Perioperative Cardiac Risk Assessment in Noncardiac Surgery





Introduction


Anesthesia has become increasingly safer. According to the Anesthesia Quality Institute’s National Anesthesia Clinical Outcomes Registry, comprising over 30 million cases, perioperative mortality has significantly decreased in high-income countries despite a population increasingly burdened by severe comorbidities. Nevertheless, cardiac complications are still common after noncardiac surgery, with myocardial infarction (MI) being the single most common cause of death. Annually, 4% of the world’s population will undergo a surgical procedure, and 30% of those patients have at least one cardiovascular risk factor. The 30-day mortality of patients with at least one cardiovascular risk factor is 0.5%–2%. Many efforts have been made to quantify risk through indices and algorithms in multivariate analyses. However, although cardiac risk can be measured, interventions are often not performed in a timely manner. This chapter’s focus is to assist the physician responsible for the well-being of the patient scheduled for surgery to do the following: (1) clinically assess the patient’s current medical status and provide a clinical risk profile, (2) decide whether further cardiac testing is indicated prior to surgery, and (3) make recommendations concerning the risk of perioperative cardiac complications and alter management with the purpose of lowering that risk.


Preoperative History and Physical Examination


Once a patient decides to undergo a surgical procedure, an entire care team is dedicated to ensuring that there are minimal complications during the perioperative process. The perioperative evaluation is a multidisciplinary effort with good communication between the patient, primary care physician, anesthesiologist, cardiologist, and surgeon. For elective procedures, patients should schedule an appointment with their primary care physician in order to undergo initial presurgical screening. The primary care evaluation will consist of a detailed history, physical examination, and review of pertinent laboratory data. A thorough review of the medical record is done to identify any previous cardiac examination or workup: electrocardiogram (ECG), echocardiography, stress testing, or cardiac catheterization. As part of the physical examination, physicians should assess for signs or symptoms of cardiopulmonary dysfunction and any associated comorbidities. The overall goal is to identify active cardiac conditions that may have developed in the months preceding noncardiac surgery. The aim of appropriate preoperative evaluation and therapy in individuals with established coronary artery disease (CAD) is not only to improve immediate perioperative outcome but also to improve the long-term clinical outcome.


The severity, frequency, and duration of symptoms, as well as treatments initiated, should be recorded. A detailed physical examination of the cardiovascular system is performed, looking for evidence of heart disease ( Table 5.1 ). In addition to the physical examination findings, a detailed review of the history can identify clinical predictors of cardiovascular risk. Table 5.2 lists the clinical predictors of perioperative cardiovascular risk. Major risk factors require immediate attention, whether through testing or cardiology consultation, in order to lower the long-term risk, regardless of the need for surgery. In emergent nonelective cases, the benefits of proceeding with surgery frequently outweigh the risk of waiting for additional testing. In such situations, physicians must be ready to manage cardiovascular complications intraoperatively as well as postoperatively in at-risk patients. It is worth mentioning that abnormal findings of a physical examination as well as extracted from the patient’s history may justifiably warrant postponing the scheduled surgical procedure.



Table 5.1

Signs and symptoms of cardiac disease.

















































Location Signs Symptoms Complaints
Hands Clubbing
Splinter hemorrhages
Heart failure Dyspnea
Orthopnea
Tachypnea
Asthma unresponsive to bronchodilator
Radial pulse Rate/rhythm/volume
Character/contour
Bruits
Symmetry
Arrhythmia Palpitations
Dizziness
Syncope
Orthostatic
Blood
pressure
Systolic + diastolic
Hypertension
Hypotension
Coronary artery
disease
Angina
Dyspnea
Carotid
pulse
Volume
Character
Bruit
Auscultation: cardiac New systolic +
diastolic murmurs
S3 heart sounds
Jugular
venous
pressure
Height
Waveform
Auscultation: lungs Rales/rhonchi
crackles/wheeze
Face
Mouth
Eyes
Pallor
Central cyanosis
Malar flush
Dental caries
Fundi
Abdomen Hepatomegaly
Ascites
Aortic aneurysm
bruit
Precordium Apical impulse
Thrills/heaves
Scar
Legs Peripheral pulses
Edema
Calf pain
Skin Skin temperature
Sweating
Urine output

Created by Taras Grosh, MD



Fig. 5.1


Stepwise approach to perioperative cardiac assessment for coronary artery disease (CAD). ACS , Acute coronary syndrome; CPG , clinical practice guideline; GDMT , guideline-directed medical therapy; MACE, major adverse cardiac events; METs, metabolic equivalents; NB , no benefit.

(Reprinted with permission from Fleisher LA, Fleischmann KE, Auerbach AD, et al: 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: Executive summary: A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines. Reprinted with permission Circulation 2014;130(24):2215–2245.)


Table 5.2

Clinical predictors of increased perioperative cardiovascular risk. a

Reprinted with permission from Fleisher LA, Fleischmann KE, Auerbach AD, et al: 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: Executive summary: A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines. Reprinted with permission Circulation 2014;130(24):2215–2245.




































Major Intermediate Minor
Unstable ACS Mild angina b Advanced age
MI within 60 days Prior MI: pathologic Q waves Abnormal ECG
(LVH, LBBB, ST-T abnormality)
Unstable angina b Compensated/prior heart failure Rhythm other than sinus
Decompensated heart failure Diabetes mellitus Low functional capacity
High-grade arrhythmia History CVA
Severe valvular disease Uncontrolled systemic HTN
SVT with uncontrolled ventricular response Obesity

ACS, Acute coronary syndrome; CVA, cerebrovascular accident; ECG, electrocardiogram; HTN, hypertension; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy; LBBB, left bundle branch block; MI, myocardial infarction; SVT , supraventricular tachycardia.

a Risk includes myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and death.


b May include stable angina in unusually sedentary patients.



ECG


Unless the patient is undergoing a low-risk surgery, an ECG is obtained in patients with cardiovascular disease, arrhythmias, or structural heart disease, as recommended by 2014 guidelines of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) and the European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESC/ESA). Although ECG abnormalities have an inconsistent prognostic factor, they serve as a baseline in the event that perioperative complications arise. The ECG should be evaluated for the presence of Q waves, significant ST-segment elevations and depressions, ischemia, infarction, left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, QTc prolongation, bundle branch block, or arrhythmia.


Metabolic Equivalents


Part of the history and physical is an assessment of functional capacity based on the number of metabolic equivalents (METs) that a patient can perform. METs are determined on the basis of a set of questions administered by the physician to the patient. The Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) is a 12-item questionnaire that uses self-reported physical work capacity to estimate peak METs and has been shown to be a valid measurement of functional capacity. One MET is defined as 3.5 mL/kg/min of oxygen uptake, the equivalent of sitting at rest. Table 5.3 lists activities and their corresponding METs. Those patients able to do more than 4 METs are largely said to be at low risk for a cardiovascular complication. Unfortunately, subjective assessment of functional capacity has limitations when compared with formal objective testing. The researchers in the Measurement of Exercise Tolerance before Surgery (METS) study reported that when comparing formal indices and questionnaires (DASI) and formal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), subjective interpretation of METs did not accurately identify patients with poor cardiovascular fitness or predict postoperative morbidity and mortality. Of the 1401 patients included in the study, subjective assessment only identified 16% correctly as being able to achieve less than 4 METs. Moreover, high-risk patients were frequently misclassified as being at low risk. Importantly, there are characteristics of CPET that predict all-cause mortality and can be useful in determining fitness for surgery. A key part of the 2014 ACC/AHA algorithm—subjective assessment of functional capacity—is important in order to avoid missing severely deconditioned individuals.



Table 5.3

Metabolic equivalents (METs).

Adapted with permission from Coutinho-Myrrha MA, Fernandes AA, Araújo CG, et al. Duke Activity Status Index for cardiovascular diseases: validation of the Portuguese translation. Arq Bras Cardiol . 2014;102:383-390.

























METs Activity
1 At rest
3-4 Introduction to pilates
Light housework
Golf (carrying clubs)
4-5 Weightlifting, vigorous
Climbing flight of stairs
6 Moving furniture
8 Basketball
10 Competitive soccer


Risk Assessment


All patients scheduled to undergo noncardiac surgery should have an assessment of the risk of a perioperative cardiac event done by their primary care physician using the ACC/AHA perioperative cardiovascular evaluation algorithm ( Fig. 5.1) . The algorithm combines the patient-specific risk factors obtained from the history, physical examination, and 12-lead ECG, with surgical risk factors to determine the overall risk of experiencing a cardiac event. In the past, preoperative cardiac risk stratification practices grouped operations into broad categories, which might inadequately consider the intrinsic cardiac risks of individual operations. Using high-quality clinical data from more than 3.2 million patients, Liu et al empirically derived the intrinsic risk of individual operations for perioperative cardiac events, as shown in Table 5.4 .



Table 5.4

Surgical risk factor chart.

With permission from Liu JB, Liu Y, Cohen ME, et al. Defining the intrinsic cardiac risks of operations to improve preoperative cardiac risk assessments. Anesthesiology . 2018;128:283-292.



































































































Description OR a
(95% CI)
Estimated cardiac risk of hypothetical patient b (%) Reliability c
Low intrinsic cardiac risk
Partial mastectomy (lumpectomy) 0.22 (0.15–0.31) 0.05 1.00
Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair 0.32 (0.19–0.54) 0.07 1.00
Simple mastectomy (complete breast) 0.37 (0.26–0.50) 0.08 1.00
Laparoscopic appendectomy 0.45 (0.33–0.62) 0.10 1.00
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy 0.62 (0.53–0.72) 0.14 1.00
Intermediate intrinsic cardiac risk
Transurethral resection of bladder tumor, large 0.85 (0.61–1.20) 0.19 0.94
Laparoscopic prostatectomy 0.88 (0.69–1.12) 0.19 1.00
Open appendectomy 0.95 (0.51–1.75) 0.21 0.96
Total hip arthroplasty 0.95 (0.83–1.08) 0.21 1.00
Laparoscopic radial hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy 1.05 (0.57–1.94) 0.23 0.96
High intrinsic cardiac risk
Laparoscopic total abdominal colectomy with ileostomy 1.50 (0.92–2.44) 0.33 0.95
Breast reconstruction with free flap 1.52 (0.81–2.86) 0.33 0.97
Open cholecystectomy 1.55 (1.25–1.92) 0.34 0.95
Open ventral hernia repair, incarcerated or strangulated, recurrent 1.78 (1.29–2.44) 0.39 0.95
Whipple procedure, pylorus-sparing 4.70 (4.00–5.53) 1.02 0.86

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Jun 9, 2021 | Posted by in ANESTHESIA | Comments Off on Perioperative Cardiac Risk Assessment in Noncardiac Surgery
Premium Wordpress Themes by UFO Themes