Approach to the geriatric patient

Chapter 57
Approach to the geriatric patient


Thomas V. Caprio and Manish N. Shah


Introduction


The older adult (age ≥65 years) group is the fastest growing segment of the US population. In 2000, 40 million older adults lived in the United States and comprised 13% of the population. The Census Bureau estimates that this number will double by 2040 to 80 million, and older adults will then comprise 21% of the US population [1].


This large number of older adults and the rapid increase in their numbers will significantly affect prehospital physicians and providers. Assuming that use rates remain constant, EMS must prepare for a significant increase in the number of older adult patients requesting assistance, with approximately half of the EMS call volume being comprised of older patients by 2030. EMS leaders must ensure that the EMS system is prepared for this massive demographic change.


Changes of normal aging


The physiological changes of normal aging are important considerations in the approach to the geriatric patient. Aging itself is not a disease. Age should be viewed as a risk factor, but not sufficient in and of itself to cause disease. Aging produces a diminished physiological capacity; therefore, older adults may not have the same functional reserve in organ systems to recover from injury or illness. Even healthy and active older adults may need prolonged periods to recover from acute illness or trauma due to this reduced physiological capacity.


There are normal and predictable physiological changes that occur with normal aging (Box 57.1). The EMS medical director must consider these changes when developing protocols, and the EMS physician must be aware of these changes when caring for older patients in the field. For instance, as skin becomes thinner and less elastic with a reduction in subcutaneous fat, trauma patients can suffer skin tears, and pressure ulcers can form more easily when patients are on backboards. The EMS medical director must ensure that EMS providers understand these concepts. Otherwise, the providers may encounter difficulty while caring for their patients. For instance, there is a predictable reduction in pulmonary and cardiac function with older age. When an older adult is physiologically stressed, he or she will have reduced ability to compensate for changes in blood pressure or respiratory illness, leading to significant clinical consequences.


Assessment of the geriatric patient


For EMS professionals caring for the geriatric patient, the initial steps are unchanged. A primary survey should be completed, evaluating the patient’s ABCs. Vital signs should be obtained and considered while accounting for existing medical problems and medications. Any immediate interventions necessary should be completed. A full history should be taken, including the symptoms the patient has experienced, allergies, medications (including over-the-counter and herbal medications, and medications that the patient is not taking despite prescription), and past medical history. A full examination should be completed. Although not traditionally considered, an environmental assessment should also be completed because the environment can provide clues as to the extent of the disease or the precipitating factors for disease. Finally, a social history should be obtained because psychosocial issues could either be the primary reason for the request for assistance or could precipitate or exacerbate medical issues.


Communication with older patients is key in performing an effective assessment. A common error is to assume that an older patient is deaf, has dementia, or is otherwise unable to communicate or participate in medical evaluation or care. It is common for medical personnel to rely on family members of older patients to contribute collateral information regarding current illness or medical history. However, this often comes at the cost of speaking exclusively to others and entirely excluding the older patient. The general rule of thumb when caring for older patients is to always speak to the patient first and establish his or her level of understanding and participation. Use a strong, clear voice, but avoid shouting as this tends to distort words and makes it more difficult to understand. If hearing aids or eyeglasses are available and practical for the patient to use in the situation, these can make a dramatic difference in communication.


When obtaining the history, it is important to establish the baseline cognitive and physical functioning of the patient. If EMS is responding to a patient with reported “confusion” or “weakness,” does this patient have a history of dementia or physical limitations from a prior stroke or other condition? It is also relevant to consider the social context of the patient. Does he or she reside in an assisted living facility, nursing home, or his or her own home? This may influence the decision to transport a patient to the hospital if there are other caregivers available to be with the patient compared with one who lives alone without support. Family members and caregivers can also provide valuable information about the patient. A report by those present during a fall, episode of syncope, or witnessed seizure becomes a crucial element of the medical history, and it is important to communicate this information to subsequent emergency personnel.


The final area to consider is the presence of advance directives and communicating these treatment preferences and goals of care throughout the health system. Patient decisions regarding resuscitation, hospitalization, and appointment of health care agents (health care poxy or durable power of attorney for medical care) are relevant care directives for EMS personnel to quickly identify, honor, and transfer across care settings. Most states have standardized out-of-hospital “do not resuscitate” forms for patients which should be available for immediate review in a patient’s place of residence, whether it is a home or a long-term care facility. For patients with advanced chronic or life-threatening illness, these advance directive papers may be the most important tools in guiding subsequent decision making with regard to emergency care. See Volume 1, Chapter 64 for further information on this topic.


Geriatric medical conditions


Cognitive impairment


Cognitive impairment is a common condition among older adults and has been shown to increase as people age. Estimates show that up to 10% of non-institutionalized older adults, 13% of EMS patients, and approximately a quarter of older adult emergency department (ED) patients suffer from it [2]. Because cognitive impairment has been associated with significant morbidity and mortality, it is important to identify this condition, even in the EMS setting. A validated instrument to assess a patient’s cognitive function, particularly suited to EMS, is the Six-Item Screener (Box 57.2). This has been shown to have a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 88% to identify cognitive impairment in a community sample and can be easily used by EMS professionals [3].


Depression


Depression is a common problem among older adults, with studies reporting that up to 20% of community-dwelling older adults suffer from depressed mood [4]. Depressive symptoms are a risk factor for increased use of medical services and for death and disability [5]. Thus, this could be a precipitating factor for repeated EMS use by a patient or deterioration of a patient’s medical condition. Due to this increased risk of morbidity and mortality, identification of depression is critical. However, estimates suggest that fewer than one half of depressed older adults receive the correct diagnosis or treatment [4,6]. A number of screening instruments exist for use in the outpatient setting with reasonable sensitivity and specificity to identify potential depression. The Patient Health Questionnaire-2, or PHQ-2, has been shown to be effective in identifying patients who may be depressed (Box 57.3). This tool can be easily used by EMS because it is short and has a simple scoring scheme and excellent sensitivity and specificity for major depressive disorder [7,8]. Recommendations can then be provided to the ED or primary care physician to ensure that the mood issues are considered.

Jun 14, 2016 | Posted by in EMERGENCY MEDICINE | Comments Off on Approach to the geriatric patient

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access