Cardiac Arrhythmias, Pacing, Cardioversion, and Defibrillation in the Critical Care Setting



KEY POINTS








  • Correct diagnoses and understanding of arrhythmia mechanisms are crucial to successful arrhythmia management.



  • The hemodynamic effects of an arrhythmia are important in developing an appropriate treatment strategy.



  • Predisposing conditions and reversible causes should be recognized and corrected.



  • Knowledge of antiarrhythmics for prophylaxis, acute management, and long-term management are necessary for successful arrhythmia management.



  • The proarrhythmic potential of antiarrhythmic drugs must be recognized and preventative measures should be taken whenever possible.



  • Knowledge of antiarrhythmic drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics and the impact of multisystem organ disease on these parameters are important in preventing drug toxicity.



  • The intensivist should be skilled in the implantation of temporary pacing systems, external cardioversion, and defibrillation.



  • Role of cardiac pacing, electrical cardioversion, and defibrillation should be clear to physicians managing patients with arrhythmias.



  • Recognition of malfunctioning temporary and permanent implantable pacemakers or cardioverter defibrillators is crucial in the management of patients with such devices.




Cardiac arrhythmias are common in the critical care setting. Many arrhythmias detected are benign, may occur in healthy individuals and require no investigation or treatment, for example, sinus tachycardia, sinus bradycardia, Mobitz type I second-degree AV block or premature atrial and ventricular beats. At times, the arrhythmia may be the clue to a sick patient, such as sinus tachycardia in a patient developing sepsis or atrial fibrillation due to a pulmonary embolus. Correct diagnosis and understanding arrhythmia mechanisms as well as knowledge of antiarrhythmic drug pharmacology and nonpharmacologic therapies of arrhythmias are crucial for successful arrhythmia management. This chapter focuses on the mechanisms, investigation, and management of the most common, clinically significant arrhythmias encountered.






TACHYARRHYTHMIAS





MECHANISMS



Tachycardia mechanisms have been classified as due to abnormalities of impulse formation or impulse conduction.1-3 Abnormalities of impulse formation may be due to normal automaticity, abnormal automaticity or triggered activity occurring within atrial or ventricular muscle tissue or the specialized conduction system (Fig. 36-1A).1,3 Natural pacemaker cells are found in the sinus node, parts of the atria, the atrioventricular node, and the His-Purkinje system. These cells exhibit phasic spontaneous depolarization during diastole, resulting in an action potential when the threshold potential is reached.1 Although in the normal heart, the sinus node is the dominant pacemaker, subsidiary pacemakers may become dominant under certain conditions, for example, sympathetic stimulation or digitalis toxicity (Fig. 36-1). Normal atrial and ventricular muscle maintains a high negative resting potential (−90 mV) and only depolarizes when stimulated. Under certain pathophysiologic conditions, for example, electrolyte abnormalities or ischemia, the resting membrane potential may decrease (−60 mV) and cells may now spontaneously depolarize.




FIGURE 36-1


Mechanisms of cardiac arrhythmias—enhanced or abnormal automaticity, triggered activity or reentry. A. The rate of phase 4 depolarization may increase causing the myocardial cell to reach the threshold potential (TP) earlier and spontaneously depolarize. In diseased tissue, the resting potential (RP) may be elevated and the time to reach TP may then be shortened (not shown). B. Early afterdepolarizations (EADs) develop late on phase 3 of repolarization of the action potential and if they reach threshold may trigger a depolarization. This is the mechanism of torsade de pointes ventricular tachycardia. C. Delayed afterdepolarizations (DADs) occur in diastole after repolarization is complete. If they reach threshold, they may trigger a depolarization. This is the mechanism associated with digitalis toxicity. D. Reentry is associated with an area of anatomic or functional unidirection block (speckled area) and a region of slow conduction (represented by zigzag arrow). A propagated impulse blocks in one area of tissue, passes through an area of slow conduction and then conducts retrogradely through the original area of conduction block, which has now repolarized.





Triggered activity is caused by afterdepolarizations that occur early in repolarization (early afterdepolarizations [EADs]) or after repolarization is complete (delayed afterdepolarizations [DADs]) (Fig. 36-1B).1,3 EADs may reach threshold to activate the slow inward current generating a new action potential and this cycle may repeat generating a sustained tachycardia. EADs are believed to be the mechanism of torsade de pointes ventricular tachycardia (VT).3 DADs initiate a triggered response only when their amplitude reaches a critical threshold (Fig. 36-1C). Increasing the heart rate or the prematurity of an extrastimulus increases the amplitude of a DAD thus increasing the probability of inducing a tachycardia. DADs are thought to cause arrhythmias secondary to digitalis toxicity and in the setting of heart failure.



Abnormalities of impulse conduction are primarily due to reentry (Fig. 36-1).2 Reentry requires an area of fixed or functional unidirectional block in one pathway, slow conduction in an alternate pathway and return of the impulse along the original path after this tissue has recovered excitability (Fig. 36-1D). Reentry is the mechanism of many types of supraventricular tachycardias (atrioventricular node reentry or in the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome) and scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT) that occurs following a myocardial infarction. Table 36-1 summarizes the mechanisms of common tachyarrhythmias.




TABLE 36-1  

Mechanisms of Common Tachycardias

 






ANTIARRHYTHMIC DRUG THERAPY





Antiarrhythmic drug therapy may be required for the termination of tachyarrhythmias and prevention of recurrence. Knowledge of the potential mechanisms of an arrhythmia as well as the pharmacology of antiarrhythmic drugs is important in selecting appropriate drug therapy. Since the critical care patient often has multisystem disease, special attention to factors that influence drug absorption, protein binding, drug metabolism and excretion as well as knowledge of potential drug interactions is essential.4



The cardiac action potential varies strikingly in duration and morphology in specific regions of the heart reflecting differences in ion channel expression or differences in modulators of ion channel function.4 Antiarrhythmic drugs may therefore exert different effects on these various cardiac cells. Moreover, the effects of antiarrhythmic drugs may be modified in diseased cardiac tissue. For example, the effects of sodium channel blockers may be exaggerated in ischemic myocardium and the effects of potassium channel blockers may be exaggerated in the setting of left ventricular hypertrophy.4 Antiarrhythmic drugs are classified most commonly by their dominant mechanism of action.4-6 However, this drug classification scheme is imperfect as many of these drugs have effects on multiple ion channels and/or cell membrane receptors (Table 36-2). Efficacy of one drug does not predict the efficacy of another drug in the same class.




TABLE 36-2  

Pharmacodynamics of Antiarrhythmic Drugs

 



Class I drugs block the inward sodium current resulting in slowing of conduction in atrial and ventricular muscle.6 Their subclassification is based on the rate of recovery from sodium channel block. Class IA antiarrhythmic drugs have an intermediate rate of recovery of sodium channel block and may cause prolongation of the QRS duration at physiologic heart rates. Class IB drugs have a rapid recovery from sodium channel block and thus slow ventricular conduction only at very rapid heart rates. Class IA and IB drugs are used infrequently. Class IC drugs have a slow rate of recovery from sodium channel block and may cause significant prolongation of the QRS duration at resting heart rates. Class IA and IC drugs also block a variety of potassium channels that causes prolongation of the atrial and ventricular action potential durations. This may manifest as prolongation of the QT interval. Class II drugs are β-adrenergic receptor blocking drugs.7 Some of these agents are selective β1-receptor blockers (Table 36-2). Class III drugs are predominantly potassium channel blockers and prolong repolarization in atrial and ventricular muscle.8,9 They can cause significant prolongation of the QT interval. Class IV drugs are calcium channel blocking drugs that reduce intracellular calcium concentrations.10



The mechanism(s) of action of commonly used antiarrhythmic drugs are listed in Table 36-2. Many of these agents are used to treat both supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. Perhaps the most serious adverse response to antiarrhythmic drugs is the risk of ventricular proarrhythmia.7,11 Proarrhythmia is defined as provocation of a new arrhythmia or worsening of an existing arrhythmia during therapy with a drug at concentrations not considered to be toxic. Class IA and IC drugs may cause excessive slowing of conduction in diseased atrial or ventricular muscle tissue that may exacerbate the clinical arrhythmia, for example, atrial flutter or VT. These drugs increase the risk of sudden cardiac death in patients following myocardial infarction. Thus, Class I antiarrhythmic drugs are contraindicated in patients with ischemic heart disease and a prior myocardial infarction because of the risk of ventricular proarrhythmia. Drugs that cause excessive prolongation of the QT interval may cause torsade de pointes VT (Fig. 36-2).4,7,11 Torsade de pointes VT may occur in 1% to 8% of patients exposed to QT interval prolonging antiarrhythmic drugs.4




FIGURE 36-2


Example of torsade de pointes ventricular tachycardia (VT). Note the significant QT interval prolongation prior to onset of the polymorphic nonsustained VT.





The pharmacokinetic characteristics of commonly used antiarrhythmic drugs are summarized in Table 36-3.6,12-15 Drug dosing, adverse effects and potential interactions are listed in Table 36-4.4,6,8,10,12,16,17 Adverse effects may develop from pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic drug interactions. Pharmacokinetic drug interactions develop when one drug modifies the absorption, distribution, metabolism, or elimination of a second drug, for example, warfarin and amiodarone or digitalis and quinidine.4,12 Pharmacodynamic interactions occur when a drug or condition increases or reduces the pharmacologic effect of a drug without changing plasma drug concentrations, for example, increased protein binding of propafenone, verapamil, or lidocaine secondary to elevated α1-acid glycoprotein following myocardial infarction.12 Several enzymes in the cytochrome P450 family are responsible for drug metabolism. Some drugs may inhibit or induce these enzymes resulting in important drug interactions (Table 36-4).4,12,13 Mutations or polymorphisms of genes encoding enzymes responsible for drug metabolism may cause important drug interactions.18,19




TABLE 36-3  

Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of Antiarrhythmic Drugs

 




TABLE 36-4  

Antiarrhythmic Drug Dosing and Adverse Effects

 






VENTRICULAR TACHYARRHYTHMIAS





VENTRICULAR TACHYARRHYTHMIA CLASSIFICATION AND MECHANISMS



Sustained ventricular arrhythmias including monomorphic VT, polymorphic VT or ventricular fibrillation (VF) usually occur in the setting of structural heart disease—most frequently in the setting of coronary artery disease, previous myocardial infarction and poor left ventricular function.20 However, any form of structural heart disease may be associated with ventricular arrhythmias. As well, some individuals have primary electrical disease usually associated with a mutation affecting one or more ion channels or proteins that regulate ion channels, for example, long QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome.21



The QRS complexes are uniform in monomorphic VT, whereas the QRS complexes are continuously varying in polymorphic VT. In VF, the surface ECG is disorganized without discernible QRS complexes. VT may precede the development of VF particularly in patients with a prior history of myocardial infarction. These arrhythmias are considered to be sustained if they last longer than 30 seconds or if they require acute intervention for termination.15,22



Multiple mechanism(s) contribute to VT. Monomorphic VT that develops in patients with a prior myocardial infarction is due to reentry near the border of the scar. In patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and an underlying intraventricular conduction delay, monomorphic VT usually with a left bundle branch block pattern may develop due to bundle branch reentry. In patients without structural heart disease, catecholamine-sensitive VT may originate in the right ventricular outflow tract due to triggered activity initiated via cyclic AMP. A verapamil-sensitive monomorphic VT that originates in the region of the left posterior fascicle is thought to be due to triggered activity.21 Such VTs that occur in patients with no structural heart disease (or channelopathy) are usually not life threatening.



Polymorphic VT in the setting of a normal QT interval usually occurs in the setting of acute ischemia or significant hemodynamic instability, although it may also occur in otherwise healthy individuals due to a mutation of the ryanodine receptor.23,24 Torsade de pointes VT is a polymorphic, pause-dependent VT that develops in association with drugs or pathophysiologic conditions which excessively prolong the QT interval (Fig. 36-2

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 13, 2016 | Posted by in CRITICAL CARE | Comments Off on Cardiac Arrhythmias, Pacing, Cardioversion, and Defibrillation in the Critical Care Setting

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access