medicine is inherently limited by, and in essence defined by, a lack of advanced diagnostic equipment, support, and resources. Wilderness EMS relies on physical exam, clinical history, and knowledge of epidemiology to guide treatment. This leads to quite a bit more uncertainty, and differentiating similar infections may not be possible without bacterial cultures, gram stains, and the support of a microbiology lab that one would have in a hospital emergency department. Although similar diseases may be indistinguishable to the wilderness EMS provider, by using a systematic approach it is possible to initiate appropriate treatment early and prevent patient deterioration. This chapter will cover recognition and treatment of the most common and life-threatening infections of the skin and soft tissue, gastrointestinal (GI) system, genitourinary (GU) system, central nervous system (CNS), and pulmonary system. Finally, this chapter covers sepsis and its management in the wilderness.
pain. Pneumonia often follows a viral illness in otherwise healthy adults. Sudden shortness of breath (or worsening of earlier mild shortness of breath), high fever, and rapid respiratory rate in a patient who has been suffering from cold symptoms for several days should be an alert that a patient is developing pneumonia. In contrast to bronchitis, pneumonia is typically a bacterial infection, although viruses can cause pneumonia as well.
Residing in a nursing home or long-term care facility
Hospitalization for more than 2 days in the past 90 days
Attendance at hospital or dialysis clinic in past 30 days
Degree of respiratory distress (examples of worsening respiratory distress include increased work of breathing, decreased SpO2, and rapid respiratory rate)
Underlying lung disease such as COPD or asthma
Signs of poor perfusion (examples include pale skin, lack of urine output, tachycardia, slow capillary refill)
Speed of progression: symptoms rapidly worsening over the course of hours instead of days
by nonrebreather mask at 10 to 15 lpm based on subjective degree of difficulty breathing. While short-term application of high-flow oxygen in otherwise healthy patients has little risk, there is evidence that, at least in patients with COPD, titrating oxygen therapy to patient response and pulse oximetry may improve mortality.5,6,7 The biggest problem with oxygen delivery in the wilderness is physically delivering an adequate supply of compressed oxygen to the patient due to the weight and size of oxygen tanks. In general, high-flow oxygen by mask should be avoided if possible. Providers should start with lower flows of oxygen than is usual in frontcountry EMS, and titrate oxygen rate of delivery to patient response. There is no need to raise a patient’s SpO2 to 100%. A goal of 92% to 94% is safe and adequate in patients with respiratory infections, as saturations less than 92% have been associated with poor outcomes, and over-oxygenation has been shown to be harmful, even in patients with such severe disease as to require intubation.1,2,3,4 Small adjustments to the flow of oxygen not only significantly increase the percentage of inhaled oxygen (FiO2), but also dramatically shorten the life of the tank (see Table 20.2.1). It is important to note that as altitude increases, atmospheric pressure decreases, which makes it more difficult to diffuse oxygen into the blood. SpO2 is normally lower in healthy people at altitude, and the degree that it is lowered is relative to the altitude. Providers can check the SpO2 of themselves and other healthy rescuers and compare it with that of the patient to get a better idea of the severity of respiratory function compromise.
Table 20.2.1 Hours of Oxygen Delivery by Tank Size and Flow Rate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
cost and minimizing complexity of decision-making. It would be reasonable to include only levofloxacin, doxycycline, and ceftriaxone in the formulary, and still be able to provide adequate respiratory coverage. All three antibiotics are useful for treatment of infections from various other organ systems, and the protocol could still account for drug allergies. It may not be feasible to carry multiple antibiotics, and one must consider the specific characteristics of the team’s practice environment and the demographics of the patients they are likely to encounter. For those teams needing a single antibiotic solution to as many conditions as possible, we recommend ceftriaxone as parenteral therapy and levofloxacin or clindamycin for oral therapy.
Table 20.2.2 Suggested Antibiotics | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FIGURE 20.2.2. Costovertebral angle (CVA) tenderness can be elicited by percussing the patient’s back at the junction between the spine and the lowest ribs, which roughly corresponds to the location of the kidney. |