Injury Prevention: Decision Making, Safety, and Accident Avoidance

Chapter 16 Injury Prevention


Decision Making, Safety, and Accident Avoidance



For online-only figures, please go to www.expertconsult.com image


For many, it is the wild in wilderness that fuels a passion for the wilderness experience. Wilderness areas are considered the last areas that humans do not control and have not developed. This lack of human control in undeveloped terrain, combined with the enthusiasm of wilderness explorers, is an ideal recipe for unintentional injury. Managing the risk through sound decisions and efforts to improve safety and reduce accidents is a critical component of wilderness medicine and the focus of this chapter.


Contributing to overall risk for injury is the growing feasibility of exploration by wilderness novices, children, elders, and persons with disabilities or chronic health issues by using off-road vehicles, watercraft, and aircraft or via improved access. For persons who venture into the wilderness, there are growing technologic advances in communications equipment, global positioning systems, sporting equipment design, water purification and disinfection, and food processing and preservation techniques, all of which extend the duration of expeditions and permit exploration of remote wilderness once accessed by only the most skilled and experienced persons. Environmental hazards, such as exposure to cold, heat, snow, or altitude, can be minimized through proper planning and training. Wilderness sports activities, such as hunting, snowmobiling, and backcountry ski touring, are safer today not only because of advances in technologic and safety equipment, but because of efforts to educate the public about associated risks and how to manage or reduce these risks and efforts to train the public in wilderness first-aid and medicine (Figure 16-1, online). Despite the growth in numbers of practitioners of wilderness medicine and improved ability to provide care for many injuries and illnesses in remote settings, evacuation of injured victims from the wilderness remains daunting and can turn a minor problem into a major medical situation with a protracted rescue.



There are 78 million hectares (193 million acres) of land in the U.S. National Forests and Grasslands. Thousands of rivers and lakes are parts of the National Forests, and there are 247,000 km (153,000 miles) of trails, primarily for nonmotorized use. It is estimated that 178 million people recreate each year in the national forests.152 Sixty-four percent of 446 million visits to national parks in 2009 were considered recreational, with 1.9 million categorized as backcountry overnight visits.97 The National Sporting Goods Association estimates that between 1994 and 2004, the number of Americans involved in backpacking and wilderness camping climbed from 10.2 million to 13.3 million. During the same time period, the number of hikers increased from 25 million to 29.8 million.98


With increased access comes the potential for higher numbers of injuries, illnesses, and fatalities. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), in 2005 a total of 173,753 injury-related deaths occurred in the United States, and during 2006 an estimated 29,821,159 persons with nonfatal injuries were treated in U.S. hospital emergency departments.26 The number of injuries and injury-related deaths as a result of wilderness activities is unknown and can only be extrapolated, particularly from National Park Service (NPS) data. Between 2003 and 2006, there were 12,337 search and rescue (SAR) operations in national parks, involving 15,537 visitors and involving 522 fatalities and 4860 ill or injured visitors.60 From a public health point of view, the physical, financial, and emotional consequences of injury can be wide ranging, devastating, and long lasting. The CDC’s National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (Injury Center) was formed partially as a result of a recommendation of the 1985 Institute of Medicine report Injury in America, which concluded that supporting injury research is necessary to substantially reduce injury rates.30 The Injury Center strives to prevent injury and reduce its consequences, using a public health approach that describes the problem, identifies risk and protective factors, develops and tests prevention interventions and strategies, and promotes widespread adoption of effective interventions and strategies. Although the Injury Center includes intentional as well as unintentional injuries in its focus on injury prevention, their efforts and approach may prove to be a model for future research and methods for injury reduction in the wilderness setting.


This chapter reviews basic principles of injury applied to the wilderness environment. Individual (human/host) factors and behavior and how they apply to injury risk and prevention are detailed, including preparation, planning, anticipation of problems, and errors of omission or commission. Problems are approached from the perspective of environmental hazards, rather than from a particular activity, because many hazards are common to different wilderness activities. Throughout this chapter, prevention of injury is the focus. Details of pathophysiology and treatment are found in the referenced chapters throughout this text.



Principles of Wilderness Injury and Prevention



The Injury Field: Basic Principles


Injury prevention is a key component of public health and medical care. It is a long-held belief of physicians and public health practitioners that injury prevention is far superior to injury treatment. Underlying injury prevention is the concept that when an injury occurs it is usually the result of a series of events under specific circumstances that had they been identified in advance might have been avoided, addressed, and/or eliminated to prevent or mitigate the injury. In the field of injury prevention, accidents are defined as unpredictable acts of fate or chance events, whereas injuries are defined as damages resulting from a sequence of accidents or intentional actions. Injuries are prevented by stopping or reducing the number of accidents causing them and/or eliminating the intentional actions and situations that lead to them. By applying this principle, practitioners of injury prevention estimate that 90% of all injuries are predictable and preventable. For example, by inspecting, testing, and replacing equipment, individuals may prevent accidents related to equipment failure. The need for this approach is even greater in wilderness medicine than in many other fields of medicine. In medicine we attempt to prevent injury, but if that prevention fails, we then provide emergency care and rehabilitation to limit the lasting effects of injury and return the person to good health. In the case of wilderness injuries, which may occur in areas with limited immediate care and often with significant distance and time to reach definitive care, our ability to limit the extent of injury is less, magnifying the need for prevention.



The Continuum of Injury Prevention


Injury prevention can occur at many points along the continuum, beginning before injury through rehabilitation. In classic injury prevention and epidemiology, opportunities for prevention are divided into primary, secondary, and tertiary phases. Primary prevention avoids development of a disease. Most population-based health promotion activities are primary preventive measures. In addition, many environmental or regulatory controls are primary.


Secondary prevention activities are aimed at early disease detection, thereby increasing opportunities for interventions to prevent progression of disease and emergence of symptoms. In the field of injury prevention this would include early recognition of injury to limit the extent and impact of an injury should it occur. An example in wilderness medicine is early recognition of foot blisters and use of protective coverings or footwear alteration to prevent skin breakdown and further extension of blisters or infections. Wearing protective equipment is both primary and secondary if it limits the extent of injury. Interventions may cross multiple stages of prevention.


Tertiary prevention reduces the negative impact of an already established disease by restoring function and reducing disease-related complications. In the field of injury prevention, this traditionally includes prompt and appropriate medical rehabilitation. An example is early splinting of a fracture in the field to prevent further injury and to limit swelling and associated complications. Quaternary prevention is the set of health activities that mitigate or avoid the consequences of unnecessary or excessive interventions within the health system. This stage is the latest addition to the classic three stages of prevention and is not always included in descriptions of injury prevention.



Epidemiologic Factors: Human or Host, Agent, and Environment


One of the most commonly used methods of categorizing the factors that lead to injury is “human (host), agent, and environment.” Numerous human factors can lead to injury and be used as opportunities for prevention. Examples include predisposition to injury, such as osteoporosis predisposing to fractures; behaviors that may be high risk for injury, such as alcohol consumption and intoxication; decision making, such as a choice to proceed on an icy trail; and different body habitus, ages, or conditions, such as pregnancy.


The next factor is the agent. Broadly defined, the agent is what causes the injury. Although this may seem straightforward, the lines can be blurred. For example, if someone decides to strike a branch with his or her hand to break it, is the branch the agent or is the human who made the decision the agent? Most would agree the branch is the agent and the human factor was the decision to strike it. Classic descriptions of agents would be propelled objects, items that strike people, falls from heights, or malfunctioning mechanical devices. In the wilderness, the items include failing ropes or belts when climbing, branches and rocks when falling, wet ground causing a slip, a poorly positioned or inappropriately worn backpack leading to back injury, or a hot object that causes burns.


The last factor is the environment, which includes the situation in which the injury occurred. This might be temperature conditions, such as extremes of heat or cold, but may also include a situation where there is only one option for moving forward through less-than-ideal terrain without the option to turn back.



Conceptual Models


A more comprehensive conceptualization for intervention and prevention can be done by combining stages of injury prevention with the host, agent, and environment approach. This combination was proposed by Dr. William Haddon, Jr., who is widely considered the father of modern injury epidemiology.


Haddon’s matrix is an injury prevention brainstorming tool originally designed for motor vehicle safety that combines the epidemiology triangle (host, agent, environment) and levels of prevention. This combination allows planning for injury interventions and prevention strategies by phases in time of the event. In addition to planning interventions, this matrix can also be used to collect data to determine the factors that cause injuries.


The following are the steps to complete Haddon’s matrix:






Haddon’s 10 Strategies for Reducing Injuries


In addition to developing the matrix, Haddon also proposed strategies for reducing injuries. These strategies have been grouped into 10 specific approaches, commonly known as Haddon’s 10 Strategies (with examples):













Environmental, Educational, and Enforcement Approaches to Injury Prevention


In addition to describing possible interventions using Haddon’s matrix approach, it may be helpful to characterize the type of intervention. One way to categorize injury prevention efforts is by the three E’s:





Comprehensive injury prevention projects employ strategies that include all of these.




Educational Approach


Preventive measures defined as an educational approach involve education of large populations, targeted groups, or individuals and efforts to alter specific injury-related behaviors. Many injuries result less from lack of knowledge than from failure to apply what is known.


Three goals of educational interventions are as follows:





An educational approach may be appropriate in the following instances:






Limitations of the educational approach include the following:








Social-Ecologic Model


In addition to the classic epidemiology approach of host, agent, and environment enhanced by the stages of prevention and articulated by Haddon in his matrix, another conceptual model attempts to describe injury prevention but with more focus on the interplay of different factors. The social-ecologic model has its foundation in human development and has been refined to apply to injury prevention and epidemiology. The social-ecologic framework was created by Urie Bronfenbrenner19 in the context of understanding human development and is very compatible with a broader view of public health.76 Social-ecologic theory defines various levels of the social environment, depicting the nested roles of intrapersonal factors, interpersonal factors, institutional elements, and cultural elements. This social-ecologic framework enhances the standard public health model of agent-host-environment.88,120,135


With respect to understanding injury prevention, intrapersonal factors include both developmental and sociobehavioral features of individuals (i.e., the host), for example, a young child’s curiosity and exploratory behaviors through touching, tasting, and crawling; an adolescent’s propensity to take risks and the varied responses to parent and peer influences; or an older adult’s suicide risk due to a sense of hopelessness in the face of an incurable chronic disease, or avoidance of walking in certain locations because of fear of falling or assault. Likewise, biologic features of the host, such as a young child’s lack of balance and strength, high center of gravity, and small size, relate to some of the hazards encountered. For an older adult, biologic characteristics such as bone brittleness; reduced visual acuity, reaction time, and balance; and thinner skin all increase susceptibility to injury events such as traffic crashes, pedestrian injuries, falls, and burns.


Interpersonal factors are those that result from the interactions between two persons, for example, intimate partners, parent and child, employer and employee, or adolescents. In the injury sphere, this relates to intentional injury as a result of behaviors associated with disciplinary practices or conflict resolution.


Institutional elements are those that reflect organizations in which individuals function, for example, schools, places of worship, and workplaces. How these organizations promote or control activities and environments can affect injury risks. Work sites contain many hazards and adopt many types of safety practices, whereas places of worship may either encourage or discourage certain safe or unsafe practices. Prehospital trauma care and inpatient health care systems are institutions that affect injury outcomes.105


Cultural elements include broad social values and norms as well as governmental policies that guide or mandate behaviors of individuals or organizations. Examples are values placed on individual freedom; social norms about drinking or corporal punishment; and laws, policies, and regulations about producing, selling, and storing firearms. Any health problem can be viewed as resulting from and being alleviated by the interactions among these dynamic factors.



Risk and Effect Modification in Injury Prevention Epidemiology


Two basic epidemiologic concepts are risk and effect modification. Risk is the likelihood of disease occurrence and is often operationalized as relative risk to aid in decision making. This is a method to describe how one option versus another option may lead to different disease outcomes. In injury prevention, one always must consider risk. Some activities are inherently risky, and all one can do is provide interventions that protect the individual or minimize the impact of a potential injury. In other cases, there may be several options each with different risk, so that one can determine the relative risk. Major human risk factor examples are age, gender, and experience.


Another basic epidemiologic concept that can be applied to injury prevention is that of effect modification. An effect modifier is a variable that lies in the pathway from independent/main explanatory variable and the dependent/outcome variable. When applying this to injury prevention, one can think of an effect modifier as something that lies in the pathway between the event and the injury, and that can alter the injury outcome from similar events. An example might be wearing a helmet, so that when thrown from a horse the injury to one’s head is less than if not wearing a helmet. Human factors can be considered from the perspective of effect modifiers. For example, when caught in bad weather, the more experienced hiker will be less likely than the novice to be injured.



Active Versus Passive Injury Prevention Strategies


Before proceeding to implement methods of injury prevention, it is important to recognize that injury prevention strategies are either active or passive.112 Active injury prevention strategies require change in behaviors by individuals before or when exposed to risks.145 For example, individuals must be convinced that wearing seat belts reduces the risk for injury and then must take the action of buckling up. Passive injury prevention strategies are preferable because they require no action on the part of the individual.54,72 For example, recent advances in automotive safety have been gained by placement of air bags. A more classic passive approach has been referred to as environmental controls. An example of this is a fence placed around a pool to prevent entry of unsupervised children, thus reducing drowning incidents.



Morbidity and Mortality Statistics for Wilderness Injury


The difficulties of obtaining data about injury prevention in the wilderness are the diversity of activities covered and lack of a single source for the data. As a result, data are often only for a selected activity and in a single location. Some data involve several activities. An example is a CDC study released in 2008 of nearly 213,000 people who had been treated each year in emergency departments for outdoor recreational injuries from 2004 to 2005.44 Of those injured, about 109,000 (51.5%) were young people between the ages of 10 and 24. For both men and women of all ages, the most common injuries were fractures (27.4%) and sprains (23.9%). Of these, most injuries were to the arms or legs (52%) or to the head or neck (23.3%). Overall, 6.5% of outdoor injuries treated were diagnosed as traumatic brain injury. Researchers found that snowboarding (25.5%), sledding (10.8%), and hiking (6.3%) were associated with the highest percentage of injuries requiring emergency department visits. The study points out that wilderness injury prevention begins with planning, preparation, and problem anticipation, which are discussed later in this chapter.


An example of event-specific data is for backpacking and camping. Data reveal that more than 11 million people participated in backpacking or wilderness camping in 1990. The morbidity and mortality figures from eight national parks in California between 1993 and 1995 are 1708 injuries and 78 fatalities.95 Another event-specific activity for which there are data is scuba diving. There are more than 9 million certified scuba divers in the United States, with approximately 650,000 annual certifications.35 The Divers Alert Network37 at Duke University Medical Center (Durham, NC) reported approximately 1000 serious diving-related injuries and approximately 90 diving-related fatalities annually between 1995 and 2002.


In addition to event-specific data, one can examine equipment-based data, which can include data based on certain types of vehicles. For example, from 1990 through 1995, an estimated 32,954 persons were involved in injuries related to personal watercraft.18


Lastly, one may search data to learn about specific types of injuries or deaths. An example of this type of data is a western Washington study of 40 pediatric wilderness-activity related deaths between 1987 and 1996.100 Ninety percent of the victims were male, and 83% were 13 to 19 years of age. The most common cause of death was drowning (55%), followed by closed head injury (26%). Injuries or deaths resulted from lack of preparation, lack of training for wilderness activities, and inadequate basic safety equipment; alcohol use and rescue delays were contributing factors. Of note, the presence of adults did not appear to be significant in reducing the incidence of mortality.



Putting Injury Prevention into Practice



Planning


Careful planning is the foundation for a safe activity that minimizes risk and avoids injury. Planning begins by gathering all relevant data for the planned activity. This includes up-to-date information regarding weather, trail, and campground conditions, best times to travel, permit requirements, equipment needed, and special considerations unique to the activity. After gathering all available information, one develops a plan for activities. The plan may be very brief and purely a mental exercise for some activities such as brief hikes, camping trips, rock climbing, or day diving. For longer excursions, the planning phase will include a detailed, written plan. Planning activities may include activity-specific planning that addresses unique risks or needs. For example, to plan for a climb that includes high altitude, allowance is made for ascent and descent to allow time for acclimatization. Planning may include provision of equipment specific to the activity, such as scuba gear or helmets.


Two of the most important planning factors are personal limitations and required preparation. It is important to establish criteria under which the activity can be undertaken safely. The level of detail is based on the risks. For events with high risk or multiple risks, these criteria need to be detailed. There are many factors that figure into a “go” or “no-go” decision plan. Some factors, such as weather, local conditions, physical conditioning for the activity, sleep, and wellness, may apply to all activities, but others may be activity specific, such as water conditions for rafting and kayaking. Once the criteria are established, the most important thing is to adhere to them. Injuries often occur when the desire to perform an activity causes someone to participate in a situation that is either unsafe or exceeds personal abilities.


At a minimum, one must address the following:









Preparation


After planning, the next step in a good injury prevention approach is to prepare for the activity so as to minimize risk and put into place factors that are targeted at the human, agent, and environmental issues that can lead to injury. Preparation activities can be grouped into human factors (physical and mental preparation) and material factors, such as equipment preparation.





Equipment Preparation


Material preparation involves acquiring proper equipment (both routine and for emergencies and unplanned events), testing and organizing equipment, and having backup equipment. Carry sufficient equipment to survive for extended periods if unforeseen changes occur and under the worst possible environmental conditions for the season. This includes ensuring that preventive maintenance has been performed for equipment and that equipment is in good working condition.


Review each person’s responsibility for equipment. Make sure that equipment and weight are properly distributed, taking into account abilities. Equipment should be appropriate for the activity and the environment (e.g., waterproof, ruggedized). Selecting battery-powered items that require the same size and type of batteries minimizes items to be carried. Maintain an equipment checklist. If using specialized equipment, know its proper use and maintenance. Courses are available through retail outlets, clubs, and wilderness organizations to prepare and train participants for most outdoor activities. The minimum equipment list should include, but is not limited to the following:
















Individual Factors and Injury Prevention



Specific Tools for Planning and Preparation in the Wilderness



Maps and Orienteering


People should have the ability to tell where they are and where they are going. A single wrong turn can have disastrous consequences. Maps are useful tools for planning, and the Global Positioning System (GPS) gives an accurate determination of actual location. Traditional two-dimensional maps, such as road maps, identify a sampling of features on the ground, with symbols to represent physical objects. Topographic maps, also known as “topo” maps or contour maps, use contour lines or shaded relief to represent the shape of land surface. Contour lines connect contiguous points at the same altitude. Topo maps usually depict significant bodies of water, forest cover, or other features and are prepared using interpretation of aerial photography or remote sensing techniques. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) produces several series of national topographic maps, the largest and best known of which is the 7.5 minute, 1:24,000 scale, quadrangle nonmetric scale map, each of which covers an area of 0.125° latitude by 0.125° longitude spaced 7.5 minutes apart (an area of about 49 to 64 square miles). The 7.5 minute series of maps has been abandoned recently in favor of The National Map, a collaborative effort of the USGS and federal, state, and local agencies to improve topographic information in the United States and contributing to the development of a new generation of digital topographic maps.141


An accurate graphic information system (GIS), such as a digital elevation (terrain) model, allows wilderness explorers to extract and analyze additional information via three-dimensional digital representation of surface terrain or topography. An offshoot of GIS is location-based services, which allows GPS-enabled mobile devices (such as cell phones, personal digital assistants [PDAs] and laptop computers) to display their location in relation to fixed or mobile assets (such as a gas station or police car) or to relay their position back to a central server for display or other processing. This is a potentially useful future application in national parks. GIS has led to the explosion of Internet mapping services, such as Google Maps and MapQuest, which allow users access to aerial satellite imagery useful in the planning and preparation stage of wilderness travel. Whether a two-dimensional planimetric, topographic, or graphic display map is used for wilderness travel, it is essential that the user carry the map and know how to use it. In addition, ingress points, checkpoints, and egress points should be established before traveling.




Communication Devices


Traditionally, emergency communications from wilderness settings have been limited to signaling with devices such as a mirror or other reflector, whistle, fire, smoke, or flare (Figure 16-2). Newer laser devices encased in waterproof housings have been found to be very effective in identifying people during aerial searches, particularly at night. Commercially available “rescue laser flares” are small, lightweight, and rugged handheld laser devices that project a wide line, rather than the pinpoint light normally associated with a laser. They allow the user to sweep across an area with a dispersed red or green light beam that can be seen from up to 30 miles away (3 miles in daylight). The device is powered by lithium batteries that when used continuously will last for up to 72 hours, depending on the model.111 The international distress signal (SOS), which can be used with many signaling devices, consists of three short signals, followed by three long signals, and then three short signals, repeated at intervals. Signals may communicate the general location of an injured person, but to provide more detailed information about injuries or illness, some form of vocal or written communication is needed. Vocal communication allows rescuers to obtain an accurate, on-site victim report with descriptions of injuries, mechanism of injury and the specific location of the victim. Ongoing communications with a reporting party can help guide rescuers to the victim and allow them to provide advice about first aid before their arrival.



Cell phone technology is useful only when travel is within an area with cell phone relay stations, making its use limited in the wilderness. Wireless access for cell phone use is becoming more common inside U.S. national parks but is limited to the more populated areas where the park service often provides audio tours. Signals may be weak or unreliable. Cell phones in national parks are controversial: Conservationists argue that parks run the risk of becoming too civilized. Critics argue that the presence of cell phone towers in wilderness areas and national parks creates a false sense of security. Despite the controversies, cell phones are being used increasingly within national parks to notify authorities of mountaineering and recreational accidents. If a cell phone is used within a park, it is best to program in the direct number for park dispatch, because dialing 9-1-1 will often reach a county sheriff, who must then relay the call. Once dispatch is reached, state your location and call-back number early in the conversation in case of connection failure. A member of a party may need to hike to the nearest trailhead to obtain cell phone service. Completion of a standard incident report form before leaving the scene will allow the caller to provide critical information about the nature of the incident, location, and initial care provided. Cell phones with GPS (E911) technology can be useful for providing the location of an injured person. As a result of a mountaineering accident with three fatalities on Mt Hood in 2007, the Oregon state legislature proposed bills that mandate electronic signaling devices (personal locator beacons, mountain locator beacon, GPS receiver with cell phone/two-way radio) for all climbs above 3048 m (10,000 feet) on Mt Hood. Although local rescue personnel and climbers are reported to encourage the use of such equipment, they do not believe its use should be required.127 One survey of climbers found that 14% of them always carry a cell phone. Twenty-one percent of climbers who reported carrying a cell phone indicated that they had used it to report an accident.8 If a cell phone or GPS unit is carried into the wilderness, consider using a waterproof box or case to prevent damage from crushing, dropping, or water, along with a backup battery. In most cases, portable radios serve as a good choice for communication between party members. When carrying a portable radio, determine which frequencies are allowed for personal use and which frequencies are monitored in your area.


Radiofrequency interference from transmitting cell phones (code division multiple access [CDMA]) or two-way radios can cause interference with some avalanche beacons. Playing an iPod at close range has also been found to cause radio frequency interference in all beacons.38 A common intermediate (processing) frequency for cell phones or digital cameras is 455 kHz, which is very close to the 457 kHz radio frequency of avalanche beacons. In addition, false signals may be produced in some beacons from cell phones cycling their transmission to “handshake” with their cell. To ensure there is no radio frequency interference, electronic equipment, including cell phones and digital cameras, should be turned off while doing an avalanche transceiver search with any brand of digital or analog transceiver.149 Satellite phones connect with orbiting satellites and have the potential to be used worldwide. The size and weight of early “sat phones” once limited their use in the wilderness, but current versions are as small as a “smartphone” or mobile PDA (Figure 16-3, online). The cost of newer satellite phones can top $1000, prohibiting their use by many wilderness adventurers. In addition, most satellite phones will only work with a corresponding network and cannot be used if the network is switched.



Depending on the type of satellite phone service used, there may be a delay in transmission of voice or data. Geostationary satellite phone systems depend on line of sight for service. Low-Earth-orbit systems (<2000 km [1243 miles] above the earth’s surface) depend less on line of sight. Two such systems in the United States are Globalstar (http://www.GlobalstarUSA.com) and Iridium (http://www.Iridium.com). Globalstar does not provide coverage of the polar caps because of the inclination of their orbiting satellites; Iridium claims worldwide coverage. Satellite phones are banned in a number of countries, such as North Korea and Myanmar, because their use bypasses local telecommunication systems, hindering efforts at censorship. In disaster situations, large spikes in call volumes may lead to cascading failures of a network, similar to cell phone network failures noted in past disasters.



Protective Gear


Engineering accomplishments have improved protective equipment for wilderness travel and recreational activities.




Foot and Hand Wear


Ideal footwear in the wilderness accommodates environmental factors (extremes of heat, cold, terrain), user comfort, and protection needs. Proper fit and hygiene are crucial for comfort and to prevent “hot spots,” blisters, or toenail problems. The purposes of footwear are protection, cushioning, support, and grip. Selecting, fitting, breaking in, and caring for footwear help it last a long time and maximize comfort. It is important to properly size footwear, including accommodating for swelling that may occur during prolonged activities. Each foot should be properly fitted. When sizing footwear, it is important to consider not only the length and width, but the ball-to-heel (arch) length. For hiking, wear shoes that extend above the ankle to reduce likelihood of an ankle sprain. Footwear should fit comfortably with moderate tension on the laces, so that they can be tightened or loosened as needed. To avoid blister formation, seams should not rub against any part of the foot. The tongue of the footwear should be aligned and laced properly. Otherwise, the tongue can slide into an incorrect position and cause blisters. Ankles should be comfortably supported by stiff heel counters or heel cups and should not slip with toe flexion, causing blisters because of repetitive rubbing. With the foot on the ground, there should be no more than 6 to 12 mm (0.2 to 0.5 inches) of heel lift.


Thermal insulation is the most important factor in footwear designed for protecting feet from cold and is influenced greatly by moisture control. Although foot comfort is affected by the interaction of sock, sole, and shoe, the choice of footwear is influenced by factors such as intended activity, fit, shoe weight, insulation, vapor barrier, waterproofing, protection, flexibility, and durability.


Mechanical injuries to the toes can be avoided with shoes or boots with integrated steel caps and soles. Sole design can prevent slippage; the design should be based on the intended use. Materials with good friction at moderate temperatures tend to become hard with cold temperatures and to lose their grip. On wet ice, virtually all shoe materials become slippery. Insulation is an important factor with low ambient temperatures. Adding heat sources such as disposable chemical foot and toe warmers, warm air or water circulation, or battery powered electrical heaters can reduce heat loss. Additional heat sources generally reduce volume inside the shoe or boot, potentially compromising fit and maneuverability, and also add weight. A 100-g (3.5 oz) increase in the weight of footwear has been shown to increase oxygen consumption by 0.7 to 1.0%, the equivalent of adding five times that weight carried on the torso.70,71,83


Insulating qualities of footwear largely depend on air being trapped inside the fabric of the shoe and between the sole of the foot and the shoe, and can be increased by addition of socks, so long as the footwear is large enough to accommodate the socks without becoming too tight.78 Socks play a large role in moisture management by absorbing sweat. Sweat rates vary widely in the foot, with lower rates in cold weather of 3 g/hr at rest. Newer synthetic materials, such as polypropylene, Capilene, and Thermax, wick moisture quickly, making them good choices for an inner layer. Pile or fleece socks do not wick moisture very well. Wool offers many advantages. It is warm in winter, cool in summer, absorbs and wicks sweat, and keeps the feet warm when wet. Furthermore, during long trips, it rinses well in cold stream water, can be worn for days at a time without wear, and does not mat down like cotton socks with terry loop liners.


Impermeable or semipermeable footwear materials prevent external moisture from entering footwear and wetting insulation. Moisture from sweat inside a shoe reduces insulation qualities and increases heat loss by 5%. Walking and the subsequent pumping effect of moving air in footwear removes moisture and in ordinary shoes removes about 40% of humidity.78 Footwear requires drying to retain insulation and protect feet from the cold. Moist socks and insoles should be changed, and shoes with removable liners should have the liners removed. Placing footwear in a warm, well-ventilated location will assist with drying.


Hand protection from cold requires gloves or mittens with insulation, moisture barrier, and adequate space for air trapping. Mittens allow more air trapping and heat retention than do gloves, but with a tradeoff for dexterity. Mittens with glove liners or finger inserts allow improved dexterity without loss of insulation and may include pockets for placement of disposable chemical heaters. For other wilderness activities where gloves are needed but dexterity is critical (such as fly-fishing or climbing), fingerless gloves may be appropriate.

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Sep 7, 2016 | Posted by in EMERGENCY MEDICINE | Comments Off on Injury Prevention: Decision Making, Safety, and Accident Avoidance

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access