How Health Care Reform Can Improve Access to Quality Pain and Palliative Care Services

and Diane E. Meier2, 3



(1)
Palliative and Hospice Care Consultant, Center to Advance Palliative Care, New York, NY, USA

(2)
Center to Advance Palliative Care, Hertzberg Palliative Care Institute, New York, NY, USA

(3)
Departments of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine and Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA

 



Abstract

By taking appropriate action, Health Care Reform can contribute significantly to the alleviation of patient and family suffering. High-quality affordable health services characterized by patient access to information and choice will address the central issues of the public debate. However, new and different care modalities and partnerships are needed to achieve desired outcomes. With appropriate recognition and support, the emerging field of palliative care will deliver on these challenges by (1) relieving symptoms including physical and emotional pain, (2) improving patient–professional communication and decision-making, and (3) coordinating care across settings.



Health Care Reform


The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) provides a framework and a set of ­expectations for testing new delivery models and payment options. The ACA goals are to enhance health care quality while at the same time limiting spending. Efforts to address quality include investment in comparative effectiveness research and rewarding quality of care through the mechanism of ­value-based purchasing – known also as Pay for Performance.


What Do Patients and Their Families Want?


If Health Care Reform is to achieve its goals, it must begin and end with the patient and family – what do they want, what do they need? Does the provider community effectively convey diagnostic and treatment options to enable and elicit informed decisions? How do we assure that the patient, her/his family, and the providers who care for them realize a coordinated journey that results in the right care at the right time for the right patient?

Singer et al. (Scott and Hughes 2006) identified the preferences of patients with serious illnesses: pain and symptom control, avoidance of the prolongation of the dying process, achievement of a sense of control, relief of burdens on the family, and strengthening of relationships with loved ones.

In a study of 475 family members who cared for their loved ones and were surveyed 1–2 years post bereavement, Tolle et al. (Thorpe and Howard 2006) found consensus about their wishes: honor the loved one’s preferences and include the loved one in the decision-making process; provide ­support and assistance in the home; make available assistance with practical needs (transportation, medicines, equipment); offer help with personal care needs (bathing, feeding, toileting); convey honest information about the patient’s condition and circumstances; assure access to health care advice all day every day; listen to family member/care-giver input; honor patient and family ­caregiver privacy; and remember and contacted family caregivers after the patient’s death.


What Are Palliative Care and Hospice?


Given these statements from patients and family caregivers, how can providers best shape their ­practices to achieve those goals? Optimizing palliative care is one strategy that will contribute to this outcome. The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services defines palliative care as follows: Palliative care means patient and familycentered care that optimizes quality of life by anticipating, preventing, and treating suffering. Palliative care throughout the continuum of illness involves addressing physical, intellectual, emotional, social, and spiritual needs and facilitates patient autonomy, access to information, and choice (73 Federal Register 32204 2008).

Hospice, a specialized form of palliative care has been effectively caring for patients with limited life expectancies and their families for many years. The success of hospice is characterized by its remarkable utilization statistics. According to the National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization as of 2009, there were 3,400 programs of which 93% were Medicare-certified. These programs served 1.56 million Americans, primarily in their homes (56% of days), nursing homes (29% of days), or assisted living facilities (10.9% of days). In 2009, over 40% of Medicare decedents utilized hospice in their care, an increase from 23% in 2000 (National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization 2010; MedPAC 2010). It is noteworthy that more than 80% of hospice beneficiaries are over age 65 and more than a-third are over 85 years of age. Ten years ago, the majority (53%) of hospice patients died from cancer. By 2008, that percentage had dropped to 31% reflecting a pattern of utilization increasingly correlated with the current leading causes of death (cancer accounts for less that 25% of U.S. deaths) (MedPAC 2010; National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization 2008). This shift demonstrates that hospices are responding to the circumstances and needs of Medicare beneficiaries.

Unlike the hospice community, palliative care as a recognized specialty service is a relative ­newcomer to the health care arena. Palliative care embraces the interdisciplinary focus of hospice and extends expert pain and symptom management and supportive care to patients with complex chronic illnesses who are not yet eligible for, or who have not elected hospice.

What is it about palliative care and hospice care services that makes them a good fit for the needs of patients and families and with the challenges of health care reform? According to the National Consensus Project Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care, “the goal of palliative care is to prevent and relieve suffering and to support the best possible quality of life for patients and their families, regardless of the stage of the disease or the need for other therapies. Palliative care is both a philosophy of care and an organized, highly structured system of delivering care. Palliative care expands traditional disease-model medical treatments to include the goals of enhancing quality of life for patient and family, optimizing function, helping with decision-making, and providing opportunities for personal growth. As such, it can be delivered concurrently with life-prolonging care or as the main focus of care” (National Quality Forum 2006).

The Guidelines continue: “Palliative care is operationalized through effective management of pain and other distressing symptoms, while incorporating psychosocial and spiritual care with ­consideration of patient/family needs, preferences, values, beliefs, and culture. Evaluation and ­treatment should be comprehensive and patient-centered with a focus on the central role of the ­family unit in decision-making. Comprehensive palliative care services often require the expertise of various providers to adequately assess and treat the complex needs of seriously ill patients an their families. Leadership, collaboration, coordination and communication are key elements for effective integration of these disciplines and services” (National Quality Forum 2006).


Growth in Palliative Care


The growth of hospital palliative care programs has been dramatic. As of 2008, 58.5% of U.S. Hospitals (with at least 50 beds) and 81% of hospitals with more than 300 beds reported the presence of a palliative care program – an increase of 125% from 2000 (American Hospital Association 2009; Goldsmith et al. 2008; Center to Advance Palliative Care 2010). As the demand for services grew, so did recognition of the need for an appropriately trained workforce of providers. In 2008, the American Board of Medical Specialties formally recognized the specialty of palliative medicine, sponsored by ten parent specialty Boards. The first hospice and palliative medicine subspecialty board examination, sponsored by the American Boards of Internal and Family Medicine, was given in 2008. Graduate medical education in palliative medicine is now accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). The profession of nursing has also adopted specialty training as have other members of the palliative care interdisciplinary team including social work, pharmacists, and the clergy. The Joint Commission is currently considering recommendations to offer a certification to hospitals with a palliative care program.


Palliative Care and the Quality Movement


In 2006, the National Quality Forum (NQF) identified the “increasingly important role of palliative care and hospice services by identifying them as priority areas for healthcare quality improvement” (National Quality Forum 2006). In its 2008 report, National Priorities and GoalsAligning our Efforts to Transform Americas Healthcare (National Priorities Partnership 2008), the National Priorities Partnership (NPP) identified six national priorities that if addressed, would significantly improve the quality of health care delivered to Americans. In recognition of evidence of poor health care quality despite high expenditure among patients with multiple chronic conditions, functional impairment and serious life-threatening illness, the NPP cited the impact of both palliative care and hospice services on improving key patient-centered, population health, and utilization outcomes.


The Case for Palliative Care


Why do we need palliative care? Despite enormous expenditures, studies demonstrate that patients with serious illness and their families receive poor-quality medical care, characterized by untreated symptoms, unmet psychosocial and personal care needs, high caregiver burden, and low patient and family satisfaction (Field and Cassel 1997; Thorpe and Howard 2006; Foundation 2005; Foundation 2009; Teno et al. 2004). The patients served by palliative care providers are those with chronic complex illnesses. This population of represents more than 95% of all health care spending. About 64% of all Medicare spending is for the 10% of beneficiaries with 5 or more chronic conditions. However, despite the heavy allocation of health care dollars spent on this population of patients, the data in these studies offer abundant evidence that the care they receive is poor.


Impact of Palliative Care and Hospice


How do we know that palliative care and hospice help to conserve health care dollars? Based on recent findings, the per patient net costs saved by hospital palliative consultations are $2,659 (Morrison et al. 2008). This figure is clearly an underestimate of the potential savings as many ­hospitalized patients with advanced and chronic illnesses do not have access to a palliative care consultation referral.

Hospices have also been shown to contribute significant cost-savings among the majority (70%) of Medicare beneficiaries (Taylor et al. 2007; Taylor 2009). Using propensity score analysis to control for selection bias, an estimated $2,300 is saved per beneficiary on average. Extrapolating this average savings across the number of hospice patients served each year yields overall savings of more than $3.5 billion a year. The savings attributed to hospice patients persisted through 233 days of hospice care for cancer patients and 154 days of care for noncancer patients (ASPE et al. 2010). In addition, recent analysis have found that the costs of care for patients who disenrolled from ­hospice were nearly 5 times higher than for patients who remained with hospice. Patients who ­disenroll from hospice are far more likely to use emergency department care and to be hospitalized (Carlson et al. 2010).


Health Care Reform Opportunities


The confluence of the emergence of palliative care and the passage of health care reform legislation has significant synergistic potential. The need for new approaches to high-quality patient-centered cost-effective care has been the stimulus for both. As a result, palliative care and hospice are uniquely well-qualified to address several of legislative initiatives including the following ACA HR 3590 provisions: Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (3001), Hospital mortality reporting (MIMA 501b), Hospital readmission reporting (3025), National Health Care Workforce Council (5101–3), Medicare Hospice Concurrent Care Demonstration (3140), Concurrent Care for Children (2302), the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (3021) and Tests of new delivery and payment models such as: Accountable Care Organizations (3022), Medical Homes, Health Homes (2703), Community health teams to support medical homes (3502), Bundling (3023), Care coordination for the dually eligible (2601–2), and Independence at Home (3024).

There are also opportunities for more effective utilization of palliative care and hospice expertise to be realized in ACA implementation strategies. Inclusion of the perspectives and skills of this field will add otherwise unrealized perspectives to the on-going planning processes. Examples include but are not limited to:

1.

Welcome to Medicare, Annual Wellness Visits to include regular review/update ACP/POLST (Physicians Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment).

 

2.

Meaningful Use – inclusion of meaningful, easy, timely availability of the content of ACP/POLST.

 

3.

New shared decision-making program at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ).

 

4.

The development of the Secretary’s National Quality Strategy.

 

Oct 16, 2016 | Posted by in PAIN MEDICINE | Comments Off on How Health Care Reform Can Improve Access to Quality Pain and Palliative Care Services

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access