Radiographic Contrast Agents



Radiographic Contrast Agents





Overview

Iodine is the only element that has proven satisfactory as an intravascular radiographic contrast medium (RCM). Iodine produces the radiopacity while the other portions of the molecule act as the carriers for the iodine, improving solubility and reducing the toxicity of the final compound. Organic carriers of iodine are likely to remain in wide-spread use for the foreseeable future. During image-guided injection, injection of RCM can prove invaluable in determining the final location and distribution of the injectate (Figs. 3-1, 3-2 and 3-3). Use of RCM can improve the safety of many techniques by allowing for detection of intravascular (Figs. 3-4 and 3-5), subdural (see Fig. 3-2), or intrathecal (see Fig. 3-3) needle location before a local anesthetic or steroid is placed.


Pharmacology

Currently, there are four chemical varieties of iodinated RCM in widespread use: ionic monomers, nonionic monomers, ionic dimers, and nonionic dimers. On intravascular injection, all four are redistributed rapidly via capillary permeability to the extravascular space, they do not enter the interior of blood or tissue cells, and they are rapidly excreted, more than 90% eliminated via glomerular filtration within 12 hours of administration. None of the four varieties have marked pharmacologic actions. All RCM agents come in a range of concentrations that vary in their radiopacity and viscosity. Because iodine is the element that is responsible for the radiopacity, the iodine concentration in milligrams per milliliter represents the radiopacity. The nonionic monomers are now used almost exclusively in pain medicine; the nonionic dimers offer increased radiopacity at low osmolar concentrations, but are not in widespread clinical use and offer questionable clinical advantages.

There are several important chemical properties that determine the characteristics of RCM in clinical use. Osmolality depends on the number of particles of solute in solution and is highest for the ionic contrast agents. Adverse reactions, particularly discomfort on injection, have been reduced dramatically with the advent of low-osmolar RCM. Contrast media with osmolality below 500 mOsm per kg of water are virtually painless. Radiopacity depends on the iodine concentration of the solution and, therefore, on the number of iodine atoms per molecule and the concentration of the iodine-carrying molecule in solution. Digital subtraction electronically enhances the image, reducing the amount of contrast medium needed by a factor of twofold to threefold. With use of digital subtraction, RCM with as little as 150 to 200 mg per mL of iodine can be used even for intra-arterial use. Ionic molecules dissociate into cation and anion in solution. Nonionicity, or a molecule that does not dissociate in solution, is essential for myelography or use along the neuraxis, where inadvertent placement within the CSF is possible during injection. The chemical properties of common RCM used in clinical practice are compared in Table 3-1.

The most frequently used ionic monomers are diatrizoate (Urografin), iothalamate (Conray), and metrizoate (Isopaque). All ionic monomers are the salts of meglumine or sodium as the cation and a radiopaque tri-iodinated fully substituted benzene ring as the anion. The ionic monomers are still used for intravenous pyelography and similar applications; however, they have been completely replaced by the low-osmolar, nonionic RCM for many applications, including intrathecal administration. The most common nonionic monomers in clinical use include iodixanol (Visipaque), iohexol (Omnipaque), iopamidol (Isoview), and ioversol (Optiray); only iohexol and iopamidol are labeled for intrathecal use. The nonionic monomers appeared in the 1970s, and now represent the most common RCM in clinical use. They are more stable in solution and less toxic than the ionic monomers.







Figure 3-1. Epidural contrast injection. This typical lateral lumbar epidurogram demonstrates the “double-line” or “railroad track” appearance of radiographic contrast in the anterior and posterior epidural space (arrows). (Reprinted from Rathmell JP, Torian D, Song T. Lumbar epidurography. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000;25:541, with permission.)


Adverse Reactions to Radiographic Contrast Media

Modern contrast agents have reduced, but not eliminated, the risk of adverse reactions. To minimize the risk, RCM should be used in the smallest concentrations and in the smallest total dose that will allow adequate visualization. Adverse reactions associated with RCM can be divided into idiosyncratic anaphylactoid reactions, nonidiosyncratic reactions, and combined reactions. The risk of adverse reactions is significantly greater with use of high-osmolar, ionic agents when compared with low-osmolar, nonionic agents. This discussion is limited to the risks associated with low-osmolar, nonionic agents because they are used almost exclusively in pain medicine applications.






Figure 3-2. Subdural contrast injection. Injection of contrast in the subdural (epiarachnoid) space is recognized by the regular posterior border and irregular anterior border of loculated contrast collection on this lateral radiograph of the lumbar spine. The contrast is contained posteriorly by the dural membrane, but extends only partially anteriorly, as it is contained by the thin arachnoid membrane. Compare with Figure 3-3, subarachnoid administration, where the contrast extends all the way from the posterior to the anterior limits of the thecal space. Although the contrast does not extend to the anterior portion of the thecal sac, it is not limited to the epidural space. (Reprinted from Ajar A, Rathmell JP, Mukerji S. The subdural compartment. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2002;27:73, with permission.)


Idiosyncratic Anaphylactoid Reactions

Idiosyncratic reactions are the most feared and most serious complications associated with RCM. At present, we cannot predict or prevent this type of reaction reliably, and they occur without warning. These reactions usually begin within 5 minutes of injection, and may be mild and self-limited or
proceed rapidly to life-threatening cardiovascular collapse and death. The risk of anaphylactoid reaction is increased in patients with previous reaction to RCM (sixfold), in asthmatics (eightfold), in allergic and atopic patients (fourfold), and in those with advanced heart disease (threefold) (Table 3-2).






Figure 3-3. Subarachnoid (intrathecal) contrast injection. This typical myelogram demonstrates contrast within the thecal sac (arrows) on this lateral radiograph of the lumbar spine. The spinal cord and exiting nerve roots are visible as hypodense regions within the contrast collection. (Reprinted from Rathmell JP, Torian D, Song T. Lumbar epidurography. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000;25:543, with permission.)


Nonidiosyncratic Anaphylactoid Reactions

Nonidiosyncratic reactions can be divided into chemotoxic reactions (chemical reactions to the iodine-carrying molecule) and osmotoxic reactions (those caused by high osmolality of the contrast medium). These nonidiosyncratic reactions are dose dependent; therefore, this type of reaction should be exceedingly rare in patients receiving the small volumes of RCM required to facilitate needle localization during image-guided pain treatment.






Figure 3-4. Intravenous contrast injection. A: Intravenous contrast injection is typically not seen on still images because the contrast material is rapidly diluted in the bloodstream. During real-time or live fluoroscopy, intravenous contrast injection appears as in this anterior-posterior radiograph of the cervical spine taken during cervical transforaminal injection. The contrast can be seen flowing away from the spinal canal and toward the central venous circulation with the venous blood. B: Labeled image showing direction of contrast flow.







Figure 3-5. Intra-arterial contrast injection (digital subtraction). A: Intra-arterial contrast injection is typically not seen on still images because the contrast material is rapidly diluted in the bloodstream. During real-time or live fluoroscopy, intra-arterial contrast injection appears as in this anterior-posterior digital subtraction radiograph of the lumbar spine taken during lumbar transforaminal injection. The contrast can be seen flowing toward the end organ (in this image, toward the lumbar spinal cord) with the arterial blood. Use of digital subtraction cineradiography allows for detection of intravascular injection with small doses of radiographic contrast material. B: Labeled image showing direction of contrast flow.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 26, 2016 | Posted by in ANESTHESIA | Comments Off on Radiographic Contrast Agents

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access