Malignant hyperthermia (MH) is a serious and possibly fatal syndrome of skeletal muscle hypermetabolism and calcium dysregulation that occurs when genetically susceptible individuals are exposed to certain anesthetic “triggering” agents- the potent halogenated inhaled volatile anesthetics and the nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocker succinylcholine.
MH susceptibility is conferred by the inherited or spontaneous (de novo) acquisition of a variant in genetic loci that encode for proteins that are integral for normal functioning of the skeletal muscle excitation-contraction (EC) complex. They include RYR1 , which encodes for the ryanodine receptor, CACNA1S , which encodes for the alpha-1 subunit of the dihydropyridine receptor, and STAC3 , which has an unknown function in the complex. A current listing of these MH causative variants is located on the European MH Group (EMHG) website.
There are currently two methods to determine MH susceptibility: molecular genetic testing for known MH-causative variants, and an open muscle contracture biopsy. Molecular genetic testing uses an individual’s DNA specimen, such as blood or buccal smear. It is noninvasive, and the sample can be sent from anywhere in the world. A positive result (finding the presence of a diagnostic variant) confirms MH susceptibility. A negative result, however, cannot rule out MH susceptibility because of known discordances between contracture testing and molecular genetic results; many families exist in whom a pathogenic variant has not been detected but have been proven MH susceptible either by a convincing clinical event or a positive contracture biopsy. Thus, MH can only be excluded by negative contracture biopsy testing.
A contracture biopsy test requires an open incision (usually from the quadriceps muscle, using either regional anesthesia or trigger-free general anesthesia) for immediate testing to determine the muscle’s contractile properties when exposed to halothane and caffeine ( Fig. 21.1 ). Its most important advantage is its high sensitivity (at least 99%); a negative result rules out MH susceptibility. Its main disadvantage is its surgical invasiveness, and limited availability at only several centers throughout the world. In North America the test is called the caffeine-halothane contracture test (CHCT) and in European centers it is called the in-vitro contracture test (IVCT). The protocols differ slightly, but both have a sensitivity close to 100% and a reasonably high specificity (yielding some possible false positive tests). Because of the size of the muscle required for analysis, children less than about 40 kg weight are usually excluded from testing, but this is biopsy-center dependent.
A person should be tested for susceptibility to MH if they or someone in their family has experienced a clinically suspicious episode of MH during exposure to an anesthetic triggering agent. However, it is very difficult to assess the accuracy of an intraoperative MH diagnosis in the absence of a bedside diagnostic test. When these clinical events are examined carefully, very few are unambiguously attributable to MH. A less common reason for MH susceptibility testing is when a person has experienced exaggerated and unexpected muscle breakdown (i.e., rhabdomyolysis) in response to nonextreme heat exposure or exercise.
The EMHG has published a suggested diagnostic pathway for MH susceptibility testing ( Fig. 21.2 ). Individuals who have experienced a clinically convincing MH event should initially obtain noninvasive molecular genetic testing. This testing, however, is only useful when the analysis demonstrates a known diagnostic MH variant, which confirms MH susceptibility. If a family member has experienced the suspicious MH event, then they should ideally be the first member of the family to undergo testing. In the absence of finding an MH-diagnostic variant, a contracture test is required to exclude or confirm MH susceptibility.
Patients with a positive contracture biopsy without prior molecular genetic investigations should subsequently undergo molecular genetic analysis. If this investigation reveals a pathogenic variant for MH, then other members of the family can be tested for that variant at less expense.
The most frequent reason for investigating an individual’s MH susceptibility is the suspicion of MH susceptibility in a blood relative, either by a convincing clinical event or diagnostic testing. How closely related should this “proband” be to warrant testing or avoidance of MH triggering agents? Although a classic mendelian inheritance of MH is an oversimplification, the autosomal dominant mode of inheritance is helpful to estimate the risk for MH susceptibility. Each offspring of an MH susceptible parent has a 50% risk to be MH susceptible. With every generation, the risk for MH susceptibility decreases by 50%. Therefore, the next generation (grandchildren) each have a risk for 25% and so on. Using a conservatively high prevalence of MH variants of approximately 1 in 1500 in the general population, it would take approximately 10 generations to decrease the calculated familial risk to be similar to that of the general population. As this example illustrates, any familial history within 10 generations (essentially everyone) should be cause for suspicion of MH susceptibility and should prompt the use of a nontriggering general anesthetic and referral for susceptibility testing. If ever possible, the family member with the highest risk for MH susceptibility should be tested for MH to rule out, or confirm, the risk for MH in subsequent generations.
Prevalence, Incidence, and Penetrance
The prevalence of MH susceptibility is defined as the percentage of people with an MH-causative variant, almost always on the RYR1 gene. It varies by geographic region throughout the world, and is currently estimated to be as high as 1 in 1500 in some areas.
The incidence of MH is defined as the percentage of MH crises that occur during all anesthetic administrations (with triggering agents). Some authors have estimated this incidence to be about 1 in 50,000 to 100,00 cases, but these estimates are unreliable for several reasons. First, it is difficult to know the total number of anesthetics administered with MH-triggering agents (i.e., the denominator). Second, it is difficult to know the total number of true MH cases. Few acute presentations of MH present with unmistakable classic signs. The remainder are a mix of true MH events and other physiologic perturbations that manifest with similar signs as MH. A definitive diagnosis relies on testing after the episode and can be difficult to obtain. In addition, reporting of MH events to a national registry is not comprehensive.
The penetrance of MH is defined as the percentage of time that MH occurs when known MH-susceptible individuals are administered MH triggering agents. This has been reported to range from 5% to over 40% and is influenced by different individual and environmental conditions. Approximately one-half of patients who develop acute MH have had one or two previous uneventful exposures to triggering agents. The North American MH Registry (NAMHR) includes a case of a genetically confirmed MH susceptible patient who developed fatal MH on what may have been their 31st exposure to an MH-triggering agent!
Triggering Agents
Nearly all MH reactions are associated with the administration of one of the potent inhalational agents (i.e., halothane, isoflurane, sevoflurane, or desflurane) in a dose dependent manner (the minimum dose is unknown), with or without concomitant administration of succinylcholine. The concomitant use of succinylcholine is associated with a worse clinical presentation of MH. The decrease in use of halothane and succinylcholine in the 1990s is thought to account for an apparent shift in clinical presentation of MH to later in the course of a patient’s anesthetic.
Although rare, there appear to be MH cases initiated with succinylcholine alone. The clinical signs of these MH events tend to occur within 10 minutes of succinylcholine administration and are more likely to be associated with masseter muscle rigidity than reactions triggered by the potent inhalational agents. Besides the inhalational anesthetic gases and succinylcholine, no other medications or substances, in any class, are causally associated with the occurrence of MH.
Clinical Presentations
MH most often presents as a constellation of physiologic signs indicative of uncontrolled hypermetabolism during the administration of general anesthetic triggering agents ( Table 21.1 from Smith’s chapter). This includes unexplainable hypercarbia that is resistant to increases in minute ventilation, sinus tachycardia , and metabolic acidosis . Spontaneously breathing patients will develop tachypnea to counteract the respiratory and metabolic acidosis. However, the onset of MH may manifest in a variety of clinical presentations. For example, in some patients the first signs of MH are abnormally prolonged skeletal muscle contractures , either generalized throughout the body or confined only to the masseter muscle soon after the administration of succinylcholine. In other patients, the first sign of MH is an arrhythmia caused by hyperkalemia from acute rhabdomyolysis . These arrhythmias are variable and are thought to depend on the absolute level and rate of rise of serum potassium and the degree of acidosis and sympathetic stimulation. They range from seemingly benign premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) or changes in the electrocardiogram (e.g., peaked T waves, broadened and decreased amplitude of the P wave, widened QRS) to sudden heart block, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, or asystole. Hyperthermia may occur any time in the clinical course of MH, from the initial onset to the later stages. It may be indolent, rising slowly without attracting much attention, or accelerated, rising more than one degree Celsius every few minutes in its initial stages. Lack of temperature monitoring and failure to detect hyperthermia has been associated with increased morbidity and death caused by MH. Therefore, core temperature monitoring (e.g. distal esophagus, nasopharynx, tympanic membrane, pulmonary artery, bladder) should be used in all general anesthetics expected to last longer than 30 minutes, or less when perturbations in body temperature are expected because of unique patient or surgical characteristics.
Hypercarbia |
|
Sinus Tachycardia |
|
Metabolic Acidosis |
|
Muscle Rigidity |
|
Hyperkalemia |
|
Hyperthermia |
|
Rhabdomyolysis |
|