Postdural Puncture Headache



Postdural Puncture Headache


Alice L. Oswald



Introduction

Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is a frequent complication of dural puncture, whether it is performed for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes, or occurs during placement of neuraxial blockade. It is also known as a spinal or post-spinal headache. Prophylaxis and treatment of this subject has been studied and discussed for more than 100 years, but for the most part, a clear consensus is lacking. The headache can be incapacitating for a postpartum patient since these women have to care for a newborn and recover from delivery while dealing with the headache. As a result, this patient population is frequently studied in regards to PDPH. Labor epidural analgesia is frequently an elective procedure, so morbidity from possible iatrogenic injury is quite unfortunate.

The headache is usually described as a severe frontal or occipital pain that is exacerbated by sitting up or standing and partially relieved in the supine position (see Fig. 27-1). Accompanying symptoms may consist of tinnitus and hyperacusis, diplopia, nausea and vomiting, or neck pain (1,2). The International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD) published by the International Headache Society is considered the official classification of headache-related disorders by the World Health Organization. Their diagnostic criteria, first published in 1998 and revised in 2003 (ICHD-2), is used in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). The criteria for PDPH is outlined in Table 27-1. Auditory symptoms result from dysfunction of the VIII cranial nerve and may occur because the circulation of endolymph in the cochleae and semicircular canals is dependent on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure (3). The visual disturbances may occur because the VI cranial nerve has a long intracranial course. Symptoms will usually present within 48 hours after dural puncture, but can take up to 7 days to appear (4). PDPH is usually a self-limiting condition and will resolve within 2 to 14 days. If the headache persists, it may be secondary to a CSF fistula, but other serious causes also need to be considered (5).


History

German physician Heinrich Quincke introduced needle lumbar puncture in 1891 as a treatment to lower intracranial pressure in patients with tuberculosis meningitis and hydrocephalus. Around the same time, London physician Walter Wynter was also establishing this as a procedure by inserting a catheter into his patients with the purpose of removing CSF to treat meningitis (6,7,8). In 1895, a New York neurologist, Corning, is credited as performing the first spinal anesthetic when he tried using spinal cocaine as a local anesthetic to treat a man of habitual masturbation. He reported injecting cocaine at the T11/T12 interspace to decrease sensation of the lower limbs and groin (9,10) and observed a transient paralysis of the lower limbs. Corning recognized the potential use of the spinal anesthetic for surgery, so he worked on developing a spinal needle and introducer, and published his design in the New York Journal of Medicine. A couple of years later, a German surgeon Karl August Bier wrote about PDPH in 1898 after he injected 10 to 15 mg of spinal cocaine into himself, his assistant, and seven of his patients. Four of the nine people, including him, developed PDPH (11). Spinal anesthesia with large gauge needles soon became more frequently reported in the literature in the early 1900s and the headache that was associated with it seemed to affect about half the patients and was noted to last for about 24 hours (12). Around 1920, technologic advances from the introduction of stainless steel allowed a fine gauge needle to be sharpened to a point without deformation or breakage. Whitacre and Hart were not the first to develop the pencil-point spinal needle but are commonly associated with this advancement in design, and in 1951 they reported significant decrease in the incidence of PDPH using this modification. Since then, there have been some minor modifications to the pencil-point spinal needle, but the basic design has remained the same (12).


Pathophysiology


Anatomy

The spinal dura mater extends from the foramen magnum to the second sacral spinal segment. It contains CSF and encases the spinal nerves after they leave the spinal cord. The pia mater and arachnoid fuse with the connective tissue of the spinal nerves, making up the lateral borders of the dural sac (see Fig. 27-2). The dura is a dense, connective tissue layer created by longitudinal lamella of collagen and elastin fibers. It was believed that these fibers ran in a longitudinal direction and this thought was initially supported by microscopic studies (13). However, more recent light and electron microscopic studies describe the dura mater as consisting of collagen fibers arranged in several layers parallel to the surface of the medulla spinalis. The direction of the fibers in each sub-lamina do not demonstrate any specific orientation (14). The outer layer may be arranged in a longitudinal direction but this is not necessarily repeated through the more interior dural layers.


CSF

Over 100 years ago, Bier attributed persistent leakage of CSF through the dural puncture as the cause of the headache, but today the exact mechanism is not still entirely clear. One theory is that when the patient’s position changes
from supine to an upright position, there is a downward traction on pain-sensitive nerves, intracranial veins, and meninges, which causes the pain. This sagging of intracranial structures has been demonstrated on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (15). If the leakage of CSF exceeds the rate of production, the cushioning effect on the brain is lost (16). The average production rate of CSF is 0.3 mL/kg/h, 0.3 to 0.4 mL/min, or about 500 mL/day for a 70 kg person. The total volume of CSF is about 150 mL at a given time, distributed half in the intracranial space and the other half cushioning the spinal cord. The choroid plexus secretes the majority of the CSF, and the rest is secreted by the brain (interstitial space of the brain, the ependymal lining of the ventricles, and the dura of the nerve root sleeves), as a byproduct of oxidative metabolism (17). Reabsorption of CSF is primarily by the arachnoid granulations in the venous sinuses.






Figure 27-1 The postural component of PDPH.

Headache usually develops when more than 10% of CSF volume is lost (18). In a series of experiments, PDPH was induced in volunteers by draining 15 to 20 mL CSF uniformly and rapidly. Replacement of the CSF volume with a sterile crystalloid relieved the headache completely and in less than a few minutes (18). Another cause of the headache could be from intracranial hypotension after leakage of CSF. This may explain why injection of the crystalloid into the epidural or subarachnoid space, or insertion of blood into the epidural space in an attempt to increase the epidural and subarachnoid pressure, can relieve a headache rapidly. Normal lumbar CSF pressure in the supine position is about 5 to 15 cm H2O and can increase to about 40 cm H2O in the sitting position (19).

In addition to the CSF, the arachnoid space contains veins that may dilate as a result of loss of CSF in order to maintain constant intracranial volume. This concept is defined by the Monro–Kellie doctrine, which states that the total intracranial volume is fixed because of the inelastic nature of the skull (20). The intracranial volume is equal to the sum of its components: Brain, CSF, and blood. When there is a decrease in one component, such as loss of CSF, the compensatory action to maintain constant intracranial volume may be vasodilation. Meningeal vessels may be pain sensitive and vasodilation can lead to increased cerebral blood flow. Also, when there is a
sudden decrease in CSF volume, adenosine receptors may be activated to compensate by producing arterial and venous vasodilation. The relief of headache with caffeine supports the vascular theory of PDPH from vasodilation since caffeine inhibits adenosine receptors to act as a cerebral vasoconstrictor (21).








Table 27-1 Postdural (Post-Lumbar) Puncture Headache the International Headache Society’s International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-2)








Diagnostic Criteria


  1. Headache that worsens within 15 min after sitting or standing and improves within 15 min after lying, with at least one of the following and fulfilling criteria C and D:

    1. Neck stiffness
    2. Tinnitus
    3. Hypacusia
    4. Photophobia
    5. Nausea

  2. Dural puncture has been performed
  3. Headache develops within 5 days after dural puncture
  4. Headache resolves eithera:

    1. Spontaneously within 1 wk
    2. Within 48 h after effective treatment of the spinal fluid leak (usually by epidural blood patch)
aIn 95% of cases this is so. When headache persists, causation is in doubt.






Figure 27-2 Anatomy of the lumbar spine.


Incidence

Reported frequency rates of headache after intentional dural puncture range from 6% to 36% of patients depending on the needle size and type of needle used (see Table 27-2) (22). The frequency of accidental dural puncture (ADP) after attempted epidural placement ranges from 0.19% to 3.6% (23,24,25,26,27,28). The injury could be from obvious perforation of the dura by the epidural needle, or a nick in the dura that either leads to an unrecognized dural puncture or subsequent perforation of the dura by the epidural catheter. The number of previous epidural anesthetics placed may affect the incidence of ADP (27). In a series of 4,600 women who received an epidural, there were 74 occurrences of ADP. Anesthesiologists who had placed less than 10 prior epidurals had an ADP rate of 2.5%, which was almost twice the rate of 1.3% in those practitioners who had placed more than 90 epidurals (29,30). If there was an ADP during attempted epidural with a large-bore needle, most studies report the incidence of PDPH being 16% to 86% (4,31,32,33,34), with the meta-analysis done by Choi et al. in 2003 finding the overall incidence to be about 50% to 55% (4).

The frequency of ADP or PDPH does not appear increased with combined spinal–epidural (CSE) blocks compared to epidural blocks, even though there is an intentional dural puncture with the former (35,36). van de Velde et al. reported a low incidence of PDPH with CSEs using 27 or 29 G spinal needles in a 10-year single-institution prospective study (37). When CSEs were compared to single shot spinals, there was also not an increased risk of PDPH (37). His study confirmed previous reports that the incidence of ADP does not decrease when performing CSEs compared to performing epidural blocks (37,38). He hypothesized that the reason for the low
incidence of PDPH with CSEs may be that there is decreased CSF leak from increased pressure of having volume in the epidural space.








Table 27-2 Frequency of PDPH with Different Spinal Needles








































































Needle Type Needle Gauge Frequency of PDPH (%)
Quincke 22 36
Quincke 24 11.2
Quincke 25 3–25
Quincke 26 0.3–20
Quincke 27 1.5–5.6
Quincke 29 0–2
Quincke 32 0.4
Sprotte 22 12.2
Sprotte 24 0–9.6
Pencan (Sprotte) 27 0.98
Whitacre 20 2–5
Whitacre 22 0.63–4
Whitacre 25 0–14.5
Whitacre 27 0–1.7
Atraucan 26 2.5–4.6
Tuohy 16 70
Adapted from: Turnbull DK, Shepherd DB. Post-dural puncture headache: Pathogenesis, prevention and treatment. Br J Anaesth 2003;91(5):718–729; and Bezov D, Ashina S, Lipton R. Post-dural puncture headache: Part II—prevention, management, and prognosis. Headache 2010;50(9):1482–1498.


Patient-Dependent Risk Factors

Not every person that has a dural puncture will develop a headache afterward and the reasons for this are multifactorial. The obstetric population is particularly at risk since young, pregnant women are at an increased risk of developing PDPH.


Age

Patients between the ages of 20 and 30 are more likely to develop PDPH after a dural puncture (39,40). Children and patients who are older than 60 years do not commonly report the headache (40,41). This may be due to older people having lower CSF pressures (42,43) and decreased elasticity of the dura, so dural perforations may not stay patent as compared to dural punctures in younger people (16,44). Vandem and Dripps studied over 9,000 patients who had received a spinal anesthetic and found the incidence of PDPH in the 20- to 29-year-old age group to be 16%. This was significantly higher than the 40- to 49-year-old (8%) and 50- to 59-year-old (4%) age group (45).


Female Gender

Most large studies find that there is a significantly higher incidence of PDPH in women compared to men (45,46,47). This may be a reporting error due to differences in pain perception or that women may be more likely to report a headache. Another explanation for this could be due to hormone-mediated cerebrovascular changes, similar to what might occur in migraine headaches. A large study of spinal anesthetics by Lybecker et al. found no significant association between gender and incidence of PDPH (40).


BMI

The incidence of PDPH is higher in people with a low BMI (31,48,49,50). One reason could be that there may be increased intra-abdominal pressure from obesity raising CSF pressure, so that even with a CSF leak, these patients do not develop headache. Another is that in attempted epidural placement, the epidural space may be unexpectedly shallow, resulting in an ADP. The incidence of ADP may be higher in the morbidly obese; however, there are not many studies that support this theory (37).


Pregnancy

It is unclear whether this is a risk factor by itself, published studies showing the opposite finding (51,52). Laboring patients may be at an increased risk because many of them receive epidural analgesia with a large-bore needle and good positioning may be challenging due to the gravid abdomen as well as influence of contraction pain.


Varying Dural Thickness

Recent studies have demonstrated that the dura has varying thickness. One reason that some people do not develop a PDPH may be that if the dural puncture occurs in a thicker area, a headache may not develop (12,14).


Other Possible Factors

Many studies have found that patients with a previous history of PDPH or chronic headache are more likely to develop PDPH (40,53,54).


Differential Diagnosis

Headache in the postpartum period is not an infrequent complaint, but this section will concentrate on headaches that have a postural component to them. Patients may present with a positional headache after experiencing intentional, inadvertent, or unrecognized dural puncture. About 40% of women will have a postpartum headache or neck pain in the week after delivery (55). Postpartum headache can be due to relatively benign reasons such as tension or migraine related, caffeine withdrawal, hunger, or sleep deprivation (56). Headaches that present immediately postpartum or more than 72 hours after delivery are not as likely to be PDPH, and other causes should be explored (55,56). The rare but potentially life-threatening diagnoses that are in the following discussion will usually need neuro-imaging and the assistance of a neurologic consultation.


Subdural Hemorrhage

This is a rare, but serious consequence of dural puncture that can occur from intracranial hypotension causing tearing of the bridging veins. The patient can initially present with symptoms of a PDPH, but then the headache becomes severe, non-postural, and associated with neurologic deficits. Zeidan et al. reported a patient who received spinal anesthesia with
a 26 gauge (G) needle for cesarean section who postoperatively developed a severe non-postural headache associated with right eye tearing, V cranial nerve palsy, and left hemiparesis. A cranial subdural hematoma was confirmed with a computed tomography (CT) scan (57). He then performed a literature review and studied 46 patients who received spinal or epidural anesthesia and developed PDPH complicated by subdural hematoma. Most had associated neurologic deficits in addition to the severe headache. Sharma reported a case of a 31-year-old primigravid term woman who had a dural puncture during attempted epidural analgesia for labor and an intrathecal catheter was placed. Twenty-three hours later she had sudden loss of consciousness, her CT scan showed a large subdural hematoma, and craniotomy revealed active bleeding from a ruptured temporal bridging vein (58). Intracranial hypotension occurred while an intrathecal catheter was present demonstrating that the hypothetical plug that a large-bore catheter provides does not necessarily prevent efflux of CSF. Amorin reviewed 35 case reports of intracranial subdural hematoma that occurred after spinal anesthesia. These patients experienced headache (74%), changes in the level of consciousness (40%), vomiting (31%), hemiplegia or hemiparesis (23%), diplopia or VI cranial nerve paresis (14%), and language disorders (11%) (59). After this review, he recommended neuro-imaging evaluation in patients whose headache persisted for more than a week and with disappearance of the postural component. He determined contributing factors to include pregnancy, multiple attempts, use of anticoagulants, intracranial vascular abnormalities, and brain atrophy. In his review of 35 case reports, four patients (11.4%) did not survive (59). Subdural hematomas usually need to be surgically evacuated and time to evacuation is important depending on the size of the hematoma and how rapidly it is expanding (see Fig. 27-3).






Figure 27-3 Bridging veins run between the surface of the brain and the dura mater of the skull.


Severe Preeclampsia or Eclampsia

If the patient had a headache and high blood pressure prior to or after a neuraxial block was placed, the diagnosis of preeclampsia would have to be considered. New seizure activity in this setting would also lead to increased suspicion of eclampsia or an intracranial vascular injury.


Venous Sinus Thrombosis/Cortical Vein Thrombosis

This predominantly occurs in females, the headache is acute in onset, there are focal neurologic signs, there can be a postural component, and it frequently presents during pregnancy and after delivery. Vasodilation that occurs as a result of CSF leakage has a role in the formation of thrombus. A stroke of venous origin is greater in pregnancy because of the prothrombotic state, and hypercoagulability is increased after delivery due to volume depletion and vascular trauma. MRI or angiography may be superior to CT in diagnosis in visualizing venous thrombosis (60). Therapy to prevent seizures and ischemia consists of heparin, oral anticoagulants, and possibly antibiotics for a favorable outcome.


Posterior Reversible (leuko) Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES)

The symptoms of PRES include headache, focal neurologic deficits, seizures, acute changes in blood pressure, and altered mental status. The pathophysiology of PRES is severe hypertension or vasoconstriction leading to brain hypoperfusion that results in altered cerebrovascular regulation and vasogenic edema. PRES is associated with preeclampsia/eclampsia occurring postpartum, and the presence of a coincidental dural puncture may confuse or delay the diagnosis.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Sep 16, 2016 | Posted by in ANESTHESIA | Comments Off on Postdural Puncture Headache

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access