Abstract
Descriptions of disasters and their psychological impact as severe trauma on humans appear in ancient literature, such as Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey, and various religious texts. The historian Herodotus, in the sixth century BC, described a soldier who suffered from permanent blindness after he witnessed the death of a fellow soldier. More recently, soldiers who fought in the civil war suffered from a set of physical and emotional symptoms known as “Soldier’s Heart” or Da Costa’s syndrome, a possible predecessor of what we now refer to as post-traumatic stress disorder. While most disaster victims do not develop psychopathology, depending on the intensity and severity of the trauma, many survivors suffer from varying degrees of emotional problems. The common post-disaster psychiatric disorders are post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), major depression, and alcohol use disorder.1 Although disaster-related emotional traumas have been known for years, the clinical evaluation and treatment of these traumas within the disaster situation are relatively recent developments. Modern disaster psychiatry dates back to the 1942 “Cocoanut Grove” nightclub fire in Boston which killed 492 people and left a community in grief. Erich Lindeman,2 Stanley Cobb,3 and Alexander Adler4 published papers describing the psychiatric complications, symptomatology, and the management of acute grief related to this event.
Descriptions of disasters and their psychological impact as severe trauma on humans appear in ancient literature, such as Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey, and various religious texts. The historian Herodotus, in the sixth century BC, described a soldier who suffered from permanent blindness after he witnessed the death of a fellow soldier. More recently, soldiers who fought in the civil war suffered from a set of physical and emotional symptoms known as “Soldier’s Heart” or Da Costa’s syndrome, a possible predecessor of what we now refer to as post-traumatic stress disorder. While most disaster victims do not develop psychopathology, depending on the intensity and severity of the trauma, many survivors suffer from varying degrees of emotional problems. The common post-disaster psychiatric disorders are post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), major depression, and alcohol use disorder.1 Although disaster-related emotional traumas have been known for years, the clinical evaluation and treatment of these traumas within the disaster situation are relatively recent developments. Modern disaster psychiatry dates back to the 1942 “Cocoanut Grove” nightclub fire in Boston which killed 492 people and left a community in grief. Erich Lindeman,2 Stanley Cobb,3 and Alexander Adler4 published papers describing the psychiatric complications, symptomatology, and the management of acute grief related to this event.
There are several definitions of disaster. The definition offered by WHO is as follows: a “severe disruption, ecological and psychosocial, which greatly exceeds the coping capacity of the affected community.”5 There are different types of disasters based on etiology. Disaster may be caused by natural events, also known as “Acts of God” (e.g. flood, typhoon, tsunami, earthquake), by accidents or technological malfunctions (e.g. aircraft crash or power plant explosion), or by deliberate acts of human with ill-motives (e.g. gun-violence or terrorism). The frequency of disasters is increasing, which can be attributed to changes in climate, geopolitical situations, increasing use of technology, etc. According to EM-DAT, an emergency disaster database maintained by the Office of US Foreign Disaster Assistance (OFDA), natural disasters are steadily increasing in recent decades. This increase is both due to natural (e.g. climate change) and man-made factors (e.g. population movements, unplanned urbanization, deforestation, etc.). While better disaster preparedness and prevention programs have reduced the number of deaths from natural disasters, more people are left injured or displaced by the disasters.6 These facts underscore the need for increased involvement of health care professionals in the disaster relief.
Mental health professionals are becoming increasingly active within disaster response. More than 700 psychiatrists responded to the 9/11 attacks (Disaster Psychiatry Outreach, personal communication, 2010). Following the earthquake and tsunami in the Indian Ocean, hurricane Katrina in 2005, and the earthquake in Haiti in 2010, psychiatrists continued to volunteer in disaster relief. In the aftermath of the Newtown shooting disaster, under the leadership of Connecticut Psychiatric Society, more than 50 psychiatrists served, all together providing over 400 hours service. Mental health professionals can play important roles in various areas, as such, their participation in disaster relief should be encouraged. However, they should be aware that disaster psychiatry is not the same as trauma psychiatry, particularly in the immediate aftermath of disaster. The emphasis of disaster psychiatry is normality of responses not psychopathology. The primary focus is helping the population of high-risk groups, rather than individual treatment modalities. Disaster psychiatry aims to promote the overall medical health status of an affected community. It facilitates application and management of post-disaster aid (human services needs, financial, etc.) Disaster psychiatry is not an office-based practice, and disaster survivors with whom the provider interacts are not generally defined as “patients.” Though disasters can lead to decompensation in stable psychiatric patients, many individuals who might benefit from mental health support are in fact experiencing normal reactions to extraordinary circumstances. Often the psychiatric presentations (“symptoms”) in disaster survivors do not reach the threshold of psychiatric diagnostic criteria (“syndrome”). The skills required early on in disaster response, therefore, differ from those used in traditional trauma treatment. In addition, a mental health professional volunteering in a disaster situation may be asked to play other unusual roles, such as performing administrative, consultative, educational, and general medical duties.
Before committing to relief efforts, health professionals should be affiliated with a recognized organization, aware of major issues impacting those affected by disasters and knowledgeable about the appropriate intervention. There should be a clear understanding of the concerted purpose, and of one’s own motivation for responding. Responders themselves should be in good health to operate in a variety of circumstances, and should be careful not to become a burden to the relief effort.
Phases of Disaster
It is generally accepted that there are three phases of response and recovery after a disaster hits a community:
1. Impact: first 24–48 hours of acute phase (hours to days)
2. Acute: Extends up to 2 months after the event
3. Post-acute: 2 months after the event and beyond (weeks to months and years).
Appropriate preparation for disaster should begin before the disaster hits a community (pre-disaster). The mental health intervention should begin as soon as possible in the acute phase and should continue in the post-acute phase and beyond.
Pre-Disaster Preparation
In the pre-disaster phase, prospective disaster-relief mental health workers should devote themselves to understanding the logistical issues related to disaster response and relief activities. They should familiarize themselves with the roles of different disaster response organizations, as well as the roles of the persons within an organization’s hierarchy of response. If possible they should be involved in hospital/clinic disaster planning at their own institutions by being a part of the institution’s emergency management committee. They should educate members in the emergency management committee regarding possible mental health consequences of disaster victims, and consider the welfare of individuals with serious mental illnesses in a disaster. Before being deployed for disaster relief, it is important for the health professional to be familiar with the characteristics of the affected community, including its strengths, weaknesses, and cultural characteristics.
Appropriate measures should be in place to meet the responder’s own medical needs. Disaster responders are not immune to disaster-related stress. Leaving behind family members to go on an assignment can be very stressful. In addition, staying in a shelter with others, working in an unfamiliar and challenging setting with an unfamiliar culture or population, language barriers, and exposure to traumatic situations and/or stories can all add to the stress.
Effects of Trauma
One has to keep in mind that most disaster victims do not develop psychopathology. According to National Comorbidity Survey the rate of lifetime history of exposure to atleast one traumatic event is 60.7% in men and 51.2% in women; exposure to a second trauma is between 25% and 50%. The prevalence of PTSD in the general population is 1.3% (DSM III), 8–9% (DSM III R, DSM IV); women are affected two times more than men. Since there is significant change in the diagnostic criteria of PTSD in DSM 5, the prevalence rate may be different now.
“Stress theory” generally assumes that external demands, (e.g. the traumatic events) as primary stressors evoke responses that draw on inner or external resources. Loss of resources, in either concrete (social, financial) or symbolic (beliefs, expectations) ways, may significantly impact the recovery trajectory.7 In addition to a psychological reaction to the exposure to trauma, genetics and neurobiology all play a part in long-term psychopathology caused by trauma. Dysregulation of stress hormone, neuropeptide Y, pre-cortical executive function, amygdala, hippocampal, and HPA axis function,8 and over-consolidation of fear-related (emotional) memory may all be associated with psychopathology caused by trauma.