8: Neurology

section 8 Neurology





8.1 Headache







Pathophysiology


The structures in the head capable of producing headache are limited. They include:






The bulk of the intracranial contents, including the parenchyma of the brain, the subarachnoid and pia mater and most of the dura mater, are incapable of producing painful stimuli.


The pathological processes that may cause headache are:






The pathophysiological causes of headache are summarized in Table 8.1.1.


Table 8.1.1 A pathophysiological classification of headache






































  Extracranial Intracranial
Tension/traction Muscular headache Intracranial tumour
  ‘Tension headache’ Cerebral abscess
    Intracranial haematoma
Vascular Migraine Severe hypertension
Inflammatory Temporal arteritis Meningitis
Sinusitis Subarachnoid haemorrhage
Otitis media
Mastoiditis
Tooth abscess
Neuralgia


Assessment


In the assessment of a patient with headache, history is of prime importance. Specific information should be sought about the timing of the headache (in terms of both overall duration and speed of onset), the site and quality of the pain, relieving factors, the presence of associated features such as nausea and vomiting, photophobia and alteration in mental state, medical and occupational history and drug use.


Intensity of the pain is important from the viewpoint of management but is not a reliable indicator of the nature of underlying pathology. This said, sudden, severe headache and chronic, unremitting or progressive headache are more likely to have a serious cause.


Physical examination should include temperature, pulse rate and blood pressure measurements, assessment of conscious state and neck stiffness and neurological examination, including funduscopy (where indicated). Abnormal physical signs are uncommon, but the presence of neurological findings makes a serious cause probable. In addition, a search should be made for sinus, ear, mouth and neck pathology and muscular or superficial temporal artery tenderness.



Headache patterns


Some headaches have ‘classic’ clinical features: these are listed in Table 8.1.2. It must be remembered that, as with all diseases, there is a spectrum of presenting features and the absence of the classic features does not rule out a particular diagnosis. Every patient must be assessed on their merits and, if symptoms persist without reasonable explanation, further investigation should be undertaken.


Table 8.1.2 Classic clinical complexes and cause of headache








































































































Preceded by an aura image  
Throbbing unilateral headache, nausea Migraine
Family history  
Sudden onset image  
Severe occipital headache; ‘like a blow’ Subarachnoid haemorrhage
Worst headache ever  
Throbbing/constant frontal headache image  
Worse with cough, leaning forward Sinusitis
Recent URTI  
Pain on percussion of sinuses  
Paroxysmal, fleeting pain image  
Distribution of a nerve Neuralgia
Trigger manoeuvres cause pain
Hyperalgesia of nerve distribution  
Unilateral with superimposed stabbing image  
Claudication on chewing Temporal arteritis
Associated malaise, myalgia
Tender artery with reduced pulsation  
Persistent, deep-seated headache image  
Increasing duration and intensity Tumour: primary or secondary
Worse in morning
Aching in character  
Acute, generalized headache image  
Fever, nausea and vomiting Meningitis
Altered level of consciousness
Neck stiffness +/– rash  
Unilateral, aching, related to eye image  
Nausea and vomiting Glaucoma
Raised intraocular pressure  
Aching, facial region image  
Worse at night Dental cause
Tooth sensitive to heat, pressure  




Migraine


Migraine can be a disabling condition for the sufferer. Most migraine headaches are successfully managed by the patient and their general practitioner, but a small number fail to respond or become ‘fixed’, and sufferers may present for treatment at EDs. As most patients (up to 80% in some studies) have tried oral medications prior to presenting, parenterally administered agents are usually indicated for ED treatment.


Migraine is a clinical diagnosis, and in the ED setting a diagnosis of exclusion. Other causes of severe headache, such as subarachnoid haemorrhage and meningitis, must be ruled out before this diagnosis is made. In particular, the response of the headache to anti-migraine therapy should not be used to assume that the cause was migraine. There have been reports that the headaches associated with subarachnoid haemorrhage and meningitis have, on occasion, responded to these agents.



Pathophysiology


The pathophysiology of migraine is complex and not completely understood. It is probably the result of interaction between the brain and the cranial circulation in susceptible individuals.


The phenomenon of ‘cortical spreading depression’ is probably the event underlying the occurrence of an aura in migraine. This is a short-lasting depolarization wave that moves across the cerebral cortex. A brief phase of excitation is followed by prolonged depression of nerve cells. At the same time there is failure of brain ion homoeostasis, an efflux of excitatory amino acids from nerve cells, and increased energy metabolism. This phenomenon appears to be dependent on the activation of an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor, which is a subtype of the glutamate receptor.


The headache pain of migraine seems to result from the activation of the trigeminovascular system. The trigeminal nerve transmits headache pain from both the dura and the pia mater. The triggers for the development of migraine headache are probably chemical and are thought to originate in the brain, the blood vessel walls and the blood itself. These triggers stimulate trigeminovascular axons, causing pain and the release of vasoactive neuropeptides, including calcium G-related peptide (CGRP) from perivascular axons. These neuropeptides act on mast cells, endothelial cells and platelets, resulting in increased extracellular levels of arachidonate metabolites, amines, peptides and ions. These mediators and the resultant tissue injury lead to a prolongation of pain and hyperalgesia.


Serotonin has also been specifically implicated in migraine. By activation of afferents, it causes a retrograde release of substance P. This in turn increases capillary permeability and oedema.




Treatment


The complexity of the mechanisms involved in the genesis of migraine suggests that there are a number of ways to interrupt the processes to provide effective relief from symptoms.


A wide variety of pharmacological agents and combinations of agents have been tried for the treatment of migraine, with varying results. Interpreting the evidence is challenging, as the majority of the studies have small sample sizes, compare different agents or combinations of agents, are conducted in settings other than EDs, and the outcome measure(s) tested varies widely. Because the ED migraine population appears to be different from the general outpatient population, the data presented here are based on studies in EDs.


The effectiveness of commonly used agents is summarized in Table 8.1.3. Dosing and administration are summarized in Table 8.1.4. At present the most effective agents seem to be the phenothiazines (chlorpromazine, prochlorperazine, droperidol and possibly haloperidol) and the triptans, each of which has achieved > 70% efficacy in a number of studies. Note that triptans are contraindicated in patients with a history of ischaemic heart disease, uncontrolled hypertension or with the concomitant use of ergot preparations.



Table 8.1.4 Drug dosing and administration



























Agent Drug dosing/administration
Chlorpromazine i.m. 12.5 mg intravenously, repeated every 20 minutes as needed to a maximum dose of 37.5 mg, accompanied by 1 L normal saline over 1 hour to avoid hypotension OR 25 mg in 1 L normal saline over 1 hour, repeated if necessary
Droperidol (i.m. or i.v.) 2.5 mg
Prochlorperazine (i.m. or i.v.) 10 mg/12.5 mg (depending on packaging)
Sumatriptan (s.c., i.n.) 6 mg SC, 20 mg i.n.
Metoclopramide (i.v.) 10–20 mg
Ketorolac (i.m. or i.v.) 30 mg i.v.; 60 mg i.m.
Tramadol (i.m.) 100 mg

Pethidine is not indicated for the treatment of migraine. Its reported effectiveness is only 56%, it has a high rate of rebound headache and it carries a risk of dependence. In two small RCTs haloperidol administered as 5 mg in 500 mL normal saline was reported to give significant pain relief in more than 80% of patients. Lignocaine (lidocaine) has been shown to be no more effective than placebo. The data on dihydroergotamine are difficult to interpret because it is often used in combination with other agents, e.g. metoclopramide; however, it has also been shown to be less effective than chlorpromazine and sumatriptan in acute treatment, and to have a high rate of unpleasant side effects. There are insufficient data to assess the effectiveness of CGRP receptor antagonists. Sodium valproate has also shown moderate effectiveness in small studies, but there are insufficient data to draw a valid conclusion. The efficacy of intravenous magnesium sulphate (1 or 2 mg) remains unclear. It was shown in a small placebo-controlled trial to be effective, but in another study the combination of magnesium with metoclopramide was less effective than metoclopramide and placebo.


There is some preliminary evidence that oral or i.v. dexamethasone, in addition to standard migraine therapy for selected patients, may reduce the proportion of patients who experience early recurrence (so-called rebound headache). Unfortunately, different studies have identified different groups who might benefit. There are insufficient data to recommend this as standard therapy.



Trigeminal neuralgia


Trigeminal neuralgia is a debilitating condition in which patients describe ‘lightning’- or a ‘hot poker’-like pain that is severe and follows the distribution of the trigeminal nerve. Individual episodes of pain last only seconds, but may recur repeatedly within a short period and can be triggered by minor stimuli such as light touch, eating or drinking, shaving or passing gusts of wind. It is most common in middle or older age.






8.2 Stroke and transient ischaemic attacks





Essentials












Pathophysiology


Brain tissue is very sensitive to the effects of oxygen deprivation. Following cerebral vascular occlusion a series of metabolic consequences may ensue, depending on the extent, duration and vessels involved, which can lead to cell death. Reperfusion of occluded vessels may also occur, either spontaneously or via therapeutic intervention, with a potential for reperfusion injury. An area of threatened but possibly salvageable brain may surround an area of infarction. The identification of this so-called ischaemic penumbra, and therapeutic efforts to ameliorate the extent of irreversible neuronal damage, have been the subject of ongoing research efforts.


Large anterior circulation ischaemic strokes can be associated with increasing mass effect and intracranial pressure in the hours to days following onset. Secondary haemorrhage into an infarct may also occur, either spontaneously or related to therapy. Clinical deterioration often follows.



Ischaemic strokes


These are the results of several pathological processes (Table 8.2.1):










Table 8.2.1 Causes of stroke











Ischaemic stroke




Intracerebral haemorrhage









Haemorrhagic stroke


Haemorrhagic stroke is the result of vessel rupture into the surrounding intracerebral tissue or subarachnoid space. Subarachnoid haemorrhage is the subject of a separate chapter in this book (see Chapter 8.3). The neurological defect associated with an intracerebral haemorrhage is the consequence of direct brain injury, secondary occlusion of nearby vessels, reduced cerebral perfusion caused by associated raised intracranial pressure, and cerebral herniation. The causes of intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) include:










Prevention


This particularly applies to ischaemic strokes. Non-modifiable risk factors for stroke include:






Primary prevention


Hypertension is the most important modifiable risk factor. The benefit of antihypertensive treatment in stroke prevention has been well shown. The other major risk factors for atherosclerosis and its complications – diabetes, smoking and hypercholesterolaemia – often contribute to increased stroke risk. These should be managed according to standard guidelines. The most important cardiac risk factor for TIA and stroke is atrial fibrillation, both chronic and paroxysmal. Warfarin is recommended to prevent cardioembolism, except in unsuitable patients. Those with contraindications to warfarin should initially receive aspirin. Other major cardiac risk factors include endocarditis, mitral stenosis, prosthetic heart valves, recent myocardial infarction and left ventricular aneurysm. Less common risk factors include atrial myxoma, a patent foramen ovale and cardiomyopathies.


A carotid bruit or carotid stenosis found in an otherwise asymptomatic patient is associated with an increased stroke risk. However, the role of carotid endarterectomy in these patients is controversial. In a highly selected patient group, the asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis study (ACAS)1 showed a small but significant benefit in reduction of stroke or death at 5 years following surgery for angiographically proven stenosis >60% compared to medical therapy. The benefit was much lower than that achieved in symptomatic carotid stenosis shown in the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Study (NASCET 2),2 and can only be achieved with low perioperative mortality and stroke rates.




Ischaemic stroke syndromes


The symptoms and signs of stroke or TIA correspond to the area of the brain affected by ischaemia or haemorrhage (Table 8.2.2).



In ischaemic brain injury the history and pattern of physical signs may correspond to a characteristic clinical syndrome according to the underlying cause and the vessel occluded. This has a bearing on the direction of further investigation and treatment decisions. Differentiating between anterior and posterior circulation ischaemia/infarction is important in this respect, but is not always possible on clinical grounds alone.


Determining the cause of the event is the next step. Once again, clues may be present on clinical evaluation. For accurate delineation of the site of the lesion, exclusion of haemorrhage and assessment of the underlying cause, it is usually necessary to undertake imaging studies.



Anterior circulation ischaemia


The anterior circulation supplies blood to 80% of the brain and consists of the ICA and its branches, principally the ophthalmic, middle cerebral and anterior cerebral arteries. Hence this system supplies the optic nerve, retina, frontoparietal and most of the temporal lobes. Ischaemic injury involving the anterior cerebral circulation commonly has its origins in atherothrombotic disease of the ICA. Atherosclerosis of this artery usually affects the proximal 2 cm, just distal to the division of the common carotid artery. Advanced lesions may be the source of embolism to other parts of the anterior circulation, or cause severe stenosis with resultant hypoperfusion distally if there is inadequate collateral supply via the Circle of Willis. This is usually manifest by signs and symptoms in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory (Table 8.2.3). Less commonly, lesions of the intracranial ICA and MCA may cause similar clinical features.


Table 8.2.3 Signs of middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion













Homonymous hemianopia
Contralateral hemiplegia affecting face and arm more than leg
Contralateral hemisensory loss
Dysphasias with dominant hemispheric involvement (usually left)
Spatial neglect and dressing apraxia with non-dominant hemispheric involvement.

Embolism to the ophthalmic artery or its branches causes monocular visual symptoms of blurring, loss of vision and field defects. When transient, this is referred to as amaurosis fugax, or transient monocular blindness.


The anterior cerebral artery territory is the least commonly affected by ischaemia because of the collateral supply via the anterior communicating artery. If occlusion occurs distally or the collateral supply is inadequate, then ischaemia may occur. This manifests as sensory/motor changes in the leg – more so than in the arm. More subtle changes of personality may occur with frontal lobe lesions, as may disturbances of micturition and conjugate gaze.


Major alterations of consciousness, with Glasgow Coma Scores <8, imply bilateral hemispheric or brainstem dysfunction. The brain stem may be primarily involved by a brainstem stroke or secondarily affected by an ischaemic or haemorrhagic lesion elsewhere in the brain, owing to a mass effect and/or increased intracranial pressure.






Clinical evaluation in the ED



History


This includes the circumstances, time of onset, associated symptoms such as headache, and any resolution/progression of signs and symptoms. It may be necessary to take a history from a relative or friend, particularly in the presence of dysphasia or reduced conscious state. The history of a stroke is usually of acute onset of a neurological deficit over minutes, but occasionally there may be a more gradual or stuttering nature to a presentation over a period of hours. A past history of similar events suggestive of a TIA should be carefully sought. The presence of a severe headache with the onset of symptoms may indicate ICH. However, headache may also occur with ischaemic strokes.


A declining level of consciousness may indicate increasing intracranial pressure due to an ICH or a large anterior circulation infarct – so-called malignant MCA infarction. It may also be caused by pressure on the brain stem by an infratentorial lesion such as a cerebellar haemorrhage.


The possibility of trauma or drug abuse should be remembered along with the past medical and medication history, particularly anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy. Risk factors for vascular disease, cardiac embolism, venous embolism and increased bleeding should be sought.


In young patients with an acute neurological deficit, dissection of the carotid or vertebral artery should be considered. This is often associated with neck pain and headaches/facial pain with or without a history of neck trauma, which may be minor, as in a twisting or hyperextension/flexion injury sustained in a motor vehicle accident, playing sports or neck manipulation.


Cardioembolism tends to produce ischaemic injury in different parts of the brain, resulting in non-stereotypical recurrent TIAs, whereas atherothrombotic disease of the cerebral vessels tends to cause recurrent TIAs of a similar nature, particularly in stenosing lesions of the internal carotid or vertebrobasilar arteries.






Investigations


The investigations of TIA and stroke often overlap, but the priorities and implications for management may differ significantly.



General


Standard investigations that may identify contributing factors to stroke/TIA or guide therapy include: a complete blood picture, blood glucose, coagulation profile, electrolytes, liver function tests and CRP (in selected cases). Arterial blood gases performed if the adequacy of ventilation is in doubt. An ECG should be performed to identify arrhythmias and signs of pre-existing cardiac disease. Holter monitoring can be considered to identify paroxysmal arrhythmias, but has a low yield. A prothrombotic screen may be indicated, particularly in younger patients. Further investigations depend on the nature of the neurological deficit and other risk factors for stroke that are identified on evaluation, but usually involve a combination of brain, vascular and cardiac imaging.


TIAs and non-disabling strokes should be evaluated similarly in order to promptly diagnose and manage a potentially treatable process that might lead to a subsequent major stroke. The risk of a stroke following a TIA is now appreciated to be much higher than previously thought, and may be as high as 30% in the first week. The ABCD stroke risk score from TIA has been developed and validated to evaluate the risk of a stroke in the first 7 days following a TIA.5 This has the potential to guide the urgency of investigations, such as carotid ultrasound, required to determine the underlying causes of the TIA. The scoring system is outlined in Table 8.2.5. In patients with an ABCD score <4 there is minimal short-term risk of stroke. With scores of 4, 5 and 6 the risk is 2.2%, 16.5% and 35%, respectively. Other patient groups are at increased risk of stroke independent of the ABCD scoring system. These include patients with diabetes, multiple TIAs within a short period, and patients with a probable or proven cardioembolic source. Diabetes has been incorporated in the recently published ABCD2 scoring system (see Further Reading).


Table 8.2.5 The ABCD TIA Risk Score





































ABCD Risk factor Score
Age Below 60 0
  Above 60 1
Blood pressure BP > systolic 140 mmHg, and/or diastolic 90 mmHg 1
Clinical Unilateral weakness of face, arm, hand or leg 2
  Speech disturbance without weakness 1
Duration Symptoms lasted >60 min 2
Symptoms lasted 10–60 min 1
Symptoms lasted < 10 min 0

(From Rothwell PM, Giles MF, Flassmann E, et al. A simple score (ABCD) to identify individuals at high risk of stroke after transient ischaemic attack. Lancet 2005; 366: 29–36)






Imaging in stroke



Brain imaging






MRI: There are many magnetic resonance modalities available for imaging the brain in acute stroke. Even standard MRI is superior to CT in showing early signs of infarction, with 90% showing changes at 24 hours on T2-weighted images. Multimodal MRI typically involves additional modes such as gradient recalled echo (GRE) for the detection of acute and chronic haemorrhage, and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for the detection of early ischaemia or infarction. MR diffusion-weighted images show areas of reduced water diffusion in the parts of the brain that are ischaemic and likely to be irreversibly injured. This occurs rapidly after vessel occlusion (less than an hour after stroke onset) and manifests as an area of abnormal high signal in the area of core ischaemia. Hence it is much more sensitive in detecting early ischaemia/infarction than standard T2-weighted MRI modalities or CT. Perfusion-weighted MR scans (PWI) reveal areas of reduced or delayed cerebral blood flow. This area of the brain is likely to become infarcted if flow is not restored. The DWI and PWI lesions can then be compared. A PWI lesion significantly larger than a DWI lesion is a marker of potentially salvageable brain: the ischaemic penumbra. It is postulated that acute ischaemic stroke patients with this pattern are most likely to benefit from vessel opening strategies such as thrombolysis. Large areas of diffusion abnormality may also be a marker for increased risk of ICH with thrombolysis. An MRA can be performed at the same time to identify a major vessel occlusion.

Recent studies have suggested that MRI is as accurate as CT in diagnosing acute ICH.6 This is significant, as it means that, where facilities are immediately available, CT may be bypassed in acute stroke and MRI can be used to both to exclude ICH and to scan for ischaemia/infarction with DWI. As already mentioned, other modalities such PWI and MRA/MRV may also give important diagnostic information and influence treatment decisions. However, MRI may not be feasible in a significant number of stroke patients, due either to standard contraindications to MRI or other factors such as haemodynamic instability, impaired consciousness or vomiting and agitation. In one study the proportion of patients intolerant of MRI was 1:10.


MRI is indicated in strokes involving the brain stem and posterior fossa where CT has poor accuracy. MRA/MRV is particularly useful in the evaluation of unusual causes of stroke such as arterial dissection, venous sinus thrombosis and arteritis. Basilar artery thrombosis causes a brainstem stroke with an associated high mortality. If the diagnosis is suspected, urgent neurology consultation should be obtained. If MRA or CTA confirms the diagnosis, aggressive therapies such as thrombolysis may improve outcome.


Other investigations may be indicated, particularly in young people, in whom the cause of strokes/TIA may be obscure. These include tests to detect prothrombotic states and uncommon vascular disorders. A list of tests is potentially long and includes a thrombophilia screen, vasculitic and luetic screens, echocardiography and angiography.



Treatment


The treatment of cerebrovascular events must be individualized as determined by the nature and site of the neurological lesion and its underlying cause. The benefits and risks of any treatment strategy can then be considered and informed decisions made by the patient or their surrogate. This is particularly the case with the use of more aggressive therapies such as anticoagulation, thrombolysis and surgery.



General


The ED management of a TIA and stroke requires reassessment of the ABCDs and repeated blood glucose testing. Airway intervention may be necessary in the setting of a severely depressed level of consciousness, neurological deterioration, or signs of raised intracranial pressure and cerebral herniation. This is particularly the case with ICH, with its associated high mortality and morbidity rates. Hypotension is very uncommon in stroke patients, except in the terminal phase of brainstem failure. Hypertension is much more likely to be associated with stroke because of the associated pain, vomiting and raised intracranial pressure and/or pre-existing hypertension, but rarely requires treatment. It may be a physiological response to maintain cerebral perfusion pressure in the face of cerebral hypoxia and raised intracranial pressure. The use of antihypertensives in this situation may aggravate the neurological deficit. There is a paucity of scientific data to support the pharmacological lowering of blood pressure in the ischaemic stroke patient. Stroke guidelines recommend cautious and controlled lowering of a persistently raised blood pressure >220/140 mmHg or a mean arterial pressure greater than 130, using rapidly titratable intravenous drugs such as sodium nitroprusside, esmolol or glycerine trinitrate at low initial doses, and with continuous haemodynamic monitoring in a critical care setting. The aim is for a 10–15% reduction. Oral or sublingual nifedipine is contraindicated as it may cause a rapid uncontrolled fall in blood pressure that may aggravate cerebral ischaemia. Analgesia is appropriate if pain is thought to be contributory, and urinary retention should be excluded.


An elevated temperature can occur in stroke and should be controlled. It should also raise the suspicion of other possible causes for the neurological findings or an associated infective focus.



TIAs


As already stated, the main aim of therapy in TIA and minor strokes is to prevent a major subsequent cerebrovascular event.


Antiplatelet therapy: Following CT scanning that excludes ICH, aspirin can be commenced at a dose of 300 mg and maintained at 75–150 mg/day in patients with TIAs or minor ischaemic strokes, and has been shown to be effective in preventing further ischaemic events. The ESPRIT trial7 showed a modest additional benefit from a combination of dipyridamole with aspirin, over aspirin alone. There was no increased risk of bleeding complications, but there was a significantly increased rate of withdrawal of patients from the combination arm because of side effects of dipyridamole, principally headache. Clopidogrel may be substituted for aspirin if the patient is intolerant of aspirin or aspirin is contraindicated. There is some evidence that clopidogrel is more effective than aspirin in the prevention of vascular events, but at greater expense.8 The combination of aspirin and clopidogrel at this stage is not recommended as it does not appear to give any greater therapeutic benefits and there is increased bleeding risk. Anticoagulation with heparin and warfarin has not been shown to be superior to aspirin, except in cases of TIA/minor stroke due to cardioembolism (excluding endocarditis).





Ischaemic stroke


A more active approach to the acute management of ischaemic stroke is seen as having the potential to improve neurological outcomes. The ED is the place where these important treatment decisions will largely be made. Most patients with a stroke will require hospital admission for further evaluation and treatment, as well as for observation and possible rehabilitation. Studies of stroke units show that patients benefit from being under the care of physicians with expertise in stroke and a multidisciplinary team that can manage all aspects of their care.10


Aspirin: In two large trials, aspirin, when administered within 48 hours of the onset of stroke, was found to improve the outcomes of early death or recurrent stroke compared to placebo.11,12 A CT scan should be performed to exclude ICH prior to commencing aspirin. The combination of low-dose aspirin and dipyridamole may confer some additional benefit.

Thrombolysis: Thrombolytic agents are seen as having an important place in the management of acute ischaemic stroke, although their use is still controversial.13 In Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States tPA has been approved for use in acute stroke patients when administered within 3 hours of onset. It is recommended that the inclusion and exclusion criteria that were used in the NINDS study14 should be strictly adhered to when deciding to administer tPA. For inclusion, treatment must be commenced within 3 hours of a known stroke onset and patients must have a CT scan excluding ICH. In the NINDS study, thrombolysis resulted in improved neurological outcomes in patients receiving tPA compared to placebo, with a 13% absolute increase in the number of patients having good neurological outcomes (numbers needed to treat = 8). In the thrombolysis group, there was a significant increase in intracerebral haemorrhage rate (6.4% versus 0.6% in the placebo group), of which half were fatal, although there was no overall excess mortality. Factors that may be associated with increased haemorrhage risk include increased age (especially > 80 years), increased severity of stroke and early CT changes of a large ischaemic stroke. Studies of acute stroke patients given tPA outside controlled trials have yielded conflicting results.1517 They suggest that when tPA is used by specialists in well-equipped stroke centres in accordance with strict guidelines, the complication rate for acute stroke patients can be similar to that achieved in the NINDS trial. However, protocol violations are associated with an increased risk of poor outcomes. Trials of thrombolysis are ongoing, with the aim of identifying patients most likely to benefit from reperfusion therapy, reducing the risk of ICH, and extending the time window for treatment, particularly through the use of advanced imaging modalities such as diffusion/perfusion MRI.



Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Sep 7, 2016 | Posted by in EMERGENCY MEDICINE | Comments Off on 8: Neurology

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access