First Aid
The role of first aid is important in prehospital and hospital treatment. It is prudent to treat all snakebites as potentially serious envenomations and to apply appropriate first aid even though many snakes are not venomous and a significant number of venomous snakebites, perhaps the majority, do not result in systemic envenomation because no venom or only a small amount of venom is injected. However, the severity of envenomation cannot be predicted at the time of the bite. Since at least 95% of bites occur on the limbs and ˜60% involve a lower limb, they are easily treated with first aid.
There are many first-aid practices that are useless or harmful. Venom may be injected quite deeply, and consequently little venom is removed by incision or excision (cutting or sucking). These practices are not recommended, and indeed may be dangerous, particularly in the coagulopathic patient. The use of arterial tourniquets, especially for prolonged periods, may also be dangerous and not recommended for any type of venomous bite or sting. Local application of chemicals, electricity, or suction is also ineffective and may worsen local tissue damage.
Pressure-Immobilization First Aid
The pressure-immobilization first-aid technique for venomous bites and stings was developed experimentally in the 1970s by Struan Sutherland specifically for Australian elapid envenomation (
6). In this technique (
Fig. 37.2), a continuous bandage is applied (as tightly as when binding a sprained ankle, 40-70 mm Hg) to the whole limb and then a splint applied to further prevent movement. For example for a bite on the ankle, the bandage is applied continuously from the toes upwards to include the bite site and is extended above the knee and a splint applied to prevent use and movement of the limb. The patient also needs to be kept still as even the movement of a splinted limb undermines the effectiveness of the technique. The rationale is compression of lymphatic channels and inactivation of the “muscle pump” by which lymph flows and by which venom reaches the circulation. Compression without immobilization is ineffective. By retarding the movement of venom from the bite site into the circulation, it “buys time” for the victim to reach medical care.
It is recommended for use in bites by all Australian venomous snakes and other purely neurotoxic elapids such as kraits, mambas, and coral snakes. While clinical trials are lacking, animal studies and human case reports suggest that pressure immobilization is safe and probably effective in delaying the movement of venom into the circulation (
7). Its general use has been endorsed by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (
8). If applied correctly, pressure-immobilization first aid may be safely left in situ for several hours, unlike arterial tourniquets, which may cause ischemic or nerve damage. Additional studies support the efficacy of this technique to retard the movement of eastern diamond-back rattlesnake (
9) and Indian cobra venom (
10) but use in these circumstances is controversial. An elasticized bandage is preferred because it retains pressure. A variant of the technique featuring a “pressure pad” applied to Russell’s viper bite sites has been trailed with modest success, in Burma (
11).
The timing of removal of a pressure-immobilization bandage (
PIB) is important. Once an asymptomatic patient has reached a hospital stocked with appropriate antivenom, first-aid measures may be removed. Bandages and splints should not be left in place for prolonged periods. If, on removal of first-aid measures, the patient’s condition deteriorates, the bandages can be reapplied while antivenom is administered. If a patient arrives at the hospital with obvious envenomation but without pressure immobilization, it should be applied. Pressure bandages may be cut away from a bite site to allow swabs to be taken for venom detection and new bandages quickly applied.
Resistance to a universal recommendation for use of pressure immobilization for snakebite has centered on concerns about potentiating local tissue damage by trapping venom locally. The rationale for this concern appears sound when the significant local toxicity of species such as North American crotalids (rattlesnakes) and Asian pit vipers is compared with the limited local effects of most Australian elapids. Therefore, immobilization without pressure remains a routine first-aid recommendation for crotalid and viper bites (
12).
Medical Treatment of Envenomation
The management principles are resuscitation, antivenom administration, and treatment of specific effects of venom. A careful history and examination should be undertaken with reference to the features of envenomation described above, as well as to any previous envenomations and allergies to antivenom, to horse serum, or to other venoms, and with reference to allergic illnesses and asthma. Samples for venom detection and for investigations should be obtained, and an attempt made, if possible, to identify the genus of snake (see below). The key question is whether or not to give antivenom, an issue that should be regularly reassessed as envenomation is a highly dynamic situation reflecting ongoing absorption of venom.
If the patient has not developed any symptoms or signs of envenomation, nor any indication of coagulopathy or myolysis within 4-6 hours after the removal of first aid (or after the bite if no first aid was used), significant envenomation has not occurred. However, the delayed onset of symptoms, particularly relating to neurotoxicity and rhabdomyolysis, for up to 24 hours after bites has been described. Particular care is required if a neurotoxic elapid bite is suspected, as few signs may be present apart from late-onset neurotoxicity. Overnight observation is highly desirable, especially if the victim is a young child or comes from a remote area. Ideally, envenomated patients should be admitted to hospital and observed for a period of at least 24 hours, depending on the clinical circumstances. Frequent neurological observations should be performed and pathology studies repeated regularly to monitor progression of the illness.
Local Effects. Vipers cause local effects such as skin blistering, limb swelling, and tissue necrosis. Although progressive limb swelling is an indication for antivenom use, its effectiveness at reducing local venom effects remains controversial. The role of fasciotomy in North American Crotaline (pit viper) envenomation causing limb swelling has been controversial but at present, fasciotomy is generally considered not useful when crotaline antivenom has been administered (
13). As compartment syndrome is an infrequent complication of necrotizing snakebites, intracompartment pressures should be carefully monitored before surgical intervention (
14). Local blistering may progress to full-thickness skin necrosis over 3-7 days—such sites are particularly prone to infection. Some such cases have been treated with the application of medical leeches in attempts to revitalize the affected tissue (
15).
Coagulopathy. Procoagulants in Australian elapid venoms initiate the consumption of coagulation factors (
16) with possible thrombotic sequelae, such as thrombotic microangiopathic renal failure. Platelets may be consumed and fibrinolysis may occur as a primary or secondary phenomenon resembling the findings in
DIC caused by other conditions. After circulating venom has been neutralized, it may be 4-6 hours or longer before reconstitution of plasma clotting factors can normalize coagulation tests.
Whether to give or withhold coagulation factors, for example in the form of fresh frozen plasma (
FFP), has always been a vexed question (
17) in the treatment of Australian snake envenomation. While
FFP would restore coagulation in the absence of free toxin, it may exacerbate the effects of coagulopathy in the presence of venom. A rational decision to give or withhold coagulation factor therapy is hampered by the lack of a rapid test for detection of exogenous enzymatically active prothrombin activator in blood. A lack of improvement in a victim’s clotting times on retesting may therefore represent either insufficient antivenom or insufficient time for hepatic regeneration of clotting factors, while improvement in coagulation may represent the efficacy of antivenom or natural hepatic regeneration of clotting factors. While it is reasonable to withhold
FFP unless coagulation restores itself within 6 hours after antivenom therapy, active bleeding or such risk, despite adequate quantities of antivenom, is an indication for factor replacement after antivenom. Whole blood should only be reserved for significant anemia and volume loss. In North America, extrapolation from other hematologic conditions suggests that coagulopathy with parameters exceeding critical thresholds (
INR > 3,
aPTT > 50 seconds, platelets < 50,000/mm
3, and fibrinogen < 75 mg/dL) is associated with a major bleeding risk of 1% over a few days and thus warrants coagulation factor replacement (
18).
Neurotoxicity. Descending paralysis, starting with ptosis and external ophthalmoplegia and progressing to respiratory failure, is typical of bites by Elapidae (including sea snakes) and a few species of Viperidae (
14). In severe envenomations, resulting in respiratory failure, supplemental oxygen and endotracheal intubation with mechanical ventilation are indicated. If antivenom is delayed or inadequate doses given, recovery may be prolonged (days-weeks). Additional possible neurotoxic complications of snakebite include dysgeusia and hypopituitarism (
19).
Rhabdomyolysis and Renal Failure. Many factors may contribute to renal failure including shock, a direct toxic effect of venom, rhabdomyolysis, and
DIC. Although various measures (such as alkalization of the urine with bicarbonate and mannitol to create a forced diuresis) have been advocated, these practices remain controversial with poor evidence of effectiveness (
20). Hyperkalemia secondary to rhabdomyolysis may be treated with calcium, insulin and glucose, salbutamol, or sodium polystyrene sulfonate. Hemodialysis may occasionally be required, particularly in delayed antivenom treatment. Long-term renal morbidity may occur (
21).
Shock and Cardiotoxicity. Central venous pressure monitoring may help titration of intravenous fluid in hypotensive patients not responding to volume replacement. The etiology of shock may vary with the snake species and includes fluid sequestration into necrotic tissue, altered vascular permeability, autopharmacological phenomena, acute reactions to venom or antivenom, and cardiotoxicity either direct or secondary to hypoxemia or hypotension. Shock occurs for example with
Echis and
Bitis species envenomation in which electrocardiographic abnormalities, such as septal T-wave inversion, sinus bradycardia, atrioventricular block, and other conduction defects are observed, but their clinical significance has not been well defined. Procoagulopathy may contribute to myocardial ischemia and pulmonary hypertension. Acute systemic hypotension after Australian brown snakebite may be lethal (
22).
Other. Spitting cobras of Asia and Africa and the South African rinkhals spray venom from their fangs into a victim’s eyes, potentially causing blindness (venom ophthalmia) with painful chemical conjunctivitis, corneal ulceration, anterior uveitis, and possible secondary infection (
23). The eyes should be irrigated immediately with generous volumes of water followed by other treatment such as cycloplegics, topical antibiotics, and analgesia.
All victims should receive appropriate tetanus prophylaxis but antibiotic prophylaxis is only routinely warranted if the bite wound is contaminated. Rarely, the snake’s fangs may break and become embedded in the wound, acting as a foreign body and a nidus for infection. Other treatments include analgesia (avoid sedating agents such as morphine if possible). Prolonged bed rest may cause contractures, which may be prevented by splinting. Rehabilitation physiotherapy should be started as early as possible (
14).