• Alon P. Winnie, MD

        INTRODUCTION

Caudal anesthesia was first described at the turn of last century by two French physicians, Fernand Cathelin and Jean-Athanase Sicard. The technique predated the lumbar approach to epidural block by several years.’ Caudal anesthesia, however, did not gain in popularity immediately following its inception. One of the major reasons caudal anesthesia was not embraced arose from the wide variety of arrangements of sacral bones encountered in the general population and the consequent high failure rate associated with attempts to locate the sacral hiatus. The failure rate of 5% to 10% made caudal epidural anesthesia unpopular until a resurgence of interest occurred in the 1940s led by Hingson and colleagues, who used it primarily in obstetrical anesthesia. Caudal epidural anesthesia has many applications, including surgical anesthesia in children and adults, as well as the management of acute and chronic pain conditions. Success rate of 98% to 100% can be achieved in infants and young children before the age of puberty, as well as in lean adults.¹ The technique of caudal epidural block in pain management has been greatly enhanced by the use of fluoroscopic guidance and epidurography, in which high success rates can be attained. Unfortunately, clinical indications, and especially therapeutic interventions for the relief of chronic pain in individuals with failed back surgery syndrome, are often most prevalent in patients with difficult caudal landmarks. It has been suggested that traditional lumbar peridural block should not be attempted employing an approach requiring needle placement through a spinal surgery scar, due to the likelihood of tearing the dura and the possibility of inducing hematoma formation over the cauda equina when blood from the procedure gets trapped between the layers of scar and connective tissues.² Under these circumstances, it is recommended that fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural block be performed in lieu of the traditional approach. The second resurgence in popularity of caudal anesthesia has paralleled the increasing need to find safe alternatives to conventional lumbar epidural block in selected patient populations, such as individuals with failed back surgery syndrome.

Figure 15-1. A: Skeletal model demonstrating the sacral hiatus and its relationship to the coccyx and sacrum. The fifth inferior articular processes project caudally and flank the sacral hiatus as sacral cornuae. B: Skeletal specimen viewed from inferior to the sacral hiatus. The hiatus is seen as the oval shaped opening at the 12 o’clock position in the photograph. C: Skeletal specimen of the sacrum viewed from craniad to caudad demonstrating the five dorsal foramina, situated bilaterally. D: Skeletal specimen of the sacrum demonstrating the ventral sacral surface. Note the five bilateral intervertebral foramina, paired on either side of the midline, defined by the retention screws used to hold the specimen together.

        ANATOMIC CONSIDERATIONS

The sacrum is a large triangularly shaped bone formed by the fusion of the five sacral vertebrae. It has a blunted, caudal apex that articulates with the coccyx. Its superior, wide base articulates with the fifth lumbar vertebra at the lumbosacral angle (Figure 15-1A-D). Its dorsal surface is convex and has a raised interrupted median crest with four (sometimes three) spinous tubercles representing fused sacral spines. Flanking the median crest, the posterior surface is formed by fused laminae. Lateral to the median crest, four pairs of dorsal foramina lead into the sacral canal through intervertebral foraminae, each of which transmits the dorsal ramus of a sacral spinal nerve (see Figure 15-1B). Below the fourth (or third) spinous tubercle an arched sacral hiatus is identified in the posterior wall of the sacral canal, due to the failure of the fifth pair of laminae to meet, exposing the dorsal surface of the fifth sacral vertebral body. The caudal opening of the canal is the sacral hiatus (see Figure 15-1 and B), roofed by the firm elastic membrane, the sacrococcygeal ligament, which is an extension of the ligamentum flavum. The fifth inferior articular processes project caudally and flank the sacral hiatus as sacral cornuae, connected to the coccygeal cornua by intercornual ligaments.

        The sacral canal is formed by the sacral vertebral foramina and is triangular in shape. It is a continuation of the lumbar spinal canal. Each lateral wall presents four intervertebral foramina, through which the canal is contiguous with the pelvic and dorsal sacral foramina. The posterior sacral foramina are smaller than their anterior counterparts. The sacral canal contains the cauda equina (including the filum terminale) and the spinal meninges. Near its midlevel (typically the middle one third of S2, but varying from the midpoint of SI to the midpoint of S3) the subarachnoid and subdural spaces cease to exist, and the lower sacral spinal roots and filum terminale pierce the arachnoid and dura maters.^3,4 The lowest margin of the filum terminale emerges at the sacral hiatus and traverses the dorsal surface of the fifth sacral vertebra and the sacrococcygeal joint to reach the coccyx. The fifth spinal nerves also emerge through the hiatus medial to the sacral cornua. The sacral canal contains the epidural venous plexus, which generally terminates at S4, but which may continue more caudally. Most of these vessels are concentrated in the anteriolateral portion of the canal. The remainder of the sacral canal is filled with adipose tissue, which is subject to an age-related decrease in its density. This change may be responsible for the transition from the predictable spread of local anesthetics administered for caudal anesthesia in children to the limited and unpredictable segmental spread seen in adults.⁵

Clinical Pearls

        Considerable variability occurs in sacral hiatus anatomy among individuals of seemingly similar backgrounds, race, and stature.¹ As individuals age, the overlying ligaments and the cornua thicken significantly. The hiatal margins often defy recognition by even skilled fingertips. The practical problems related to caudal anesthesia are mainly attributable to wide anatomic variations in size, shape, and orientation of the sacrum. Trotter³ summarized the major anatomic variations of the sacrum. The sacral hiatus may be almost closed, asymmetrically open, or widely open secondary to anomalies in the pattern of fusion of the laminae of the sacral arches. Sacral spina bifida was noted in about 2% of males, and in 0.3% of females. The anteroposterior depth of the sacral canal may vary from less than 2 mm to greater than 1 cm. Individuals with sacral canals having anteroposterior diameters less than about 3 mm may not be able to accommodate anything larger than a 21-gauge needle (5% of the population).¹ Additionally, the lateral width of the sacral canal varies significantly. Since the depth and width of the canal may vary, the volume of the canal itself may also vary. Trotter found that sacral volumes varied between 12 and 65 mL, with a mean volume of 33 mL.³ A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study in 37 adult patients found the volume (excluding the foramina and dural sac) to be 14.4 mL, with a range of 9.5 to 26.6 mL.⁶ Patients with smaller capacities may not be able to accommodate the typical volumes of local anesthetics administered for epidural anesthesia via the caudal route. In a cadaver study of 53 specimens, the mean distance between the tip of the dural sac and the upper edge of the sacral hiatus as denoted by the sacrococcygeal membrane was 45 mm, with a range of 16 to 75 mm.³ In the MRI study mentioned earlier, the mean distance was found to be 60.5mm, with a range of 34 to 80 mm.⁶ The sacrococcygeal membrane could not be identified in 10.8% of subjects using MRI.⁶ A recent anatomic evaluation of 92 isolated sacra found that 42% of cases had both a hiatus and cornu; 4% of the cases showed an absent hiatus. The apex of the sacral hiatus, in that study, was noted in 64% of cases to exist at the S4 level. The hiatus was closed in 3% of cases.⁷

        The sacral foramina afford anatomic passages that permit the spread of injected solutions such as local anesthetics and adjuvants (see Figure 15-1C and D). The posterior sacral foramina are essentially sealed by the multifidus and sacrospinalis muscles, but the anterior foramina are unobstructed by muscles and ligaments, permitting ready egress of solutions through them.⁸ The sacral curvature also varies substantially.⁹ This variability tends to be more pronounced in males than in females. The clinical significance of this finding is that a noncurving epidural needle will more likely pass easily into the canal of females than males. The angle between the axis of the lumbar canal and the sacral canal varies between 7 and 70 degrees in subjects with marked lordosis. The clinical implication of this finding is that the cephalad flow of caudally injected solutions may be more limited in lordotic patients with exaggerated lumbosacral angles than in those with flatter lumbosacral angles, in whom the axes of the lumbar and sacral canals are more closely aligned.

        INDICATIONS FOR CAUDAL EPIDURAL BLOCK

The indications for caudal epidural block are essentially the same as those for lumbar epidural block, but its use may be preferred when sacral nerve spread of anesthetics and adjuvants is preferred over lumbar nerve spread. The unpredictability of ascertaining consistent cephalad spread of anesthetics administered through the caudal canal limits the usefulness of this technique when it is essential to provide lower thoracic and upper abdominal neuraxial blockade. Though this modality is described for perioperative use (diminishing role) and for managing chronic pain in adults (increasing role), it is essential to recognize that caudal block has an extremely wide range of applicability (Table 15-1 ).^10–13

Clinical Pearls

Other newer indications in adults bear special mention and will be described later, including the performance of percutaneous epidural neuroplasty;^14,15 the use of caudal analgesia following lumbar spinal surgery;¹⁶ caudal analgesia after emergency orthopedic lower extremity surgery;¹⁷ administering local anesthetic adjuvants for postoperative analgesia;¹⁸ and caudal block for performing neurolysis for intractable cancer pain.¹⁹

        THE TECHNIQUE OF CAUDAL EPIDURAL BLOCK

The technique of caudal epidural block involves palpation, identification and puncture.¹ Patients are evaluated for any epidural block, and the indications and relative and absolute contraindications to its performance are identical. A full complement of noninvasive monitors is applied, and baseline vital signs are assessed. One must decide whether a continuous or single-shot technique will be employed. For continuous techniques, a Tuohy-type needle with a lateral facing orifice is preferred.

Patient Positioning

Several positions can be used in adults, compared with the lateral decubitus position in neonates and children. The lateral position is efficacious in pediatrics because it permits easy access to the airway when general anesthesia or heavy sedation has been administered prior to performing the block. In pediatric patients, blocks may be performed with the patient fully anesthetized; the same is not recommended for older children and adults. In adults, the prone position is the most frequently utilized, but the lateral decubitus position or the knee-chest (also known as knee-elbow) position may be employed. In the prone position, the procedure table or operating room table should be flexed, or a pillow may be placed beneath the symphysis pubis and iliac crests to produce slight flexion of the hips. This maneuver makes palpation of the caudal canal easier. The legs are separated with the heels rotated outward to smooth out the upper part of the anal cleft while relaxing the gluteal muscles. For placement of caudal epidural block in the parturient, the woman is in the lateral (Sim position) or in the knee-elbow position.

Anatomic Landmarks

A dry gauze swab is placed in the anal cleft to protect the anal area and genitalia from povidone-iodine (Betadine) or other disinfectants (especially alcohol) used to sterilize the skin. The skin folds of the buttocks are useful guides in locating the underlying sacral hiatus. Alternatively, a triangle may be marked on the skin over the sacrum, using the posterior superior iliac spines (PSIS) as the base, with the apex pointing inferiorly (caudally). Normally, this apex sits over or immediately adjacent to the sacral hiatus. The hiatus is marked and the tip of the index finger is placed on the tip of the coccyx in the natal cleft while the thumb of the same hand palpates the two sacral cornua located 3-4 cm more rostrally at the upper end of the natal cleft. The sacral cornua may be identified by gently moving the palpating index finger from side to side (Figure 15-2). The palpating thumb should sink into the hollow between the two cornua, as if between two knuckles of a fist.¹ A sterile skin preparation and draping of the entire region is performed in the usual fashion.

Technique

A small-gauge 1.5-in. needle is then utilized to infiltrate the skin over the sacral hiatus using 3-5 mL of 1-1.5% plain lidocaine HC1 (Figures 15-3 through 15-5). If fluoroscopy is utilized, a lateral view is obtained to demonstrate the anatomic boundaries of the sacral canal. We routinely leave the local anesthetic infiltration needle in situ for this view, since it demonstrates whether the approach is at the appropriate level for subsequent advancement of the epidural needle. With fluoroscopy, the caudal canal appears as a translucent layer posterior to the sacral segments (Figure 15-6). The median sacral crest is visualized as an opaque line posterior to the caudal canal. The sacral hiatus is usually visualized as a translucent opening at the base of the caudal canal. The coccyx may be seen articulating with the inferior surface of the sacrum.

Figure 15-2. Technique of palpating the midline over the sacral hiatus. The palpating index and middle fingers are spread over the fifth sacral vertebral body. The sacrococcygeal ligament lies directly beneath the palpating fingers.

Figure 15-3. Technique of skin infiltration using a fine-bore needle and local anesthetic. The needle is inserted first above, and then into the substance of the sacrococcygeal ligament.

Figure 15-4. The fine-bore needle has been left in place, having engaged the sacrococcygeal ligament.

Figure 15-5. A longer, firmer infiltration needle for local anesthetic injection is now advanced through the sacrococcygeal ligament to anesthetize that structure and the overlying subcutaneous tissues.

        Once the tissues overlying the hiatus have been anesthetized, a 17- or 18-gauge Tuohy-type needle is inserted either in the midline or, using a lateral approach, into the caudal canal (Figures 15-7 and 15-8). A feeling of a slight “snap” may be appreciated when the advancing needle pierces the sacrococcygeal ligament. Once the needle reaches the ventral wall of the sacral canal, it is slowly withdrawn and reoriented, directing it more cranially (by depressing the hub and advancing) for further insertion into the canal (Figure 15-9). We utilize the anteroposterior view once the epidural needle is safely situated within the confines of the canal, and the epidural catheter is advanced cephalad. In this projection, the intermediate sacral crests appear as opaque vertical lines on either side of the midline. The sacral foramina are visualized as translucent and nearly circular areas lateral to the intermediate sacral crests. The presence of intestinal gas may obfuscate the recognition of these structures. A syringe loaded with either air or saline containing a small air bubble is attached to the needle, and the loss-of-resistance technique is used to establish entry into the epidural space.

Figure 15-6. Lateral fluoroscopic image depicting the 17-gauge extracatheter device correctly seated in the caudal epidural space.

Figure 15-7. The 17-gauge needle has been advanced from the skin into the sacral hiatus through the sacrococcygeal ligament. Usually, when fluoroscopy is not available to verify correct needle placement, a syringe loaded with air or saline is attached to the needle and the loss-of-resistance technique is employed to identify the epidural space, as for conventional lumbar or cervical epidural injections.

Clinical Pearls

Related posts:

Regional Anesthesia in the Patient with Preexisting Neurologic Disease. The History of Local Anesthesia. Stimulating Catheters. Ultrasound-Assisted Nerve Blocks in Adults. Cutaneous Blocks for the Upper Extremity. Cervical Plexus Block.

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Join