Evaluation of Chest Pain



Evaluation of Chest Pain





The patient who presents with chest pain in the outpatient setting poses a diagnostic challenge. The spectrum of diagnostic possibilities ranges from life-threatening cardiac, pulmonary, and aortic etiologies to esophageal and musculoskeletal causes. Harmless conditions may mimic more serious disease. Atypical chest pain can be especially problematic. The primary physician must be skilled in quickly and accurately differentiating the patient who requires immediate hospitalization from the person who can be safely evaluated in the outpatient setting. Initial decision making depends predominantly on a careful assessment of the history supplemented, when possible, by a check for a few key physical and electrocardiographic findings. Further testing must be selected judiciously to avoid generating false-positive results.


PATHOPHYSIOLOGY AND CLINICAL PRESENTATION (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15)

Chest pain may arise from chest wall, intrathoracic, abdominal, or even psychophysiologic sources.


Chest Wall

Pain originating in the chest wall is usually due to musculoskeletal pathology, although occasionally nerve injury is responsible. Because it is of somatic origin, the pain can be pinpointed by the patient, who may use the pointing sign (one or two fingers locating a specific painful site on the chest wall). Although uncommon, the sign has been found to have a specificity of 98% and a positive predictive value of 88% for nonischemic disease among persons presenting to the emergency room (ER) with chest pain.

Chest wall pain is characteristically aggravated by deep inspiration, cough, direct palpation, and movement. Common sites of involvement are the costochondral and chondrosternal junctions. Duration ranges from a few seconds to several days and quality from sharp to dull or aching. Sometimes the patient complains of tightness. Vigorous and unaccustomed exertion can lead to muscular and ligamentous strain, which may account for some cases. Other cases are due to costochondritis (Tietze syndrome), which is an inflammatory condition that causes localized swelling, erythema, warmth, and tenderness at the costochondral or chondrosternal junction. Rib fracture may produce a similar picture, although location is different, and there is a history of antecedent trauma or metastatic cancer. Of interest, there is an increased frequency of musculoskeletal pain in patients with angina, which causes a potentially confusing clinical presentation.

Nerve injury due to a recrudescence of herpes zoster infection can be very painful, with a dermatomal distribution being characteristic. The pain may precede the typical rash (picturesquely described as “dew drops on a rose petal”; see Chapter 193) by 3 to 5 days. Neurologic complaints range from hypoesthesia to dysesthesia and hyperesthesia. In the elderly, the pain may persist for months, long after the rash resolves.

Nerve injury from cervical root compression (see Chapter 148) due to cervical spine disease or a thoracic outlet syndrome can produce pain in the chest and upper arm, superficially resembling angina. In the outlet syndrome, a cervical rib may compress part of the brachial plexus, resulting in motor and sensory deficits in an ulnar distribution at the same time that there is discomfort in the chest and upper arm (see Chapter 167).


Lungs and Pleura

Inflammation or distention of the pleura produces true “pleuritic pain,” which is worsened by deep inspiration and cough but relatively unaffected by movement or palpation. A host of causes can trigger the inflammatory process, including pneumonia, pulmonary embolization with infarction, neoplasm, uremia, and connective tissue disease. The more florid the inflammation, the greater is the pain. An infectious origin is more likely to cause pain than is a low-grade serositis associated with connective tissue disease.


Pneumococcal Pneumonia and Pulmonary Tuberculosis

Pneumococcal pneumonia and pulmonary tuberculosis are the archetypical pneumonias associated with pleural involvement. The onset of symptoms in pneumococcal pneumonia (fever, chills, cough, sputum production, pleuritic chest pain) may be acute and mimic pulmonary embolization (see Chapter 52).


Pulmonary Embolization

Pulmonary embolization can cause pleuritic pain, especially when embolization leads to parenchymal infarction and pleural reaction. Pleural rub, effusion, low-grade fever, and hemoptysis also herald pulmonary infarction with pleural involvement. However, in some instances, the pain may be less clearly pleuritic and is often absent; it is estimated that fewer than 10% of all embolic episodes are accompanied by chest pain. The classic cardiopulmonary manifestations of embolization—dyspnea, tachypnea, and tachycardia—are nearly universal but may be
short-lived. Hypoxemia and oxygen desaturation may or may not be present, depending on the degree of mismatch between ventilation and perfusion. Severe embolization can cause acute pulmonary hypertension manifested by systemic hypotension, jugular venous distention, an accentuated pulmonic component of the second heart sound, acute tricuspid regurgitation, chest x-ray abnormalities, and electrocardiographic manifestations of acute right heart strain (see later discussion).


Spontaneous Pneumothorax

Spontaneous pneumothorax stretches the pleura and results in acute onset of pleuritic pain and dyspnea. The condition occurs in young persons and those with emphysema, in which there can be rupture of a bleb. If the pneumothorax is large, deviation of the trachea may be observed.


Pleurodynia

Pleurodynia is a self-limited source of pleuritic pain, most commonly in children and young adults, and is associated with a respiratory viral infection, such as that due to coxsackie virus B. A typical viral syndrome precedes the acute onset of chest pain. Chest pain in the setting of a viral upper respiratory infection may also occur from cough-initiated injury to the chest wall or from bronchospasm. Young healthy persons sometimes note a sudden sharp pleuritic episode relieved by taking a deep breath, referred to as the precordial catch syndrome. Its mechanism is unclear, but a transient folding of the pleura on itself is hypothesized.


Heart and Pericardium


Angina Pectoris

Angina pectoris due to occlusive coronary artery disease is the most important cardiac source of chest pain. Coronary perfusion may be similarly compromised by critical aortic stenosis leading to angina (see Chapter 33). The classic hallmarks of angina are its sudden onset with exertion, emotional stress, or eating (usually a very large meal) and its relief within minutes by rest or nitroglycerin. Patients usually describe their chest pain as a squeezing, heaviness, or pressure, although it may be burning or sharp. The quality of the pain is not diagnostic, and many patients state the sensation is more a “discomfort” than a true pain. Radiation to the jaw, neck, shoulder, arm, back, or upper abdomen is common and may present in the absence of chest symptoms. At times, the arm is reported to feel numb or tingling. Autonomic epiphenomena such as diaphoresis and nausea may accompany the episode, as may dyspnea if there is transient pump failure or marked anxiety. Episodes last 2 to 20 minutes. Prompt response to nitroglycerin is characteristic; relief is usually obtained within 5 minutes. Often, patients make gestures in describing their chest pain. Those traditionally associated with ischemia include the Levine sign (clenched fist brought to the chest), the palm sign (extended palm touching the chest), and the arm sign (touching the left arm with the right hand). Prevalences in prospective observational study of patients presenting to the ER with chest pain were 11%, 35%, and 16%, respectively; sensitivities for coronary artery disease were low (9%, 38%, and 16%, respectively), and specificities were higher (84%, 67%, and 78%, respectively), but positive predictive values were modest (50%, 65%, and 55%, respectively) and contributed little to refining the pretest probability.

Gender and racial differences in presentation have been explored. The clinical presentation of myocardial ischemia in women, particularly women younger than the age of 60 years, can differ from that in men. Chest pain is more likely to be absent or atypical (see later discussion) and may be overshadowed by exertional fatigue, shortness of breath, diaphoresis, arm tingling, jaw discomfort, nausea, or other epiphenomena of ischemia that are easy to dismiss as “noncardiac.” Diabetes mellitus is a major risk factor for the early onset of ischemic heart disease in women. With regard to the effect of race on presentation, acute chest pain presentations appear to be similar among whites and African Americans.


Unstable Angina

Unstable angina is one of the acute coronary syndromes, along with non-Q-wave myocardial infarction and Q-wave myocardial infarction. All are important causes of coronary chest pain and result from acute plaque rupture, which triggers platelet activation, thrombin clot formation, and active vasoconstriction. The clinical presentations of unstable angina include onset of new chest pain within the last 2 months severe enough to inhibit activity; established angina now increasing in frequency, severity, and duration (crescendo angina) and occurring with progressively less provocation; and development of rest pain or nocturnal angina in a person with a previously stable anginal pattern. Immediate mortality risk is high (up to 4%) but declines after 1 to 2 weeks. Clinical features associated with greatest risk include rest pain in excess of 20 minutes, signs of pump failure (hypotension, rales, S3), new or worsening mitral regurgitation, and 1 mm or more of ST-segment change with pain.

Women with unstable angina are less likely than are men to present with acute ST-segment elevation indicative of vessel-occluding infarction. Compared with men presenting with unstable angina, they are older and more likely to have diabetes, hypertension, and prior heart failure, and they typically present hours later into the episode.


Myocardial Infarction

Myocardial infarction is typically heralded by chest pain exceeding that of unstable angina, but the presentation is often more subtle or even silent, particularly in diabetics, the elderly, and women. Bad prognostic signs include heart failure, hypotension, mitral regurgitation, ST-segment elevation, and a new left bundle-branch block. Onset of postinfarction angina is also associated with high risk.


Variant Angina/Coronary Vasospasm

Variant angina, as originally described by Prinzmetal, refers to anginal pain occurring exclusively at rest in conjunction with transient ST-segment elevation on electrocardiogram (ECG). Classically, this syndrome was associated with coronary artery spasm at the site of high-grade proximal fixed stenosis. However, other forms of coronary disease may produce a similar clinical picture, and vasospasm of the large coronary arteries may present in ways other than Prinzmetal’s description. Patients typically demonstrate inducible coronary vasospasm at angiography in response to vasoactive stressors. Cocaine abuse can trigger ischemia by precipitating coronary vasoconstriction, increasing myocardial oxygen demand, and enhancing platelet aggregation. It may present as angina in a young person with no other coronary heart disease (CHD) risk factors. Patients with vasospasm of large coronary arteries are at risk for ischemic events.


Atypical Angina (Atypical Chest Pain)

Atypical angina is a term used to denote angina-like chest pain that differs in location, quality, or other characteristics from more typical angina yet is still suggestive by virtue of similar precipitants, timing, or other features. Some define the term more precisely, indicating the presence of any two of angina’s
three cardinal features (substernal location, exercise precipitation, prompt relief by rest or nitroglycerin). As many as 50% of such patients who come to angiography prove to have coronary disease. Among the remainder, there appear to be increased incidences of panic disorder, major depression, esophageal disease, and coronary microcirculatory dysfunction. The mechanisms for many of these causes are not well-understood, but recent interest has focused on the coronary microcirculation.


Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction (Microvascular Angina, Coronary Syndrome X)

The microvasculature is responsible for regulating coronary blood flow to myocytes through both endothelial and nonendothelial regulatory mechanisms. Endothelial dysfunction of the coronary microvasculature has been noted among more than half of patients who present with typical angina, an ischemic response to exercise stress testing, but absence of occlusive coronary disease at angiography. Sometimes referred to as having microvascular angina, or coronary syndrome X, these patients (most of whom are women in their 40s) are thought to exhibit abnormal coronary microvascular responses to autonomic and biochemical stimuli. The preponderance of cases occurring among women raises the question of a hormonal contribution to pathophysiology. At angiography, in response to intracoronary infusion of adenosine or acetylcholine, these patients often manifest reductions in subendocardial perfusion and may experience anginal chest pain. Such endothelial dysfunction is now recognized as a marker of early coronary artery disease and an important risk factor for adverse cardiac events (e.g., myocardial infarction, heart failure, sudden death)—a 5-year event risk of 7.9% in those with no occlusive disease. Symptomatic relief and event-risk reduction are achievable with use of beta-blockers, statins, and ACE inhibitors; nitrates and calcium channel blockers can provide symptomatic relief (see Chapter 30).


Mitral Valve Prolapse

Mitral valve prolapse is notorious for its association with atypical chest pain. The commonly held view of a link between the two has been challenged by recent studies controlling more stringently for selection bias. Some argue that the apparent association is due to an increased frequency of underlying psychopathology, such as panic disorder (see later discussion), which may trigger chest pain. Symptoms of autonomic dysfunction (e.g., palpitations, sweating, dizziness) may sometimes accompany the chest pain and simulate an ischemic attack.


Apical Ballooning Syndrome

This form of transient cardiomyopathy, typically associated with an emotionally stressful event, results in hypercontractility of basal segments of the left ventricle and severe anteroapical hypokinesis producing a characteristic “ballooning” of the left ventricle. It occurs predominantly in middle-aged women and may mimic acute coronary syndrome by producing chest pressure, shortness of breath, LV dysfunction (heart failure in 50%), ischemic anterior wall electrocardiographic changes, and even mild troponin elevations; however, troponin elevations are much more modest than would be expected from acute MI causing LV wall motion abnormalities. Purported mechanisms include catecholamine toxicity, aborted MI due to sudden clot lysis, coronary vasospasm, and microvascular dysfunction. Clinical differentiation from acute coronary syndrome and acute myocardial infarction can be very difficult; only at cardiac angiography can the diagnosis be made with certainty, finding “clean” coronary arteries and a ballooning left ventricle.


Pericarditis/Myocarditis

Pericarditis may present with pleuritic pain, resulting from spread of the inflammatory process from the relatively insensitive pericardium to the adjacent pain-sensitive parietal pleura. The pain is sharp, aggravated by respiratory activity, and sometimes precipitated by swallowing if the posterior aspect of the heart is involved. When the diaphragmatic surface of the pericardium is involved, pain will be referred to the tip of the shoulder. Change in position may alter the pain. Patients often note a lessening of pain on sitting up and leaning forward. Pericarditis can also produce a second type of pain that mimics angina. Its most diagnostic physical finding is a two- or three-component friction rub. A vexing pericardial problem is the development of chest pain after coronary bypass surgery. The return of typical angina raises the specter of graft occlusion, but pleuritic pain suggests the postpericardiotomy syndrome.

Myocarditis usually occurs in the context of a viral infection, classically heralded by prodromal symptoms of fever, myalgias, and respiratory or gastrointestinal complaints. Subsequently, the patient may present with cardiac manifestations ranging from chest pain (in about 1/3 of patients) to shortness of breath (in 2/3); about 1/5 note palpitations. Mechanisms include an associated pericarditis causing pleuritic chest pain; inflammation-induced coronary vasospasm resulting in ischemic pain, and a dilated cardiomyopathy compromising ejection fraction and triggering electrical instability.


Aorta

Aortic dissection is a must-not-miss cause of chest pain. Almost invariably (70% to 90% of cases), it begins with sudden onset of severe chest or interscapular pain, maximal from the start, and tearing or ripping in quality. If it begins in the chest, it may radiate to the interscapular region, neck, jaw, lower back, or even down into the legs. Associated symptoms include neurologic deficits from cutoff of blood supply to the brain, spinal cord, or limb. Loss or diminution of a major peripheral pulse is a key physical finding, as are new onset of aortic insufficiency and pericardial tamponade due to dissection into the aortic root.


Esophagus

Esophageal pain can be the great mimicker of anginal chest pain, producing chest discomfort that can resemble angina in quality, location, radiation, and even precipitants (e.g., exposure to cold, exertion). Unlike angina, esophageal chest pain is more likely to persist as a dull sensation for several hours after an acute attack and may occur with swallowing. The pain sometimes radiates to the interscapular region. The chest pain may occur spontaneously or in the context of meals or acid reflux (manifested by retrosternal burning that may be brought on by a large meal, lying down, or bending over and is relieved by antacids). Some patients report dysphagia as an accompanying symptom. In some instances, studies of esophageal function reveal motor dysfunction (e.g., nonpropulsive contractions or “spasm”) and acid reflux from the stomach. Nitrates and calcium-channel blockers may provide relief in such cases, as they do for angina. Some patients with atypical chest pain and normal coronary angiograms manifest both esophageal spasm and microcirculatory dysfunction, raising the intriguing possibility of a generalized disorder of smooth muscle reactivity.

About half of patients with noncardiac (i.e., angiogram-negative) angina-like chest pain report no concurrent dysphagia or heartburn and manifest no signs of reflux or motor dysfunction on detailed esophageal testing. In the past, such chest pain
was labeled as noncardiac chest pain of unknown etiology; however, controlled studies using impedance planimetry reveal esophageal hypersensitivity, hyperreactivity, and stiffness in a large proportion of previously undiagnosed patients. These findings suggest a sensory or nociceptive etiology to much noncardiac chest pain. It appears that, in such patients, normal degrees of esophageal distention result in exaggerated perceptions of pain and in hyperreactivity.


Other Gastrointestinal Tract Sources

An attack of acute cholecystitis may resemble angina by producing substernal discomfort that responds to nitrates, which reduce cystic duct spasm. On rare occasions, pancreatitis or peptic ulcer disease produces substernal chest pain. Even a patient with gaseous distention of the bowel in the area of the splenic flexure may complain of precordial discomfort.


Psychiatric Causes

Dramatic chest pain presentations are common among patients with underlying psychopathology. In addition to presentations that may be clinically indistinguishable from angina, patients with anxiety or depression often describe feelings of chest heaviness or tightness that can last for hours to days, unrelated to exertion and unrelieved by rest. In patients with anxiety disorders, this sensation may be accompanied by a feeling of inability to take in a deep breath. When there is associated hyperventilation, the resulting hypocapnia leaves the patient lightheaded and the extremities tingling.

Cardiac neurosis may lead to reports of chest pain mimicking angina. At other times, the patient misinterprets a noncardiac chest sensation. Patients with a personality disorder and somatization may describe almost any form of chest pain, including some suggestive of angina. A lifelong pattern of multiple refractory bodily complaints is characteristic (see Chapter 230). Malingering represents a conscious effort to feign illness for secondary gain. The hallmark is inconsistency of the story. Although other forms of psychogenic chest pain may bring secondary benefits to the patient, there is no premeditated attempt to deceive.

Depression and panic disorder can be sources of atypical chest pain. Patients with such conditions tend to be younger, more often female, more apt to have a higher number of accompanying autonomic symptoms, more bothered by phobias, and more likely to describe an atypical form of chest pain than those with chest pain and a positive coronary angiogram or stress test. There is no increased frequency of coronary endothelial dysfunction or syndrome X among psychiatric patients with persistent chest pain episodes.




WORKUP (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45 and 46)

The first priority is to determine the need for emergent hospitalization. This requires estimating the likelihood of acute myocardial ischemia, aortic dissection, and pulmonary embolization, conditions that place the patient at high risk for a potentially life-threatening complication. Timeliness of the assessment is of the utmost importance because outcome often depends on prompt intervention. In many instances, the decision to immediately hospitalize will need to be made by history alone, often on the basis of a telephone call by the patient. Delaying hospitalization is a major cause of poor outcome. Delays tend to be particularly prevalent among women and African Americans. Postmenopausal women presenting with ischemic chest pain are one-third less likely to be admitted to the hospital than men with the same degree of cardiac risk.


Strategy

The presenting history supplemented by physical examination, ECG, and chest x-ray (if available and deemed necessary) provides an efficient, proven approach to initial diagnosis and risk stratification, which can be used to determine the need for urgent hospitalization. Extensively testing low-probability
patients for ischemia, dissection, and embolization is not only wasteful but also leads to a high false-alarm rate with its attendant adverse consequences. Although there may be psychological pressure (on the part of physician and/or patient) to proceed immediately to elaborate diagnostic studies in all patients with chest pain, only those with at least a modest pretest probability (e.g., at least 20%) of serious pathology benefit from such testing (see Chapter 2). The provision of meaningful reassurance does not usually require exhaustive testing, but it is aided by a careful clinical assessment (see Patient Education and Indications for Admission and Referral).


History


Estimating Probability of Coronary Disease by History

A careful chest pain description is critical. The prevalence of angiographically confirmed CHD approaches 90% in persons with a classic story for angina (see prior discussion). Prevalence declines to less than 15% in those coming to catheterization who have nonanginal chest pain. In the Framingham Study, patients presenting with new onset of definite angina had a relative risk of a coronary event over 2 years of 3.7 for men and 5.9 for women. Relative risk for those with possible angina fell to 3.0 for men and 2.9 for women, and it fell to 1.3 for men and 0.8 for women with nonanginal chest pain.

Among the features of the chest pain description with the greatest discriminant value are its timing in relation to precipitating and alleviating factors. Quality, location, radiation, and intensity of pain are notoriously nonspecific. Precordial pain radiating down the left arm can occur with almost any cause of chest pain. A common pitfall in taking the history is to provide classic descriptions of chest pain to the patient who cannot give a quick, crisp account of his or her chest pain. Under the duress of the physician’s interrogation, the patient may agree to one of these neat descriptions, leading to a falsepositive diagnosis. A vaguely described chest pain may have important diagnostic meaning. As noted earlier, gestures traditionally associated with coronary disease, such as the Levine sign, have only modest predictive value that is usually insufficient to change the probability of coronary disease based on more-predictive clinical features.

Care is needed not to dismiss a story suggestive of ischemic pain because it is occurring in an atypical patient group, such as women in their 40s, who are at increased risk for coronary microvascular disease/syndrome X and its attendant adverse sequelae, especially if they have cardiac risk factors. Similarly, listening carefully to the chest pain story and checking for cardiovascular risk factors in patients with underlying psychiatric illness is essential, because there is frequently an overlay of distracting somatic symptoms and emotional responses.

Past medical history is reviewed for major cardiac risk factors (e.g., hypertension, diabetes, smoking, hypercholesterolemia, and obesity). Inquiry into cocaine use is essential, especially in young persons presenting with ischemia-like chest pain. Family history is checked for premature coronary disease. Note is also taken of patient age and gender. Postmenopausal women with coronary artery disease have an especially poor prognosis. Awareness of the potential biasing effects of gender and race on clinical thinking is critical to avoiding them. Race and gender have been found to be independent determinants of how patients are assessed. Because there are no differences in acute chest pain presentations among whites and African Americans, the chest pain presentation can be evaluated without the need to adjust for race. However, differences in CHD presentation between sexes need to be kept in mind. Women are often underdiagnosed, in part because the story may be atypical or vague (e.g., exertional fatigue, arm tingling, nausea, shortness of breath). A high index of suspicion for CHD is required in women younger than the age of 60 years presenting with chest pain, especially if they have preexisting diabetes (which negates the beneficial effects of estrogen).

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Aug 23, 2016 | Posted by in CRITICAL CARE | Comments Off on Evaluation of Chest Pain

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access