Malfunction: It’s Electric! Boogie, Woogie, Woogie!

div class=”ChapterContextInformation”>


© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020
C. G. Kaide, C. E. San Miguel (eds.)Case Studies in Emergency Medicinehttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22445-5_14



14. Defibrillator Malfunction: It’s Electric! Boogie, Woogie, Woogie!



Matthew Malone1   and Ashish Panchal1


(1)
Department of Emergency Medicine, Wexner Medical Center at The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

 



 

Matthew Malone



Keywords

AICD discharges resultMalignant ventricular arrhythmiaVT or VFStructural heart diseaseCardiomyopathyMalignant ventricular dysrhythmia


Case


Pertinent History


This patient is a 73-year-old male who presented to the ED approximately 3 hours after a perceived firing of his AICD. He states he was walking to the bathroom when he developed palpitations. He had no chest pain, dyspnea, lightheadedness, or other symptoms. Several seconds later, he felt as though he was “kicked in the chest by a mule.” Subsequently, the palpitations he experienced resolved. His only symptom after the event is mild chest discomfort, which is slowly resolving. Patient reports that he forgot to take his metoprolol this morning.



Past Medical History


Hypertension, Type II Diabetes, Coronary Artery Disease, and remote STEMI resulting in ischemic cardiomyopathy with EF 20%.



Medications


Metoprolol, Lisinopril, Lasix, Metformin, Atorvastatin.



Social History


Forty pack-year smoking history, no drug or alcohol use.



Pertinent Physical Exam


BP 142/90, Pulse 102, Temp 98.1 °F (36.7 °C), RR 14, SpO2 96%.



Cardiovascular:


Borderline tachycardia, regular rhythm, no gallop, friction rub or murmur heard.



Chest Wall:


Left upper chest AICD device without overlying erythema or tenderness to palpation of site.



Lung:


Clear to auscultation bilaterally.


Except as noted above, the findings of a complete physical exam are within normal limits.


Pertinent Test Results



EKG


Normal sinus rhythm with old LBBB pattern otherwise unchanged from previous.

../images/463721_1_En_14_Chapter/463721_1_En_14_Figa_HTML.jpg



Laboratory Analysis


















































































Test


Result


Units


Normal Range


WBC


4.55


K/uL


3.8–11.0 103/mm3


Hgb


14.8


g/dL


(Male) 14–18 g/dL


(Female) 11–16 g/dL


Platelets


222


K/uL


140–450 K /uL


Sodium


136


mEq/L


135–148 mEq/L


Potassium


2.9 ↓


mEq/L


3.5–5.5 mEq/L


Chloride


106


mEq/L


96–112 mEq/L


Bicarbonate


25


mEq/L


21–34 mEq/L


BUN


13


mg/dL


6–23 mg/dL


Creatinine


1.01


mg/dL


0.6–1.5 mg/dL


Glucose


177 ↑


mg/dL


65–99 mg/dL


Magnesium


1.4 ↓


mg/dL


1.6–2.6 mg/dL


Troponin


<0.13 ↑


ng/dl


<0.11 ng/dl


BNP


350 ↑ (baseline for this patient is 350)


pg/ml


<100 pg/ml



CXR


Single chamber AICD in place without evidence of lead fracture or displacement, no other acute cardiopulmonary process.



Device Interrogation


Single episode of irregular wide complex tachycardia with rate approximately 177 bpm, successfully aborted by AICD discharge. No other events on device interrogation.


Updates on ED Course


Update 1: The patient’s nurse informs you that the patient had four additional AICD firings in the last 10 minutes. You review the cardiac monitor alarms, revealing four episodes of irregular wide complex tachycardia successfully aborted by AICD discharge. You suspect new-onset atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response. You place a magnet over the AICD and ask the nurse to notify you if the patient’s heart rate increases. Potassium and magnesium were also supplemented.


Update 2: Five minutes later, the nurse notifies you that the patient has had a rhythm change with a heart rate of 175. You enter the room and ask for a 12-lead ECG, which shows recurrence of the irregular wide complex tachycardia. The patient has a BP of 120/70. You administer 15 mg of diltiazem and begin an infusion. The patient’s heart rate improves to 130 and BP increases to 120/68.


Update 3: Cardiology was consulted and reviewed the device interrogation report. The consultant believes that this event represents new-onset atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response and the shock was inappropriate. She recommends correction of electrolytes, rate control, anticoagulation, and admission for further monitoring and trending of cardiac enzymes. During the admission, the AICD will be adjusted. No recommendation for addition of an antiarrhythmic medication was made at this time. Admission orders were placed and the patient admitted to a monitored unit.


Learning Points: AICD Firing



Priming Questions


1. How can one distinguish between an appropriate and inappropriate AICD discharge?


2. What are the types of inappropriate AICD discharges and how are they treated?


3. Which patients with AICD discharge can be safely discharged home and which require admission?

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Mar 15, 2021 | Posted by in EMERGENCY MEDICINE | Comments Off on Malfunction: It’s Electric! Boogie, Woogie, Woogie!

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access