46 Electrical Stimulation
Historical Perspective
Long before the development of modern electricity, “natural electricity” was used for its therapeutic properties of inducing analgesia. In the earliest written description of an electric fish, Aristotle remarked, “The torpedo is known to cause a numbness even in human beings.”1 Perhaps the earliest record of local electrical analgesia was when Scribonius Largusm wrote in circa CE 46 that he advocated piscine “electrotherapy” for the relief of pain.1 Centuries later, in the mid 1740s, the application of an electrical apparatus was first used in medicine by Kratzenstein.1 In 1858, Francis received a patent for an electrical device that he claimed relieved dental pain; he boasted that he had performed 164 successful tooth extractions and that most had resulted in no pain.1
Electrical Stimulation in Modern Medicine
As a physical modality, electrical stimulation has been prescribed to strengthen muscles, promote healing, decrease urinary incontinence, and increase circulation, as well as for pain management.2
Electrical stimulation is a nonpharmacologic and, in most cases, a noninvasive pain-management method that has been promoted for its analgesic properties. It has demonstrated efficacy for a variety of pain conditions including chronic low back pain,3–4 dysmenorrhea,5 hemiplegic shoulder pain,6 and arthritic pain.40
In all three types of electrical stimulation that will be explored in this chapter, an electrical stimulation device is turned on and electrical current is sent through electrodes that are applied to the body causing a tingling sensation and/or muscle contractions in the underlying skin and muscle. This electrical signal disrupts the regular pain signals that are being sent from the affected area to its surrounding nerves. By interrupting this signal pathway, the recipient perceives less pain (see Fig. 46-2).
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES), sometimes known as Electrical Muscle Stimulation (EMS), is often referred to as functional electrical stimulation (FES) when it is used to activate paralyzed muscles in a precise sequence and magnitude so as to directly accomplish functional tasks.6,8 Beyond its neurorehabilitation potential, NMES has shown efficacy in pain management. NMES uses high-intensity electrical stimulation to elicit intermittent contraction and relaxation of proximal muscle fibers and is widely prescribed following surgery and trauma.
Developed in the early 1950s, interferential current (IFC) therapy produces two alternating currents of slightly differing medium frequency using wave interference to create a resultant amplitude of therapeutic stimulation.9 Interferential current therapy is mainly used to relieve pain that is felt in deep tissues. Depending on the configuration of the electrodes applied to the skin, the effects can be localized or adjusted to be more general. Unlike other methods of low-frequency electrical stimulation, IFC encounters low electrical resistance and therefore can penetrate deeply without causing unnecessary discomfort.
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation
TENS is a method of pain relief in which a device transmits low-voltage electrical impulses through electrodes on the skin to an area of the body that is in pain.
Proposed Mechanisms of Pain Control
Research indicates that TENS can be a noninvasive, safe method for managing and reducing both acute and chronic pain. Although a uniform mechanism has not been established, there are a number of theories to explain the modulation of pain associated with TENS. Two main theories on pain transmission are the gate theory and the endorphin theory.10 The gate theory pioneered by Melzack and Wall has been attributed to motivating the development of electrotherapeutic equipment, and the endorphin theory has led to a decrease on the reliance of pain medication for treatment of postoperative pain. An additional theory includes the acupuncture theory, which hypothesizes that management of pain is related to energy lines and its associated acupuncture points.
Gate Theory
The gate theory asserts that stimulation of large, highly myelinated (afferent A-beta fibers) block the transmission of pain signals by relatively small, nociceptive fibers with little or no myelination (A-delta and C fibers) at the level of the spinal cord. Small, unmyelinated C fibers are responsible for chronic, throbbing pain, whereas the thicker A-delta fibers with slight myelination make them more conducive to transmitting faster more intense pain information. It is postulated that electrical stimulation decreases the perception of pain by increasing the activation of A-beta fibers and therefore flooding the pain signal pathway and ‘closing the gate’ of transmission in the spinal cord.11,12 These target cells are located in the substantia gelatinosa (Rexed’s laminae I, II, and IV) of the dorsal horn (Fig. 46-1).11,13
Endorphin Theory
Also known as the opiate-mediated theory, the endorphin theory is based on the discovery of the presence of natural opiates in the body (Fig. 46-2).14,15 Acting as the body’s own natural pain relievers, they are produced in the spinal cord and pituitary gland as enkephalins and beta-endorphins, respectively. These endogenous opiates are effective at decreasing the perception of pain and, in turn, mimicking the action of narcotic drugs. Basic science studies show that high and low-frequency TENS produce their effects by activation of opioid receptors in the central nervous system. High-frequency TENS and low-frequency TENS activate delta-opioid and mu-opioid receptors, respectively, both in the spinal cord and supraspinally (in the medulla). Studies suggest that TENS also stimulates the body’s production of endogenous opiates that interact with specific receptor cites in the central and peripheral nervous systems, thereby blocking the perception of pain.
Cheng and Pomerantz demonstrated that pain relief produced at 4 Hz of stimulation (low frequency) was blocked by the opiate antagonist, naloxone, whereas pain relief induced at 200 Hz was not blocked by naloxone. When administered with a strong, subnoxious intensity at an adequate frequency, TENS has been demonstrated to decrease reliance on pain medication for postoperative pain.16–22
Acupuncture Theory
A lesser-known theory that has been presented as a possible explanation for the ability of TENS to be effective in pain management is the acupuncture theory. Some believe that the use of TENS opens and stimulates common acupuncture points along the same meridians or energy lines used in traditional acupuncture. Acupuncture points can lie on, be adjacent to, or be distant from the site of pain. When applied to these points, TENS is believed to modify the flow of energy or chi resulting in a decrease in pain.23,24 Some theorists propose that hyperirritable spots in the skeletal muscle that are associated with palpable nodules in taut bands of muscle fibers, known as trigger points, can be stimulated by TENS to successfully decrease pain. It is believed that trigger points cause tissue ischemia and that the application of TENS causes vasodilation to occur, which modifies the ischemic area, thereby decreasing pain.25–28
Practical Application
Clinical Use and Application
There are four main types of stimulation (Table 46-1) namely: conventional mode TENS, acupuncture mode TENS, burst or pulse mode TENS, and modulation mode TENS.
Conventional Mode TENS
This mode has high-frequency (40 to 150 Hz) and low intensity (10 to 30 mA) stimulation, with amplitude being adjusted to induce minimal sensory discomfort. Studies have shown it is the most effective type of stimulation. This mode is most useful for neuropathic pain. Patients customarily apply the electrodes and have them in place all day, turning it on for approximately 30-minute intervals throughout the day. This mode activates A-beta and A-alpha nerves that cause interneurons from the substantia gelatinosa to inhibit the transmission of pain by T cells in lamina V neurons of the spinal cord (Table 46-2).
External use only |
Keep from children |
Skin irritation at electrode placement sites |
Avoid water content |
Acupuncture Mode TENS
Characterized as low-frequency (1-10 Hz) and high-intensity (close to the tolerance limit of the patient) stimulation, Acupuncture mode TENS is useful for musculoskeletal pain. It is thought that this mode stimulates C-fibers causing counterirritation. This method is often considered for patients who do not respond to conventional TENS. Acupuncture mode stimulates the hypothalamus which, in turn, causes the release of endogenous opiates, specifically beta-endorphin, evidenced by the fact that the TENS effect can be reversed by naloxone (see Table 46-2).