Surgery, Anesthesia, and the Immature Brain

23 Surgery, Anesthesia, and the Immature Brain

MILLIONS OF CHILDREN UNDERGO SURGERY with anesthesia every year.1 During the perioperative period they are exposed to a multitude of stressors capable of interfering with normal brain development. Pain, stress, inflammation, hypoxia, and ischemia have all previously been shown to adversely affect the immature central nervous system. However, recent findings from animal studies have indicated that sedatives and anesthetics—the very drugs used to reduce pain and stress—may themselves undesirably influence brain development by triggering structural and functional abnormalities. There is now an extensive body of work, mostly based on laboratory research, that has defined this phenomenon and explored mechanisms and protective strategies. However, translating these laboratory findings to humans in clinical settings is laden with uncertainties and questions.

Human epidemiologic studies have found mixed evidence for an association between surgery (and anesthesia) in childhood, and subsequent neurodevelopmental delay. Some studies identified more learning disabilities in children after surgery with general anesthesia early in life, whereas others have not. Although surgery or comorbidities may play a central role in these abnormalities, emerging laboratory data regarding the deleterious effects of anesthesia without surgery has forced clinicians to consider the possibility that anesthetics may play a role in this phenomenon. However, similar to the uncertainties surrounding animal studies, the interpretation of the human data is fraught with substantial limitations.

Any discussion of the long-term effects of anesthetics on the developing brain is further complicated by the fact that anesthetic drugs may be neuroprotective under certain conditions, and may indeed mitigate brain damage that is due to inflammatory responses, hypoxia-ischemia, or other insults that might occur during the perioperative period.

It is currently impossible to provide any definitive statements about the effects of anesthesia on neurodevelopment. This chapter provides an overview of the current laboratory and clinical data concerning the affect of sedatives, anesthetics, and analgesics on the immature brain.


About 160 years ago, William T. G. Morton conducted the first public demonstration of a drug-induced, reversible coma, later termed anesthesia, at the Massachusetts General Hospital and instantaneously revolutionized the field of surgery. After witnessing Morton’s demonstration, Oliver Wendell Holmes coined the name for what he saw from the greek words “an” (without) and “esthesia” (sensibility). The inscription on Morton’s tombstone, “Inventor and Revealer of Inhalation Anesthesia: Before Whom, in All Time, Surgery was Agony; By Whom, Pain in Surgery was Averted and Annulled; Since Whom, Science has Control of Pain,” represents a powerful testament to the tremendously positive impact that anesthesiology has made on the field of medicine. This positive impact is now tempered by the possibility that anesthetics may impede normal brain development in the young. During the first century of their use, general anesthetics quickly became ubiquitous during surgery, although they were also regarded with serious concern because they were combustible and they depressed the hemodynamic and respiratory systems. Accordingly, up until 25 years ago, general anesthesia was rarely used in critically ill neonates because of the fear of myocardial depression and hemodynamic instability. Perioperative drug regimens were limited by some to neuromuscular blocking drugs and nitrous oxide. However, with the realization that unopposed pain exerted deleterious effects on the developing brain, that dramatic stress responses to painful stimulation can be detected even in preterm infants, and that modern anesthetics and analgesics can abolish these responses without substantial hemodynamic compromise, pediatric anesthesia, for the past two decades, has afforded critically ill neonates the benefits of amnesia, analgesia, and immobility during increasingly invasive surgery. These surgical interventions have helped to save lives and preserve the quality of life in one of the most vulnerable of patient populations. All the while, the powerful effects of general anesthetics on the brain were thought to be limited to the duration of immediate exposure, and no serious long-term adverse effects were expected following emergence from anesthesia. This notion of safety is now being seriously questioned, because apoptosis (defined as programmed cell death, see later) has been detected in neonatal animals during and immediately after anesthesia, and long-term learning defects have been reported in animals and children that were exposed to anesthesia at a young age.

Normal Brain Development

The human brain undergoes a complex and extended process of enormous growth in cell number, synapses, and connections. Combined with this expansion of cells and connections, massive regressive processes also occur during normal brain development. These expanding and regressive processes allow the brain to fully develop and eventually execute complex tasks, such as talking, walking, reading, writing, calculating, acquiring social skills, perfecting fine motor dexterity, and planning and executing long-term objectives, while at the same time maintaining all life-sustaining functions. In order to accomplish these tasks, several specialized cells populate the brain. These cells are commonly divided into two large groups: neurons and glial cells, the latter subdivided into astrocytes and oligodendrocytes. Neural development starts with proliferation from a neural stem cell, followed by migration of that cell to its final place, differentiation into a specialized neuron, outgrowth of synapses during synaptogenesis to integrate into neural networks, and, finally, myelination of axons. In humans, many of these specialized processes occur in utero, but will also continue for an extended period of time postnatally. Indeed, some brain regions exhibit lifelong neurogenesis.

In utero and during the early postnatal period, the human brain initially undergoes a rapid growth in size and cell number, and is then pared back to achieve the efficient network of about 100 billion neurons of the adult brain. At birth, the size of the immature brain is one-third that of the adult brain, doubling in size within the first year of life, and reaching 90% of its eventual size by 6 years of age.2 This dramatic growth spurt coincides with a remarkable overabundance of neurons and neuronal connections. In fact, less than half the neurons generated during development survive into adulthood.3,4 Superfluous neurons that lose in the competition for a limited amount of trophic factors are removed by programmed cell death. Also called apoptosis, this cellular suicide program is built into every mammalian cell. Apoptotic cells enter a well-orchestrated, stepwise, and energy-consuming destruction process that involves a cascade of enzymes called caspases and ultimately leads to the breakdown of cellular proteins and DNA.5 This process is heavily used during development, such as during embryonal deletion of the interdigital mesenchymal tissue to separate fingers and toes. Similar to the clotting cascade, the apoptotic cascade remains active throughout life and is held in check by antiapoptotic factors, whereas proapoptotic factors promote its execution. Neurons are protected from apoptosis by neurotrophic factors. Conversely, noxious stimuli, such as pain, hypoxia, and ischemia, can increase the level of proapoptotic factors and activate the apoptotic suicide program, leading to neuronal cell death.

In addition to an overabundance in the total number of neurons generated during early development, the mammalian brain also forms an excess of neuronal connections, or synapses, during this period. Depending on brain region, synaptic density reaches its maximum in infants and young toddlers between 3 and 15 months of age, and will undergo a progressive reduction by about half into adulthood.6 Connections that are active with continued electrical and chemical signals are sustained, whereas those with little or no activity are lost.

In summary, brain architecture changes rapidly and dramatically throughout life. Neuronal density is greatest during fetal life, and excess neurons are eliminated via apoptosis, predominantly in utero, during the neonatal period and throughout infancy.7 Rapid growth of dendrites and synaptic connections occurs during infancy and early childhood, and unneeded dendrites and synapses are trimmed back, predominantly during later childhood and adolescence.6,7

Accordingly, the first several years after birth represent a critical period of development for many brain regions. Recent findings in animals suggest that exposure to anesthetics or sedatives may interfere with proper neuronal development, brain architecture, and subsequent function. Although the exact molecular mechanisms by which anesthetics afford their therapeutic properties of amnesia, analgesia, and immobility are only incompletely understood, their interaction with a wide variety of ion channels, such as sodium, calcium, and potassium channels, as well as several cell membrane proteins, including the receptors for γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), glycine, glutamate (and N-methyl-d-aspartate [NMDA]), acetylcholine, and serotonin, make it conceivable that anesthetics could interfere with normal electrical and chemical activity in the developing brain. In fact, both GABA and NMDA play critical roles as trophic factors and in regulating neuronal maturation and programmed cell death. During brain development, GABA directs cell proliferation, neuroblast migration, and dendritic maturation.8 Developmental NMDA receptor stimulation fosters survival and maturation of some neurons.9,10 It is therefore not implausible that anesthetics might interfere with these developmental processes.

Effects of Anesthetic Exposure on the Developing Brain

Concerns regarding neurologic abnormalities following general anesthesia in young children were first raised more than half a century ago, when postoperative personality changes were observed following the administration of vinyl ether, cyclopropane, or ethyl chloride for otolaryngologic surgery.11 However, these abnormalities were felt to be psychological in nature because they were alleviated by the timely administration of preoperative sedative drugs.11,12 Approximately two decades later the focus of research shifted to examine the effects of anesthetics in animal models that represented occupational exposure in pregnant healthcare workers.1316 Delayed synaptogenesis and behavioral abnormalities were observed in neonatal rats born to dams that were chronically exposed to subanesthetic doses of halothane during their entire pregnancy. However, interest in the effects of anesthetics on children did not elicit widespread interest until publications began to appear 10 years ago. In a seminal study in neonatal rat pups, widespread neuronal degeneration was observed after repeated injections of ketamine.17 This led to numerous editorials and review articles, and more than 200 publications in which structural brain abnormalities and/or functional impairment were demonstrated after a wide variety of immature animal species (including chicks, mice, rats, guinea pigs, swine, sheep, and rhesus monkeys) were exposed to almost every sedative and anesthetic in clinical use.1865 However, no discussion about the effects of drug exposure on the developing brain would be complete without examining the effects of opioid analgesics in the developing brain.54,55 Accordingly, this chapter will examine the various specific effects of sedatives, anesthetics, and analgesics in the immature brain.

Apoptotic Cell Death

The most widely studied deleterious consequence of exposure to sedatives or anesthetics in immature animals is apoptosis, or programmed cell death. Although neuronal apoptosis eliminates approximately 50% to 70% of neurons throughout the brain during development, at any particular time, this natural process affects only a small fraction of cells. Exposure to anesthetics or sedatives briefly, but dramatically, increases the number of apoptotic neurons (Fig. 23-1). Some studies demonstrated up to a 68-fold increase in the density of degenerating neurons after a combination of anesthetics in neonatal rats, compared with control animals, although it remains unclear what fraction of the entire neuronal population these degenerating neurons represent. Unpublished data from one of the authors’ laboratory suggest that a 6-hour exposure to a clinically relevant dose of isoflurane triggers apoptotic cell death in 2% of neurons in the superficial cortex of neonatal mice, whereas less than 0.1% of neurons undergo physiologic apoptosis in this region in unanesthetized litter mates (Loepke, personal communication). Interestingly, dying neurons are immediately adjacent to seemingly unaffected neighboring cells (Fig. 23-2), and the exact mechanism and selectivity of the cell death process remains unknown. Increased neuroapoptosis has also been observed following either in vitro or in vivo, exposure to a wide variety of sedatives and anesthetics, including chloral hydrate, clonazepam, diazepam, midazolam, nitrous oxide, desflurane, enflurane, halothane, isoflurane, sevoflurane, ketamine, pentobarbital, phenobarbital, propofol, and xenon, as well as opioid receptor agonists, in a wide variety of species, including chicks, mice, rats, guinea pigs, piglets, and rhesus monkeys (E-Table 23-1). Cell death–selective stains, such as cupric silver and Fluoro-Jade (EMD Millipore, Billerica, Mass.), have confirmed the cellular demise in neurons that positively stain for activated caspase 3, the central executioner enzyme of the apoptotic cascade.


Apoptosis represents an inherent, energy-consuming process using a cascade of enzymes called caspases. Apoptosis is highly conserved among species and culminates in self-destruction and elimination of cells, even under physiologic conditions, when these cells are functionally redundant or potentially detrimental to the organism.208 Apoptosis involves an orderly breakdown of the cell that includes chromatin aggregation, nuclear and cytoplasmic condensation, and partitioning of cytoplasmic and nuclear material into apoptotic bodies for subsequent phagocytosis, without an extensive inflammatory response. That contrasts with the features observed during necrosis, which include energy failure, cellular swelling, membrane rupture, and release of cytoplasmic content into the extracellular compartment, followed by an inflammatory response.208 Accordingly, apoptosis has also been termed cellular suicide and is extensively used during tissue homeostasis, endocrine-dependent tissue atrophy, and normal embryogenesis (e.g., ablation of tail tissue as part of tadpole metamorphosis in amphibians). Similarly, brain cells are also produced in excess during normal brain development, and up to 50% to 70% of immature neurons are eliminated during normal brain maturation in rodents, nonhuman primates, and humans.3,4 Accordingly, physiologic apoptotic cell death is critical to establish proper brain structure and function, and any disruption of this process can lead to massive brain malformations and intrauterine demise.209 However, in addition to this intrinsic pathway of physiologic, developmental apoptosis, cell death can also be triggered by pathologic, extrinsic factors, such as hypoxia and ischemia.210 It currently remains unknown whether anesthesia-induced neuroapoptosis accelerates physiologic programmed cell death or whether it eliminates cells not destined to die, as in pathologic apoptosis.

Animal studies have identified a narrow window of maximum susceptibility to neuronal cell death induced by several anesthetic drugs, such as the NMDA antagonist ketamine, the GABA agonist isoflurane, or ethanol (a combined NMDA antagonist and GABA agonist). Ketamine-induced neuronal demise occurs in neonatal rodents between 5 and 7 days of age, or before 6 days of age in monkeys, but not in older animals.17,69,139 Similarly, neurotoxicity was not detected after isoflurane anesthesia in 1-day-old animals or in those more than 10 days of age, whereas neuroapoptosis reached a maximum effect at 7 days of age.87 However, preliminary data from the laboratory of one of the authors challenges the notion that anesthetic-induced neuroapoptosis is limited to this age range (Loepke and associates, unpublished data). Conversely, intrauterine exposure to clinical doses of isoflurane in prenatal rats may actually decrease physiologic apoptosis and improve subsequent memory retention,96 whereas only supraclinical doses of isoflurane induced neuroapoptosis in this setting.112

Long-Term Brain Cellular Viability, Neurologic Function, and Behavior

In order to answer the important question whether anesthetics simply hasten physiologic apoptosis or whether they induce pathologic apoptosis, long-term neuronal density and neurologic function have to be assessed in adult animals exposed to anesthesia as neonates. If exposure to anesthetics or analgesics only temporarily accelerated physiologic apoptosis, one would expect normal cell counts and function in adult animals. Conversely, a permanent neuronal cell loss and long-term neurocognitive impairment after anesthetic exposure early in life would suggest that anesthesia-induced neuronal apoptosis may be pathologic in nature. However, this would only be true if the organism was unable to compensate for the neonatal cell loss by increasing neuronal plasticity and repair. To answer these questions, several studies measured neurologic function, assessed behavior, and/or determined neuronal density in adult animals after they were exposed to anesthesia in the neonatal period. Unfortunately, results from these studies are conflicting. Several studies reported long-term neurocognitive or behavioral abnormalities after exposure of neonates to enflurane, halothane, isoflurane, sevoflurane, propofol, or ketamine, or to a combination of isoflurane, nitrous oxide, and midazolam.* Importantly, however, many of these studies only observed abnormalities in very specific tests or subsets of neurocognitive batteries, whereas many other neurobehavioral domains remained intact. For example, a 6-hour exposure to midazolam, isoflurane, and nitrous oxide in neonatal rats led to transient impairment in a water maze learning task in young adulthood and in older animals, whereas, in the same animals, several other tests of behavior and learning, including acoustic startle response, sensorimotor tests, spontaneous behavior in an open field, and learning and memory in the radial arms maze, remained unimpaired.85 Similarly, after a 4-hour exposure to the minimal alveolar concentration (1 MAC) of isoflurane in 7-day-old rats, long-term memory retention was abnormal at two time points, whereas performance at several other time points, as well as in other tests of learning and memory, remained intact.107 Accordingly, the relevance of these limited learning deficits remains uncertain. Similar to humans, performance of rodents and primates in learning tasks depends to a great extent on maternal behavior and rearing conditions, making them strong confounders during neurocognitive testing.105,211213 Moreover, another obvious and important factor in neurocognitive testing is the verification of similar degrees of motivation when comparing separate groups of animals. For example, a 24-hour exposure to ketamine sedation early in life impaired subsequent performance of rhesus monkeys in learning and memory tests, in addition to decreasing their motivation to perform these tasks.158

Studies of prolonged opioid administration in immature animals have also found evidence for long-term impairment in learning tasks,174-176,179181 as well as altered pain responses in adult animals after exposure to morphine, fentanyl, heroin, or methadone early in life.

Conversely, several other investigations have observed no neurologic abnormalities after administration of midazolam, isoflurane, sevoflurane, or ketamine, even when using complex neurologic tests in neonatal animals.* It remains to be determined whether these differential findings are attributable to the anesthetic doses, exposure times, species, or related to the type or timing of the neurologic tests performed. Interestingly, escalating exposure times of isoflurane in neonatal rats caused neuronal apoptosis beginning at 2 hours of anesthesia, but no evidence of long-term neurologic abnormalities until 4 hours of anesthesia.106 In another study, a 6-hour exposure to isoflurane caused significant apoptosis immediately after exposure in neonatal mice, but resulted in no measurable long-term deficit in performance of complex neurologic tests as adult animals.105 Moreover, in brain regions significantly affected by the neonatal neuroapoptosis, adult neuronal density was not diminished compared with unanesthetized litter mates.105 These findings could either suggest that isoflurane may only accelerate physiologic apoptosis or that the developing brain’s plasticity and capacity for repair could compensate for a pathologic insult early in life. Conversely, a study in similarly aged rats observed a permanent elimination of neurons, as well as neurologic abnormalities in adult animals, after exposure to isoflurane, nitrous oxide, and midazolam as neonates, suggesting that either the specific combination of anesthetic drugs (isoflurane alone vs. the combination exposure) or species differences (rats vs. mice) could affect any relationships between neonatal neuroapoptosis and long-term function and neuronal density.97 Alternatively, these conflicting results may be explained by the dissimilar testing environment, because neurocognitive tests are easily transferable among laboratories.214 On the other hand, neonatal apoptosis may not be causally linked to adult neurocognitive performance at all, as evidenced by substantial apoptosis immediately after carbon dioxide–induced hypercarbia in neonatal rats without long-term neurologic sequelae.107

Decrease in Trophic Factors

Isoflurane- or propofol-based anesthesia in the neonatal animal has been associated with a decrease in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF),91,109,198 a protein integral to neuronal survival, growth, and differentiation. The cellular mechanism involves a reduction in tissue plasminogen activator and plasmin, which converts proBDNF to BDNF. Accordingly, isoflurane triggered proBDNF/p75NTR (p75 neurotrophin receptor) complex–mediated apoptosis in neonatal mice.109 Moreover, prolonged exposure to opioid receptor agonists early in life has also been found to alter nerve growth factors in the immature brain.66,164

Degeneration of Mitochondria

Ultrastructural morphologic abnormalities have been reported in mitochondria of pyramidal neurons in the subiculum of 7-day-old rats after 6 hours of isoflurane, nitrous oxide, and midazolam.126 A morphometric analysis demonstrated mitochondrial enlargement, impaired structural integrity, and decreased mitochondrial density, indicative of a protracted injury to the mitochondria after anesthetic exposure. Moreover, ultrastructural examination of pyramidal neurons of anesthetized animals by electron microscopy revealed evidence for increased autophagy, a form of cell death.

Abnormal Reentry into Cell Cycle

Ketamine induces reentry of postmitotic neurons into cell cycle in immature rats.155 Neuronal progenitor cells enter cell cycle during proliferation, but mature neurons lose this ability, and if they are forced to reenter cell cycle they will follow a path to apoptotic cell death.

Effects on the Developing Spinal Cord

Most animal studies have focused on the effect of general anesthetics and sedatives on the developing brain. However, it is important to also consider the developmental impact of anesthetics on the spinal cord. After 6 hours of 0.75% isoflurane with 75% nitrous oxide in 7-day-old rats, neuroapoptosis increased in the lumbar region of the spinal cord.100 Similar results were reported after 6 hours of isoflurane in a similar model, although 1 hour of isoflurane or spinal bupivacaine resulted in no neuroapotosis.124 Intrathecal ketamine causes neuroapoptosis in the developing spinal cord of 3-day-old rats, but not at 7 days of age.157 Preservative-free ketamine was associated with long-term alterations in spinal cord function and gait disturbances,157 whereas, in a separate study, even high-dose intrathecal morphine produced no signs of spinal cord toxicity.215

Putative Mechanisms for Neurotoxicity

The exact mechanisms that trigger the above responses to anesthetics and sedatives in the immature brain remain unresolved. Elucidating these mechanisms is critical in order to establish the relevance of these findings for pediatric anesthesia and neonatal critical care medicine, as well as to develop mitigating interventions, if necessary. The current, overarching hypothesis is that anesthetics and sedatives interfere with normal GABAA and NMDA receptor–mediated activity, which are the putative targets for unconsciousness, amnesia, and immobility,216 but are also essential for mammalian central nervous system development.9,217 Some have suggested that administering GABAA-receptor agonists and/or NMDA-receptor antagonists may cause abnormal neuronal inhibition during a vulnerable period in brain development, triggering apoptosis in susceptible neurons, which in turn leads to neurocognitive impairment and decreased neuronal density in adults.22,60,85,97 Other lines of evidence suggest that the NMDA receptor–blocking properties of ketamine may upregulate NMDA receptors, rendering the neurons more susceptible to excitotoxic injury caused by endogenous glutamate immediately after ketamine withdrawal.135,139 However, several observations violate both hypotheses; neuronal cell death has been reported during exposure to anesthetics and not only after their discontinuation. Moreover, several anesthetics with minimal NMDA-receptor interaction, such as propofol and barbiturates, have demonstrated robust neurotoxic properties, whereas the neurotoxic potency of the NMDA-antagonist xenon is limited, therefore casting doubt on receptor upregulation being the sole mechanism for anesthetic neurotoxicity. In terms of abnormal neuronal inhibition being the main trigger for apoptosis in developing neurons, GABAA-receptor stimulation indeed decreases neuronal activity in the mature brain; however, it also causes excitation in developing neurons,218 thereby contradicting the inhibition hypothesis. In immature neurons, intracellular chloride (Cl) concentration is high, thus GABA-induced opening of Cl channels allows this anion to exit the cell, leading to membrane depolarization. On the other hand, the intracellular Cl concentration is low in mature neurons. When anesthetics open Cl channels in mature neurons, ions enter the cell, thereby hyperpolarizing the membrane. This reversal of the cellular Cl gradient occurs as a result of a switch from the immature Na+-K+-2Cl cotransporter 1 (NKCC1) to the mature brain form, K+-Cl cotransporter 2 (KCC2).219 Along these lines, studies in neonatal rats demonstrated excitatory properties in the brain and episodes of epileptic seizures during sevoflurane anesthesia in neonatal rats.204 Isoflurane has also been shown to cause an excessive release of Ca2+ from the endoplasmic reticulum via over-activation of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors (InsP3Rs) in neonatal rats in vivo and in vitro.220 A similar mechanism may be linked to the production of Alzheimer-associated increases in β-amyloid protein levels after anesthesia.221 Moreover, whereas xenon and hypothermia cause neuronal inhibition, they do not appear to exacerbate isoflurane-induced neuronal cell death, as expected by cumulative neuronal inhibition, but rather significantly reduce it.94,101,207

Importantly, evidence indicates that equianesthetic concentrations of the three contemporary inhalational anesthetics cause similar degrees of neuroapoptosis, suggesting that it is the anesthetic depth and not the doses of the anesthetics that determines the cytotoxic potency.71 However, other studies have failed to link the anesthetic and the apoptotic mechanisms. Specifically, although racemic ketamine and (S)-ketamine both elicit their anesthetic effects via NMDA-receptor blockade, (S)-ketamine induces up to 80% less cell death in vitro when compared with equipotent doses of racemic ketamine.154 Moreover, concomitant administration of the GABAA-receptor antagonist gabazine did not attenuate neuroapoptosis induced by the GABA agonist isoflurane, whereas the α2-agonist dexmedetomidine did.73 Decreases in anesthetic-induced neuronal activity may therefore be less important than the disruption of the neuronal balance of excitation and inhibition, as demonstrated by a series of studies that examined anesthesia-induced dendritic morphologic changes in mice.70,152 Whereas simultaneous blockade of excitatory and inhibitory activity with tetrodotoxin did not lead to structural changes during synaptogenesis as would have been expected from a causative relationship between neuronal inhibition and structural damage, the administration of either GABAA-agonistic or NMDA-antagonistic compounds alone altered synaptogenesis.152

It is not entirely clear at this time whether cytotoxicity is a direct effect of the anesthetic itself, or of anesthetic byproducts, or by the metabolic acidosis and respiratory derangements that have been observed during anesthesia in small rodents.105,107,222 Hypercarbia can trigger widespread neuroapoptosis, even in unanesthetized neonatal rats exposed to increased partial pressures of carbon dioxide. Whereas apoptotic cell death was quantitatively indistinguishable from neurodegeneration in isoflurane-treated litter mates, which were also hypercarbic, adult neurocognitive impairment was only observed in the isoflurane-treated animals.107

Lastly, experimental models of neurodegeneration have implicated reentry of postmitotic neurons into the cell cycle, leading to cell death. Ketamine exposure has been found to induce aberrant cell cycle reentry, leading to apoptotic cell death in the developing rat brain.155

Specific Anesthetic and Sedative Agents

In order to provide a succinct overview of the available laboratory data, we briefly review the effects of each class of anesthetics separately. Although the effects of some anesthetics, such as ketamine and isoflurane, have been extensively studied on the developing brain, the effects of others, such as xenon and desflurane, have not. However, the current data suggest that all anesthetics exert deleterious effects to some degree, on the developing animal brain (see E-Table 23-1). It is important to appreciate that although the MAC values for inhalational anesthetics are fairly constant across species, equipotent dosing of intravenous (IV) medications is not. That is, the dose of most IV medications to effect sedation or anesthesia in animals is approximately 6- to 10-fold greater than that in humans. The dosing is further complicated by the different routes by which drugs are administered in neonatal animals, which include the subcutaneous and intraperitoneal (IP) routes, as opposed to the oral or IV routes in humans. The possible importance of the interspecies differences in the pharmacology of IV medications on neuroapoptosis and cognitive dysfunction has not been addressed.


Possibly the most frequently studied anesthetic is ketamine, an antagonist of the NMDA and glutamate receptor that also interacts with other cell membrane proteins, such as muscarinic and opioid receptors, as well as voltage-gated calcium channels. Ketamine’s properties, which include potent analgesia, dissociative anesthesia, and relative hemodynamic stability, have made it a popular choice for procedural sedation in children, as well as for induction of anesthesia in children with critical congenital heart disease or pulmonary hypertension.223225 However, about 10 years ago, a seminal study that examined the effects of repeated IP injections of ketamine on the brain of neonatal rats observed widespread apoptosis.17 Seven injections of 20 mg/kg of ketamine, administered over a 9 hour period in evenly divided intervals, to 7-day-old rat pups caused a 3- to 31-fold increase in degenerating neurons, depending on brain region. This led to speculation that these changes might contribute to neuropsychiatric disorders.17 These initial findings for ketamine have been confirmed in more than fifty studies in small rodents, as well as nonhuman primates, both in vitro and in vivo (see E-Table 23-1). Several of these studies have identified relationships between neurodegeneration and dose, duration of treatment, as well as animal species and age during exposure. Single doses of up to 75 mg/kg or multiple IP injections up to 17 mg/kg/hr for 6 hours were not neurotoxic to neonatal rat brains,128 whereas single doses between 20 and 50 mg/kg were neurotoxic to neonatal mice brains.74,134 Six or seven repeated injections of 20 to 25 mg/kg consistently cause apoptosis in neonatal rat brains.17,128,131,149,150 Although the doses of ketamine in these small-animal models appeared to be excessive and plasma concentrations in the rodents were up to 7 times greater than those in humans,131 these increased doses are consistent with the requirements for IV anesthesia in small animals (refer to later section on interspecies comparison). Coadministration of midazolam, diazepam, propofol, or thiopental compounded the neuronal injury caused by ketamine.74,134,142 Studies in rats, mice, and nonhuman primates suggest that the susceptibility to ketamine-induced neurotoxicity is limited to a brief period after birth, with a maximum impact between 3 and 7 days of age in small rodents and less than 35 days of age in monkeys.17,139 Beyond these ages, ketamine-induced neuroapoptosis subsides. In addition to apoptosis, both small rodents and nonhuman primates that were anesthetized with ketamine have exhibited impaired learning tasks later in life.129,130,158

In summary, ketamine is the most frequently studied anesthetic, in terms to its neurotoxic effects, and has repeatedly been shown to cause widespread apoptosis (an effect that is exacerbated by the coadministration of other anesthetics), as well as neurologic impairment in adult animals exposed early in life. Importantly, long-lasting learning impairment has been demonstrated in nonhuman primates, the closest animal model to humans.158 However, these animals were anesthetized with ketamine for 24 hours to produce this effect, a duration that exceeds the usual clinical scenario. Furthermore, it is unclear whether the observed learning abnormalities could not be explained by a reduction in motivation to perform the learning tasks.158

Inhalational Anesthetics

The second most commonly studied class of drugs is the inhalational anesthetics (see E-Table 23-1). The anesthetics desflurane, sevoflurane, isoflurane, enflurane, and halothane exert their anesthetic properties predominantly by their agonistic effects on the GABAA receptor, but also by differing degrees on glycine, NMDA, acetylcholine, serotonin (5-HT3), α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA), and kainate receptors. Whereas GABA represents the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the adult central nervous system, it has excitatory properties in the developing brain,218 which may have implications for neurotoxicity, as discussed previously. Most studies of inhalational anesthetics examined either isoflurane alone or a combination of midazolam, isoflurane, and nitrous oxide. This combination of GABA agonists and NMDA antagonists has been repeatedly found to cause widespread increases in brain cell degeneration in neonatal animals.85,87,91,92 In addition to the immediate deleterious effects on brain structure, long-term abnormalities in spatial learning tasks and decreased neuronal cell density in adult rats have been observed after exposure to this anesthetic combination early in life.85,97 One MAC of isoflurane administered as the sole anesthetic for 4 hours to neonatal rats led to neurocognitive deficits in rats when they matured to adults,106,107 whereas up to 0.6 MAC for 6 hours in neonatal mice, while causing widespread neuronal degeneration immediately after exposure, failed to cause neurocognitive deficits or decreases in neuronal density in adulthood.105,115 These inconsistent findings raise the question of whether neonatal neuronal apoptotic cell death is linked directly to behavioral and learning abnormalities in adulthood. Neuronal cell death has also been observed in neonatal rhesus monkeys after 5 hours of 0.75% to 1.5% isoflurane,114 although long-term neurologic studies in this species have not yet been published.

Similar to isoflurane, sevoflurane has also been shown to induce neuroapoptosis in neonatal mice,71,115,202 although the long-term effects on learning and behavior are conflicting.72,115,202 To date, few studies have examined desflurane in this context. Desflurane causes age- and species-dependent neuronal cell death in 7-day-old mice, but not 16-day-old rats.70,71

Few studies have compared the neurotoxicity of contemporary anesthetics. At equianesthetic concentrations of desflurane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane in neonatal mice, the degree of neuronal degeneration in the superficial neocortex, a brain region significantly affected in this model, is similar.71 These results contrast with those from a study of lower concentrations of sevoflurane and isoflurane, in which cell death was less after the former than the latter, but without differences in neurocognitive performance in adult rats.115 In another comparative mouse study, desflurane caused a greater degree of neurodegeneration than isoflurane and sevoflurane, and long-term neurologic impairment only occurred after desflurane.72 The significance of these differential findings remains unknown, but could be related to methodologic differences.

Although largely phased out from clinical pediatric anesthesia practice, halothane and enflurane have been shown to induce brain abnormalities. These anesthetics were studied in models of intermittent or chronic occupational exposure during pregnancy, and caused subsequent delayed synaptogenesis and behavioral and learning abnormalities in rats after fetal exposure.131676

In summary, inhalational anesthetics represent one of the most frequently used classes of anesthetics in pediatric anesthesia, and their neurotoxic properties have been extensively studied. Consistent findings include widespread apoptosis immediately after exposure in a wide variety of animal models, including nonhuman primates. However, neurologic impairment in adult animals exposed early in life to anesthesia has not been a consistent finding, and in fact some studies have found no neurologic impairment at all. Therefore long-lasting learning impairment has not been convincingly linked to neonatal neuroapoptosis. Primate studies on long-term neurocognitive outcomes after inhalational anesthesia early in life have not yet been published.

Nitrous Oxide

Nitrous oxide, an NMDA antagonist, is the oldest anesthetic in clinical use, although its low potency (MAC of 115% in adult humans) necessitates the coadministration of other anesthetics to provide surgical anesthesia. Anesthetic combinations with nitrous oxide often include the GABA agonist midazolam, and the mixed GABA-agonist/NMDA-antagonist isoflurane.* In rats, nitrous oxide alone did not induce neuronal apoptosis,85,87,94 whereas in an in vitro study, it did cause neuronal cell death in mouse hippocampal slices.94 When administered in combination, however, nitrous oxide has been shown to exacerbate neuronal cell death induced by isoflurane, and also to contribute to long-term neurologic abnormalities in rats when combined with isoflurane and midazolam.85


Due to the cost differential between other inhalational anesthetics and this rare, colorless, and odorless noble gas, xenon has not reached widespread clinical anesthesia practice, despite its NMDA-antagonistic, anesthetic properties.226 Xenon has a relatively low anesthetic potency, with a MAC measuring between 65% and 70% in adults227,228; its low blood-gas solubility speeds emergence from anesthesia.229 Xenon’s effects on neuronal apoptosis have been examined by two groups, with slightly differing results. Although 75% xenon for 6 hours did not cause neuronal apoptosis in 7-day-old rat pups,94 70% xenon for 4 hours did increase neuroapoptosis in 7-day-old mice.207 Interestingly, both studies demonstrated that xenon decreased the neurodegeneration induced by isoflurane anesthesia,94,207 which may have relevance to the phenomenon’s putative mechanism, as discussed.


Benzodiazepines, such as clonazepam, diazepam, and midazolam, have been investigated regarding their effects on the immature brain, either alone or in combination with other drugs. These GABA agonists are frequently used in toddlers and older children for preoperative anxiolysis, but infrequently in neonates and infants. Studies have shown that they increase neuronal degeneration in small-animal models, depending on the dose, region of the brain, species, and age of the animal. Although single doses of 5 mg/kg of diazepam or 9 mg/kg of midazolam IP did not increase neuronal cell death in neonatal rats,68,85 5 mg/kg subcutaneous diazepam did cause neuronal cell death in some brain regions in mice, though this was not associated with learning deficits in adults.74 In these studies, the neuroapoptosis associated with diazepam was significantly augmented by the coadministration of other sedatives, such as ketamine.74 Studies have consistently reported increased neuroapoptosis in neonatal rats after diazepam in doses of 10 mg/kg or greater,68,69 an effect that was prevented by the coadministration of the benzodiazepine-antagonist flumazenil in one study.68 Two studies reported no neurocognitive learning disabilities in adult mice after they were sedated with diazepam or midazolam as neonates.74,166

Chloral Hydrate

The sedative chloral hydrate, a chlorination product of ethanol that is a GABA agonist as well as NMDA antagonist, has been largely supplanted by barbiturates and benzodiazepines in pediatric clinical practice. However, it is still being used in doses of up to 120 mg/kg for sedation for radiology studies,230 and its neurotoxic properties have been investigated. Preliminary results indicate that it causes neuroapoptosis in the cerebral cortex and the caudate-putamen complex in immature mouse pups in doses of 100 mg/kg or greater.67 The neurofunctional outcome in adult mice, however, has not as yet been investigated.


Barbiturates act largely via the GABAA receptor, but also exert effects via nicotinic acetylcholine, AMPA, and kainate receptors. Thiopental alone, in doses of 25 mg/kg subcutaneously in neonatal mice, did not induce apoptosis, although when doses of 5 mg/kg were administered in conjunction with 25 mg/kg of ketamine subcutaneously, neuronal degeneration occurred and was associated with long-term impairment of learning and memory.142 Pentobarbital and phenobarbital have been shown to induce neurodegeneration in mouse and rat pups. Furthermore, after receiving these sedatives as neonates, long-term alterations in brain protein expression and learning and memory have been observed,103,184,186 although in one study these long-term alternations may be attributed in part to hypoxia and hypercarbia during the neonatal sedation.184 Interestingly, estradiol has been shown to attenuate phenobarbital-induced neuroapoptosis.68,185


In recent years, propofol has supplanted the barbiturates as the IV induction agent of choice in children. Propofol predominantly acts via GABA and glycine receptor–agonistic properties, but also weakly on nicotinic, AMPA, and NMDA receptors, and has been repeatedly studied regarding its neurotoxic profile, both in vitro and in vivo. The overall consensus of this body of literature is that propofol, in a dose- and exposure time–dependent fashion, has dramatic effects on the developing brain in animals. Propofol has consistently caused neuroapoptosis after doses exceeding 50 mg/kg (subcutaneous or IP) or repeated doses exceeding 20 mg/kg/hr for 4 to 5 hours in neonatal small rodents.142,148,191,196 Interestingly, lithium protected from propofol-induced neuroapoptosis in neonatal mice.148 However, after 24 hours of IV anesthesia with propofol (6 mg/kg/hr) and fentanyl (10 µg/kg/hr), there was no evidence of apoptosis.192 Apart from overt neuronal cell death, propofol decreases the GABAergic enzyme glutamic acid decarboxylase,188 decreases nerve growth factors,194,198 and causes neurite growth cone collapse in tissue culture.190 In addition, propofol alters dendritic spine architecture in developing rats, depending on the age at the time of anesthetic exposure.197 For example, dendritic spine density decreased if the rat was anesthetized during week 1 of life, but it increased spine development if exposure took place during week 3 of life; the mechanism of these differing responses remains elusive.197

Opioid Analgesics

To date, only one study investigated neurotoxic properties of opioids in relation to an inhalational anesthetic regimen. Mechanically ventilated, neonatal pigs, sedated with an IV bolus of 30 µg/kg fentanyl followed by 15 µg/kg/hr for 4 hours, exhibited significantly less neuroapoptosis in several regions of the brain, compared with an intramuscular injection of 1 mg/kg of midazolam, followed by 4 hours of 0.55% isoflurane and 75% nitrous oxide.79 These initial findings are interesting, although future neurotoxicity studies that include opioid infusions need to also include adjuvants that produce amnesia, as is customary in pediatric anesthesia practice. Moreover, when comparing different anesthetic regimens regarding their neurotoxic potential, equianesthetic potency should be established during the study.

Importantly, however, the long-term consequences of opioid administration to the immature brain needs to be further elucidated before recommending such a regimen as an alternative strategy. Similar to GABA and NMDA receptors, opioid receptors are also intimately involved in early brain development and synaptogenesis,231,232 which would make it plausible that opioids could similarly affect brain development during the critical period of synaptogenesis. Increased neuronal cell death and decreased neuronal density after perinatal exposure to opioid receptor agonists, such as morphine and heroin, have been observed in developing animals.82,83,233 Chronic buprenorphine and methadone treatment early in life have been found to diminish concentrations of nerve growth factors in the immature brain.66,164 Moreover, immediate and permanent reductions in µ-opioid receptor density have been observed after perinatal exposure to morphine,168,169 and may be associated with long-term impairment of memory and cognitive function in small animals,171,174176,179181 as well as exaggerated nociceptive responses to a pain challenge later in life.177,182 Stimulation of the κ-opioid receptor may amplify neuronal cell death induced by proapoptotic agents.234 High-dose fentanyl has been shown to significantly exacerbate white-matter brain lesions induced by glutamatergic overstimulation in mice.78

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

May 25, 2016 | Posted by in ANESTHESIA | Comments Off on Surgery, Anesthesia, and the Immature Brain
Premium Wordpress Themes by UFO Themes