2.1 Paediatric cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA)
Epidemiology
Previous studies of paediatric Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) have reported poor survival rates with severe neurological sequelae,2,3 however more recent publications have challenged this reporting a similar rates of survival to hospital discharge as that of adults who sustain OHCA.4,5
The incidence of out-of-hospital arrest is reported as ranging from 2.6 to 19.7 per year per 100 000 paediatric population (age < 18 years), in the region of 30% achieving return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), 24% surviving to hospital admission, and 12% surviving to discharge.6
Less than 10% of paediatric OHCA victims have a shockable rhythm on arrival of the prehospital care providers.4,5
Outcome
Generally, the survival from respiratory arrest alone is much better than from cardiopulmonary arrest. Survival to discharge for children with respiratory arrest (pulse present) is around 75%, and of these up to 88% have a good neurological outcome. Reported survival rates from cardiac arrest in children have varied from 0% to 17%. Survival to discharge from hospital for paediatric OHCA is 7%4,5 and 36% for in-hospital cardiac arrests.7 ‘Survival to discharge’ is a very crude marker of ‘success’ as it does not include a measure of neurological function. Proactive early resuscitation of the pre-arrest child is important in order to have the most impact on outcome.
Unfortunately, the perception of the public, and even doctors and nurses, is that the expected survival rate is higher than this. Lay rescuers, physicians and nurses estimate the survival rate for cardiopulmonary arrest in children as being 63%, 45% and 41% respectively (compared to 53%, 30% and 24% for adult cardiopulmonary arrest).8 Undoubtedly, fictional medical television programmes contribute to this bias, and even non-fictional medical programmes rarely show death as an outcome.
Differences compared to adults
When comparing children to adults in relation to cardiopulmonary arrest, there are several important differences. The aetiology of the event is usually different. Adults who collapse are more likely to have ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia, hence the time to defibrillation is the single greatest determinant of survival. Thus the ‘phone first’ principle that applies to adults is not applicable to most infants and children, in whom the response should be ‘phone fast’ (see Chapter 2.2 on Basic life support).
There are several anatomical and physical differences between children and adults. It is important to consider these differences in relation to the primary event leading to arrest and to the resuscitation techniques subsequently required (Table 2.1.1).
Difference in children | Implication |
---|---|
AIRWAY | |
Prominent occiput tends to cause neck flexion | Neck extension, into a neutral or sniffing position (slight extension), is required to optimise the airway for an infant or child respectively |
Mandible is relatively smaller | More difficult intubation |
Tongue is relatively larger | Tends to obstruct airway More difficult intubation |
Larynx is more cephalad (located almost at base of tongue) | More difficult intubation – tendency for inexperienced operator to insert laryngoscope blade into oesophagus |
Epiglottis is proportionally larger and more ‘floppy’ | Intubation may require straight-bladed laryngoscope to lift epiglottis forward to allow visualisation of vocal cords |
Upper airways are more compliant (i.e. distensible) | Tend to collapse during increased work of breathing |
BREATHING | |
Chest wall more compliant (particularly the newborn infant and more so the preterm infant) | Less efficient ventilation, when increased work of breathing Earlier fatigue |
Greater dependence on diaphragm to generate tidal volume | Distended stomach impairs ventilation Importance of venting stomach with gastric tube |
CIRCULATION | |
Maintains cardiac output and blood pressure by tachycardia initially | Diagnose and treat shock before hypotension develops Hypotension usually indicates late decompensation |
GENERAL | |
Head has proportionally greater component of body surface area | Loss of body heat during primary event or resuscitation Greater chance of head injury |
Compliant chest wall allows transmission of energy to underlying organs, resulting in traumatic damage/rupture, rather than dissipation of energy | Pulmonary, hepatic and splenic injury may occur without overlying rib fractures |
Development Language Motor development (fine and gross) Social and cognitive development (including abstract thinking) | Must be considered when interacting with the child and understanding injuries (accidental versus non-accidental) |
Parental and staff considerations | Psychosocial issues Presence of family during resuscitation Staff pressure to continue resuscitation Impact on staff from death of child |