Core Anesthesiology Skills


Chapter 5
Core Anesthesiology Skills


Meld Process with Intellect


Anesthesiology demands not only medical knowledge and clinical acumen, but also mastery of processes and throughput. As much as we would like to spend your first few months focusing on the medical aspect alone, timeliness and efficiency are inextricable from the curriculum. This is a concept you will likely pick up on day one. Being a successful trainee means recognizing that your intellect is valued, but only in tandem with your ability to keep the system moving. If you can’t show up on time, see your patient, hang the antibiotics, or run a smooth anesthetic, your thoughtful questions about the latest pulmonary function tests (PFTs) will carry less weight. The OR cares equally about knowledge as it does about reliability, efficiency, and punctuality.


Healthcare systems ultimately prioritize two things above all else: financial stability and operational efficiency. These goals often stand in tension with the ideals of patient-centered care: safety, individualized attention, and clinical excellence. That tension is where we come in as anesthesiologists. Because we support the hospital’s most revenue-generating service—surgery—our professional duty to provide meticulous patient care will always clash with institutional pressures to move faster and do more. Our challenge is to protect the patient while aligning these competing goals.


A Strong Foundation in Perioperative Medicine


Perioperative medicine is a multidisciplinary field focused on the assessment, optimization, and quality improvement of patients throughout the entire surgical journey. This domain is largely driven by anesthesiologists and continues to expand. It is critical to develop this perspective early and to keep it up. Your training program will ideally set you off on the path to becoming a perioperative medicine clinician, but all too often I see this being to atrophy once trainees get into the routine of the same few anesthetic techniques. Learn to see the thousand-foot view of the patient, not just the operation in front of you.


Anesthesia is a medical subspecialty. You are the patient’s doctor in the OR. This means understanding the natural disease course of the most common medical afflictions, such as congestive heart failure (CHF), coronary arterial disease (CAD), diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Mastery of these fundamentals is essential not only for your growth as a clinician but for the continued relevance and survival of our specialty. As a trainee, resist the impulse to lean on external consults to piece together your perioperative plan. While surgeons and proceduralists may call on other specialties to justify moving forward with a case, you are ultimately responsible for the patient’s medical optimization.


Before surgery, use your knowledge to act as a bridge between “silos” of care, whatever those may be: surgery clinic, preop, emergency room, ICU, imaging suite, trauma bay, and operating room. For example, if your patient is going to the OR for source control of a septic joint, you are responsible for ensuring that their antibiotic order started in the ER is continued throughout the perioperative phase. You are responsible for seeing that they are on methadone twice daily, and that this should be verified with the patient and continued without interruption to reduce perioperative withdrawal.


It’s important to maintain and grow your knowledge throughout residency and into your career, not just during your training years. If the last day of your training is the last time you open a book, your clinical relevance will be frozen in time. Without continuous learning, you risk becoming a liability to the teams you join and the patients you serve.


Keeping up with the literature is an extremely easy habit. Read about your patient and look up things you are not familiar with. Keeping up with major journals is easy by subscribing to their monthly table of contents. In the era of large language models such as OpenEvidence, you can simply type “summarize the table of contents of the latest issue of JAMA” or “summarize the latest evidence for aprepitant in preventing postoperative nausea vomiting.” Anesthesiology, A&A, CHEST, etc., as well as major medical journals like Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) and New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) are useful to clue you into the major breakthroughs and medical cultural shifts of the time.


Reading about your patients isn’t just essential for delivering quality care (and yes, it’s very obvious when you haven’t); it also immerses you in a wealth of information about chronic diseases and their management.


A personal anecdote: In the early stages of training, mental and physical fatigue made reading feel overwhelming. I struggled with this myself during my CA-1 year, but a low ITE score in my first quarter was the wake-up call I needed to revisit my habits. I carved out dedicated time every night to read and spent just two or three evenings a week with reading material. I found it helpful to use my cases the next day as a template to decide what ITE topics to focus on. I also found that this mental preparation helped me be less anxious at work.


Your patient’s chart is a window into a myriad of learning opportunities. For example, you might read about the patient’s dens fracture and query its anesthetic implications. An ophthalmology note may describe narrow-angle glaucoma, and you can use this as an opportunity to learn about the anesthetic implications of various glaucoma therapies. Each clinical syndrome is a window into an entirely unfamiliar area of medicine. Try to read normal echocardiograms as well as abnormal ones, getting used to the common ranges of various indices such as left ventricle end-diastolic volume, etc. This allows you to be an informed consumer of a test you will read a million times over. In doing so, you can grade your patients on a spectrum that is more than just “the echo was fine” or “the EF was low.”


Take, for example, a patient presenting for a colectomy with heart failure. In an aspirational scenario, you understand her specific subtype of heart failure (systolic vs diastolic) and its underlying etiology, be it ischemic, rheumatic, restrictive, or amyloid related. You know her current level of exercise tolerance and are up to date on recent evaluations, including cardiac catheterization, echocardiography, and stress testing. You’ve reviewed the 2024 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines and determined that she is appropriately optimized. You’re familiar with the components of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) and their perioperative implications.


You’ve reviewed her physical exam and imaging to assess for signs of volume overload. Drawing on your cardiac rotation experience, you recognize key symptoms that could point to decompensated heart failure in the perioperative setting—cold extremities, altered mental status, oliguria, acidosis, and hypotension. You also have a working understanding of how inotropes differ from pressors, including which receptors each class targets.


You might think your attending wants a step-by-step list of drugs and IV sizes. Wrong! What they actually want is to see that you have a solid foundation of clinical knowledge and an awareness of potential complications. You can’t manage what you don’t understand. That starts with mastering the basics of clinical medicine.


Adaptability


The ability to adapt to unexpected clinical circumstances is our most specialty-distinguishing feature. The challenge of anesthesiology training is learning how to adapt to scenarios that require balancing conflicting goals, complications, and clinical extremes. This is your value proposition to the healthcare system.


Your treatment plan must take into consideration changes in location, transport, surgical conditions, and time constraints. A patient with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) presenting for open reduction of a hip fracture after being found down at home is a far more complex challenge than one with DKA already optimized on the medical ward. In the former, you’re tasked with simultaneously managing their DKA, providing safe anesthesia, and investigating the underlying cause of their “found down” status: whether it’s a coronary event, stroke, infection, or another acute process.


There are limits to our adaptability, and these limits are largely intuitive.


Table 5.1 highlights a few scenarios where our adaptability has boundaries. Our patients depend on your ability to draw these lines. Our patients rely on your judgment here. I’ve noticed that frustration often arises when trainees lean too far in either direction: some become overly accommodating to surgical requests, while others are rigid to the point of impeding care. Both of these scenarios are easy to avoid. When in doubt, especially when you’re being asked to adjust your plan, it’s always wise to check in with your supervisor.


Table 5.1 A few common examples help distinguish adaptable conditions from nonadaptable ones.




































Clinical example Adaptability consideration Adaptability guardrails
Difficulties with single-lung ventilation in a patient with coexisting severe chronic respiratory failure and limited cardiopulmonary reserve. Most patients will tolerate permissive respiratory acidosis, as well as temporary periods of permissive hypoxemia (SpO2>88%).

Proceeding with these maneuvers for prolonged periods of time is not advisable, particularly in patients at elevated risk for end-organ ischemia (CAD, CKD, peripheral arterial disease, recent stroke, etc.).


This “permissive” approach would similarly be contraindicated if the patient with pulmonary hypertension (PH), as hypoxemia and hypercarbia can lead to a PH crisis.


During these extremes, it might be necessary to periodically check ABGs to assess the level of acidosis and maintain continuous communication with the surgeon regarding the patient’s status. Occasionally, re-inflating both lungs may be necessary to achieve both (1) surgical success and (2) stable oxygenation.

A surgeon requests to limit pressor use for concerns about perfusion to an anastomosis of a difficult microsurgical head and neck flap. It is reasonable to accommodate some level of surgical preference, provided that you are keeping the patient within reasonable bounds of hydration and perfusion. It’s important to establish shared goals: MAP target, urine output, and acid/base status.

The patient’s perfusion status is ultimately your responsibility, and while we can adapt to surgical preferences, the limits of patient safety are up to us. Tolerating significant oliguria or a MAP below 65 in a patient at risk for myocardial ischemia or with a recent stroke is unsafe.


Hemodynamic parameters should take into consideration disease states and the patient’s baseline blood pressure. A patient with chronic hypertension is a poor candidate for permissive hypotension.

Anesthesia for MRI in an obese patient who is hospitalized with bowel obstruction with new onset of lower extremity weakness. The patient is on 4 L of oxygen via nasal cannula.

For patients who are claustrophobic or in pain, anesthesia for MRI can provide significant relief for the patient and greatly assist the medical team in achieving a timely diagnosis.


In this case, you are sacrificing physical proximity to the patient, resulting in a more logistically complex and potentially delayed response to adverse events such as hypotension, airway emergencies, or unexpected patient movement.


Adaptation to your anesthetic in this case would involve using extension tubing, pre-prepared emergency medications, and a well-defined action plan that accounts for MRI-safe resuscitation equipment and logistical constraints.


You should have one other capable person who can help with hands-on tasks, including calling for help.


In off-site cases such as MRI, it is critical for the anesthesiologist to establish safety guardrails.


Regardless of how cumbersome, all anesthetics require a full set of ASA monitors, suction, and rescue airway equipment. A stretcher, an Ambu bag, and freestanding O2 are always needed.


An unprotected airway comes with additional risk in cases outside the operating room. In this patient, you should ignore pressure from the primary team or radiologist to “just try some sedation,” and trust your instincts that a secure airway is needed. Only you can appreciate the serious risk of aspiration and limited ability to resuscitate in an MRI, in a patient who is likely to have limited pulmonary reserve.


Discussing general anesthesia may trigger a larger conversation about this patient, particularly given their poor respiratory status. Challenging conversations like this one are part and parcel to anesthetic care, since we frequently deal with very sick patients requiring imaging or other noninvasive procedures during critical illness or end-of-life.

The surgical team desires a “dry” operative field during a hepatectomy, requesting no fluid administration until the specimen is removed. Anesthesia for hepatectomy can be easily accomplished with minimal fluid, provided you maintain an adequate mean arterial pressure with a phenylephrine drip. Once the specimen is removed, you can rehydrate the patient. Most patients tolerate this period of temporary hypovolemia and pressor use, and the surgical benefits are real.

You should take into consideration comorbid conditions that might make hypovolemia especially dangerous in this patient. For example, if the patient had hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM), this approach would be unsafe.


This approach would also be unwise for a complex hepatectomy in a malnourished patient with advanced cancer.


The use of a “dry technique” should be reassessed periodically. What may be acceptable at 10 a.m. in a patient with adequate urine output may no longer be appropriate by 3 p.m., particularly in the context of anuria, prolonged open abdominal surgery, and escalating vasopressor requirements. In such situations, it is your responsibility to communicate with the surgeon—and your attending—that the anesthetic approach must be adjusted to accommodate the evolving clinical status.

The surgical team requests deliberate hypotension during auricular (middle ear) surgery.

Deliberate hypotension may be requested to reduce bleeding in orthopedic procedures, regardless of evidence suggesting it may have risks that outweigh its benefits.


For head and neck procedures in small orifices, BP reduction may improve operating conditions. This may be achieved using short-acting arterial vasodilators, remifentanil, or short-acting beta blockade. It is less ideal to use drugs that cause venodilation, such as nitroprusside or nitroglycerin, since these might increase venous engorgement at the site of surgery.


You should not negotiate low BP in a patient with recent stroke, severe peripheral vascular disease, mesenteric ischemia, recent kidney injury, or significant cardiac risk factors. In these patients, even short periods of hypotension can hypo-perfuse “watershed” areas of blood flow and lead to ischemic events.


In orthopedic cases, your adaptability should be accompanied by an increase in monitoring and frequent assessment of urine output and acid/base status.

General anesthesia without airway (“GAWA”)

GA is usually performed with a protected airway. However, some short procedures are amenable to deep planes of anesthesia while retaining a natural airway and spontaneous ventilation. Such cases include: upper and lower endoscopy, lymph node or bone marrow biopsy, lumpectomy, hernia repair, and pediatric procedural sedation.


“GAWA” requires adapting to somewhat suboptimal ventilatory conditions, but ones that are satisfactory and well tolerated by most patients for short procedures.


This anesthetic is a luxury that not every patient can tolerate.


First, it requires that you maintain adequate spontaneous ventilation. This is nonnegotiable.


It requires a higher level of vigilance than any other type of anesthetic, both to maintain ventilation and to prevent and treat airway obstruction. It may require rapid titrations to keep the patient still enough to tolerate the stimulation of the procedure.


This balancing act is unsafe for many patients: those with aspiration risk, severe obesity, difficult airway, extremes of age, brittle physiologic states, pulmonary hypertension, and bowel obstruction or intra-abdominal process. It may also not be safe in patients who are acutely ill.


Your skill lies in knowing when to extricate the convenience factor and put patient safety first.

An 81-year-old female with cardiac risk factors and a recent positive stress test presents for resection of a bleeding bladder tumor.

A cardiac catheterization and subsequent dual-antiplatelet therapy may be unrealistic in some patients who present for nonemergent but clearly nonelective surgical resections.


A discussion with the patient’s cardiologist, surgeon, and you may result in a decision to proceed with surgery without further investigation of her myocardial viability (i.e., a stress test). In doing so, you have weighed the risks of delaying the surgery with the risks of a postoperative myocardial event.


Your anesthetic will have to account for adequate hemodynamics, avoidance of extremes of blood pressure, beta-blockade, and close postoperative monitoring. You will counsel the patient as well as the surgical team on your plan.


A preoperative decision is not immutable. If the patient develops new symptoms (chest pain, shortness of breath) or shows new EKG changes, the plan must be reassessed accordingly.


Effective hemodynamic control requires that her underlying cardiac conditions (hypertension, hyperlipidemia, atrial fibrillation) and respiratory disease (COPD) be reasonably optimized prior to surgery to minimize perioperative risk. Accepting the risk of a coronary event does not justify lowering vigilance in other domains.


If the surgeon is generally hesitant about using epidurals, this may be a case worth advocating for one. Improved postoperative pain control reduces myocardial oxygen demand, thereby lowering cardiac risk. In this context, you’re not simply requesting a change; you’re inviting the surgeon to adapt in a way that aligns both of your goals.


You’ll learn over time which rules have flexibility and which lines must never be crossed. Early in your training, stay especially alert to situations that push you outside your comfort zone, particularly when plans change on the fly.


For example, it can be frustrating to hear that a trainee gave “a little bit of paralysis” during a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) case simply because the surgeon asked. While this might be a reasonable adjustment in some cases, it’s still an off-label move that warrants discussion and approval beforehand.


Another example: a common occurrence during your first year will be managing hypoxemia during laparoscopic surgery, particularly in a steep Trendelenburg position. I see residents frequently jump immediately toward asking to reduce insufflation pressures, confident that this is the only technique available. In reality, most of the time, the issue can be resolved with basic maneuvers: increasing positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), alveolar recruitment maneuver, and checking to ensure the tube is not mainstemmed. We can also tolerate some degree of ventilatory restriction. When the issue occurs, assume first that you can do something to optimize the patient, and ask for help from your attending. Managerial overconfidence is not a core skill for any anesthesiologist, much less a trainee.

Oct 11, 2026 | Posted by in ANESTHESIA | Comments Off on Core Anesthesiology Skills

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access