Scavenging Waste Gases Benefits the Staff But May Harm the Patient



Scavenging Waste Gases Benefits the Staff But May Harm the Patient


Terrence L. Trentman MD



Why scavenge waste anesthetic gases? Since the early days of anesthesia, anesthesia providers have been both concerned with and challenged by minimizing the risks associated with volatile anesthetics. Ether and cyclopropane were known to cause explosions, and, by the 1960s, serious questions had also arisen with regard to possible mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, and teratogenicity of the volatile anesthetics. Because the volatile anesthetics are likely to remain ubiquitous in clinical practice, the anesthesia provider must be aware of the following issues: the history behind current anesthetic waste gas scavenging practice; the recommended limits for trace gas levels issued by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH); the real risks of teratogenicity; the mechanics of scavenging systems, including open versus closed interfaces and active versus passive gas-disposal assemblies; sources of exposure to waste gas; and the risk of obstructions in the scavenging system.


CHRONIC EXPOSURE TO WASTE GASES

Studies done in the 1960s on the risks of chronic exposure to waste anesthetic gases yielded conflicting results. A human study suggested an increased incidence of spontaneous abortion among female anesthesiologists, and an animal study showed that high concentrations of nitrous oxide could cause skeletal deformities in offspring. Subsequent publications supported the idea that waste anesthetic gases put anesthesia providers at risk for adverse health effects. In the 1970s, NIOSH recommended that waste anesthetic gases be scavenged and set recommended acceptable waste gas levels (Table 95.1). However, both prospective and epidemiologic studies conducted in the 1980s and 1990s have shown that, when scavenging is used to reduce amounts of volatile anesthetics to trace amounts, the waste gases pose no risk of adverse health effects. Also, health risks are not associated with short-term clinical (or unscavenged) exposure to potent volatile agents, such as isoflurane or sevoflurane. Experimental nitrous oxide exposure has been associated with animal reproductive abnormalities; however, these conditions do not exist for workers in the clinical environment in which scavenging is present. Of note, NIOSH transmitted its recommendation to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) in 1977. Since that time,
OSHA has not taken the necessary steps to promulgate the standards, but it has published technical instructions regarding waste gases. The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations has recommended that each anesthesia machine be equipped with a scavenging system and that monitoring be carried out.








TABLE 95.1 NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH TRACE GAS RECOMMENDATIONS, 1977




























ANESTHETIC GAS


MAXIMUM CONCENTRATION (PPM)


Agent alone



Halogenated


2



Nitrous oxide


25


Combined halogenated and nitrous oxide



Halogenated agent


0.5



Nitrous oxide


25


Adapted from US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare: Criteria for a Recommended Standard: Occupational Exposure to Waste Anesthetic Gases and Vapors. Washington, DC, US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, March, 1977.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 1, 2016 | Posted by in ANESTHESIA | Comments Off on Scavenging Waste Gases Benefits the Staff But May Harm the Patient

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access