Staging
Clinical staging of cervical cancer is based on findings from biopsy, physical examination, and radiologic study. An estimate of extent of local disease can be made by pelvic examination, carefully palpating to see whether there is lateral extension to the vagina or pelvic wall. Palpating lymph nodes may detect a distant nodal metastasis, but clinical staging for involvement of pelvic nodes and the more distant paraaortic ones requires lymphangiography and/or computed tomography (CT). The latter has been especially helpful in the assessment of paraaortic nodes. Studies of magnetic resonance imaging suggest some usefulness in delineating local extension.
Stage of disease is designated by the TMN (tumor, metastasis, node) system (
Table 123-1). FIGO (Federation International Gynecology Obstetrics) staging is the most widely used system worldwide. Stage I cancers are confined to the cervix. Stage II cancers involve either the upper two thirds of the vagina or the inner half of the parametria. A stage III cancer involves the lower third of the vagina, extension of tumor from the cervix to the pelvic side wall, or hydronephrosis. Stage IV cancer involves direct extension into the bladder or rectum or distant spread.
Prognosis worsens with advancing stage of local disease, development of regional and distant nodal metastases (especially paraaortic nodes), and histologic grade. Risk of nodal metastasis is zero for tumors with less than 3-mm invasion. The incidence of nodal spread increases steadily for tumors larger than 3 mm, and survival is directly proportional to number of lymph nodes involved.
Treatment and Prognosis
Early stages of carcinoma of the cervix are curable. Patients sometimes ask the opinion of their primary physician regarding the choices of therapy for early-stage disease. Consequently, these choices are worth reviewing here.
For stage 0 disease, which is preinvasive disease such as severe dysplasia or carcinoma in situ, the long-standing treatment of choice has been cold knife conization. Alternatives excisional approaches include loop electrosurgical excision and laser conization. Ablative methods include cryotherapy, laser ablation, electrofulguration, and cold coagulation. Hysterectomy is reserved for those who have intraepithelial neoplasia at the margins of the excised specimen and for whom future childbearing is not an issue. Cure is greater than 99%.
Stage IA1, microinvasive cancer with less than 3 mm of invasion, is treated with vaginal hysterectomy when childbearing is not an issue. When it is desired, excisional conization and close followup are the alternative if the cone margins are free of tumor. Five-year survival is greater than 90%. There is debate regarding the best approach to stage IA2 disease, which is defined as invasion between 3 and 5 mm with a maximum of 7-mm lateral spread. A cone biopsy, simple hysterectomy, or fertility sparing radical trachelectomy, the removal of the cervix with preservation of the fundus of the uterus, can be considered.
Stages IB and IIA are treated by radical hysterectomy plus pelvic lymphadenectomy or by definitive irradiation. Surgery is preferred in young women because the ovarian function can be spared and the vagina is more pliable than after irradiation. In addition, radiation effects on bowel and other adjacent structures are avoided. Radiation therapy spares the need for an extensive surgical procedure and its attendant complications. With either procedure, 5-year survival is equally good, with rates averaging about 85% for patients with no pelvic node disease. If there is involvement of pelvic nodes, 5-year survival falls to about 50%.
Stages IIB and beyond are treated with irradiation. Five-year survival averages about 60% for patients with IIB disease and falls to about 35% for stage IIIB disease and to 20% for stage IV disease.
Concomitant chemotherapy with cisplatin ±5 fluorouracil and radiation therapy has been shown to increase overall survival and progression-free survival in women with locally advanced cervical cancer compared to treatment with radiation alone and is now considered the standard of care. It also may reduce local and distant recurrence rates. There is an increase in acute treatment toxicity; the effect on long-term side effects has not been well defined.
The high likelihood of nodal metastasis associated with advancing stages of local disease markedly lowers the chances of cure. Clinically unapparent involvement of paraaortic nodes is a particularly difficult problem, leading some to advocate surgical sampling. Prophylactic radiation to the area does not seem to improve survival.