20.1 Analgesia and sedation
Introduction
Acute pain in children is one of the most common reasons for presentation to the emergency department (ED).1 Pain resulting from injury, illness or necessary medical procedures is associated with increased anxiety, avoidance behaviour, systemic symptoms and parental distress. Painful experiences involve the interaction of physiological, psychological, behavioural, developmental and situational factors. Children with painful conditions can be difficult to assess and are often still underassessed and undertreated. Children often receive less analgesia than adults and the administration of analgesia varies by age, with our youngest patients at the highest risk of receiving inadequate analgesia.2,3
Children’s pain is underestimated because of a lack of adequate assessment tools and the inability to account for the wide range of children’s developmental stages. Pain is often undermedicated because of fears of oversedation, respiratory depression, addiction, and unfamiliarity with use of sedative and analgesic agents in children.3
Definitions of terms are outlined in Table 20.1.1.
Analgesia | Relief of the perception of pain without sedation |
Anxiolysis | Relief of apprehension without sedation or analgesia |
Sedation | Lessening of awareness of the environment and or pain perception |
Anaesthesia (general) | Complete loss or awareness of the environment accompanied by loss of protective reflexes |
Procedural sedation | A technique of administering sedative or dissociation agents, with or without analgesics, to induce a state that allows the patient to tolerate unpleasant procedures while maintaining cardio-respiratory function |
PSA | Procedural sedation and analgesia is intended to result in a depressed level of consciousness but one that allows the patient to maintain airway control independently and continuously |
EDPS | Emergency Department Procedural Sedation |
Assessment and measurement of pain
Pain is a subjective multifactorial experience and should be treated as such.2 Pain may be influenced by age, race, gender, culture, emotional state, cognitive ability, expectations and prior experience. Assessment of pain should be individualised, continuous, measured and documented. Over the last 20 years, pain assessment and measurement tools have been developed that are suitable for children of different ages and developmental stages. A definitive review of pain measurement in infants and children has not been published.
Accurate assessment requires a detailed pain history and consideration of the complexity of the child’s pain perception and the influence of situational, psychological and developmental factors. Because of its subjective nature, pain is best assessed using the child’s self-report, especially in older children’s pain. Observation of the child’s behaviour should be used to complement self-report tools. Four useful means of recognising pain in children are outlined in Table 20.1.2.
Observational assessment scoring may be useful when the child is too young or self-report is not possible, e.g. children with cognitive impairment. Pain ratings provided by parents or regular carers may be used;4 however, whilst there is good correlation between the child’s and the parent’s assessment of pain intensity, parents tend to underscore more severe pain being experienced by their children.5 Physiological measures (e.g. heart rate and respiratory rate) may be useful in pain assessment in non-verbal or sedated children but may be confounded by stress reactions. For example, the infant who is hungry or frightened may give an inappropriately high score.
Pain scores are typically standardised on a 0–10 scale. Pain scores are documented with other observations and vital signs. Some common pain rating scales appropriate to age are outlined in Table 20.1.3.
Procedural sedation and analgesia: a structured approach
Critical incident analysis of adverse sedation events in paediatrics has identified inadequate medical evaluation, inadequate monitoring during or after the procedure, inadequate skills in problem recognition and timely intervention and lack of experience of the practitioner with a particular age group or with an underlying medical condition as factors associated with adverse events in paediatric sedation.6
The development and implementation of procedural sedation guidelines in emergency departments, addressing quality of care for the patient, are associated with practice improvements7 and the lessening of adverse events and complications.8–16
The formulation of a sedation plan and sedation policies can be divided into:
Pre-procedure assessment and management
Important factors to consider are listed in Table 20.1.4.
• Respiratory conditions – active asthma, upper or lower respiratory tract infections, respiratory failure |
While the presence of active asthma or upper respiratory tract infection is associated with a higher risk of complications, including laryngospasm, in patients undergoing general anaesthesia17 it is unclear whether this increased risk also applies to procedural sedation. Most authorities assume that it does and tailor the sedation plans accordingly.
Pre-procedure fasting guidelines are a feature of most protocols developed for procedural sedation in children and aim to minimise the risk of pulmonary aspiration. Both the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) list specific fasting times for solids and liquids that vary from 2 hours to 6–8 hours, depending on the age of the child.18,19 However, these recommended times were a result of expert consensus opinion and are not specifically directed at patients in the unique ED setting. In fact, aspiration associated with paediatric procedural sedation has not been reported in the literature and there is no compelling evidence to support specific pre-procedure fasting periods for either liquids or solids.20–23
Whilst some EDs use a general fasting guideline of 2 hours for clear liquids and 4–6 hours for solids or liquids that are not clear (including milk), a number of EDs do not have strict fasting guidelines. The risk of aspiration with ED procedural sedation is likely to be significantly lower than that associated with general anaesthesia and the requirement for fasting remains a subject of debate. Fasting requirements should be adjusted for individual cases, following consideration of an individual patient’s risks of aspiration and the nature and urgency of the sedation.23
The ASA physical status categories developed for general anaesthesia are not generally used for ED procedural sedation as it is unclear how they extrapolate to this setting.24 Following risk assessment and generation of a sedation plan, this plan should be discussed with the child’s parent or carer to obtain informed consent. A clear explanation of the sedation plan and what is to happen for the older child is often useful in an effort to allay anxiety and optimise co-operation.
Medications
Reversal drugs and life-support drugs should also be available (Table 20.1.5).
Equipmenta |
Intravenous cannulation equipment |
Drugsb |
a All equipment must be available in varying sizes appropriate to patient population.
b Correct weight-based dose information should be readily available.
Environment
Sedation in environments where the area does not meet these requirements is associated with an increased level of serious adverse events.6
Management during the procedure
A number of recommendations and statements from clinical authorities have been published detailing particular aspects of required personnel, monitoring equipment, patient preparation for procedural sedation in children both inside and outside of the operating theatre.25–27
Accordingly, well-understood policies and procedures detailing the requirements for procedure management should be developed by EDs providing procedural sedation to children. Table 20.1.6 details the important elements of the conduct of procedural sedation management.
Capnography
Capnography provides a more sensitive means of identifying respiratory depression or airway complications resulting from sedative agents than conventional monitoring and observation, but has been underutilised.28
With abnormalities in ventilation that are detectable by capnography and then only later evolve into the typical clinical manifestations of respiratory depression, apnoea, or airway obstruction.29–33 Oxygen desaturation is often the last sign of the complication, particularly when supplemental oxygen has been administered.29
Supplemental oxygen
The use of supplemental oxygen is largely unstudied in children undergoing procedural sedation in the emergency department.32,34,35
The addition of supplemental oxygen has the potential to mask respiratory depression as hypoxia may not manifest even in the presence of significant hypoventilation. Use of ETCO2 monitoring is recommended when supplemental oxygen is administered as changes in ETCO2 associated with respiratory depression are detectable before the onset of hypoxia.34
Sedation scores
These scores are observational in nature and are recorded during the episode of sedation.
A commonly used sedation score is the Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin Sedation Scale.9
The scale has seven levels of sedation ranging from 6 to 0:
Deep sedation is commonly defined as a score of 0–2 and moderate sedation as a score of 3.
The Modified Ramsay Sedation Score36 is also commonly used and ranges from a score of 1: awake and alert, through to a maximum score of 8: unresponsive to external stimuli, including pain.
Bispectral index monitoring
The advent of bispectral index (BIS) monitoring to measure the depth of anaesthesia in patients in the operating room may potentially be a useful adjunct in procedural sedation in the ED. 29,37–39
Post-procedure management
The period immediately following the completion of the procedure – with cessation of the painful or unpleasant stimulus – is a period during which cardiorespiratory depressant effects of the sedation drugs may be most apparent and it is during this time that there is an increased risk of complications.40
It is important to have standard discharge criteria, which must be met by the child prior to leaving the ED, and nursing staff caring for the child must be familiar with these. Suggested discharge criteria are listed in Table 20.1.7.
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channelFull access? Get Clinical TreeGet Clinical Tree app for offline access |