Subacromial subdeltoid bursa (bounded by arrows) in coronal plane. The humerus, deltoid muscle, and acromion (Acr) are visible as well
Hip
Elbow
Indications
Aspiration of fluid from an inflamed bursa for analysis
Injection if anti-inflammatory medications into the bursa
Contraindications
Cellulitis overlying the needle entry site (relative contraindication)
Preparation
Equipment setup for bursa aspiration is the same as standard landmark-guided approaches. When ultrasound is used, a sterile ultrasound sheath (probe cover) and sterile gel should be used.
Procedure
- 1.
Patient positioning is the same as landmark-guided approaches.
- 2.
Longitudinal and transverse views of the bursa should be obtained sonographically to confirm the location of the bursa and that hypoechoic fluid exists within it (Figs. 8.4 and 8.5).
- 3.
An in-plane needle visualization approach can be used to visualize the needle path from the skin to the bursa, as well as fluid injection if that is performed (Figs. 8.6, 8.7, and 8.8).
Complications
Infection
Bleeding
Hematoma
Injury to neurovascular structures
Pearls
For olecranon bursa aspiration, elbow flexion can put some pressure on the bursa which aids drainage.
The subacromial, subdeltoid bursa should be examined through a range of shoulder abduction to highlight its position.
Hip rotation can make subgluteus maximus bursitis more evident.
Pitfalls
The olecranon bursa is a frequent site of septic bursitis; confirm a sterile (aseptic) bursitis prior to steroid injection.
Integration into Clinical Practice
Ultrasound can be used to confirm the location and appearance of the bursa in cases of suspected bursitis. Then under appropriate sterile real-time guidance, a needle can be directed into the bursa for fluid analysis or injection.
Evidence
A review of studies comparing the two approaches found subacromial-subdeltoid bursa injection was 63% successful in cases where palpation was used; ultrasound guidance increased the success rate to 100% [1].
A recent Cochrane review of 290 patients in five studies found that image guidance provided no outcome benefit (pain, function, or adverse events) for patients compared to blind glucocorticoid injection for shoulder pain. Thus, the authors concluded that despite the fact that ultrasound may improve accuracy of injection into the shoulder, there was no added outcome benefit to ultrasound use [2].
Key Point
Examine bursae through the joint’s full range of motion.
Arthrocentesis and Joint Injection
Arthrocentesis is commonly performed for diagnostic and therapeutic indications in multiple joints throughout the body. The procedure has traditionally been landmark guided, but there is a range of difficulty in accessing certain joints, and patient body habitus or acute discomfort may make the procedure more challenging. Thus, ultrasound can be used to confirm an effusion is present and to guide needle placement into the synovial joint for fluid aspiration or injection of analgesic or anti-inflammatory medications.
Anatomy
Knee
Ankle
Hip
MTP joint
Elbow
Shoulder
AC joint
Wrist
Indications
Fluid analysis for diagnostic evaluation of a new effusion
Evaluation of possible septic joint
Aspiration of fluid to relieve pain and pressure of an effusion or fluid collection
Injection of anesthetic or anti-inflammatory medication
Contraindications
Cellulitis overlying the needle entry site (relative contraindication)
Mass or vessel overlying the needle entry site
Preparation
Standard preparation for arthrocentesis should be maintained, including creating a sterile prep site and assembling appropriate anesthesia, syringes, needles, drapes, and other equipment. In order to visualize needle entry in real time, a sterile probe sheath and sterile gel should be used.
Procedure
- 1.
The ultrasound probe should be placed over the joint of interest, and the typical appearance of a joint space should be confirmed.
- 2.
The presence of joint effusion should be confirmed by noting an anechoic space without Doppler flow above the joint cartilage.
- 3.
At this point, the needle should be directed in the plane of the ultrasound beam toward the joint space. The needle progress may be observed in real time until joint fluid is aspirated.
- 4.
In some cases, ultrasound may be used to confirm the presence and location of joint fluid, at which point the proper location and trajectory of needle placement will be noted but performed without direct ultrasound visualization. This technique is more feasible for larger joints where the procedure itself is less challenging and there is less benefit to holding the ultrasound probe for the duration of the procedure.
Complications
Infection
Bleeding
Hematoma
Injury to nerves, vessels, and tendons
Pearls
Joint effusion may be hypoechoic instead of anechoic in the presence of debris, immune reaction, infection, or other causes.
Joint effusions should compress under probe pressure.
Pitfalls
It is quite feasible to perform a sterile joint aspiration using real-time ultrasound guidance. Do not let the introduction of the ultrasound probe alter the sterility of the procedure.
Integration into Clinical Practice
Ultrasound can rapidly confirm the presence of joint effusion prior to considering arthrocentesis or joint injection. Local anatomy can be assessed, including the presence of any vessels, nerves, or other structures to be avoided with your needle.
Evidence
Glenohumeral joint and knee joint injection were each 79% successful with landmark technique; ultrasound guidance increased success to 95% for the shoulder and 99% for the knee [1]. An emergency department-based study of ultrasound-guided knee arthrocentesis demonstrated the technique had equal success compared with a landmark-based approach. However, ultrasound guidance yielded less pain for patients and shorter procedure time and was less technically difficult for emergency providers [3].
Key Points
Ultrasound may be especially useful in confirming effusions in smaller or deeper joints.
Sonographic guidance for needle approach can assist in avoiding vessels, nerves, and other sensitive structures en route to the effusion.
Fracture Reduction
Distal radius fractures are one of the most commonly encountered fractures in both the adult and pediatric population. Ultrasound has been shown to be accurate compared to radiography for detecting distal radius fractures. Ultrasound can show the amount of fracture displacement and can also be used to determine adequate reduction. Traditionally, adequacy of reduction is assessed blindly. Once the clinician determines that reduction is successful, the wrist is splinted, and the patient is sent for post-reduction x-rays. If the alignment is inadequate, then the splint must be removed and a second reduction attempt performed. This may include additional procedural sedation and increases the patient’s length of stay. Some settings have access to fluoroscopy, where reduction can be assessed immediately at the bedside. While fluoroscopy is accurate, purchase and maintenance of the machine add additional costs. It also adds radiation, a concern especially in pediatric patients. Ultrasound has advantages over both these techniques, allowing real-time objective assessment of fracture reduction similar to fluoroscopy, without the additional cost and radiation.
While ultrasound can theoretically be used to reduce any fracture, it has been most extensively described in distal radius fractures, and therefore this section will focus specifically on distal radius fractures. In particular, it will focus only on the use of ultrasound to guide the procedure, as the reduction technique is described in other procedural texts.
Anatomy
Indications
Any fracture that may be clearly visualized on ultrasound, most commonly distal radius, with or without associated ulnar fractures
Contraindications
Open fracture, such that the ultrasound gel would come into contact with tissue
Preparation
- (a)
Posteroanterior view from the dorsal surface
- (b)
Anteroposterior view from the volar surface
- (c)
Lateral view