Embolic disease during pregnancy includes venous thromboembolism, amniotic fluid embolism (AFE), and venous air embolism (VAE). These vary in incidence, clinical course, and consequences and account for almost one-sixth of all maternal deaths in the United States. Early recognition, diagnosis, and treatment are necessary to reduce associated morbidity and to avoid mortality.
THROMBOEMBOLIC DISORDERS
Incidence
Venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) in pregnancy refer to deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE). Analysis of administrative data from US hospital admissions including 73,109,789 pregnancy-related hospitalizations (2000 to 2018) suggested a VTE event rate of 6.6 events per 10,000 deliveries. Among these, the DVT event rate (5.1 per 10,000 deliveries) was higher than the PTE event rate (1.7 per 10,000 deliveries). In the United States, 5.3% of maternal mortalities are related to VTE, but the incidence is increasing, as is the number of patients with related risk factors.
The risk for thromboembolic events is elevated during pregnancy. Compared with nonpregnant patients, pregnant women have 5-fold greater odds of thromboembolic events during pregnancy (odds ratio [OR], 4.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.7 to 7.8) and at 60-fold greater odds postpartum (OR, 60.1; 95% CI, 26.5 to 135.9). DVTs are more likely to occur antepartum, with 21%, 23%, and 56% occurring in the first, second, and third trimester, respectively. Most cases of PTE (60% to 80%) occur postpartum. Analysis from a 30-year population-based cohort ( n = 50,080 births) revealed the risk for both DVT and PTE was highest in the first week postpartum, with a progressive decline thereafter. Risk is elevated until at least 12 weeks after delivery.
Although VTE-related mortality, as reported by the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity in the United Kingdom and Ireland, appeared to have been decreasing a decade ago, more recently, the VTE-associated mortality rate has been stable. VTE was the leading cause of direct maternal deaths with 1.6 deaths per 100,000 births in 2019 to 2021. VTE-related maternal mortality appears to be stable in the United States, at 1.8 deaths per 100,000 births.
Pathophysiology
Virchow’s triad describes three factors that increase risk for thromboembolism: (1) venous stasis , (2) hypercoagulability , and (3) vascular damage . The incidence of each factor is increased during pregnancy, especially postpartum. Venous stasis occurs as a result of decreased venous flow velocity, venocaval compression, and possibly decreased mobility later in pregnancy. Additionally, pregnancy is a relatively hypercoagulable state, associated with enhanced platelet turnover, coagulation, and fibrinolysis. Thrombin generation and the concentration of clotting factors increase during pregnancy, including factors I (fibrinogen), V, VII, VIII, IX, X, and XII. Fibrinolytic activity decreases during the 48 hours after delivery and enhances clot stability in the early postpartum period. Vascular damage occurs at delivery. Placental separation from the uterine wall traumatizes the endometrium and accelerates the coagulation cascade. This vascular damage, in addition to delivery events that increase the risk of thromboembolism, explains the increased incidence of VTE events postpartum.
Risk Assessment
Awareness of VTE risk factors and frequent assessment of VTE risk are crucial for identification of patients who require thromboprophylaxis because the risk is not static throughout pregnancy. The assessment of risk should be performed antepartum, at hospital admission, and postpartum. The VTE risk factors can be categorized into maternal characteristics, pregnancy and delivery characteristics, and obstetric complications.
The two most important risk factors for thromboembolic events during pregnancy and postpartum are a previous history of thromboembolism and a diagnosis of thrombophilia. The increased risk is notable, with an increased odds of VTE of 24.8 (95% CI, 17.1 to 36) for women with a history of prior VTE and 51.8 (95% CI, 38.7 to 69.2) for women with thrombophilia. Thrombophilias increase the risk for VTE in pregnancy, for example in women homozygous for the factor V Leiden mutation. Other risk factors include advanced maternal age, race/ethnicity, obesity, anemia, hypertensive disorders, inflammatory bowel disease, and smoking status. Multifetal gestation, hyperemesis, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, antenatal hospitalization and prolonged bedrest, intrauterine fetal demise, and cesarean delivery also increase the risk for postpartum VTE. In a metaanalysis of 28 studies (pooled n > 53,000 postpartum VTE events), the OR of postpartum VTE after cesarean delivery compared with vaginal delivery was 3.7 (95% CI, 3.0 to 4.6). Greater increases occurred after emergency versus elective cesarean deliveries. Obstetric complications, such as postpartum hemorrhage and postpartum infections, are also associated with increased risk, likely mediated via effects on maternal coagulation and inflammation. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample showed that between 2000 and 2018, the average annual percent change in the proportion of deliveries with one, two, or three VTE risk factors increased by 2.7%, 5.0%, and 7.5%, respectively. Patients with two or more risk factors accounted for over one-fourth of the VTE diagnoses.
Deep Vein Thrombosis
Clinical Presentation
The signs and symptoms of DVT are nonspecific and often mimic normal pregnancy symptoms such as lower leg edema and pain, necessitating a high degree of awareness for timely diagnosis. A systematic review of the anatomic distribution of DVT in symptomatic pregnant patients identified left leg thrombus in 88% of women in whom the side of the DVT was reported. Most thrombi were proximally located in the iliac or femoral veins, or both. This differs from nonpregnant patients, who are more likely to have thrombi in the distal calf vessels. A prospective observational study of serial ultrasonographic examinations in pregnant women found an increase in vessel diameter and a decrease in flow velocity in the proximal deep leg veins with increasing gestation, most notably in the common femoral vein. The flow velocity was slower in the left leg than in the right leg, presumably caused by uterine compression of the left iliac vein where it crosses the right iliac artery.
Diagnosis
For patients with new-onset signs or symptoms suggestive of DVT, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommends compression ultrasonography of proximal veins as the initial diagnostic test. If the test is negative, and involvement of the iliac vessels is not suspected, no further action other than routine surveillance is necessary. A positive result warrants treatment (see later discussion). If the results are negative or equivocal, or iliac vein thrombosis is suspected, Doppler ultrasonography of the iliac vein, venography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or presumptive anticoagulation may be considered. Alternatively, compression ultrasonography may be repeated after 3 to 7 days. The negative predictive value of serial compression duplex ultrasonography is 99.5% (95% CI, 96.9% to 100%).
The d -dimer test has high sensitivity and high negative predictive value in nonpregnant patients. Unfortunately, d -dimer levels are increased in pregnancy, and levels may be further elevated in women with multiple gestation, making interpretation of elevated levels difficult. In one prospective, longitudinal study, serial d -dimer levels were evaluated in healthy pregnant women ( n = 89); values exceeded the normal nonpregnant reference range in all but one woman in the third trimester. One study ( n = 16,127 deliveries with 19 VTE events), suggested that a d -dimer threshold of greater than or equal to 3.7 mg/L could be used as an independent predictor of VTE (specificity 75.5%, sensitivity 73.7%) ; however, this has not been validated in prospective studies. Therefore, the d -dimer test is not recommended for diagnosis of DVT in pregnancy.
Pulmonary Thromboembolism
Clinical Presentation
The clinical presentation and prognosis of PTE depend on: (1) the size and number of emboli, (2) concurrent cardiopulmonary function, (3) the rate of clot fragmentation and lysis, (4) the presence or absence of a source for recurrent emboli, and (5) the location of the embolism (proximal or main pulmonary artery embolism is more symptomatic than segmental embolization). Massive PTE can occlude the pulmonary vasculature and precipitate cardiopulmonary arrest; smaller emboli may lead to cardiopulmonary failure by triggering pulmonary arterial vasospasm and secondary pulmonary edema. Local platelets embedded in the clot release serotonin, adenosine diphosphate, and thrombin, which promote both vasoconstriction and bronchoconstriction. Redistribution of pulmonary blood flow leads to “hyperperfusion” of otherwise low V/Q zones in unaffected areas of the lung; the resulting intrapulmonary shunts cause hypoxemia disproportionate to the cross-sectional area occluded by a clot. Simultaneously, regional hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction exacerbates pulmonary hypertension initiated by mechanical and humoral factors. Intracardiac shunting may develop when elevated right ventricular pressure forces blood across a probe-patent foramen ovale. The increase in right ventricular pressure leads to right ventricular dilation, with increased wall tension and oxygen demand, and a leftward shift of the interventricular septum. Compression of the left ventricle combined with a decrease in preload impairs left ventricular function, cardiac output, and coronary arterial perfusion, with eventual myocardial ischemia and cardiopulmonary failure.
Clinical suspicion for PTE is critical for timely diagnosis and treatment. Physical signs and symptoms may be subtle and limited to symptoms (e.g., shortness of breath) that mimic normal pregnancy ( Table 38.1 ). Palpitations, anxiety, pleuritic chest pain, cyanosis, diaphoresis, and cough with or without hemoptysis may all indicate PTE. Hypotension and syncope, though rare, may indicate massive PTE. Examination commonly reveals tachypnea, crackles on chest auscultation, decreased breath sounds, and tachycardia. Signs of right ventricular failure, such as an accentuated or split second heart sound, jugular venous distention, a parasternal heave, or hepatic enlargement, may be apparent. Although the Pa o 2 is commonly decreased to less than 80 mm Hg (10.7 kPa), in up to 30% of patients this is not apparent; thus, the diagnosis of PTE cannot be excluded on the basis of a normal Pa o 2 . Left ventricular failure may occur secondary to poor left ventricular filling and arterial hypoxemia. One or more signs of DVT (calf or thigh edema, erythema, tenderness, palpable cord) generally accompany the pulmonary or cardiovascular findings. The electrocardiogram may show signs of right ventricular strain, including a right-axis shift, P pulmonale, ST-segment abnormalities, and T-wave inversion, as well as supraventricular arrhythmias. Transthoracic echocardiography may reveal signs of right ventricular dysfunction or hypokinesis of the right ventricular free wall with normal contraction of the apical segment (McConnell’s sign).
Table 38.1
Symptoms and Signs of Pulmonary Embolism During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Data from Elgendy, IY, Fogerty A, Blanco-Molina Á, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of women presenting with venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and the postpartum period: findings from the RIETE registry. Thromb Haemost. 2020;120:1454–1462.
| Finding | Patients Affected (%) |
|---|---|
| Dyspnea | 85 |
| Chest pain | 59 |
| Oxygen saturation < 95% | 32 |
| Syncope | 8 |
| Hemoptysis | 4 |
Diagnosis
Diagnosing PTE in pregnancy is challenging given the lack of validated criteria specific for the peripartum period. The American Thoracic Society developed an evidence-based guideline for the evaluation of suspected PTE in pregnancy, which has been endorsed by the ACOG. A diagnostic algorithm for suspected PTE is shown in Fig. 38.1 . If the pregnant patient has signs or symptoms suggestive of DVT, in addition to the signs or symptoms of PTE, compression ultrasonography should be performed. If the results are positive, treatment should ensue. However, if the results are negative, further imaging is necessary. If there are no signs or symptoms of DVT, a chest radiograph should be performed to exclude alternative diagnoses and to guide further decision making. If the chest radiograph is normal, V/Q scanning should be performed. A retrospective study of 304 women who underwent computed tomographic angiography (CTA) or V/Q scanning at a single institution demonstrated that pregnant women with a normal chest radiograph have a fivefold higher rate of a nondiagnostic result from a CTA compared with a V/Q scan (relative risk [RR], 5.3; 95% CI, 2.1 to 13.8). Screening with chest radiography may minimize radiation exposure if the patient is a candidate for V/Q scanning. If the chest radiograph is abnormal, CTA is the next appropriate test because the proportion of nondiagnostic V/Q scans in the presence of an abnormal chest radiograph is reportedly as high as 48%. If either the V/Q scan or CTA is positive, anticoagulation should ensue. In clinical practice, although a V/Q scan may be the most appropriate test for diagnosis of a PTE, CTA may be considered because it may inform an alternative diagnosis. Magnetic resonance pulmonary angiography has not been validated in pregnant patients and uses gadolinium, which crosses the placenta, and historically its use during pregnancy has been discouraged. However, in a study of 782 women who received gadolinium in pregnancy, there was no increased risk of fetal or infant death (adjusted RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.34 to 1.55). As the impact of exposure on subacute and chronic outcomes is unknown, gadolinium-based imaging studies during pregnancy should be used when necessary for a diagnosis, in accordance with professional society guidelines. Traditional pulmonary angiography is now rarely used because of high radiation doses and cost.
Diagnostic algorithm for workup of suspected pulmonary thromboembolism during pregnancy. CTA , Computed tomography angiography; CUS , compression ultrasonography; CXR , chest radiograph; DVT , deep vein thrombosis; V/Q scan , ventilation-perfusion scan.
Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) has been evaluated in pregnant women. In a nonpregnant patient population, the V/Q SPECT demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 94% specificity compared with CTA as the “gold standard.” A retrospective analysis of 127 women who underwent evaluation for PTE with V/Q SPECT identified PTE in 11 women (9%). The negative predictive value was 100%, and the calculated fetal and breast absorbed radiation doses were low (<0.014 and 0.25 mGy, respectively).
A great concern with diagnostic imaging for PTE is maternal and fetal exposure to ionizing radiation, (see Chapter 18 ). Both V/Q scanning and CTA are associated with low fetal radiation exposure (<1 mGy). V/Q scanning delivers a higher fetal dose of radiation than CTA; however, the maternal radiation exposure is higher with CTA, particularly radiation to breast tissue. A patient’s lifetime breast cancer risk may increase as much as 14% after CTA. Maternal radiation exposure is lower with V/Q SPECT than with CTA. Two prospective studies used d -dimer testing in conjunction with prediction rules to determine whether diagnostic imaging is required. Validation studies are necessary as the risk of a missed PTE has potentially catastrophic implications.
Prevention of Thromboembolic Events
Anesthesia and obstetric providers should work together to develop and implement strategies to reduce VTE. Systems should be developed to identify at-risk women for whom peripartum mechanical or pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis is indicated. Given the recent expansion of indications for pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis, it is imperative that there is communication between anesthesia and obstetric providers regarding timing of delivery, plans for neuraxial analgesia and/or anesthesia, and plans for postpartum anticoagulation.
Several risk assessment tools provide guidance on antepartum and postpartum anticoagulation management. Currently, there is not one validated and clinically accepted scoring tool, and controversy exists regarding the VTE risk level at which patients should be anticoagulated. The ACOG Practice Bulletin on thromboembolism in pregnancy summarizes which patients should receive prophylactic versus therapeutic anticoagulation. Patients with a previous history of thrombosis, certain high-risk populations (e.g., patients with acquired or inherited thrombophilia), or patients with a mechanical heart valve should be anticoagulated during pregnancy as well as postpartum. The American College of Chest Physicians has defined major and minor risk factors for postcesarean VTE ( Box 38.1 ). The National Partnership for Maternal Safety published a consensus bundle on VTE in 2016. This bundle broadens the indications for antepartum and postpartum pharmacologic anticoagulation beyond the ACOG practice guidelines, including recommending daily thromboprophylaxis for antepartum patients hospitalized for longer than 72 hours. This has anesthetic implications (see later discussion). All women with a new-onset thromboembolic event in pregnancy should be therapeutically anticoagulated.
Box 38.1
Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism in the Postpartum Period
Modified from Bates SM, Greer IA, Middeldorp S, et al. VTE, thrombophilia, antithrombotic therapy, and pregnancy: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis. 9th ed. American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest . 2012;141(2 suppl):e691S–e736S.
Major risk factors
-
•
Previous venous thromboembolism
-
•
Thrombophilia
-
•
Antithrombin III deficiency
-
•
Factor V Leiden (homozygous or heterozygous)
-
•
Prothrombin G20210A (homozygous or heterozygous)
-
•
-
•
Immobility (strict bed rest for 1 w or more in the antepartum period)
-
•
Preeclampsia with fetal growth restriction
-
•
Medical conditions (e.g., systematic lupus erythematous, heart disease, sickle cell disease)
-
•
Postpartum hemorrhage ≥ 1000 mL and surgery
-
•
Blood transfusion
-
•
Postpartum infection
Minor risk factors
-
•
Body mass index > 30 kg/m 2
-
•
Emergency cesarean delivery
-
•
Multiple pregnancy
-
•
Postpartum hemorrhage > 1000 mL
-
•
Smoking more than 10 cigarettes/d
-
•
Fetal growth restriction
-
•
Thrombophilia (Protein C or S deficiency)
-
•
Preeclampsia
Mechanical thromboprophylaxis should be initiated in women with contraindications to pharmacologic anticoagulation, and after all cesarean births. Intermittent pneumatic compression stockings are cost-effective versus no thromboprophylaxis after cesarean delivery ; however, compliance has been shown to be suboptimal. For women in whom significant risk factors persist after delivery, extended prophylaxis (6 to 8 weeks postpartum) is recommended. Women are at the highest risk for thrombotic events in the first week postpartum ; therefore, careful postdischarge planning and evaluation of VTE risk are equally as important as inpatient management.
Management of Thromboembolic Disorders
Anticoagulation
Two classes of drugs are typically used to initiate anticoagulation in pregnancy and postpartum: unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) . Direct oral anticoagulants inhibit factor Xa (e.g., dabigatran , rivaroxaban , apixaban ) and are preferred for nonpregnant patients; however, experience in pregnancy and postpartum is limited. As they may cross the placenta and may be excreted in breastmilk, their use in pregnancy is not recommended, but they may be used postpartum in patients who are not breastfeeding. Table 38.2 lists anticoagulation regimens commonly used in pregnancy. The ACOG, the American College of Chest Physicians, and the American Society of Hematology recommend LMWH rather than UFH for prophylactic and therapeutic anticoagulation for pregnant women. LMWH is preferred because of a more predictable anticoagulant response, better bioavailability, longer half-life, and fewer side effects. The most appropriate dosing strategy remains controversial. The Highlow study randomized 1110 women who had a history of VTE to either a fixed low dose of LMWH or a weight-adjusted intermediate dose of LMWH. There was no difference in the incidence of VTE between the two groups (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.32 to 1.47), and no difference in major bleeding, suggesting that a fixed low-dose LWMH strategy is preferred for antepartum anticoagulation.
Table 38.2
Commonly Used Anticoagulation Regimens During Pregnancy
Modified from American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice Bulletin No. 196: Thromboembolism in pregnancy (reaffirmed 2025). Obstet Gynecol . 2018;132:e1–e17.
| Drug | Dose |
|---|---|
| Prophylactic LMWH | Enoxaparin 40 mg SC once daily |
| Dalteparin 5000 units SC once daily | |
| Tinzaparin 4500 units SC once daily | |
| Nadroparin 2850 units SC once daily | |
| Intermediate-dose LMWH | Enoxaparin 40 mg SC every 12 h |
| Dalteparin 5000 units SC every 12 h | |
| Therapeutic LMWH (weight-adjusted treatment dose) | Enoxaparin 1 mg/kg every 12 h |
| Dalteparin 200 units/kg once daily | |
| Tinzaparin 175 units/kg once daily | |
| Dalteparin 100 units/kg every 12 h | |
| Prophylactic UFH in the first trimester | UFH 5000–7500 units SC every 12 h |
| Prophylactic UFH in the second trimester | UFH 7500–10,000 units SC every 12 h |
| Prophylactic UFH in the third trimester | UFH 10,000 units SC every 12 h (unless aPTT is elevated) |
| Therapeutic (adjusted-dose) UFH | UFH 10,000 units or more SC every 12 h |
| Postpartum anticoagulation | Prophylactic LMWH for 6–8 w |
aPTT , Activated partial thromboplastin time; LMWH , low-molecular-weight heparin; SC , subcutaneously; UFH , unfractionated heparin.
LMWH has an enhanced ratio of antithrombotic (anti–factor Xa) to anticoagulant (anti–factor IIa) activity compared with UFH and does not affect activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). A systematic review (pooled n = 2777) evaluated the efficacy and safety of LMWH in pregnancy. The rate of VTE in women receiving LMWH was 0.9% (95% CI, 0.6% to 1.3%), and the rate of significant bleeding was 2.0% (95% CI, 1.5% to 2.6%).
Pregnancy alters the pharmacokinetics of LMWH. When LMWH is used for therapeutic anticoagulation, dosing can be adjusted based on anti–factor Xa activity. The desired peak level is 0.6 to 1.0 U/mL measured 4 hours after injection ; however, because of the cost, routine monitoring of anti–factor Xa activity is not recommended during therapy in pregnancy. Viscoelastic monitoring provides an alternative method to assess LMWH activity. The delta reaction time (ΔR) measured by thromboelastography correlates with anti–factor Xa levels in pregnancy ; this allows LMWH doses to be adjusted to ensure anticoagulation or, conversely, confirm the absence of anticoagulation. LMWH is cleared by the kidney; therefore, dose reduction may be required in patients with renal failure.
UFH therapy may be used to initiate anticoagulation or to maintain therapy. UFH exerts its anticoagulant activity by binding to antithrombin III and potentiates inactivation of other coagulation factors, including thrombin (factor IIa); factors IXa, Xa, XIa, and XIIa; and kallikrein. Typically, UFH is administered as a subcutaneous injection for both prophylactic and therapeutic therapy. The aPTT measured 6 hours after an injection or dose adjustment should be maintained at 1.5 to 2.5 times the normal range. In pregnancy, the bioavailability of UFH decreases because of an increase in heparin-binding proteins, increased plasma volume, increased renal clearance, and increased degradation by plasma heparinases. Even a twice-daily dose of subcutaneous UFH is often inadequate to achieve prophylactic plasma heparin concentrations in the second half of pregnancy, possibly because of the presence of a heparin-neutralizing protein or the presence of increased factor VIII and fibrinogen levels in pregnancy. For therapeuti c anticoagulation, the ACOG currently recommends a subcutaneous, twice-daily UFH dose ≥ 10,000 units, with aPTT monitoring and dose adjustment. In the event of antepartum massive PTE with hemodynamic instability, thrombolytic therapy is associated with high maternal and fetal survival. However, in the postpartum period, other options, including thrombectomy, should be considered because thrombolysis is associated with a significant risk for hemorrhage.
In patients who develop heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, or severe cutaneous reactions to heparin, fondaparinux is the preferred anticoagulant because it has minimal cross-reactivity with UFH. Anticoagulation with other classes of drugs such as vitamin K antagonists , thienopyridines , direct factor Xa inhibitors , and direct thrombin inhibitors is possible in pregnancy, but the use of these medications is less common. Inferior vena cava filters may be considered for women with contraindications to anticoagulant therapy or DVT progression despite adequate anticoagulant therapy.
Antithrombotic Therapy and Anesthetic Implications
In 2025, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA) published its fifth edition guidelines for regional anesthesia in patients receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy. The ASRA suggests following the guidelines for surgical patients when developing clinical policy for obstetric patients regarding initiation of neuraxial procedures and postpartum thromboprophylaxis. The ASRA-recommended time intervals between anticoagulant administration and the initiation of neuraxial anesthesia are summarized in Table 38.3 . Of note, it was once recommended that patients be transitioned from LWMH to UFH at 36 weeks’ gestation to facilitate neuraxial procedures. In the third trimester, the ACOG-recommended prophylactic doses of UFH require a 12-hour delay prior to initiation of neuraxial anesthesia; therefore, there is no benefit to transitioning patients from LMWH to UFH.
Table 38.3
Recommended Time Intervals for Administration of Neuraxial Anesthesia After Anticoagulation and Initiation of Postpartum Anticoagulation
Modified from Kopp SL, Vandermeulen E, McBane RD, Perlas A, Leffert L, Horlocker T. Regional anesthesia in the patient receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy: American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine evidence-based guidelines (fifth edition). Reg Anesth Pain Med . 2025: Epub ahead of print Jan 29; https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105766 ; Leffert L, Butwick A, Carvalho B, et al. The Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology consensus statement on the anesthetic management of pregnant and postpartum women receiving thromboprophylaxis or higher dose anticoagulants. Anesth Analg . 2018;126:928–944.
| Therapy | Time Interval | |
|---|---|---|
| Administration of Neuraxial Anesthesia After Anticoagulation | Initiation of Postpartum Anticoagulation | |
| SC UFH, low-dose prophylactic | >4–6 h or assessment of coagulation status | ≥1 h after neuraxial block or epidural catheter removal |
| SC UFH, intermediate dose | ≥12 h, and verify normal coagulation status | ≥1 h after neuraxial block or epidural catheter removal |
| SC UFH, therapeutic | ≥24 h, and verify normal coagulation status | ≥1 h after neuraxial block or epidural catheter removal |
| IV UFH | 4–6 h, and verify normal coagulation status | ≥1 h after neuraxial block or epidural catheter removal |
| LMWH, prophylactic | ≥12 h | ≥12 h after neuraxial block and ≥4 h after catheter removal |
| LMWH, therapeutic | ≥24 h | ≥24 h after neuraxial block and ≥4 h after catheter removal |
IV , Intravenous ; LMWH , low-molecular-weight heparin; SC , subcutaneous; UFH , unfractionated heparin.
In 2018 the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology (SOAP) released a consensus statement with pregnancy-specific recommendations regarding neuraxial procedures in obstetric patients receiving thromboprophylaxis or therapeutic anticoagulation. This integrated the ASRA guidelines, pharmacokinetic parameters of anticoagulants in pregnancy, and the risks associated with maternal airway management into decision-making algorithms intended to guide clinicians. The consensus statement emphasized the importance of weighing the risk associated with potential spinal or epidural hematoma versus the risk associated with general anesthesia in decision making.
Other anticoagulants sometimes administered to pregnant women include aspirin , warfarin , and newer anticoagulants. The ASRA recommends discontinuation of warfarin for 5 days and waiting for normalization of the international normalized ratio. Neuraxial catheters are not recommended in patients receiving fondaparinux, and neuraxial techniques are not recommended in patients anticoagulated with direct thrombin inhibitors. Treatment with thrombolytics is an absolute contraindication to neuraxial anesthesia. By contrast, there is no contraindication to neuraxial anesthesia in patients receiving nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs or aspirin, if used alone.
If neuraxial anesthesia is contraindicated, alternative analgesic methods (e.g., intravenous opioid) should be offered for labor, and general anesthesia should be performed for operative procedures. The anesthesia provider should note that placement of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal airways, gastric tubes, and other devices (e.g., temperature probes) carries a risk for traumatic hemorrhage. Emergency surgery may necessitate the administration of protamine or the transfusion of blood products (e.g., plasma) to reverse anticoagulation and reduce the risk for hemorrhage.
The timing of initiation of pharmacologic prophylaxis postpartum varies according to drug and dose. Both the ASRA and the SOAP consensus statements recommend at least a 1-hour delay after neuraxial blockade or epidural catheter removal before starting or restarting UFH, regardless of dose; at least a 12-hour delay after neuraxial blockade before the initiation of low-dose LWMH; and at least a 24-hour delay after neuraxial blockade before initiating therapeutic LMWH (see Table 38.3 ).
The greatest concern with neuraxial procedures in anticoagulated patients is spinal or epidural hematoma. A metaanalysis estimated the incidence of epidural hematoma in obstetric patients to be 1:183,000. An incidence of 1:251,643 (95% CI, 1:46,090 to 1:10,142,861) was identified in the SOAP Serious Complication Repository Project (SCORE). The consequences of a spinal-epidural hematoma can be devastating. A systematic review and review of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Closed Claims Project Database (1990 to 2013) identified no cases of spinal or epidural hematoma in obstetric patients who received thromboprophylaxis consistent with the 2018 ASRA guidelines. However, two case reports describe epidural hematoma following neuraxial anesthesia for cesarean delivery and administration of LMWH. In the first case, the initial dose of LMWH followed the onset of lower extremity weakness and sensory changes, and in the second case, symptoms began only after the initiation of therapeutic anticoagulation on postpartum day three. Spontaneous epidural hematoma in pregnancy has been reported.
Signs and symptoms of epidural hematoma include (1) severe, unremitting backache; (2) neurologic deficit, including bowel or bladder dysfunction or radiculopathy; (3) tenderness over the spinous or paraspinous area; and (4) unexplained fever (see Chapter 31 ). Suspicion of epidural hematoma should lead to immediate spinal imaging and neurosurgical consultation. Neurologic recovery is a function of the severity of the deficits, the duration of maximum deficit, and the interval between symptom onset and surgery; better outcomes are associated with a shorter symptom onset-to-surgery interval. A high index of suspicion is necessary because neurologic dysfunction may mimic local anesthetic–induced effects.
AMNIOTIC FLUID EMBOLISM
Death attributable to AFE was first reported by Meyer in 1926. Early reports described a syndrome of fatal peripartum shock attributed to emboli of amniotic fluid mechanically obstructing the maternal pulmonary circulation. Although the pathophysiology of AFE is poorly understood, current evidence suggests that emboli alone are insufficient to precipitate it. Rather, fetal material in the maternal circulation has the potential to trigger a catastrophic cascade of inflammatory and hemostatic reactions that culminate in cardiopulmonary collapse and profound coagulopathy.
Epidemiology
The incidence of AFE is difficult to establish because (1) there are no universally accepted diagnostic criteria, (2) differing ascertainment methods yield divergent rates of AFE, and (3) there are no serum or histologic markers that are specific for AFE, making AFE a clinical diagnosis that is ultimately a diagnosis of exclusion. The dependence on clinical criteria has likely resulted in both over- and under-diagnosis; mild cases without permanent sequelae may not be reported, and many reports, particularly those based on administrative codes, likely include inappropriate diagnoses of AFE in women who become critically ill from other causes. As AFE is considered the least preventable cause of maternal mortality, there may be medical-legal pressure to diagnose AFE in some cases of maternal mortality or severe morbidity. The lack of uniform diagnostic criteria is a significant barrier to furthering our understanding of AFE.
In an effort to standardize diagnosis and reporting of AFE for research purposes, in 2016 an expert panel convened by the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) and the AFE Foundation proposed diagnostic criteria for AFE. Notably, this definition requires documentation of coagulopathy to confirm diagnosis and excludes patients who were febrile during labor. It is intentionally biased toward specificity in an effort to standardize reporting; thus, even some cases considered by experts to represent true cases of AFE do not meet all components of this definition. Similar, but slightly more liberal definitions of AFE, have been established by the International Network of Obstetric Survey Systems (INOSS), the UK Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS), and by consensus in Japan (see Table 38.4 ).
Table 38.4
Commonly Used Amniotic Fluid Embolism Diagnostic Criteria
Criteria from Clark SL, Romero R, Dildy GA, et al. Proposed diagnostic criteria for the case definition of amniotic fluid embolism in research studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol . 2016;215:408–412; Fitzpatrick KE, van den Akker T, Bloemenkamp KWM, et al. Risk factors, management, and outcomes of amniotic fluid embolism: a multicountry, population-based cohort and nested case-control study . PLoS Med . 2019;16:e1002962; Fitzpatrick KE, Tuffnell D, Kurinczuk JJ, Knight M. Incidence, risk factors, management and outcomes of amniotic-fluid embolism: a population-based cohort and nested case-control study. BJOG . 2016;123:100–109; Kanayama N, Tamura N. Amniotic fluid embolism: pathophysiology and new strategies for management. J Obstet Gynaecol Res . 2014;40:1507–1517.
| Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine and the Amniotic Fluid Foundation Criteria | International Network of Obstetric Survey Systems Criteria | UK Obstetric Surveillance System Criteria | Japanese Consensus Criteria |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Acute cardiorespiratory collapse within 6 h after labor, delivery, or ruptured membranes, with no other identifiable cause, followed by acute coagulopathy in those women who survive the initial event |
|
|
DIC , Disseminated intravascular coagulation.
The challenges of applying definitions to AFE are evident from studies that have combined expert case review with application of various consensus criteria. In an analysis of cases submitted to the US AFE Registry, 12% of cases were considered atypical because they did not meet the full research criteria, but on expert review were considered to represent AFE. A retrospective observational study confirmed that a larger number of cases are classified as AFE using Japanese criteria compared with US or UKOSS criteria. In an international cohort study that included a comparison of criteria, the INOSS found that 31% of cases collected by member institutions met INOSS, but not SMFM criteria, with a lack of evidence for disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) being the most common reason for not meeting SMFM criteria. Similarly, in the French Confidential Enquiry into Maternal Deaths (2007 to 2011), documentation of coagulopathy was missing for 14 of 39 deaths. Practically, while obtaining laboratory studies to assess coagulation status can be essential in the management of a critically ill patient, it may not occur in the appropriate time frame in the context of ongoing resuscitation.
While a rate of up to 6 per 100,000 pregnancies has been recently reported in the United States based on data from the National Inpatient Sample, this discrepancy likely represents the result of ascertaining cases using administrative codes versus diagnostic criteria rather than geographical variation. Overdiagnosis of AFE in administrative data has been identified in studies from a regional surveillance system in Australia that has the capacity to systematically review records for all cases identified from administrative data. By only counting women using a validated case identification system, the reported incidence of AFE decreased from 6.3 to 3.3 cases per 100,000 pregnancies. The largest international study of the epidemiology of AFE suggested a much lower event rate of 0.8 to 1.8 per 100,000 pregnancies, with a lower rate when the SMFM criteria are applied and a higher rate using the more liberal UKOSS criteria.
Risk Factors
Maternal demographic factors, including older age and maternal race or ethnicity, have been associated with AFE in population-based studies. Other obstetric factors such as abnormal placentation, placenta previa, placental abruption, eclampsia, multiple gestation, induction of labor (particularly with prostaglandins), artificial or spontaneous rupture of membranes, fetal demise, and operative delivery have also been associated with AFE. Notably, 66% of women in the US AFE registry had a history of atopy, latex, medication, or food allergy. This potentially may reflect a predilection for immunologic hyperreactivity in patients with AFE.
Because nonreassuring fetal heart rate (FHR) tracings can complicate AFE in labor, cesarean delivery may be a consequence, rather than a cause, of intrapartum AFE. Nonetheless, there was a strong association between cesarean birth and postpartum AFE in the INOSS data set, with an adjusted OR (aOR) of 14.02 ; notably, 61% of women did not labor prior to their cesarean delivery, and 33% of cesarean deliveries complicated by postpartum AFE were elective. In the US registry, of the patients who had a cesarean delivery and AFE, only 27.5% underwent emergency cesarean delivery in response to AFE. Overall these results suggest that the association between cesarean birth and AFE is not solely a consequence of emergency intrapartum cesarean delivery prompted by nonreassuring fetal well-being as a result of maternal hemodynamic collapse.
Despite possible association between AFE and maternal demographic characteristics, obstetric complications, and labor outcomes, the rarity of AFE and the tenuous nature of the described associations means that none of the potentially identified risk factors carry clinical utility for prediction or risk stratification of AFE.
Pathophysiology
In 1941, Steiner and Lushbaugh described eight autopsies after fatal intrapartum shock in which examination of lung tissue revealed embolic material of squamous cells, mucin, meconium, and amorphous eosinophilic material. Because all of these patients were described as having tumultuous labors with stronger than usual uterine contractions, it was presumed that the forceful contractions loosened or tore the placenta and forced the emboli into the maternal circulation. Yet, periods of uterine tachysystole are the least likely times for maternoplacental exchange of embolic material to occur as uterine blood flow ceases. The tachysystole is probably a result of endogenous norepinephrine (noradrenaline) release and, therefore is likely temporally related to, but not causative for, embolic material transfer.
Large intravenous boluses of human meconium suspended in human amniotic fluid can precipitate cardiovascular collapse in rabbits and dogs, but injection of autologous amniotic fluid fails to reproduce the AFE syndrome in many animal models, including primates. Passage of fetal squames, lanugo hair, and mucin into the maternal pelvic vasculature appears to be a common event at term, and fetal material has been identified in pulmonary arterial samples aspirated from critically ill women who did not have AFE. Furthermore, in a goat model of AFE, histopathologic analysis of the lungs after injection of autologous amniotic fluid failed to demonstrate evidence for amniotic debris in 19 of 29 animals. Therefore, the presence of fetal tissue in the lungs is neither sensitive nor specific for the diagnosis of AFE.
The trigger for development of AFE, as well as the pathophysiology driving the associated cardiovascular collapse and coagulopathy, are all unknown. Given that AFE appears to be a systemic inflammatory response, its pathophysiology may include the inappropriate release of endogenous inflammatory mediators, such as arachidonic acid metabolites (i.e., thromboxane, prostaglandins, leukotrienes), although a role for these inflammatory mediators in AFE has not yet been definitively established.
The large proportion of women in AFE registries with a history of allergy or atopy has led to suggestions of an anaphylactoid mechanism. In support of this theory, the symptoms of AFE were blocked by the administration of a leukotriene inhibitor in a rabbit model. However, a series of case reports suggested that levels of tryptase and histamine are not dramatically or universally elevated among women with AFE. While mast cell degranulation may play a role in the pathophysiology of AFE, this may be a secondary product of the inflammatory cascade, rather than causal, and thus the term anaphylactoid syndrome of pregnancy may be a misnomer.
Other immune-mediated mechanisms may be potential mediators of AFE. A case-control study demonstrated low levels of the complement components C3 and C4 among women diagnosed with AFE compared with controls, suggesting that complement activation may also contribute to the inflammatory cascade. Levels of C1 esterase inhibitor (C1INH), a regulator of the complement pathway, have also been shown to be decreased in AFE compared with controls. These studies should be considered preliminary; it is unknown whether complement plays a primary, secondary, or no role in AFE.
Coagulopathy develops in the majority of women who survive initial cardiovascular collapse. In vitro studies using amniotic fluid and viscoelastic testing suggested that amniotic fluid may accelerate thrombin production and increase platelet activation, leading to a consumptive coagulopathy, although the in vivo relevance of these findings has not been established. One proposed mechanism for the coagulopathy in AFE involves tissue factor. As pregnancy progresses, increasing amounts of tissue factor, a potent procoagulant, accumulates in the amniotic fluid. Tissue factor binds factor VII, thus activating the extrinsic pathway and triggering clotting by activating factor X, with the subsequent development of a consumptive coagulopathy. A second possible mechanism is that amniotic fluid has a thromboplastin-like effect, which induces platelet aggregation, releases platelet factor III, and activates the clotting cascade. Other components of amniotic fluid, the amniochorion, and the placenta have also been implicated in contributing to the coagulopathy. Uterine atony, from a specific myometrial depressant or from uterine hypoperfusion, may exacerbate hemorrhage and the consumptive coagulopathy seen in AFE. While these studies suggest that the bleeding seen in AFE is due primarily to a consumptive coagulopathy, conflicting evidence suggests that the coagulopathy may primarily be due to hypofibrinogenemia. Specifically, reports of viscoelastic testing conducted early in AFE suggest that, at least in some cases, the initial coagulopathy may result from isolated hyperfibrinolysis and hypofibrinogenemia.
Clinical Presentation
AFE presents clinically as cardiorespiratory collapse and coagulopathy during labor, immediately postpartum, or very rarely after abdominal trauma or abortion.
AFE most often occurs during labor; intrapartum events comprised 46% of cases in the INOSS registry and 70% of cases in the initial cohort of the US registry. With the caveat that milder cases may not be as reliably reported, severe initial presentations are common: 50% of cases in the INOSS registry presented with cardiac arrest, 67% of cases in an Israeli retrospective study presented with sudden loss of consciousness, and 97% of cases in the US registry presented with hypotension. AFE may also be accompanied by cough, cyanosis, or seizures, and some cases are accompanied by nonspecific premonitory symptoms such as restlessness or agitation. Maternal symptoms may precede FHR changes. Fetal bradycardia, or the abrupt onset of variable decelerations that progress to fetal bradycardia, may also herald AFE in labor ( Fig. 38.2 ).
Fetal Heart Rate Tracing in a Patient With Amniotic Fluid Embolism. Maternal symptoms began just before the onset of spontaneous uterine tachysystole and fetal bradycardia.
Modified from Clark SL, Hankins GDV, Dudley DA, et al. Amniotic fluid embolism: analysis of the national registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1995;172:1158–1167.
Point-of-care echocardiography has established that the cardiovascular collapse that heralds the onset of AFE is typically accompanied, and likely caused, by acute right ventricular failure. While right ventricular failure in AFE is thought to be mediated by acute pulmonary hypertension, the molecular mediators causing increased pulmonary vascular resistance are unknown. Echocardiographic findings include a dilated, akinetic right ventricle and a normally contracting left ventricle with a nearly obliterated cavity. Right ventricular failure results in an underfilled left ventricle, decreased systemic cardiac output, and hypotension.
Patients who survive the initial cardiorespiratory collapse associated with AFE subsequently develop profound coagulopathy. This has classically been described as DIC, and numerous reports document thrombocytopenia with prolonged prothrombin time and aPTT in addition to hypofibrinogenemia or “flatline” viscoelastic testing suggesting global hemostatic failure. More recent reports, however, suggest that hyperfibrinolysis and severe hypofibrinogenemia may be the hallmarks of coagulation failure in AFE, with less prominent decreases in factor V and preservation, at least initially, of other components of the coagulation cascade. It is unclear whether the global hemostatic failure that has been described represents progression of the disease process or a more severe variant of AFE-induced coagulopathy. The coagulopathy described in some cases of AFE is indistinguishable from cases of severe placental abruption. It is unclear whether they share a common inciting mechanism or whether this represents a common pathway in acute obstetric coagulopathy.
Because many of the signs and symptoms of AFE are nonspecific, AFE must be distinguished from other life-threatening causes of cardiovascular collapse in obstetric patients ( Box 38.2 ). In an analysis of cases submitted to the US AFE Registry, obstetric hemorrhage was most commonly misdiagnosed as AFE. While severe obstetric hemorrhage may cause life-threatening hypotension and coagulopathy, it can be distinguished from AFE by the sequence of presentation; massive blood loss precedes cardiovascular collapse in hemorrhage, whereas cardiovascular collapse precedes blood loss in AFE. Furthermore, except in cases of placental abruption, massive blood loss typically precedes development of a coagulopathy in obstetric hemorrhage, whereas a coagulopathy precedes significant blood loss in AFE. Reflecting this, the hemoglobin/ fibrinogen ratio, when assessed early, has been suggested as a potential tool for differentiating AFE from postpartum hemorrhage from other sources. The fibrinogen level often decreases earlier than hemoglobin in AFE, leading to a high hemoglobin/fibrinogen ratio Sepsis is associated with hypotension and can cause both hypoxia and coagulopathy, but typically is insidious in onset and frequently is associated with maternal hyper- or hypothermia. Anaphylaxis can cause hypotension and hypoxia, but is not associated with a coagulopathy and occurs in association with exposure to an allergen. Furthermore, in cases of anaphylaxis, tryptase levels remain elevated 1 to 2 hours following suspected anaphylactic reactions, whereas serum tryptase levels are not elevated in cases of AFE. High neuraxial block can cause hypotension and respiratory compromise, but does not include coagulopathy. While pulmonary or air embolism can cause hypotension and hypoxia, they are not typically associated with coagulopathy. Similarly, hemodynamic collapse from a primary cardiac etiology, such as an acute myocardial infarction, does not present with coagulopathy and typically occurs in the clinical context of patients with known risk factors or recognized cardiac pathology.
Box 38.2
Differential Diagnosis of Amniotic Fluid Embolism
Nonobstetric
-
•
Myocardial infarction
-
•
Pulmonary embolism
-
•
Aspiration
-
•
Sepsis
-
•
Anaphylaxis
-
•
Venous air embolism
Obstetric
-
•
Placental abruption
-
•
Eclampsia
-
•
Uterine rupture or laceration
-
•
Obstetric hemorrhage
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree




