Recreational Activities and Cold Water

A Canadian Red Cross Report stated that, from 1991 to 2000, there were 5900 water-related deaths in Canada. Two hundred and eighty-three (21%) of recreational boating drownings occurred in “extremely cold” water, which means that it was colder than 10° C (50° F). Of the 14% of all boating drownings in which the victims were wearing personal flotation devices (PFDs), most of these occurred in cold water, and death resulted from hypothermia. Of note is that 232 snowmobilers drowned after breaking through the ice, and 218 individuals died after falling through the ice during other activities.

Cases 6-1 to 6-4 illustrate potential problems that might occur with immersion hypothermia during recreational boating, hiking, snowmobiling and other activities.

Commercial Activities on Cold Water

Numerous examples of maritime occupational accidents exist. In 1982, the offshore mobile oil-drilling platform Ocean Ranger collapsed in mountainous seas near Newfoundland, Canada; the water temperature was −1° C (30.2° F). Eighty-four workers were plunged into the water, and, despite the presence of a rescue vessel, all of them died. Immersion hypothermia was a significant factor in these deaths, although the inabilities of the workers to combat rough seas and to maintain airway freeboard (i.e., the distance between the water surface and the mouth) were also major problems.¹²⁷

Fishing vessel mishaps are a common cause of immersion hypothermia. Cases 6-5 to 6-6 illustrate the problems that face the commercial fishing industry (Figure 6-4).

FIGURE 6-4 Sinking fishing vessel.

(Courtesy U.S. Coast Guard.)

Military Activities and Cold Water

The extensive use of combat ships and aircraft in World War II, particularly in the north Pacific and north Atlantic oceans, provided many examples of accidental immersion in cold water. Molnar reviewed several hundred of these cases.¹²⁴ Among them was the following: “A ship was rammed, and it sank in 3 minutes. Thirty survivors were picked up from rafts after exposure of 1.5 to 4 hours. Some drowned and others died of exposure because the water was 4° C (7.2° F) with high seas and a wind velocity of scale 7. Some of the survivors who held on to ropes couldn’t let go and rescuers had to cut frozen rope to release them. It appears miraculous how the survivors could have endured such cold water. Most of those who were rescued were in an unconscious state and, when they became conscious, complained of numbness of extremities and hands.”

The Falklands War in 1982 provided further examples of immersion hypothermia related to naval combat. The Argentinian cruiser General Belgrano sank in approximately 5° C (9° F) water, which resulted in the deaths of many sailors. Some of the deaths from cold occurred even after the sailors had managed to emerge from the water into life rafts.

Maritime military operations are not the only source of hypothermia casualties in the armed forces; land operations, either during combat or training, also have immersion hypothermia risks. In March 1995, four U.S. Army Rangers died and four others were hospitalized during a training mission in a Florida swamp. The water at the exercise site was deeper and colder than was customary for this exercise. Consequently, the Rangers were forced to spend more than 6 hours in cold and wet conditions, much of the time partially immersed in the 15° C (59° F) water. Night conditions and difficulties encountered during the medical evacuation of the accident victims contributed to the hypothermia deaths.^17,186

In March 2001, two U.S. Coast Guard crewmen drowned after immersion in cold water, when their four-man vessel capsized in the waves of the Niagara River bar in Lake Ontario. The water temperature was 2° C (3.6° F). All of the crewmen were wearing dry suits with insulation as well as PFDs, but they were without insulated headgear. They left the boat to swim towards a buoy. Vigorous swimming caused water intrusion into two of the dry suits, as did the coxswain’s use of a neck ring device before capsizing. This leakage resulted in severe immersion hypothermia and subsequent drowning.¹⁸²

The relatively high fatality rate from accidental immersion in cold water in various military, commercial, and recreational settings has stimulated technologic advances in protective clothing and rescue devices. The current availability of commonplace items of survival equipment (e.g., wet suits, dry suits, survival suits, inflatable life rafts) is primarily a response to the needs of people who work in cold-water environments. The value of various types of protective clothing is examined later in this chapter.

Vehicular Activities on Ice

Motor vehicle submersions account for approximately 10% of all drownings, including approximately 400 fatalities in North America each year.^177,201 Although most of these deaths occur in open water during spring, summer, or fall, many also occur during the winter, when vehicles break through the ice while traversing either makeshift (e.g., ice fishing) or official (e.g., winter roads) transport routes. In 2005, a heavy machine operator was maintaining an icy road when his snowplow broke through the ice, and he drowned.⁹¹ The ice-cold water temperature was cited as a contributing factor to his death.

In summary, numerous case histories and statistical evidence document the significance of cold-water immersion as a cause of the environmental emergencies of drowning and hypothermia. Although drowning is relatively easy to prevent (e.g., with the use of PFDs, water safety training, and the restriction of alcohol use), hypothermia is not easy to prevent. Hypothermia is now more widely recognized than in the past, but the prevention of immersion hypothermia is still a difficult and often expensive proposition. Therefore, in regions with cold water (which includes most of the North American continent), cold-water safety, knowledge of cold-water risks, and the use of appropriate flotation and protective clothing are essential.

Phase 1: the Cold Shock Response (0 to 2 Minutes)

The cold shock response occurs within the first few minutes of cold-water immersion and depends on the extent and rate of skin cooling. The responses are generally those that affect the respiratory system, heart, and the body’s metabolism (Figure 6-5).^36,175 Rapid skin cooling initiates an immediate gasp response, an inability to hold one’s breath, and hyperventilation. The gasp response may cause drowning if the head is submersed during the initial entry into cold water. The subsequent inability to hold one’s breath may further potentiate drowning in high seas. Subsequent hyperventilation will normally diminish within seconds to minutes, but it could be increased and exaggerated indefinitely as a result of emotional stress and panic. Uncontrolled hyperventilation can cause numbness, muscle weakness, or fainting, which may lead to drowning. Any of these respiratory responses can lead to pulmonary aspiration of water. Panic may ensue, with subsequent drowning. These responses may be viewed on several video links listed in the Video Resources section at the end of this chapter.

FIGURE 6-5 Possible cold shock responses. ↑, Increase; ↓ decrease.

(From Edmonds C, Lowry C, Pennefather J: Cold and hypothermia. In Diving and subaquatic medicine, Oxford, UK, 1992, Butterworth-Heinemann.)

Skin cooling initiates peripheral vasoconstriction as well as increased cardiac output, heart rate, and arterial blood pressure. Increased workload on the heart may lead to myocardial ischemia and arrhythmias, including ventricular fibrillation. Sudden death can occur either immediately or within a matter of minutes after immersion as a result of syncope or convulsions, which can lead to drowning, vagal cardiac arrest, or ventricular fibrillation in susceptible individuals.*

Cold shock can occur in water colder than 20° C (68° F), with symptoms increasing as water temperature decreases to freezing. Staged entry into cold water attenuates respiratory responses because of a gradual increase in thermal stimulation. The best advice to combat this phenomenon is, when possible, to control entry into cold water by entering slowly and most importantly by keeping the head from being submersed. One should never dive into cold water! After cold-water immersion, it is important to focus on surviving the first minute by not panicking and by consciously getting one’s breathing under control. Figure 6-6 shows that minute ventilation and breathing frequency increase dramatically with rapid immersion in cold water. These responses are blunted by more than 50% with graded immersion.

FIGURE 6-6 Respiratory responses (minute ventilation and respiratory rates) to sudden and graded immersion into cold water.

(From Hayward JS, French CD: Hyperventilation response to cold water immersion: Reduction by staged entry, Aviat Space Environ Med 60:1163, 1989.)

Phase 2: Cold Incapacitation (5 to 15 Minutes)

For those who survive the cold shock response, significant cooling of peripheral tissues—especially in the extremities—continues, with most of the effect occurring during the first 15 minutes of immersion. This cooling has a direct deleterious effect on neuromuscular activity.¹⁸⁶ This effect is especially significant in the hands, where blood circulation is negligible,³⁴ which leads to finger stiffness, poor coordination of gross and fine motor activity, loss of power,* and swim failure (Figure 6-7, online). It has been shown that this effect is primarily the result of peripheral rather than central cooling.⁶³ The loss of motor control makes it difficult if not impossible to execute survival procedures, such as grasping a rescue line or hoist. The ultimate cause of death is drowning, either through the failure to initiate or maintain survival performance (i.e., keeping afloat, swimming, or grasping onto a life raft) or excessive inhalation of water under turbulent conditions.

FIGURE 6-7 Swim failure test of a woman not wearing a personal flotation device and a man wearing a personal flotation device swimming in cold (14° C [57.2° F]) water. The man experienced difficulty early on as a result of gasping and uncontrolled breathing (i.e., cold shock response) and likely would have drowned if he was not wearing a personal flotation device.

(Courtesy Gordon G. Giesbrecht.)

These phenomena have obvious survival implications. It is of course advisable to avoid cold-water exposure completely. If cold-water immersion occurs, it is best to quickly determine and execute a plan of action: (1) try to enter the water without submersing the head; (2) escape (i.e., pull oneself out of the water, inflate, and board a life raft); (3) minimize exposure (i.e., get as much of one’s body as possible out of the water and onto a floating object); (4) ensure flotation if one must remain in the water (i.e., don or inflate a PFD); and (5) call for assistance (i.e., activate signaling devices). It may be difficult to execute these actions when cold shock responses predominate. However, after respiratory effects are under control, immediate action should be taken. If self-rescue is not possible, actions to minimize heat loss should be initiated by remaining as still as possible in the heat escape lessening position (HELP), in which the arms are pressed against the chest while the legs are pressed together, or by huddling with other survivors (Figure 6-8, online).⁸⁶ Drawstrings should be tightened in clothing to decrease the flow of cold water within clothing layers. Many of these responses can be viewed on several video links in the Video Resources section at the end of this chapter.

FIGURE 6-8 Group huddle techniques for decreasing the cooling rates of survivors in cold water.

(Courtesy Gordon G. Giesbrecht.)

Phase 3: Onset of Hypothermia (Immersion of More Than 30 Minutes)

Most cold-water deaths likely result from drowning during the first two phases of cold-water immersion, as discussed previously. In general, true hypothermia usually only becomes a significant contributor to death if immersion lasts more than 30 to 60 minutes. A recent survey indicates that even medical practitioners greatly underestimate the time required for a person to become hypothermic in cold water.⁴⁷ In fact, 75% of respondents felt that a properly clothed adult would become hypothermic after less than 15 minutes in ice water (0° C [32° F]) (Figure 6-9, online). An individual who survives the immediate and short-term phases of cold-water immersion faces the possible onset of hypothermia, because continuous heat loss from the body eventually decreases T_co. Many predictive models to determine the T_co response to cooling are based on the relationships between body composition, thermoregulatory response (i.e., shivering thermogenesis), clothing and insulation, water temperature, and sea conditions (see Cold-Water Survival, later).*

FIGURE 6-9 Estimates of 661 respondents regarding how long it would take to become hypothermic and to die of hypothermia in ice water when wearing winter clothing.

(From Giesbrecht G, Pretorius T: Survey of public knowledge and responses to educational slogans regarding cold water immersion, Wilderness Medicine Newsletter 19:261, 2008.)

Even in ice water, a victim may not drown when he or she becomes unconscious as a result of hypothermia (≈30° C [86° F]) if a PFD is worn or if some other factor prevents the need for vigorous exercise to prevent drowning. If the head is kept above water, the victim could still survive for up to 1 hour before the heart stops as long as the sea is relatively calm and waves do not wash over the mouth. It is important for members of the public to be educated about the fact that they are not necessarily going to die if they are suddenly immersed in cold water (Box 6-2).

The relative contributions of the first three phases to death in cold water of varying temperatures are estimated schematically in Figure 6-10. In colder water, if no flotation is worn (top panel), death occurs as a result of cold shock or cold incapacitation. Only if flotation is worn (bottom panel) will a victim survive long enough to die as a result of hypothermia (Box 6-3).

FIGURE 6-10 Estimation of the relative contributions of cold shock, cold incapacitation, and hypothermia to death in water at different temperatures. A, Estimation if no flotation is available. B, Estimation if flotation is available.

Phase 4: Circum-Rescue Collapse

Anecdotal cases of fatalities among immersion hypothermia victims have been noted during the immediate pre- and post-rescue periods, despite the survivor being recovered in an apparently stable and conscious condition. The hypothermic victim may experience symptoms that range from fainting to cardiac arrest. These events are often referred to as cases of “rewarming shock” or “post-rescue collapse.” Golden and colleagues⁷³ noted that deaths can occur either shortly before rescue, during rescue, or after rescue, and they have used the term circum-rescue collapse to describe these events. Deaths have occurred within minutes before rescue, while climbing out of the water, while being hoisted onto a helicopter, within a few minutes of entering a warm compartment of a rescue vessel, 20 to 90 minutes after rescue, in a hospital after transport, and during the 24-hour period after rescue.^{71,73,100,116}

Three causes of circum-rescue collapse have been proposed: (1) afterdrop, which is a continued drop in T_co after recovery; (2) collapse of arterial pressure (Figure 6-11, online); and (3) factors that potentiate the risk of ventricular fibrillation (e.g., hypoxia, acidosis, rapid changes in pH). These causes are discussed further later in this chapter.

FIGURE 6-11 Heart rate and blood pressure responses during the vertical removal of a test subject from cold water.

(From Golden FS, Hervey GR, Tipton MJ: Circum-rescue collapse: collapse, sometimes fatal, associated with rescue of immersion victims, J Roy Nav Med Serv 77:139, 1991.)

When rescue is imminent, mental relaxation and the decreased output of stress hormones may result in a drop in blood pressure, which may cause fainting and drowning. The act of rescue itself may also cause sudden collapse. Pulling a victim out of the water in a vertical position removes hydrostatic squeeze around the lower limbs and may cause blood pooling in these extremities, with subsequent decreased blood pressure. Extra cardiac work or rough handling may induce reflex cardiac arrest of the cold heart.

Afterdrop is a well-known phenomenon that occurs after the removal of a victim from cold-water immersion. T_co continues to decline (i.e., afterdrop) in both animate and inanimate objects, although cold-water immersion has ended.* Afterdrop of as much as 5° to 6° C (9° to 10.8° F) has been observed in humans (Figure 6-12, online).^6,43,161 This afterdrop was long proposed to be the major cause of post-rescue death, because further cooling of the heart might result in a temperature at which ventricular fibrillation or cardiac arrest could occur.¹³

FIGURE 6-12 Core temperature response of a nonshivering subject (whose response was inhibited with meperidine) during spontaneous warming, inhalation warming, and forced-air warming. Warming took place in a chamber at −20° C (−4° F). Only forced-air warming reversed the afterdrop. Temperature remained low for several hours, even with inhalation warming.

(From Giesbrecht G, Wilkerson J: Hypothermia, frostbite and other cold injuries, ed 2, Seattle, Wash., 2006, The Mountaineers Books.)

Golden and colleagues⁷³ discount the importance of this phenomenon and propose the collapse of arterial pressure as the cause of death during rescue. They correctly point out that afterdrop that occurs in victims who were hypothermic yet warm enough to climb on board a ship without assistance would be unlikely to cause enough myocardial cooling to result in cardiac arrest or ventricular fibrillation. Those clinicians also propose that removal from cold water results in a precipitous fall in blood pressure, inadequate coronary blood flow, and myocardial ischemia, which possibly precipitate ventricular fibrillation. This mechanism is likely the main factor in both pre-rescue collapse and collapse that occurs during rescue. A fall in blood pressure before removal from the water may be the result of reduced sympathetic tone or catecholamine secretion when rescue is imminent. Hypotension during and shortly after rescue may be caused by a sudden decrease in hydrostatic pressure on the body (i.e., removal of the hydrostatic squeeze of water pressure that exists during immersion), hypovolemia, or impaired baroreceptor reflexes. However, this mechanism cannot fully account for all of the other post-rescue deaths that occur 20 minutes to 24 hours after rescue.

The importance of continued myocardial cooling cannot be discounted. Fibrillation of a cold heart can be initiated by mechanical stimuli, hypoxia, acidosis,¹³¹ and rapid changes in pH.¹⁰¹ In dogs, myocardial cooling from 30° to 22° C (86° to 71.6° F) has been shown to cause a five-fold decrease in the electrical threshold for ventricular fibrillation.²⁵ It is also likely that an increase in the rate of myocardial cooling may stimulate fibrillation. On the basis of the large afterdrop values described previously, it is plausible that continued T_co cooling in significantly hypothermic victims could result in ventricular fibrillation, caused primarily by spontaneous fibrillation of the cold myocardium or secondary to a cold-induced increase in sensitivity to other fibrillation stimuli.

Finally, death may occur within minutes to hours after rescue. A rescued victim may be severely compromised with cold alkaline or acidic blood in the extremities, a heart that is extremely prone to failure, a decrease in or a loss of consciousness, or low blood volume (hypovolemia). Sudden redistribution of blood to the extremities (especially the lower extremities) may cause collapse as a result of decreased blood pressure and cardiovascular instability, sudden return of metabolic by-products to the irritable heart, or continued decrease in temperature (afterdrop) of an irritable heart. The T_co will continue to drop, and the heart will react with profound tachycardia or fibrillation. Up to 20% of persons who are recovered alive die as a result of circum-rescue complications, either before or during rescue, or within hours after rescue.

Water Temperature and Sea State

These variables are critically important to the intensity of the cold shock response, the onset of physical and mental impairment, and the rate of T_co cooling. Figure 6-14 graphically illustrates the inverse linear relationship between water temperature and T_co cooling rate.⁸² Water conducts heat away from the body approximately 25 times as fast as does air at the same temperature.¹²⁵

FIGURE 6-14 Relationship between water temperature and mean rectal temperature cooling rate in lightly clothed nonexercising males and females during immersion in seawater.

(From Hayward JS: The physiology of immersion hypothermia. In Pozos RS, Wittmers LE, editors: The nature and treatment of hypothermia, Minneapolis, 1983, University of Minnesota Press.)

Thermal Protection

A large number of studies over the past few decades have evaluated the relationships of different types of protective clothing with heat loss and cooling rates.† Nearly all of these studies have been conducted in calm water or in laboratory settings. As illustrated by the cooling rate data in Tables 6-2 and 6-3, such studies have generally shown that, in calm water, intact “dry” and insulated garments provide better protection than do “wet” insulated garments and that well-insulated garments provide significantly better protection than do poorly insulated garments. Figure 6-15, online shows various types of cold-water protective garments.

TABLE 6-2 Mean Linear Cooling Rates for Lean Men Dressed in Various Types of Garments in Calm Water at 10° C (50° F)

TABLE 6-3 Comparison of Mean Cooling Rates for Thin Men (Mean Body Fat = 9.1%) Wearing Various Types of Protective Clothing in Calm Water at 11.8° C (53° F)

FIGURE 6-15 Anti-exposure garments. A, Float coat. B, Aviation coveralls with personal flotation device. C, Boat-crew coveralls or snowmobile suit. D, Short wet suit worn as an undergarment. E, Full wet suit with personal flotation device. F, Insulated dry suit. G, Immersion suit. The garments in A, B, and C are loose-fitting, closed-cell, foam-insulated wet suits. The garments in D and E are tight-fitting, closed-cell, foam-insulated wet suits. The garments in F and G are closed-cell, foam-insulated dry suits.

Although calm-water studies have value in that they compare the relative degree of protection afforded by different types of protective clothing, many immersion accidents occur in rough water.^143,168,169 In this environment, a survivor’s cooling rate may be affected by swimming to maintain airway freeboard, passive body movements caused by waves, flushing of cold water through “wet” suits, and leakage of cold water into “dry” suits. For example, subjects in a wave tank demonstrate higher energy expenditure and faster cooling rates than do subjects in calm water.⁸¹ Several experimental studies have demonstrated significantly faster cooling rates for human volunteers wearing “wet” protective garments in rough or turbulent water^142,158,203 as compared with persons in calm water. Even “dry” suits have shown degradation of protection in rough water. In a study of dry immersion suits in 16° C (60.8° F) water, Ducharme and Brooks found that wave heights of up to 70 cm (28 inches) resulted in a 14% decrease in total suit insulation and an average 45% decrease in thermal resistance at the head and trunk regions of the suits.³¹

Figure 6-16 shows a comparison of cooling rates for lean males dressed in the various types of protective clothing shown in Figure 6-15 in both calm and rough waters at approximately 10° C (50° F).¹⁵⁸ The most dramatic differences occurred in the loose-fitted “wet” protective clothing (e.g., float coat, insulated coveralls), where cooling rates nearly doubled in rough seas as compared with those seen in calm seas. This was primarily caused by the flushing of cold water through the garments. However, even the tight-fitted full “wet” suit allowed for a 30% faster cooling rate in rough water as compared with that seen in calm water. The “dry” suit, which did not leak, showed no significant difference between calm and rough seas.

FIGURE 6-16 A comparison of mean rectal temperature cooling rates in lean male subjects in calm versus rough seas at 10.7° C (51.3° F). The flight suit, when used as a control garment, is equivalent to lightweight clothing.

(From Steinman AM, Hayward JS, Nemiroff MJ, et al: Immersion hypothermia: Comparative protection of anti-exposure garments in calm vs rough seas, Aviat Space Environ Med 58:550, 1987.)

Estimated survival times in rough seas, on the basis of experimental data, were published for thin males wearing different types of protective clothing in 6° C (42.8° F) water.¹⁵⁹ Table 6-4 shows these times for three different levels of survival. Underlying these estimations are the following assumptions:

TABLE 6-4 Estimated Survival Times for Lean Subjects (Mean Body Fat = 11.1%) Wearing Various Types of Protective Clothing in Rough Seas

By comparing these estimated survival times with those of Figure 6-17 (i.e., calm-water survival times), the reader must recall that Figure 6-17 concerns only survival to a T_co of 30° C (86° F). Furthermore, the zone in the graph must be adjusted downward for rough seas and for survivors wearing only lightweight clothing, and it should be adjusted upward for survivors wearing insulated clothing. For 6° C (42.8° F) water, the survival times (to a T_co of 30° C [86° F]) correlate well between Figure 6-17 and Table 6-4. We must emphasize that the estimates in Table 6-4 pertain to lean individuals with a mean body fat level of only 11.1%. Because many populations of adults (e.g., offshore oil workers) in the 30- to 50-year-old age range average 25% to 30% body fat, the estimates of “time to unconsciousness” and “time to cardiac arrest” must be considered conservative for a broader spectrum of adults.

FIGURE 6-17 Predicted calm-water survival time (defined as the time required to cool to 30° C [86° F]) in lightly clothed, nonexercising humans in cold water. The graph shows a line for the average expectancy and a broad zone that indicates the large amount of individual variability associated with different body sizes, builds, fatness levels, physical fitness levels, and states of health. The zone would include approximately 95% of the variations expected for adult and teenage humans under the conditions specified. The zone would be shifted downward by physical activity (e.g., swimming) and upward slightly for heavy clothing or protective behaviors (e.g., huddling with other survivors, adopting a fetal position in the water). Specialized insulated protective clothing (e.g., a survival suit or wet suit) is capable of increasing survival time from 2 to 10 times (or more) the basic duration shown here. For the zone in which death from hypothermia is highly improbable, cold shock on initial immersion can potentiate death from drowning, particularly for those who are not wearing flotation devices.

(From the U.S. Coast Guard: Addendum to the National Search and Rescue (SAR) Manual, COMDTINST M16120.5 and COMDTINST M16120.6. 1995.)

A recent video production called Cold Water Boot Camp (see Video References section at the end of this chapter) tested various flotation ensembles, including closed-cell and inflatable PFDs, heavy dry suits, and lighter extended-wear (paddling) dry suits. Figure 6-18 schematically shows that T_co and survival time decrease as the amount of thermoprotection and flotation decreases (Box 6-4).

FIGURE 6-18 Schematic estimation of core temperature and survival times with varying flotation devices and thermal protective clothing.

Body Morphology (Size and Composition)

Children cool faster than adults because children have a greater surface area–to–mass ratio. Cooling rate is generally proportional to surface area, whereas the amount of heat that can be lost is proportional to mass. Thus, a large surface area–to–mass ratio favors cooling. Similarly, smaller adults generally cool faster than do larger adults, and tall, lanky individuals cool faster than do short, stout individuals. Body composition is also important. Subcutaneous fat is a very efficient insulator against heat loss, and cooling rate is inversely related to skinfold thickness. For example, subjects in the tenth percentile for skinfold thickness wearing light clothing in 5° C (41° F) water have nine times the cooling rate of subjects in the ninetieth percentile for skinfold thickness.¹³² Figure 6-19 shows the linear relationship between change in T_co and mean skinfold thickness.¹⁰¹ Shivering, which is a primary defense against T_co cooling, also varies with skinfold thickness. At a given skin temperature, the shivering response is less in humans with greater amounts of subcutaneous fat.¹⁰⁸ In moderately cold water temperatures (18° to 26° C [64.4° to 78.8° F]), T_co cooling has been shown to proceed at the same rate in high- and low-fat individuals because of greater shivering thermogenesis in the low-fat subjects. However, at colder water temperatures (8° C [46.4° F]), T_co cooling is attenuated by greater amounts of subcutaneous fat and body mass as a result of increased insulation.⁵³

FIGURE 6-19 The relationship between subcutaneous fat thickness in 10 men and the decline in rectal temperature during 30-minute immersions in stirred water at 15° C (59° F). Skinfold thickness is given as a mean of readings at the biceps, the abdomen, and subscapular and subcostal sites. T_re, Rectal temperature.

(From Keatinge WR: Survival in cold water, ed 2, Oxford, 1969, Blackwell Scientific Publications.)

In general, for a survivor who is immersed in cold water, the T_co cooling rate is fairly linear after T_co begins to decline. This has been shown to be true for mildly hypothermic experimental subjects. The only data that exist for severely hypothermic humans are those from the infamous Dachau concentration camp atrocities, in which conscious victims were inhumanely cooled to death in ice water.² Because these unfortunate victims were emaciated and ill, these data do not apply to healthy cold-water immersion subjects and should be considered atrocious.

The advantage of body fat as an insulator against cold has been discussed previously in the section about pathophysiology and cooling rates. With the use of an extrapolation of a linear cooling rate to 30° C (86° F), Figure 6-17 shows predicted calm-water survival times of lightly clothed, nonexercising humans in cold water. The graph shows a line for the average survival expectancy. A broad zone indicates the large amount of individual variability associated with different body sizes, builds, and degrees of fatness. The zone would include approximately 95% of the variation expected for adult and teenage humans under the conditions specified. For the zone in which death from hypothermia is highly improbable, cold water still potentiates death from drowning as a result of cold shock (as discussed previously) during the first few minutes of immersion, especially for those who are not wearing PFDs. It is important to note that Figure 6-17 discusses only calm-water survival times. Because rough-water conditions decrease survival times, as will be discussed later in this chapter, Figure 6-17 may be useful for estimating maximum survival times for an individual who is immersed in cold water. Search and rescue organizations might find such a maximum survival time helpful, because they often use the longest possible survival time to decide when to terminate a search effort.

Amount of Body Immersed

Because of the difference in thermal conductivity between air and water (as discussed previously), heat loss from body surfaces immersed in cold water is far greater than from body surfaces exposed to cold air, even considering the effect of windchill. Thus, immersed victims should attempt to get as much of their bodies out of the water as possible (Figure 6-20). This issue is discussed in greater detail in Cold-Water Survival, later in this chapter.

FIGURE 6-20 Nick Schuyler sitting atop an overturned boat, awaiting rescue. He survived for 43 hours in 18° C (64° F) water, whereas his three companions perished after 13 to 25 hours. His position on top of the boat decreased his heat loss, and his bright-colored jacket and keyhole personal flotation device resulted in him being seen by U.S. Coast Guard personnel.

(Courtesy U.S. Coast Guard.)

Head Immersion

Exposure of the dorsal head to cold water may increase a survivor’s rate of cooling and adversely affect mental performance. Survival may depend on the ability to conduct multiple tasks to avoid drowning and hypothermia. The ability to carry out these tasks involves both physical components, which are affected by local muscle and nerve temperature,⁶³ and mental components, which are affected by brain temperature;⁵⁰ both may be adversely affected by hypothermia.

Head immersion has traditionally been of concern in survival situations.⁶⁹ In the absence of water in the airways, heat is lost through the head either via convection (heat loss from the blood that perfuses the scalp) or conduction (direct heat loss through bone and soft tissue).²⁰⁶ One hypothesis predicts substantial heat loss through the head because of abundant scalp vascularity and because the scalp vasculature does not vasoconstrict in response to cold as do superficial blood vessels in other body areas.⁴⁵ Alternatively, heat loss from the back of the head might be minimal, because dorsal head and neck immersion would only involve an additional 3% to 5% of the body surface area.¹⁰⁷ In addition, conductive heat loss directly through the scalp and skull is likely to be minimal.²⁰⁶

A few studies have addressed the head cooling of animals in water²² or of humans in cold air,^45,139 but only one human study has included cold-water exposure of the head. Alexander reported the data regarding head cooling from studies carried out on prisoners of war in Dachau during World War II.² These studies were horrific, reprehensible, and grossly unethical, and the results are considered invalid and unusable because of the emaciated condition of the prisoners as well as questions regarding the protocol and accuracy of the results.

Few experimental data are available to evaluate the effects of mild hypothermia on mental performance. A few medical studies have evaluated the impairment of memory among divers during cold-water dives.^9,190,193 Two other studies involved cognitive testing during hypothermia without direct head cooling.^19,50

Lockhart and colleagues¹¹¹ recently evaluated the effects of dorsal head and neck immersion among human subjects immersed in 10° C (50° F) water on T_co cooling rates and mental performance. Dorsal head and neck immersion (with the body insulated) resulted in a cooling rate of 0.4° ± 0.2° C/hr (0.7° ± 0.4° F/hr). Body immersion with the head, neck, and upper thorax out of the water resulted in a cooling rate of 1.5° ± 0.7° C/hr (2.7° ± 1.3° F/hr). Immersion of both the whole body and the dorsal head and neck nearly doubled the cooling rate to 2.8° ± 1.6° C/hr (5.0° ± 2.9° F/hr) (p <0.0002). In addition, there were significant correlations between diminished cognitive performance and decreasing T_co. The time required to correctly complete the Stroop Color-Word Test increased as T_co decreased (p <0.001). The number of correct responses decreased with T_co for digit symbol coding (p <0.02), backward digit span (p <0.05), and paced auditory serial addition testing (p <0.05). Figure 6-21 demonstrates the effects of different PFDs on the position of the head in water.

FIGURE 6-21 Effectiveness of various types of personal flotation devices for keeping the head and the upper chest out of the water. Top left, Type I jacket; top right, Type 3 jacket; bottom left, typical keyhole inflatable jacket; bottom right, waist-mounted inflatable device.

(Courtesy Gordon G. Giesbrecht.)

Giesbrecht and co-workers⁴⁶ repeated the head-cooling study with the use of subjects immersed in 12° C (53.6° F) whose shivering thermogenesis had been inhibited with intravenous meperidine to model severe hypothermia.⁶⁷ When the body was insulated, there was no T_co cooling with the head out of the water, and immersing the dorsum of the head had no further effect. However, when the body was not insulated but instead exposed to the cold water, T_co decreased at 3.6° C/hr (6.5° F/hr). In this condition, also immersing the dorsum of the head significantly increased the rate of T_co cooling to 5.0° C/hr (9° F/hr) (Figure 6-22).

FIGURE 6-22 Core-temperature response to immersion in 12° C (54° F) water with the head out or the dorsum immersed in body-insulated and body-exposed conditions; shivering was inhibited with meperidine to mimic a severely nonshivering victim.

(From Giesbrecht G, Lockhart T, Bristow G, et al: Thermal effects of dorsal head immersion in cold water on nonshivering humans, J Appl Physiol 99:1958, 2005.)

These results did not confirm the supposition of proportionately greater heat loss from the head. The measured heat loss from the head in both head-immersed conditions was only about 60 kJ as compared with 18 kJ to 33 kJ in the two head-out conditions. By contrast, total body heat loss in the body-exposed configurations was about 1100 kJ and 1260 kJ, respectively, for head-out and back-of-the-head-in conditions. Thus the head accounted for only about 3% and 5% of the total body heat loss, respectively, in the body-exposed conditions. The majority of the difference in heat loss in the body-immersed conditions came from immersion of the anterior thorax rather than from the dorsal head and neck. Nevertheless, it is important to recognize that, although there was not a significant increase in heat loss through the head, there was a disproportionate increase in T_co cooling. Although the mechanisms for this disparity have not yet been determined, the implications are clear for manufacturers and survivors. During long-term cold-water immersion, it is advantageous to keep the head out of the water. If this is not possible (i.e., most survival suits place the victim in a supine position), the survival ensemble should include a hood with as much insulation as is practical (Box 6-5).

Behavior and Posture of the Body in Cold Water

Behavioral variables also affect T_co cooling rate. Hayward and colleagues used infrared thermography to demonstrate that, despite marked peripheral vasoconstriction, heat losses are high in the groin, the lateral and central thorax, and the neck.⁸⁵ In the groin and neck, which are regions with relatively thin layers of peripheral soft tissue, blood flow through the large and relatively superficial femoral vessels, carotid arteries, and jugular veins potentiates heat flow to the cold water. In the lateral and central thorax, the relative absence of tissue (muscle and subcutaneous fat) insulation in combination with the high thermal conductivity of rib bone potentiates heat loss from the relatively warm lungs to the cold environment. Furthermore, exercise or excessive movement in the water greatly increases heat loss from active muscles.

The effect of activity on total heat balance depends on the balance among the many factors illustrated in Figure 6-23. In normothermic circumstances, heat produced locally in peripheral muscles is transferred to the core via venous return. By contrast, during cold-water immersion, physical activity may actually increase heat loss through increased blood flow to the periphery. This is especially true when immersed victims engage in excessive movement in the water (e.g., swimming, performing the vigorous extremity movements that are necessary to maintain airway freeboard in rough seas).

FIGURE 6-23 Factors that influence total thermal balance during increases in metabolic heat production (i.e., voluntary exercise and involuntary shivering).

Related posts:

Outdoor Clothing for the Wilderness Professional Helicopter Rescue and Aeromedical Transport Ethnobotany: Plant-Derived Medical Therapy Litters and Carries Global Humanitarian Medicine and Disaster Relief Wilderness Orthopedics

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Join