to optimize recovery and rehabilitation, with many of the interventions aiming to minimize the stress response of surgery through optimal nutrition, management of analgesia and physiotherapy. Initially the focus was on colorectal surgery, but now this has been expanded into multiple other areas including orthopaedic and upper gastrointestinal surgery.
Nutrition
The hypercatabolic state associated with trauma can lead to muscle atrophy and a resultant negative nitrogen balance. If inadequate fuel sources are available, ketogenesis occurs which can exacerbate any existing acidaemia. Nutritional supplementation is necessary to enable a supply of amino acids for regeneration of protein and requirements are potentially higher in burn and multitrauma patients. ESPEN guidelines recommend that all trauma patients should preferentially receive early enteral nutrition instead of early parenteral nutrition where possible and a higher protein intake should be considered due to high protein losses. The necessity to supply micronutrients as well as glutamine is a hotly debated issue, with large trials not demonstrating a clear benefit.
Other innovative approaches
Burns patients are a subgroup of trauma patients that have been described as being in a particularly marked hypermetabolic and catabolic state for even up to 3 years post injury with sustained levels of catecholamines, glucagon and glucocorticoid with insulin resistance. Increasingly, a significant amount of research is being done in this group of patients, especially in regards to analgesia, nutrition and fluid management.
Innovative approaches include using propranolol to not only manage the persistent tachycardia and development of a catecholamine induced cardiomyopathy, but to reduce resting energy expenditure.
Exercise and rehabilitation in the perioperative period can improve lean body mass, energy expenditure and overall mobility. Again this has been extensively studied in burns patients, but even post cardiothoracic and vascular surgery, it has been safely implemented.
Conclusions
Severe trauma results in immense physiological derangement, impacting metabolic, endocrine, autonomic and immune pathways. To survive traumatic insults the human body has evolved compensatory responses. The interventions needed to optimize these responses are still being determined.
As understanding and management of these patients has improved in recent years, so too has survival. Nonetheless, John Hunter, a military surgeon, as early as 1794, summed up the body’s innate ability to survive trauma and reminds us of the need to manage these patients with caution, to support rather than hinder these metabolic and endocrine responses:
‘ There is a circumstance attending accidental injury which does not belong to disease – namely, that the injury done has in all cases a tendency to produce both the disposition and the means of cure ’.