30: Toxinology

Section 30 Toxinology



Edited by Lindsay Murray




30.1 Snakebite





ESSENTIALS















Clinical features and toxinology


Envenoming results when venom is injected subcutaneously and reaches the systemic circulation. Whether or not a snakebite results in envenoming depends on a number of factors including fang length, average venom yield of the snake, effectiveness of the bite and bite site. Recent studies have suggested that only a small amount of the injected venom actually reaches the systemic circulation.1


Most snakebites do not result in envenoming because either insufficient venom reaches the systemic circulation or the snake is non-venomous. Envenoming is characterized by local and systemic effects, although Australasian elapids rarely cause major local effects such as necrosis and haemorrhage. The clinical features of envenoming depend on the particular toxins present in each snake’s venom but non-specific systemic effects (nausea, vomiting, headache, abdominal pain, diarrhoea and diaphoresis) occur in most cases. The major clinical syndromes are coagulopathy, neurotoxicity, myotoxicity and renal impairment. Severe envenoming can result in early collapse associated with dizziness, loss of consciousness, apnoea and hypotension. In the majority of cases there is spontaneous recovery over 5 to 15 min, but in some cases this does not occur and multiorgan failure and death ensue if resuscitation is delayed.


The medically important Australian snakes and their associated clinical effects are listed in Table 30.1.1.









Treatment



First aid


Australian snake venoms appear to be absorbed via the lymphatic system so absorption is likely to be increased by movement and exercise. The aim of first aid is to minimize movement of venom to the systemic circulation. This is achieved by a pressure bandage (elastic bandage such as ACE®) being applied over the bite site and then covering the whole limb with a similar pressure to that used for a limb sprain. The bitten limb must be immobilized as well as the whole patient, or the first aid is ineffective.3 Immobilization consists of splinting and complete prevention of movement or exercise of the bitten part. It has been shown that movement of all limbs, not just the affected one, needs to be minimized for optimal effect.4 Transport should be brought to the patient and walking must be avoided. Prompt, properly applied first aid probably prevents significant absorption of venom for many hours although there is only anecdotal evidence to support this. Pressure bandaging is clearly impractical for bites that are not on the limbs but direct pressure with a pad and immobilization may be useful. The bite site should not be washed so that it can be swabbed for venom detection.


First aid must eventually be removed but this should take place in a resuscitation area of a facility with the means to definitively treat envenoming. The first aid is removed when:





Initial assessment and treatment


Figure 30.1.1 provides a simple approach to the management of suspected and envenomed snakebite patients. The patient is managed in an area with full resuscitation facilities. Assessment and management proceed simultaneously. The airway, breathing and circulation are assessed and stabilized. The majority of patients are not critically unwell and can have a focused neurological examination for early signs of paralysis (e.g. ptosis, drooling), examination of draining lymph nodes and general examination for signs of bleeding (oozing from the bite site, gum bleeds). Intravenous access should be established and intravenous fluids commenced.




Further management


Two major diagnostic and risk assessment issues exist for snakebite:




The majority of patients are not envenomed, but all patients must initially be assessed as if they are potentially envenomed. Asymptomatic patients, particularly those seen early after a brown snakebite, may still be severely envenomed with VICC. The diagnosis of envenoming is made on history, examination and the clinical investigations listed below. Although systemic envenoming can be ambiguous in patients with mild envenoming, the following definitions are useful for determining whether patients require antivenom:






If there is no evidence of envenoming after clinical assessment and initial laboratory testing the first-aid bandage can be removed. The patient requires ongoing close observation including repeated investigations one hour after bandage removal, and at 6 and 12 h after the bite (see Figure 30.1.1).


If the patient is envenomed then management must proceed with antivenom. A small number of patients present in extremis, usually following collapse and in cardiac arrest and should have antivenom administered immediately as part of advanced life support.


The next step is to determine the snake group responsible for the envenoming in order to allow the administration of the appropriate monovalent antivenom. This is done taking into account:





In the majority of cases a combination of these three factors allows determination of the correct monovalent snake antivenom required. If it is unclear which snake is involved then one vial of polyvalent antivenom should be administered. This contains sufficient antivenom for an initial dose for all types of snakes. In some parts of Australia, such as Victoria and Perth, a combination of brown and tiger snake antivenom can be administered in preference to polyvalent. In Tasmania only tiger snake antivenom is required.



Administration of antivenom


Snake antivenom should be administered by the intravenous route after being diluted 1 in 10 with normal saline or Hartmann’s solution and administered over 15 min. In patients with cardiac arrest or life-threatening effects, undiluted antivenom may be administered more rapidly.


The initial dose of antivenom for children is the same as for adults and is provided in Table 30.1.1. Further doses are usually not required and recovery is determined by the reversibility of effects and the time it takes for recovery once venom is neutralized. The benefits of antivenom are listed in Table 30.1.2, which underlines the importance of waiting for recovery after antivenom administration, particularly with VICC.5 Although there is controversy over the dose of antivenom, recent studies have demonstrated that previously recommended large doses are not required. For brown snake envenoming an initial dose of two vials binds all venom and sufficient time must then be allowed for resynthesis of clotting factors.1,2


Table 30.1.2 The benefits of antivenom for different effects of envenoming (Modified from Therapeutic Guidelines Emergency Medicine, March 2008 with permission)
























Clinical effect Benefit
Venom-induced consumption coagulopathy (VICC) Appears to neutralize toxin effect allowing clotting factors to be resynthesized and clotting to recover over 6 to 18 hours
Anticoagulant coagulopathy Neutralizes a toxin inhibitor of coagulation with immediate improvement in coagulation studies
Neurotoxicity Neutralizes toxin in the intravascular compartment and will prevent further development of neurotoxicity but will not reverse neurotoxic effects already present
Myolysis/rhabdomyolysis Neutralizes myotoxins and will prevent further muscle injury but will not reverse effects
Local effects Unlikely to reverse any already developed local effects
Renal damage Unlikely to have an effect

Generalized systemic effects: nausea, vomiting, headache, abdominal pain, diarrhoea and diaphoresis.


Rapidly reverses non-specific effects and is a useful indication of antivenom binding venom components.


Premedication for snake antivenom administration has previously been controversial but is no longer recommended in Australia. One randomized controlled trial suggested that adrenaline was an effective premedication for snake antivenom.6 However, the trial was for an antivenom with a much higher reaction rate and was too small to assess the safety of adrenaline.7 Promethazine has been shown to be ineffective as a premedication,8 and often leads to drowsiness that makes neurological assessment difficult. Immediate-type hypersensitivity reactions occur in about a quarter of antivenom administrations in Australia, but are only severe (mainly hypotension) in 5% of administrations.9 Reactions are more common with tiger snake antivenom and polyvalent antivenom compared to brown snake antivenom. Antivenom should always be administered in a critical care area with readily available adrenaline, intravenous fluids and resuscitation equipment.


The frequency of delayed-type reactions to antivenom or serum sickness is probably higher than acute reactions and likely to depend on the amount of horse protein administered. All patients given antivenom should be warned of serum sickness and a course of oral steroids (prednisolone 50 mg/day for 5 days) may be considered in patients receiving large amounts of antivenom. However, there is no evidence that prophylactic corticosteroids will reduce the risk of serum sickness. A similar course of steroids should be used for treatment in patients who re-present with serum sickness.




Clinical investigation


Assessment of the potentially envenomed requires the following investigations to be performed, usually serially:











References



1 Isbister GK, O’Leary MA, Schneider JJ, et al. Efficacy of antivenom against the procoagulant effect of Australian brown snake (Pseudonaja sp.) venom: In vivo and in vitro studies. Toxicon. 2007;49:57-67.


2 Isbister GK, Williams V, Brown SG, et al. Clinically applicable laboratory end-points for treating snakebite coagulopathy. Pathology. 2006;38:568-572.


3 Sutherland SK, Coulter AR, Harris RD. Rationalisation of first-aid measures for elapid snake bite. Lancet. 1979;1:183-186.


4 Howarth DM, Southee AE, Whyte IM. Lymphatic flow rates and first-aid in simulated peripheral snake or spider envenomation. Medical Journal. 1994;161:695-700.


5 Isbister GK. Snake bite: a current approach to management. Australian Prescribing. 2006;29:125-129.


6 Premawardhena AP, de Silva CE, Fonseka MMD, et al. Low dose subcutaneous adrenaline to prevent acute adverse reactions to antivenom serum in people bitten by snakes: randomised, placebo controlled trial. British Medical Journal. 1999;318:1041-1043.


7 Lalloo DG, Theakston RD. Snake antivenoms. Journal of Toxicology: Clinical Toxicology. 2003;41:277-290.


8 Fan HW, Marcopito LF, Cardoso JL, et al. Sequential randomised and double blind trial of promethazine prophylaxis against early anaphylactic reactions to antivenom for bothrops snake bites. British Medical Journal. 1999;318:1451-1452.


9 Isbister GK, Brown SG, MacDonald E, et al. Australian Snakebite Project Investigators. Current use of Australian snake antivenoms and frequency of immediate-type hypersensitivity reactions and anaphylaxis. Medical Journal Australia. 2008;188(8):473-476. Apr 21

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Sep 7, 2016 | Posted by in EMERGENCY MEDICINE | Comments Off on 30: Toxinology

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access