Systemic and Inhalational Agents for Labor Analgesia



Systemic and Inhalational Agents for Labor Analgesia


Samantha J. Wilson

Roshan Fernando



Introduction

The use of drugs to provide pain relief during labor dates back to 1847, when James Young Simpson anesthetized a parturient with a deformed pelvis using diethyl ether. Both the use of heavy sedation during labor and general anesthesia during uncomplicated vaginal delivery have since then been abandoned due to an increasing awareness of neonatal effects and the wish for women to be actively involved in childbirth. However, given that less than 10% of laboring women in the United States underwent childbirth without analgesia in 2001 (Table 7-1), analgesia plays an important role in labor.

Central neuraxial analgesia in the form of an epidural is currently the gold standard, providing effective maternal pain relief with few adverse effects on the mother and infant and have replaced systemic analgesics as the preferred techniques for many patients, with epidural uptake rates of up to 61% in major maternity centers in the United States (1).

However, although rates of epidural analgesia have been shown to be increasing with increasing availability of epidurals across all types of facilities worldwide, systemic analgesia use in labor remains a common practice. In the United Kingdom (UK), the NHS Maternity Statistics of 2005–2006 (2) show that only a third of parturients received regional techniques during their labor and delivery.

Several reasons exist for this continued use of systemic analgesia during labor. Firstly, epidural analgesia is not without well-documented risks. Unrecognized incorrect placement can be associated with serious consequences. Reports exist of intravascular, intrathecal, and subdural placements with incidences of 1 in 5,000, 1 in 2,900, and 1 in 4,200, respectively (3).

Regional analgesia may also be medically contraindicated, for example, if there is a coagulopathy or technical difficulty (e.g., following surgery to the lumbar spine). It may also be declined by some women on the basis of personal preference. Finally, although regional analgesia is becoming more and more accessible across all sorts of medical facilities, women will naturally continue to labor in places where epidurals may not be available.


Commonly Used Labor Analgesics


Systemic Agents: Opioids

Opioids are the most commonly used systemic medications for labor analgesia, and although they do not typically provide complete analgesia, they do allow the parturient to better tolerate labor pain. In addition, they are easily accessible worldwide, and easy to administer in most facilities as their use does not usually need any specialized equipment or personnel. Factors acting against their popularity include the frequency of side effects experienced by the parturient (e.g., nausea, vomiting, delayed gastric emptying, dysphoria, drowsiness, hypoventilation) combined with the concerning potential for adverse effects on the neonate.

Despite the longstanding tradition of the use of systemic opioids for labor analgesia, there has been a paucity of evidence to promote the use of one opioid over another and it appears to be the case that often the selection of an opioid has been based on institutional tradition and/or personal preference rather than having a scientific basis. The efficacy of systemic opioid analgesia and the incidence of side effects appear to be largely dose dependent rather than drug dependent.

The risks of neonatal respiratory depression and neurobehavioral changes exist with the use of all opioids due to several factors. Firstly, opioids easily cross the placenta by diffusion due to their lipid solubility and low molecular weight, and secondly, the metabolism and elimination of opioids are prolonged in neonates compared to adults. Thirdly, the blood–brain barrier is also less well developed and due to this there can be additional direct effects of opioids on the respiratory center of the neonate. The likelihood of neonatal respiratory depression at delivery is dependent on the dose and timing of opioid administration. In utero effects on the fetus can also be seen in the form of decreased beat-to-beat variability of the fetal heart rate (FHR). This change does not, however, usually reflect a worsening of fetal oxygenation or acid–base status.

The neonatal effects of maternal opioid administration can also be much more subtle than obvious neonatal depression at birth. For example, there may be slight changes in neonatal neurobehavior for several days, although the long-term clinical significance of these changes is unclear. Reynolds et al. (4) performed a meta-analysis of studies comparing epidural analgesia with systemic opioid analgesia using meperidine, butorphanol, or fentanyl. The authors concluded that lumbar epidural analgesia was associated with improved neonatal acid–base status. In addition, a multicenter randomized controlled trial by Halpern et al. (5) compared patient-controlled epidural analgesia to intravenous patient-controlled opioid analgesia and demonstrated a higher need for active neonatal resuscitation in the opioid group (52% vs. 31%).


Routes and Techniques of Administration

Opioids may be administered as intermittent bolus doses to the parturient, or as patient-controlled analgesia. The suitability of various types of opioids to these differing administration techniques will be discussed below and can be seen to be both dependent on, and affect the pharmacokinetic and dynamic properties of the drugs involved.


Intermittent Bolus Technique

Opioids may be administered intermittently by subcutaneous (SC), intramuscular (IM) or intravenous (IV) administration,
and the route and timing of this administration influence both maternal uptake and placental transfer. SC and IM injections have the advantage of relative safety and simplicity but can be painful and are associated with a variable absorption depending on the site of the injection. The injection itself is inevitably followed by a delay in the onset of analgesia. Therefore, delivery via SC or IM injection results in analgesia of variable onset, quality, and duration. The IV route of administration offers several advantages. Firstly, there is less variability in the peak plasma concentration of the drug; secondly, there is a faster onset of analgesia; and thirdly, the ability to titrate dose to effect tends to be much more achievable.








Table 7-1 Type of Labor Analgesia Used by Parturients Stratified by Births Per Annum




















































Labor Analgesia Stratum 1 (>1,500 births per annum) Stratum 2 (500–1,500 births per annum) Stratum 3 (100–500 births per annum)
1981 1992 2001 1981 1992 2001 1981 1992 2001
None 27 11 6 33 14 10 45 33 12
Parenteral 52 48 34 53 60 42 37 48 37
Epidural 22 51 61 13 33 42 9 17 35
Modified from: Bucklin BA, Hawkins JL, Anderson JR, et al. Obstetric Anesthesia Workforce Survey. Anesthesiology 2005;103:645–653.


Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesic Technique

Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) is widely and effectively used in the management of postoperative pain and has also been applied to the management of labor analgesia, with a recent survey of UK practice showing that 49% obstetric units offer PCIA for labor analgesia (6). Advantages of the PCIA technique over that of intermittent boluses have been shown to be plentiful with smaller, more frequent dosing resulting in a more stable plasma drug concentration and having a more consistent analgesic effect (7). Other advantages include superior pain relief with lower doses of drug, less risk of maternal respiratory depression, less placental transfer of drug, less need for antiemetic agents, and higher patient satisfaction (7).

PCIA can offer an attractive alternative for labor analgesia in hospitals when epidural anesthesia is unavailable or when contraindicated or unsuccessful. The mother can theoretically adjust the analgesic dose to her individual needs and achieve a greater perceived control over the situation. PCIA use has resulted in higher patient satisfaction scores than other methods of opioid administration. However, studies have not concurrently demonstrated either a reduced use of drug or improved analgesia with PCIA as compared with intravenous administration of an opioid by the obstetric nurse (8).








Table 7-2 Different Patient-Controlled Intravenous Labor Analgesia Regimens








































Drug Patient-Controlled IV Dose Lockout Period (min)
Meperidine 10–15 mg 8–20
Nalbuphine 1–3 mg 6–10
Morphine 1–2 mg 3–6
Diamorphine 1 mg 6
Alfentanil 250 μg 3–5
Fentanyl 10–25 μg 5–12
Remifentanil (bolus only) 0.4–0.5 μg/kg 2–3
Remifentanil (background infusion with bolus) 0.05 μg/kg/min with bolus 0.25 μg/kg 2–3
Modified from collated data: Saravanakumar K, Garstang JS, Hasan K. Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for labor: a survey of UK practice. Int J Obstet Anesth 2007;16:221–225 and Douma MR, Verwey RA, Kam-Endtz CE, et al. Obstetric analgesia: a comparison of patient-controlled meperidine, remifentanil and fentanyl in labour. Br J Anaesth 2010;104(2):209–215.

PCIA use for labor does have some limitations, as even frequent administration of small doses of opioid proves to not always be effective for the fluctuating intensity of labor pains, especially in the late first or second stage of labor (7). Many of the studies in this area have used variable, non-comparable methods to assess the risks to the neonate making the true risks to the fetus and neonate difficult to assess. In addition, variable doses and dosing intervals have also been used, including both the use of a background infusion with an added PCIA bolus as well as PCIA bolus alone, which can make comparison across different studies using a variety of opioids difficult. The most appropriate drug, drug dose, and dosing schedules have not necessarily yet been thoroughly defined with a wide variety being used (Table 7-2).


Individual Agents


Meperidine

Meperidine (pethidine, Demerol™) is the most widely used opioid for labor analgesia worldwide, with 84% of UK units prescribing meperidine for labor analgesia (9), usually at a dose of 100 mg IM 4 hourly for 2 doses. Onset of analgesia is 30 to 45 minutes with a 2- to 3-hour duration. Its popularity and widespread use are perpetuated by familiarity, ease of administration, low cost and until recently perhaps, a lack of extensive evidence that alternative opioids showed any significant superiority.

The use of meperidine has been investigated by Tsui et al. (10), who conducted the first double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of IM meperidine for labor analgesia. The study was terminated prematurely when interim analysis revealed significantly greater reduction in visual analog scale
(VAS) pain scores with 100 mg IM meperidine versus saline control. The analgesic effect was found to be modest, however, with a median change in VAS pain score of 11 mm (95% CI 2 to 26 mm) at 30 minutes.








Table 7-3 Fetal and Neonatal Effects of Meperidine








































Fetal Effects Reduced Muscular Activity
Aortic blood flow    
Oxygen saturation    
Short-term heart rate variability    
Neonatal Effects Depressed Apgar Scores
Respiration    
Neurobehavioral scores    
Muscle tone and suckling    
A detrimental effect on breast feeding    
From: Reynolds F. Labour analgesia and the baby: good news is no news. Intl J Obstet Anesth 2011;20:38–50.

Maternal, fetal, and neonatal side effects are ongoing concerns with meperidine use. Maternal nausea, vomiting, and sedation all occur frequently. Fetal and neonatal effects relate to the pharmacokinetic properties of meperidine and are shown in Table 7-3, as well as being discussed below. It is a synthetic opioid which readily crosses the placenta by passive diffusion, equilibrating between materno-fetal compartments in 6 minutes (11). Decreased FHR variability occurs 25 to 40 minutes after administration and resolves within an hour (12). Maternal half-life is 2.5 to 3 hours but neonatal half-life is prolonged at 18 to 23 hours (13). It is metabolized in the liver to produce normeperidine, a pharmacologically active metabolite which is a potent respiratory depressant. This crosses the placenta and is also produced by the neonate’s own metabolism of meperidine.

Normeperidine has a half-life of 60 hours in the neonate (14). Neonatal complications relate to the total dose and dose-delivery time. Maximal fetal uptake of meperidine occurs 2 to 3 hours after maternal IM administration and studies have shown that infants born within this time have increased risk of respiratory depression (15,16). Normeperidine accumulates after multiple doses or after prolonged dose–delivery interval (17) and may be associated with altered neonatal neurobehavior including reduced duration of wakefulness, reduced attentiveness, and impaired breast feeding (18,19,20).

The efficacy of meperidine use in labor with variable administration techniques was investigated by Isenor and Penny-McGillivray (21), who compared intermittent bolus IM meperidine (50 to 100 mg 2 hourly) and PCIA meperidine with background infusion 60 mg/h and bolus 25 mg up to a maximum of 200 mg. They found that pain scores were significantly lower in the PCIA group and that there was no difference in maternal side effects, FHR or neonatal Apgars in this small group. However, when meperidine PCIA is compared with shorter acting opioids, it has been shown to have disadvantages. Volikas et al. (22) compared 10 mg meperidine with 5-minute lockout to 0.5 μg/kg remifentanil with a 2-minute lockout. The study was terminated after 17 subjects due to concern about poor neonatal Apgar scores in the meperidine group (median score 5.5 at 1 minute, and 7.5 at 5 minutes). Blair et al. (23) also compared meperidine PCIA (15 mg, 10-minute lockout) to remifentanil PCIA (40 μg, 2-minute lockout). VAS pain scores were similar in both groups but neurologic and adaptive capacity scores were significantly lower in the meperidine group. These studies show a clear advantage to the use of shorter acting opioids, such as remifentanil, in the PCIA technique as compared to meperidine.


Morphine

Historically, morphine had been administered in combination with scopolamine to provide “twilight sleep” during labor and delivery, with good analgesia being obtained at the expense of excessive maternal sedation and neonatal depression. Morphine is also used in the present day in some North American hospitals as a single agent in early labor, at doses of 5 to 10 mg IM or 2 to 5 mg IV with a time of onset at 20 to 40 minutes or 3 to 5 minutes, respectively, and a duration of 3 to 4 hours (24).

Morphine is metabolized by conjugation to its major inactive and active metabolites. Morphine-3-glucuronide is the major inactive metabolite and is excreted in the urine with 66% clearance in 6 hours if renal function is normal (24,25). Morphine-6-glucuronide is the active metabolite, which is produced in smaller amounts (1:4). This has significant analgesic properties but also a respiratory depressant effect (26,27). Morphine rapidly crosses the placenta with a fetal to maternal blood concentration ratio of 0.96 at 5 minutes (28). The elimination half-life is increased in neonates (at 6.5 +/- 2.8 hours) as compared to adults (at 2.0 +/- 1.8 hours) (28,29). FHR variability decreases as with other opioids.

Oloffson et al. (30) assessed the analgesic efficacy of IV morphine during labor (0.05 mg/kg every third contraction to a maximum of 0.2 mg/kg) and found clinically insignificant reductions in pain intensity. The group’s further work (31) compared IV morphine (up to 0.15 mg/kg) to IV meperidine (up to 1.5 mg/kg) and found high pain scores were maintained in both groups despite high levels of sedation. Way et al. (32) showed that IM morphine given to newborns caused greater respiratory depression than an equipotent dose of meperidine when response to CO2 was measured, and attributed it to an increased permeability of the neonatal brain to morphine.

The concern regarding using morphine PCIA in labor is the accumulation of the active metabolite, morphine-6-glucuronide, a respiratory depressant, which may increase the incidence of neonatal adverse events. There are no studies to compare modes of administration of morphine in labor. Morphine PCIA is not routinely used in labor when there is a viable fetus.


Diamorphine

Diamorphine (3,6-diacetylmorphine, heroin) is a synthetic derivative of morphine used as a labor analgesic and has been reported to provide rapid, effective analgesia with euphoria and reduced nausea and vomiting. Although it is not available legally anywhere other than the UK, it is used in 34% UK obstetric units, and in some areas of the country, it is used more frequently than meperidine (9). Diamorphine is rapidly metabolized to 6 monoacetylmorphine via hydrolytic ester cleavage (33). The greater lipid solubility as compared to morphine accounts for its rapid onset. A significant proportion of analgesic activity is due to the metabolite 6-monoacetylmorphine, which crosses the placenta and is associated with respiratory depression. Further breakdown to morphine occurs and this is metabolized by conjugation as already described (34). Typically, a dose of 5 to 7.5 mg IM diamorphine is used, with the administration of higher doses being linked to neonatal respiratory depression (35).

Rawal et al. (35) investigated the effects of a single dose of diamorphine on free morphine concentrations in the umbilical cord at delivery. Following diamorphine 7.5 mg IM, they
found evidence of rapid fetal exposure to morphine and a significant correlation between dose–delivery interval and umbilical cord morphine levels. There was a trend toward lower 1-minute Apgar scores, the need for resuscitation, and higher morphine concentrations in those infants born after a short dose–delivery interval.

In 1999, Fairlie et al. (36) compared IM meperidine (150 mg) to IM diamorphine (7.5 mg) and found significantly more of the meperidine group reported no or poor pain relief at 60 minutes. The trial was small, but suggested that diamorphine conferred some benefits over meperidine with regard to maternal side effects, notably vomiting, and neonatal condition as assessed by Apgar scores at 1 minute. High numbers in both groups required analgesia in addition to meperidine though, suggesting poor efficacy of analgesia achieved by both meperidine and diamorphine.

Diamorphine PCIA has been found to be associated with higher pain scores and lower satisfaction scores when compared to intermittent IM bolus in labor (37). As is the case for morphine, diamorphine PCIA is also not frequently used for labor.


Fentanyl

Fentanyl is a highly lipid soluble, highly protein bound synthetic opioid with an analgesic potency 100 times that of morphine and 800 times that of meperidine. Its rapid onset (peak effect 3 to 4 minutes), short duration of action and lack of active metabolites make it attractive for labor analgesia. However, large doses of fentanyl may accumulate, and the context sensitive half-time (the time for plasma concentration to decrease by 50% after stopping an infusion which had achieved steady-state plasma concentration) of fentanyl increases with the length of infusion.

Fentanyl readily crosses the placenta but the average umbilical to maternal concentration ratio remains low at 0.31. Eisele et al. (38) found that 1 μg/kg fentanyl provided good analgesia without significant hemodynamic effect and with no adverse effect on Apgar scores, acid–base status or neurobehavioral scores at 2 and 24 hours. Rayburn et al. (39) administered 50 to 100 μg fentanyl IV as often as hourly at maternal request during labor. All patients experienced transient analgesia and sedation. Reduced FHR variability occurred but there was no difference, when compared with a group of infants unexposed to analgesia, with regard to Apgar scores, respiratory depression, or neurologic and adaptive capacity scores at 2 to 4 hours or 24 hours. Rayburn et al. (40) also compared fentanyl (50 to 100 μg IV hourly) and an equi-analgesic dose of meperidine (25 to 50 mg IV 2 to 3 hourly). The authors found less sedation, vomiting, and significantly less naloxone use for neonatal respiratory depression with fentanyl but no difference in neurologic and adaptive capacity scores. Unfortunately, both groups had similarly high pain scores, suggesting poor efficacy of both analgesics.

The pharmacokinetic profile of fentanyl with rapid onset, high potency, short duration, and absence of active metabolites makes it particularly suitable for PCIA mode of delivery and because of this is one of the most common opioids for labor PCIA. In the UK it was found to be used in 26% of the units which offer PCIA for labor (6).

Rayburn et al. (40) compared PCIA fentanyl (10 μg, 12-minute lockout) to intermittent IV fentanyl (50 to 100 μg hourly) and found equivalent analgesia and sedation between the groups. Unfortunately, however, both groups had incomplete analgesia in late labor. Neonatal Apgar scores, naloxone requirement, and neuroadaptive tests were comparable. Morley-Forster and Weberpals (41) found a 44% incidence of moderate neonatal depression (1-minute Apgar <6) in a retrospective review of 32 neonates after maternal fentanyl PCIA. They found a significant difference in total dose of fentanyl in the mothers of neonates who required naloxone (mean 770 ± SD 233 μg vs. 298 ± 287 μg).


Alfentanil

Alfentanil is a fentanyl derivative with reduced potency (10 times less than fentanyl). Alfentanil is less lipophilic and more protein bound, so has a low volume of distribution, which results in a rapid onset (within 1 minute), short duration of action, and rapid clearance (elimination half-life is only 90 minutes). It has a shorter context sensitive half-life than fentanyl. It has, however, been associated with greater depression of neonatal scores than meperidine (42). Morley-Forster et al. (43) compared PCIA alfentanil (200 μg bolus, 5-minute lockout and 200 μg/h basal infusion) to PCIA fentanyl (20 μg bolus, 5-minute lockout and 20 μg/h basal rate). PCIA alfentanil failed to provide adequate analgesia late in labor as compared to fentanyl. There were no significant differences in maternal side effects or neonatal outcome. They concluded that alfentanil was less effective as PCIA than fentanyl.


Remifentanil

Remifentanil is a novel ultra-short acting mu-receptor agonist with a rapid onset of action (brain–blood equilibration occurs in 1.2 to 1.4 minutes) and is rapidly metabolized by plasma and tissue esterases to an inactive metabolite (44). It has a constant context sensitive half-life of 3.5 minutes, which is independent of the duration of infusion. The effective analgesia half-life is longer at 6 minutes allowing effective analgesia for several consecutive painful uterine contractions (45).

Plasma concentrations in pregnancy are about half that of the non-pregnant state. This may be due to the increased volume of distribution, with higher blood volume and reduced protein binding, and greater clearance due to increased cardiac output and renal perfusion with higher esterase activity. Remifentanil crosses the placenta rapidly; the umbilical vein to maternal blood ratio is 0.85. However, umbilical artery to vein concentration ratio is low, at 0.29, demonstrating that the drug is rapidly redistributed and metabolized by the fetus (46). Remifentanil was introduced into obstetric analgesia at the end of the 1990s and has many advantages as an opioid PCIA for this purpose. In 2007, 33% of UK obstetric units that offered labor PCIA were using remifentanil (47) and this is likely to increase as clinical confidence with the technique grows.


Analgesic Efficacy

Remifentanil has been assessed in comparison to many other analgesics and a growing body of evidence exists to suggest its efficacy (Table 7-4). Thurlow et al. (48) compared remifentanil (20 μg IV bolus, 3-minute lockout) to the most commonly used opioid analgesic, meperidine 100 mg IM. Significantly, lower pain scores were found in the remifentanil group with a median pain score of 48 versus 72 (P = 0.004). Maternal side effects included mild sedation and more episodes of desaturation to less than 94% but there was reduced nausea and vomiting. No significant difference in neonatal Apgar scores was found. In addition, Volmanen et al. (49) performed a double-blind crossover trial (subjects used both analgesics in random order) comparing remifentanil 0.4 μg/kg and 1-minute lockout with 50% nitrous oxide. They showed a significant reduction in pain scores with remifentanil, yet no difference in maternal side effects other than sedation.

Blair et al. (23), on evaluating the efficacy of remifentanil versus meperidine PCIA, found that VAS pain scores were similar but that patient satisfaction was higher with remifentanil. In 2005, Evron et al. (50) performed a double-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing the analgesic effects of remifentanil PCIA with an IV infusion of meperidine in
early labor. More effective analgesia was achieved with remifentanil PCIA with lower VAS pain scores (36 vs. 59 mm) and higher patient satisfaction scores (3.9 vs. 1.9 using a 4 point scale, 1 = poor and 4 = excellent analgesia). In addition, the need to convert to epidural analgesia because of inadequate pain relief was less with remifentanil (11% vs. 39%).








Table 7-4 Summary of Studies on Remifentanil for Labor Analgesia







































































































  Remifentanil PCIA Bolus Dosea N Comparator Group Lockout Interval (min) Nitrous Oxide Used Median or Reduction in Pain Scores Conversion to Neuraxial Analgesia
Blair (57) 0.25–0.5 μg/kg 21 None 2 No Median 50 mm 4 of 21
Thurlow (48) 0.2 μg/kg 18 IM meperidine 2 Yes Median 48 mm 7 of 18
Volmanen (49) 0.4 μg/kg 20 Nitrous oxide 1   Reduction of 15 mm Not reported
Blair (23) 40 μg 20 PCIA meperidine 2 Yes Median 64 mm 2 of 20
Volmanen (54) 0.2–0.8 μg/kg 17 None 1 No Reduction of 42 mm Not reported
Evron (50) 0.27–0.93 μg/kg 43 meperidine infusion 3 No Median 35 mm 4 of 43
Volikas (54) 0.5 μg/kg 50 None 2 No Mean 46 mm 5 of 50
Balki (56) 0.25–1.0 μg/kg variable bolus + fixed IV infusion 20 0.025–0.1 μg/kg/min variable infusion + fixed IV bolus 2 No Reduction of 56 mm vs. 41 mm (variable bolus vs. variable infusion) 1 of 20
Volmanen (58) 0.3–0.7 μg/kg 24 Epidural 1 No Median 73 mm Not reported
Douma (51) 40 μg 52 PCIA meperidine, PCIA fentanyl 2 No Mean 46 mm at 1 h
Mean 57 mm at 2 h
Mean 72 mm at 3 h
7 or 52
All pain scores reported in millimeter (0–100 mm scale) for comparison between studies.
aWhen indicated, most bolus doses were administered over 1 min.
PCIA, patient-controlled intravenous analgesia; IM, intramuscular.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Sep 16, 2016 | Posted by in ANESTHESIA | Comments Off on Systemic and Inhalational Agents for Labor Analgesia

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access